The Nigerian livestock population is estimated to be 165.3
million [1] However, the native chicken constitutes 80% of
the120 million poultry birds in Nigeria leaving Guinea fowl
11.20%, duck 5.70%, turkey 2.00% and others 1.10% [2] Native
chicken constitutes about 45.8-83.2% of the total meat consumed
in Africa. This meat is characterized by excellent taste, flavor,
juicy, tender, inviting, nutritious, appetizing with low fat and
cholesterol. It contains 51% water and 320 calories, 100g of meat
compared to exotic broilers with 71% water and 151 calories,
[3,4]. More than 80% of the total indigenous chicken population
in Nigeria are found in the rural households. Their products are
preferred by majority of Nigerians because of the leanness and
suitability for special dishes [5]These outputs (egg and meat) are readily available to both the rural and urban areas and serves
significantly as a rich source of protein in diets.
Indigenous chickens are hardy, can withstand harsh climate
under minimal management, possess ability to incubate and
hatch on their own, brood and scavenge for their food, with
appreciable immunity from endemic diseases, and can thrive
effectively well under inadequate nutrition at different agroecological
zones. They possess distinct genetic resources which
significantly influence their production potentials, survivability
and adaptation. They survive on crop residue, weed seeds,
insects, kitchen and agro- industrial waste [6] Its production is
popular in the rural area as high cost of formulated feed, health
management, lack of electricity and poor brooding technique
limits industrial poultry production. Local chickens are however
important as it account for the nutritional needs of the family,
small cash flow reserve during celebration from the sales of
eggs, meat and live birds. They are also useful for religious and
recreational purposes and can be harnessed for rural poverty
reduction. They are kept to supplement meals, honor guest as
gifts, supply manure for crops and to serve as a means of checking
time [5]The sales of local chickens (live birds and other products)
contribute about 15.38% of rural household income in Nigeria.
Some are potential egg producers, while others are known for
their excellent meat quality and or for dual purposes. These
species represent a valuable resource for livestock development
because their extensive genetic diversity allows for rearing
poultry under varied environmental conditions, providing a
range of products and functions.
The regular breeding failure in livestock production can be
attributed to the gross absence of comprehensive information
on animal genetic resources. This could however be controlled
through detailed characterization studies of a sub population
of local chickens in a large population. [7] observed that local
chickens are the most thriving industry for small holder farmers
in Nigeria and contributes about 25.6% of the country economy.
This therefore, indicates that efforts to improve upon local
chickens would directly alleviate rural poverty and boost the
nation’s economy.
In Nigeria, indigenous chickens were characterized along the
genetic lines of plumagecolour and feather type as(normal and
frizzled), body structure as (naked neck and dwarf types) and
colour variants as (black, white, brown, mottled etc.) The genetic
resources embedded in local poultry of Bekwarra, still await full
exploitation that could provide the basis for improvement to
produce breeds that can adapt to local conditions for the benefits
of farmers. This suggests that characterizing local chicken would
help to assess their genetic resources for improvement and
selection purposes This study was carried out to identify and
determine some characteristics of local chickens in Bekwarra
Local Government, Cross River State, Nigeria, to provide a
comprehensive information on their genetic resourcesand
production potential.
Study area
This study was carried out in Bekwarra, Northern Cross
River State, Nigeria. The state is located at latitude 8o41’N and
14o5’E of the equator with a total population of 4,151,193 and
land mass of 69,436km2 (NPC, 2001). Bekwarra lies within
latitude 6o 41’38’’N and 8o 71’E of the equator and occupies 306
km2 with a total population of 105,822 [8]. The area is a thick
rain forest zone, characterized by minimum temperature of
10-22.3oC in December which could rise to a maximum of 18.5-
35.8oC in February. The altitude of the study area ranges from
400-3000mm above sea level. Annual rainfall is between 1500-
1849.3mm in areas with lower altitude and 1556-1960mm in the
high lands areas. It has low intensity of light due to thick forest
with a relative humidity ranging between 61% in February, 92%
in August and yearly average of 95% [9].
