Back to Journal

SM Journal of Pulmonary Medicine

Bronchiolitis Management – Towards a Recommendation, Why We Bend the Rules?

[ ISSN : 2574-240X ]

Abstract INTRODUCTION Objective Patients and Methods Outcomes Statisical Analysis RESULTS Sub-group analysis DISCUSSION CONCLUSION DECLARATIONS FUNDING STATEMENT REFERENCES
Details

Received: 28-Jul-2025

Accepted: 26-Aug-2025

Published: 27-Aug-2025

Henryk Szymański, Sara Szupieńko*, Maciej Ostrowski, Karolina Pietraszewska, Adrianna GórniakOktaba and Aleksandra Buczek

Department of Paediatrics, St Hedwig of Silesia Hospital, Poland

Corresponding Author:

Sara Szupie?ko, Department of Paediatrics, St Hedwig of Silesia Hospital, Prusicka 53/55, 55-100-Trzebnica, Poland

Abstract

Purpose : Guidelines adherence and identification factors influencing non-compliance with recommendations in bronchiolitis management.

Methods : A retrospective study of children hospitalized with bronchiolitis from December 1, 2014, to December 31, 2016. Infants aged under 24 months, with an episode of bronchiolitis, were included. Data was analyzed separately for children aged under 12 months with the first episode of dyspnea (strict bronchiolitis) and aged 12 up to 24 months or with the history of previous dyspnea (loose bronchiolitis). There were compared patients treated with the recommendations (adherent group) and not (non-adherent group).

Results: 306 infants were included. 253 patients (82.7%) were treated according to recommendations. 162 (94.2%) of the 172 meeting the “strict bronchiolitis” criteria and 91 (67.9%) of the 134 with “loose bronchiolitis”. In the non-adherent group (n=53, 17.3%) more patients were aged over 12 months (56.6% vs 24.1%), with risk factors (43.4% vs. 30%), previous episodes of bronchiolitis (41.5% vs 15.4%), higher respiratory rate (49 vs 44/min), greater need of oxygen therapy (32% vs 16.6%) and PICU transfer (5.7% vs 0.8%).

Conclusions : Children with bronchiolitis under the age of 12 months with the first episode of dyspnea are more likely to be treated in accordance with the guidelines. The use of additional drugs is due to older age, significant medical history and severe clinical symptoms.

Keywords: Bronchiolitis; Guidelines Compliance; Hospitalized Infants.

INTRODUCTION

Bronchiolitis is an acute viral infection of the lower respiratory tract occurring in infants and children around the World [1]. There is lack of one common definition. The diversity primarily concerns those that are under the age of 12 or 24 months, the presence of auscultation findings (rales, crackles with or without wheezing), and the first or subsequent episode of the disease [2]. The literature also distinguishes a group meeting the restrictive definition of bronchiolitis, being patients under 12 months of age with the first episode of dyspnea (strict bronchiolitis), and the second group as over 12 months of age or with a history of dyspnea (loose bronchiolitis) [3].

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) is the most frequent cause of this disease and over 90% of children by age two years are infected with this virus. Other viruses as Rhinovirus or Bocavirus can cause it as well [4]. It was estimated that in 2019-year, RSV causes 33 million infections of the lower respiratory tract, resulting in 3.6 million hospitalizations and approximately 101.400 deaths in in children aged 0-60 months [5]. According to Polish latest publications the reported rates of hospitalization for RSV infections are 267.5/100.000 for children under 5 years of age and 1132.1/100.000 for those under 1 year of age in Poland [6]. The diagnosis of bronchiolitis is based on clinical symptoms and there is no need to perform laboratory blood tests, blood gas analysis or chest radiography.

According to evidence-based guidelines only supportive treatment is recommended, what includes water–electrolyte balance maintenance, suctioning nasal secretions, and oxygen supplementation when needed. The use of inhaled bronchodilators, nebulized adrenaline, antibiotics and nebulized or systemic steroids is not recommended [7,8]. Even though the presented guidelines are based on reliable clinical trials and endorsed by expert groups, so far, their adherence is limited. Our recent multicenter, retrospective study in Poland showed that 70% of inpatient children undergo examinations and treatment methods that are not supported by current guidelines [9]. Studies from other countries have also confirmed lack of compliance with guidelines [10,11,14].