The vegetation of the zone represents an interface between
temperate a tropical rainforest which favors livestock and crop
production which are the main activities in the area. Bekwarra
Local Government Area is made of has 10 administrative council
wards namely: Gakem, Ugboro, Ikparikobo, Nyanya, Abuochiche,
Ibiaragidi, Ukpah, Ububa, Beten and Afrike.
Sampling technique and procedure
Seven council wards was carefully studied, with four villages
from each of; Nyanya, Gakem, Ugboro, Beten, Abuochiche,
Ibiaragidi, and Ukpah. The sample frame was four villages per
council ward, and 4-5 households per village. In each household,
5-7 matured chickens (hens and cocks) were sampled for
quantitative and qualitative traits. Fresh eggs collected from chicken in the sampled area were also considered for external
egg quality traits.
Purposive and multistage sampling technique was adopted
in selecting the wards and villages with large population of local
chickens for close observations. This was done based on wide
information provided by the community heads of each wards.
Households and matured birds were selected at random from the
list of households that have been keeping local chickens for more
than three years.
Data collection
Primary data was collected with the aid of 208 well-structured
questionnaires. Multistage sampling technique was employed for
selecting respondents. The first stage involved the selection of
seven wards from the local government area. The second stage
involved the selection of villages from the selected wards, and the
third stage involved the selection of 5-6 households in each of the
selected villages. Adult local chicken in the selected households
were then observed for both qualitative and quantitative trait
measurements. Fresh eggs were collected at random from
the sampled house for egg quality measurements. Data was
collected from a total of 530 adult local chicken and 111eggs. The
population was composed of males 222 and 308 females. Among
the households sampled, birds were observed individually for
phenotypic traits including; plumage features, eye, shank, egg and
beak colour, comb as well as feather type. Body spur and comb
length and height were measured. Other body and egg traits were
examined. These parameters were determined as thus:
Shank Length (SL) - the length of the torso-metatarsus from
the hock joint to the pad, with the aid of a calibrated measuring
tape in centimeter. Kneel Length (KL) – was be considered as the
length from the v-joint to the end of the sternum using a meter
rule or measuring tape in centimeter (Cm). Wing Length (WL)
– was taken as the length of the wing from the scapula joint to
the last digit of the wing in centimeter (Cm). Body Length (BL) –
was determined with tape as the distance from the tip of the beak
over the neck through the trunk in centimeter (Cm). Egg length
(EL) – was determined as the distance from one end of the egg to
another in centimeter. Egg Width (EW) – was measured as the
widest diameter using micrometer screw gauge in centimeter.
Body Girth (BG) – was taken as circumference of the breast
region with graduated measuring tape in centimeter (Cm). Egg
Wight (EWT) –gg weight was measured using a sensitive digital
scale ‘ohaus (D110 max: 4100g) balance in grams (g).
Data analysis
Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was employed
to carry out descriptive statistics on both qualitative and
quantitative data of indigenous chicken population identified in
the study areas.
Table 1 presents the physical characteristics of indigenous
chicken in Bekwarra, Northern Cross River state Nigeria. The
commonest plumage colour is black with 36.23%, followed
by white with 20.00%, brown 13.02%, 9.43% red, 7.93% multicolored, 3.21% black-white 3.21%, grey 3.02%, grey-white
2.45%, black brown 2.26%, 0.94% reddish-black and ash-black,
and 0.57% ash.
Variation in phenotype is what characterizes local chickens
[10,11] in Botswana observed indigenous chicken to be multi
colored, but predominately black. [12,13] reported similar
observation for the indigenous chickens of Plateau state Nigeria.