Among indicated factors influencing nonadherence interventions to the guidelines the use of salbutamol and steroids was associated with older age and a previous history of atopy in children with wheezing and in infants admitted to the intensive care unit [12,13]. In Canada it has been shown that high adherence to bronchiolitis recommendations across care settings was associated with shorter length of stay and lower cost [14]. Therefore, clinicians should aim to increase the guidelines compliance.

Objective

The aim of this study was assessment of adherence to the guidelines and identification the factors influencing non-compliance with recommendations.

Patients and Methods

This was a retrospective study of hospitalized infants with bronchiolitis that used a cohort study design. The study was conducted according to the STOBE statement. Data were collected in Pediatric Department of St Hedwig of Silesia hospital. All infants less than 24 months of age on admission day, hospitalized for their first or subsequent episode of bronchiolitis from December 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016 were included. The exclusion criteria were age over 24 months and hospitalization in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) immediately before the admission due to bronchiolitis. Patients were identified based on the ICD10 code diagnosis of bronchiolitis (J21, J 21.0, 21.8, 21.9). Physicians from the Department reviewed the medical records to collect the data. The clinical data were collected from the time of the bronchiolitis episode.

Outcomes

The primary outcome measure was the assessment of adherence to the diagnostic and therapeutic process used in the management of children hospitalized for bronchiolitis according to American Academy of Pediatrics (APP) guidelines 2014. The analysis of data from 2014- 2016 was performed due to direct training of healthcare providers after the publication of the APP recommendations. Subgroup analysis was also planned. Based on data from literature, we have isolated one group meeting the restrictive definition of bronchiolitis (as proposed in some European countries), being patients under 12 months of age with the first episode of dyspnea (strict bronchiolitis), and a second group as over 12 months of age or with a history of dyspnea (loose bronchiolitis). [3] According to APP guidelines the bronchiolitis diagnosis is based on the clinical symptoms. The is no need of lab test or chest X-ray to be performed. In the treatment only supportive therapy is recommended, it includes oxygen supplementation, water-electrolyse balance, probe feeding and nose suctioning [15]. Non-adherence was defined as receiving any of test or treatments: bronchodilators, steroids, adrenaline, antibiotics or chest X-ray. Antibiotics used in treatment because of bacterial superinfection were not classified as a non-adherence to the recommendation. Due to the patients were admitted to the hospital, viral tests were justified for epidemiological reasons. The secondary outcome measure was identification factors influencing non-adherence to the guideline. We have decided to compare groups of patients treated according to the guidelines with group where no adherence to the guideline was observed.

Both groups were compared in terms:

1. Age

2. Risk factors for developing severe bronchiolitis [age less than 12 weeks, premature birth, hemodynamically significant heart defects, chronic lung disease (bronchopulmonary dysplasia), congenital malformation, genetic diseases, immune disorders, smoking by mother whilst pregnant or in the child’s environment] .

3. Number of previous bronchiolitis episodes

4. Respiratory parameters on the day of admission (saturation, respiratory rate, CO2 level in blood gas analysis)

5. Number of RSV infections in groups

6. Necessity for oxygen therapy

7. Necessity for breathing support and transfer to PICU.

8. Duration of hospitalization

Our research hypothesis assumes that the primary reason for the use of additional drugs is a significant medical history and severe clinical symptoms, primarily dyspnea.

Statisical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize baseline characteristics. The Student t test was used to compare mean values of continuous variables for approximating a normal distribution. The χ2 test was used to compare percentages. The difference between study groups was considered significant when the p value is <0.05.

RESULTS

306 patients with bronchiolitis who met the inclusion criteria were hospitalized at St. Hedwig of Silesia Hospital in Trzebnica, Poland from December 2014 to December 2016. The characteristics of patients at admission are presented in Table 1. *age less than 12 weeks, premature birth, hemodynamically significant heart defects, chronic lung disease (bronchopulmonary dysplasia), congenital malformation, genetic diseases, immune disorders, smoking by mother whilst pregnant or in the child’s environment 253 (82.7%) patients were treated in accordance with guideline recommendations. Antibiotic therapy was used for comorbidity or for complications (acute otitis media (AOM) or pneumonia). No patient received intravenous steroids or physiotherapy. Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are presented in Table 2.

Table 1: Patient demographic and clinical characteristics in the studied group (n=306).