These reports are in agreement with those obtained in this
study. The explanation is that a number of genes interacts to
determine plumage colour [14] and probably because indigenous
chickens have not been artificially selected. Yellow and black
were the most frequent shank colours with 31.90% and19.60%
respectively. Other variant colours like white and greenish were
next with 18.50% and 11.30% which were followed closely
by milky 6.40%, ash 5.10%, dark-ash 3.40%, pink 3.00%, red
0.40% and light -brown red 0.40%. The observed occurrence
of yellow and black in this study is comparable to evidence in
literatures [15-17]. The variations in shank colour observed are
most probably due to the difference between free ranging local
chickens in different geographical areas, and the combination
of pigments and gene responsible for colour determination. The
presence of yellow shank is due to dietary carotenoid pigments
in the epidermis when melanin was absent. The occurrence of
black results from the presence of melanic pigment in the dermis
and epidermis. The presence of black pigments in the epidermis
might account for the greenish shank. In the absence of both
pigments, the shanks were white. The varying shade of milky,
ash and other colours was due probably to the interactions of the
dermis-epidermis pigments.
The low frequency of white shank colour in the areas
contradicts [18,19]who reported 47.92% for chickens in
Botswana. The proportion of black shank 19.60% observed
in this study was lower than the findings of [20] who reported
42.20%.
The frequent eye colour among chicken populations
studied were black and light–brown with 44.72% and 14.91%
respectively. This is followed by dark-brown 12.83%, dark –red
11.32%, orange11.13%, and 5.09% pink. This is consistent with
the reports by [21].
Eye colour characteristics depend on carotenoid pigmentation
and blood circulation in the eye. Black (48.90%) was the most
wildly distributed beak color in the study area. This was followed
by yellow, brown, ash, white, pink and ash with 21.10%, 11.10%,
9.10%, 6.80%, 1.90%, and 1.10%, respectively.
Pea comb type predominated with 38.90%, next was single
24.20%, rose18.50%, double13.70%, and walnut 4.70%. The
predominant pea comb in this study area tallies with the reports
by [22] for chickens from Dekina. In contrast, single combed
chickens were reported to be predominant, followed by rose [23-
25] for indigenous chicken in Nigeria. [26,27], observed similar
reports in Asia and Bangladesh. The occurrence of different
comb types might be due to the interactions of different genes
responsible for comb expression.
Combs are vital for heat loss in birds [28]. This implies large comb would provide an efficient means of heat dissipation.
Therefore, high proportion of pea comb type observed in the
study area suggests selections advantage. There was difference
in comb size with sex the of birds. Both small, medium and large
comb occurred at variable proportions in Nigeria. Chickens with
small comb were frequent followed by medium and large. Small
and medium size comb was predominant with female and male
were observed with large combs. This shows that male birds with
large combs are significantly resistant to heat effect than female.
According to [29] reproductive hormone such as follicle
stimulating hormone (FSH) have pleiotropic effect on the size of
face and head appendages. Hence, the occurrence of small sized
comb in the population suggests that the size of the face and head
appendages of chickens observed could have been influenced by
reproductive hormones. This might also, be attributed to sexual
dimorphism since all male chickens in the study area appeared to
have larger combs than females.
Normal feather type (57.20%) was the most prevalent among
the chicken population studied. Frizzle was 18.10% with naked
neck chicken 24.70%. This is in line with the findings of [30] for
indigenous chicken in Tanzania. Possible explanation for rare
expression of frizzled character in the study area is that frizzing
gene is a rare mutant with recessive effects and lack selection
advantage in the population. Also, frizzled feather pattern tends
to provide poor insulation in cold climate.
Body Measurement Traits of Indigenous Nigerian chickens
Table 2 shows the mean values and standard error (SE) of
bodymeasurement traits of local chicken. The mean population
of hen, cock, growers and chicken owned per house hold were
5.1 ± 0.09, 3.4 ± 0.02, 4.1 ± 0.04 and 3.8 ± 0.03 respectively. The
average body weight of 1.5 ± 0.05Kg for hen and 2.0 ± 0.01Kg
for cock observed in this study were higher than 1.3Kg reported
by [31,32] This study confirmed the research findings on local
chickens by [33] in Plateau State and could be compared with the
findings of [34] for traditional scavenging chickens of Uganda.