Demographics and medical

history

n (%)

Sex m/f

175 (57.2)/131 (42.8)

Age (months)

8.9 (±6)

< 3 m

54 (17.6)

3-12 m

161 (52.6)

12-24 m

91 (29,8)

 

Patients with risk factors for developing severe bronchiolitis *

 

 

100 (32.7)

1 factor

74 (24.2)

2 and more

26 (8.5)

Episode of bronchiolitis

 

1

229 (74.8)

2 or more

61 (20)

No data

16 (5.2)

Table 2: Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the studied group during hospitalization (n=306).

Diagnostic procedures

n(%)

Chest X-ray

35(11.4)

RSV

243 (79.4)

Laboratory

305 (99.7)

Treatment

 

B-mimetics inhaled

38 (12.4)

Steroids inhaled

33 (10.7)

Adrenaline inhaled

2 (0.7)

 

Steroids systemic

 

0 (0)

Antibiotics

37 (12.1)

Oxygen therapy

29 (9.5)

 

Comorbidity/complications

 

61 (19.9)

Hospital re-admission

3(1)

Transfer to PICU

5 (1.6)

Duration of hospitalization (h)

69.8  (±37.6)  (11.1-

287.9)

Sub-group analysis

162 (94.2%) of the 172 patients who met the “strict bronchiolitis” criteria and 91 (67.9%) of the 134 patients who met the criteria of “loose bronchiolitis” were treated in accordance with present guidelines.Subgroup analysis is presented in Figure 1. To identify factors influencing non-adherence to guidelines we compared the group where treatment was consistent with the recommended procedures – “adherent group” (A) with the group where recommended treatment was discontinued – “non-adherent group” (B). Both groups were compared at admission and during hospitalization (Table 3 and 4). In the “non-adherent” patient group there were significantly more children over the age of 12 months, a higher number of patients with risk factors for developing severe bronchiolitis and a prior history of bronchiolitis (Table 3). Non-adherent interventions were associated with lower saturation, higher respiratory rate and level of carbon dioxide in arterial blood at the time of admission (Table 4).

Figure 1: Analysis of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures depending on the defined type of bronchiolitis.

Table 3: Patient group characteristics at the time of admission, depending on the method of treatment later used.

 

 

A – “ADHERENT

(n = 253) n (%)

 

B – “NON-ADHERENT”

(n = 53) n (%)

 

P

Sex m/f

142 (56.1)/111 (43.9)

33 (62.3)/20 (37.7)

NS

Age (m)

8.2 (±5.8)

12.2 (±6)

NS

< 3 months

50 (19.8)

4 (7.5)

0.04

3-12 months

142 (56.1)

19 (35.8)

0.005

>12 months

61 (24.1)

30 (56.6)

0.00006

Risk factors for developing severe

bronchiolitis

 

77 (30)

 

23 (43.4)

 

0.0003

1 factor

63 (24.9)

11 (20.6)

NS

2 and more

14 (5.5)

12 (22.6)

0.00005

Episode of bronchiolitis

 

 

 

1

203 (80)

26 (49.1)

<0.000001

2 or more

39 (15.4)

22 (41.5)

0.0004

No data

11 (4.3)

5 (9.4)

 

Table 4: Adherent and non-adherent group comparison.

 

 

A                       –                          “ADHERENT” (n = 253) n (%)

 

B                      –                      “NON-ADHERENT” (n = 53) n (%)

 

 

P

Saturation in first day

95 (±2)

94 (±3)

<0.000001

Respiratory rate in first day

44 (±6)

49 (±8)

0.02

Arterial blood gas CO2 level

34 (±5.6)

37.6 (±7.3)

0.001

RSV positive

86 (34)

12 (22.6)

0.02

Oxygen therapy

42 (16.6)

17 (32)

0.02

Transfer to PICU

2 (0.8)

3 (5.7)

0.01

Duration of hospitalization (h)

67.5 (±35.8)

80.9 (±43.8)