However, [35]reported much higher weight (3.0Kg) in Yobe
for commercial birds. The higher weight is expected because
commercial birds grows faster than local birds. Low body weight
observed in this study can be attributed poor management and
genetic make-up of birds. Variations in the weight of male and
female birds in the studied area are in harmony with previous
reports by [36-41]for Nigerian, Tanzania, Eastern Europe, and
Ethiopia native chicken populations. This however indicates that
the live weight of an animal is sex dependent.
Differential growth rate of animals account for the heavier
weight of male to female birds observed in Nigeria. This further
buttress the fact that indigenous chickens in Bekwarra, Nigeria
has not yet undergone gene mixing with exotic lines else their
weight would have been quite higher.
The mean shank length (12.2 ± 0.04cm) of adult chickens
found in the study area is higher comparable with 11.3cm
reported by [42] and 10.0 ± 0.29cm reported by for local chicken
population in Jos North, Nigeria. This length further contradicts previous report by who indicated shorter shank length range of
5.5 ± 0.1Cm, 7.43 ± 7.36Cm and 7.54 ± 0.9Cm and 9.1Cm for local
chickens of North Central, Eastern Nigeria and Ethiopia.
The long shank length observed in this study results from
breed difference, prevalence of major gene and extensive
husbandry system which allows birds to scavenge long distance
for their food.
The comb length, comb height, wattle length and height in the
study varied with sex. The explanation for this is due probably to
age, genetic constitution, and breed difference. Indigenous birds
in Bekwarra possess a body circumference of 42.7 ± 0.03cm,
with short spur. This is consistent with the research findings
by who reported 31.50 ± 0.33cm and 37.08 ± 0.24cm for the
indigenous chickens in Ayingba and DekinaKogi State. It however
contradicted the report of who indicated 13.05 ± 19.15cm for
five genetic groups of native chickens, and Mancha, 2004 who
reported 26.90cm and 27.50cm, and 38.1Cm for necked neck,
and frizzled normal feathered chicken sin Plateau state. This
variation might be attributed to genetic composition of birds and
feed availability.
Chickens in the study area have long body, wing, and tail length
(55.8 ± 0.21cm, 25.0 ± 0.70cm, 14.70 ± 0.03cm) respectively.
Long body length (55.8 ± 0.21cm) observed in this study higher contradicted 27.0 ± 01cm reported by for native chickens in
Botswana, 33.8 ± 0.50cm by for birds in Kogi state, 36.70cm,
37.60cm and 39.2cm indicated by for naked neck, frizzled and
normal chicken, respectively.
The comb length (3.9 ± 0.6cm), comb height (5.2 ± 0.23cm),
and wattle length (3.30 ± 0.21cm) and wattle height (3.30 ±0
.01cm) in the study varied among birds and sex. The explanation
for this due probably to age, genetic constitution, and breed
difference.
Moderate neck and keel length were observed with 8. 9 ±
0.50cm, and 9.8 ± 0.02cm, respectively. The mean value and
standard error of wattle and comb height of chickens studied
were 3.3 ± 0.01cm, and 5.2 ± 0.23cm.
Table 3 shows the Pearson correlations among some egg
traits of local chickens in Bekwarra, Nigeria. The direct effect of
egg weight and number of chickens hatched was positive and
significant (r= 0.263; p<0.01). There existed a positive association
between the number of clutches per hen per year and clutch size
per year, numbers of chicken hatched per year, egg weight and
egg length though not significant (r= 0.134; r= 0.066; r= 0.020
and r= 0.116).
Highly significant and positive relationship existed between
clutch size per year and the number of chickens hatched.
Egg weight, egg width and egg length are associated with
clutch size per hen per year but not significant (r= 0.103; r=
0.074 and r= 0.160). Similar relationship also existed between
the number of chickens hatched per hen per year and egg weight,
width and length (r= 0.120; r= 0.129; r= 0.061). Egg weight is
directly affected by egg length (r= 0.248 p<0.01) and positively
related to egg weight though not significant (r= 0.078). Egg width
was positive and related to egg length though non- significant.
That there was no significance between clutch size and other
egg parameters reported in this current study agreed with the
research findings Similarly, that egg width has non- significant
correlations with egg length contradicted the reports by The high
correlation of egg length with egg weight in this study implies
that the selection for egg length could improve egg weight.
Similarly, the high value of correlation between clutch size and
the number of chickens hatched observed in this study implies
that a unit change in the clutch, increases the number of chickens
hatched per hen per year. The correlation between the number clutch per hen per year and egg width in this study is consistent
with the evidence in literatures by This high correlation suggests
that selection for egg number could improve egg weight.
Table 4 represents some of the egg production traits of
indigenous Nigerian chickens. The average mean weight, length
and width of local chickens observed were31.6 ± 0.30g, 7.6 ±
0.10cm, and 5.2 ± 0.30cm. The chickens exhibited 83.7 ± 1.30%
hatchability. Mean clutch size per hen was 12.5 ± 0.30 and 2.5 ±
1.3 was the number of clutches per hen per year. Mean value of
12.5 ± 0.09 eggs per clutch recorded in this study agreed with
the reports of for native chicken kept under extensive system.
This study compares favorably with the reports of who observed
an average clutch size of 10 eggs in Jos Northern, Nigeria and
contradicted the findings of Mapiye and Sibanda, 2005 who
indicated (7.86-8.52) eggs per clutch in who reported 21.12
eggs for the local chicken population in Benue and Nasarawa
state, respectively. The mean egg weight 31.6 ± 0.05g observed
in this study agreed with who reported 31.61g but lesser than
37.99 ± 0.8g for local chicken under intensive system reported
by and 39.0 ± 0.1g, and 37.1 ± 0.1g for guinea savannah and rain
forest zones of Nigeria by The variation in egg weight observed
in this study is due to difference in bird genetics, management
system, locations, feed quality and availability, disease factors
and seasonal variations. Seasonal variations affect feed quality
and availability and directly influence egg production and egg
quality in birds.
Eggs from frizzled chicken in Bekwarra were heavier than
necked neck and that of normal feathered chickens under the
same conditions. This aligned completely with the results reached
by which indicated that frizzled and necked neck chicken laid
heavier egg compared to normal feathered birds. The variation
in egg weight in relation to plumage characters is due to thermo
regulation efficiency and genetic make-up of the different birds.
The high percentage hatchability (83.7%) of local chickens
observed in Bekwarra is similar to 88.24% reported by Nwosu
and Birds in Bekwarra, Northern Cross River State exhibits higher
hatchability potential compared to 69.3% for the native chicken
population in Dekina, Kogi State indicated by and 56.0% by for
birds in Western Nigerian. These differences are due primarily
to variation in egg shell characteristics, egg size, brooding
management and egg storage.
Management system, nutrition, and genetic composition
of the sub-populations could account for the variation in eggs
length, width, clutch size and number of clutches per hen per year
in this study. Predominance of white coloured eggs followed by
brown coloured observed in this study was also reported by This
must have resulted from the fact that native chickens are kept
with little or no controlled breeding and the frequent mating of
white with brown plumage colour population.
The indigenous chicken population in Bekwarra revealed
heterogeneity in most of morphological and phenotypic
traits considered. Further work can be done to standardize
the phenotypic characters observed in the study area.
Notwithstanding, it can be maintained at the interim that the
local chickens in Bekwarra, Nigeria are multicolored. They are
pea combed, black eyed and beak, with yellow shank.