0.02

DISCUSSION

Our study indicated a high percentage of inpatient children treated in accordance with APP guidelines (82.9%). We believe that such a high compliance rate results from the teamwork of clinicians and the mandatory training of healthcare providers in applicable guidelines. Our recent study analyzing adherence to the guidelines revealed lower level of adherence to the guidelines [9]. A randomized trial showed that interventions such as site-based clinical leads, stakeholder meetings, a train-the-trainer workshop, targeted educational delivery, other educational and promotional materials can de-implement low-value care [16]. We found multiple factors associated with no adherence to the guidelines. Our results are, overall, in line with previous reports [12,13]. The factors included older age of children (>12 months), occurrence of risk factors and another episode of bronchiolitis. This correlation was also demonstrated in the comparison of the strict and loose bronchiolitis groups, where children over 12 months of age and/ or with a second episode of dyspnea more often received treatment inconsistent with the recommendations. This may be due a higher suspicion of asthma in this group of children (Table 3). Differences in vital signs at admission day (saturation, respiratory rate and level of carbon dioxide in arterial blood), need of oxygen and need for PCIU transfer in both groups indicate that non-compliance decisions are related to the more severe clinical condition of the patient. Also, a negative RSV result may raise the suspicion of a diagnosis other than bronchiolitis due to the frequent emphasis on this pathogen as the main cause. Based on the above results, we can conclude that the formulated hypothesis where primary reason for the use of additional drugs is a significant medical history and severe clinical symptoms, primarily dyspnea was correct. Bearing in mind that adherence to guidelines is associated with shorter length of hospitalization and lower costs [14], we believe that knowing the specific factors is an opportunity to reduce unnecessary procedures and treatments in subsequent seasons. Due to the lack of one consistent definition of bronchiolitis and the need to define it, we consider limiting it to children up to 12 months of age with the first episode of dyspnea. This would eliminate two main factors leading to higher adherence to the guidelines. Our study has several limitations. The major one is the retrospective nature of the study, resulting in a lack of full access to patients’ data. Secondly, the data is obtained from 2014-2016. This period was chosen as the time in which the center declared to train the medical workers to applicable by that time APP guidelines. Another aspect is the fact that our population includes only patients from one center, therefore the results cannot be generalized to other medical centers in Poland.

CONCLUSION

Children with bronchiolitis under the age of 12 months with the first episode of dyspnea are more likely to be treated in accordance with the guidelines. The use of additional drugs is due to age, significant medical history and severe clinical symptoms.

DECLARATIONS

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

FUNDING STATEMENT

This study was fully funded by the Department of Pediatrics, St Hedwig of Silesia Hospital, Trzebnica, Poland.

REFERENCES

  1. Dalziel SR, Haskell L, O’Brien S, Borland ML, Plint AC, Babl FE, et al. Bronchiolitis. Lancet. 2022; 400: 392-406.
  2. Hancock DG, Charles-Britton B, Dixon DL, Forsyth KD. The heterogeneity of viral bronchiolitis: A lack of universal consensus definitions. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017; 52: 1234-1240.
  3. Elenius V, Bergroth E, Koponen P, Remes S, Piedra PA, Espinola JA, et al. Marked variability observed in inpatient management of bronchiolitis in three Finnish hospitals. Acta Paediatr. 2017; 106: 1512-1518.
  4. Kenmoe S, Kengne-Nde C, Ebogo-Belobo JT, Mbaga DS, Fatawou Modiyinji A, Njouom R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of common respiratory viruses in children < 2 years with bronchiolitis in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic era. PLoS One. 2020; 15: e0242302.
  5. Li Y, Wang X, Blau DM, Caballero MT, Feikin DR, Gill CJ, et al. Respiratory Virus Global Epidemiology Network; Nair H; RESCEU investigators. Global, regional, and national disease burden estimates of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in children younger than 5 years in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022; 399: 2047-2064.
  6. Borszewska-Kornacka MK, Mastalerz-Migas A, Nitsch-Osuch A, Jackowska T, Paradowska-Stankiewicz I, Kuchar E, et al. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections in Polish Pediatric Patients from an Expert Perspective. Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11: 1482.
  7. Bronchiolitis in children: diagnosis and management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); August 9, 2021.
  8. Ralston SL, Lieberthal AS, Meissner HC, Alverson BK, Baley JE, Gadomski AM, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics. Clinical practice guideline: the diagnosis, management, and prevention of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics. 2014; 134: e1474–e1502.
  9.     Szupieńko S, Bojarska-Cikoto K, Woźny-Sędek E, Kazubski F, Kazubska K, Stryczyńska-Kazubska J, et al. Practice in bronchiolitis management in Polish hospitals-a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Eur J Pediatr. 2024; 184: 3.
  10. Carlone G, Graziano G, Trotta D, Cafagno C, Aricò MO, Campodipietro G, et al. Bronchiolitis 2021-2022 epidemic: multicentric analysis of the characteristics and treatment approach in 214 children from different areas in Italy. Eur J Pediatr. 2023; 182: 1921-1927.
  11.   House SA, Marin JR, Hall M, Ralston SL. Trends Over Time in Use of Nonrecommended Tests and Treatments Since Publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics Bronchiolitis Guideline. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4: e2037356.
  12. Pittet LF, Glangetas A, Barazzone-Argiroffo C, Gervaix A, Posfay-Barbe KM, Galetto-Lacour A, et al. Factors associated with nonadherence to the American Academy of Pediatrics 2014 bronchiolitis guidelines: A retrospective study. PloS one. 2023; 18: e0285626.
  13. Hester G, Nickel AJ, Watson D, Bergmann KR. Factors Associated With Bronchiolitis Guideline Nonadherence at US Children’s Hospitals. Hosp Pediatr. 2021; 11:1102-1112.
  14. Bryan MA, Desai AD, Wilson L, Wright DR, Mangione-Smith R. Association of Bronchiolitis Clinical Pathway Adherence with Length of Stay and Costs. Pediatrics. 2017; 139: e20163432.
  15. Ralston SL, Lieberthal AS, Meissner HC, Alverson BK, Baley JE, Gadomski AM, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics . Clinical practice guideline: the diagnosis, management, and prevention of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics. 2014; 134: e1474-e1502.
  16. Haskell L, Tavender EJ, Wilson CL, O’Brien S, Babl FE, Borland ML, et al. PREDICT Network. Effectiveness of Targeted Interventions on Treatment of Infants with Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2021; 175: 797-806.

Citation

Szyma?ski H, Szupie?ko S, Ostrowski M, Pietraszewska K, Górniak-Oktaba A et al. (2025) Bronchiolitis Management – Towards a Recommendation, Why We Bend the Rules?. SM J Pulm Med 7: 9

Other Articles

Article Image 1

The Overview of the Clinical Significance of Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis

Due to lack of the practical application guidelines for Interferon-Gamma Release Assays (IGRAs), the testing result of IGRAs may be misinterpreted in clinical practice in China. Therefore, we clarify some important issues related to IGRAs based on the available evidences in this review. The available data reveals that IGRAs can be used to assist the diagnosis of Latent TB Infection (LTBI) and combined with HIV infection; while for the definite diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of active TB have no value. In addition, IGRAs showed no better performance than TST in low income countries. It should make practical guidelines to TB diagnostic tools and further strengthen the training and guide for the clinicians the low income countries, so as to more scientifically manage TB.

Yulu Gao¹#, Shencong Mei²#, Jun Wang⁴#, Zhonghua Liu⁶, Qinyun Li³, Zongshuai Gao³, Changtai Zhu³,⁶, and Yongning Sun⁵


Article Image 1

Obesity and Breathing Related Sleep Disorders: Concise Clinical Review

The increasing prevalence of obesity has lead to an increase in the prevalence of sleep disordered breathing in the general population. Obesity is a serious disorder resulting in significant health impairment. Obese adults are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from acute and chronic medical conditions. Obesity is associated with anatomic alterations that predispose to upper airway obstruction during sleep. Obesity and sleep related breathing disorders occur to a particular subgroup that includes obese patients with hypoventilation correlated with Hypercapnic-OSA (obstructive sleep apnea), Hypercapnic-OSA with OHS (hypoventilation syndrome) and OHS without OSA.

OHS is a disease entity distinct from simple obesity and OSA. OSA is a common disorder. Obesity and particularly central adiposity are potent risk factors for OSA. They can increase pharyngeal collapsibility through mechanical effects on pharyngeal soft tissues and lung volume, and through central nervous system–acting signaling proteins (adipokines) that may affect airway neuromuscular control. Specific molecular signaling pathways encode differences in the distribution and metabolic activity of adipose tissue.

The OHS is characterized by the combination of obesity (BMI>30 kg/m2 ), daytime awake hypercapnia and hypoxemia , in the presence of sleep-disordered breathing without other known causes of hypoventilation, such as severe obstructive or restrictive parenchymal lung disease, kyphoscoliosis, severe hypothyroidism, neuromuscular disease, and congenital central hypoventilation syndrome. It is estimated that 90% of patients with OHS also have OSA. Patients with OSA typically have normal control of breathing and obesity is not a necessary condition; patients with OHS are morbidly obese, have hypoventilation during wakefulness with increased arterial PCO2 and decreased arterial PO2 , as well as nocturnal hypoventilation. The gold standard for the diagnosis is monitored polysomnography during sleep. In stable hypercapnic patients therapeutic choice will depend on two factors: underlying diagnosis (presence or absence of OSA) and severity of hypercapnia.

Ines Maria Grazia Piroddi¹, Sofia Karamichali², Cornelius Barlascini³, and Antonello Nicolini¹*


Article Image 1

Tracheal Diverticulosis Presenting as Chronic Cough

A 62 year old female patient with mild intermittent asthma was seen in the pulmonary clinic with a history of a productive cough for two years. She had required multiple courses of antibiotics over the past year. She underwent a CT scan of the chest which showed central bronchiectasis and multiple discrete diverticula projecting posteriorly from the membranous trachea measuring up to 2.3 x 1.7 x 1.7 cm.  The diverticula involved nearly the entire course of the trachea (Figure 1). A bronchoscopy was performed which showed tracheal pouches and indentations (Figure 2). There were no prior scans and therefore it is unclear for how long she had the diverticula. Her symptoms improved with antibiotics and she remains relatively well with chest physiotherapy and bronchial hygiene.

Humam Farah¹*, Parth Parikh¹, Michael Bukstein¹, and Ruxana T Sadikot²,³


Article Image 1

Emphyema Due to Hepatic Abscess

A 36 year-old man with previous biliary surgery due to pancreatitis with pseudo cyst formation five years earlier, had one week of right upper-quadrant pain. Although the pain was pleuritic, he had no respiratory symptoms and a normal chest radiograph.

Joseph R Shiber¹* and David Skarupa²


Article Image 1

Primary Soft-Tissue Nocardial Abscess with a Complication of Severe Pneumonia: A Case Report and Literature Review

Although very rare, nocardiosis is considered as an important opportunistic infection, especially in immunocompromised patients with long-term corticosteroid use or organ transplantation. Lung and skin involvements are frequent, but primary soft-tissue nocardiosis is very rare. Herein, we described a 48 year-old Chinese man with a primary soft-tissue nocardial abscess caused by multidrug-resistant nocardia asteroides, which was sensitive only to imipenem and resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and other antibiotics like amikacin and vancomycin.An initial treatment with a combination of surgical drainage and imipenem was conducted, but a secondary severe pneumonia was complicated two weeks later. Then, the antimicrobial regimen was shifted to sulbactam sodium/cefoperazone and itraconazole injection for the severe pneumonia. For nocardiosis, drainage was continued and minocycline was administered instead of imipenem for maintenance therapy for 9 months. Eventually, the patient recovered well from the primary soft-tissue nocardial abscess and the secondary severe pneumonia. To our knowledge, this is the first case with a combination of primary softtissue nocardial abscess, multidrug-resistant nocardia asteroides and complication of severe pneumonia.

Shufang Zhang¹#, Feifei Zhou²#, Xiuhui Lin³, Liuhong Wang⁴, Wei Cui³, and Gensheng Zhang³*


Article Image 1

Superior Vena Cava Obstruction in Lung Carcinoma

We report a case of Pancoast tumor with Superior vena cava obstruction and thoracic outlet syndrome in 60 year old patient who has been diagnosed to have undifferentiated lung carcinoma on evaluation. Patient was a chronic smoker from 40 years on treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and presented with hoarseness of voice, puffiness of face, pain in right arm and chest.

Chest radiography and computerized tomography of thorax showed homogenous density in right upper lobe extending in to superior mediastinum with involvement of multiple groups of lymphnodes. CT guided biopsy confirmed diagnosis of undifferentiated large cell carcinoma. Patient developed clinical features of superior vena caval obstruction in a period of 15 days.

Sreenivasa Rao Sudulagunta¹*, Shyamala Krishnaswamy Kothandapani², and Mahesh Babu Sodalagunta³


Article Image 1

The Role of Lung Function and the Importance to Measure Small Airways Modifications

Normally in clinical practice the evaluation of lung pathophysiology follows a functional and mechanical evaluation primarily through spirometry and plethysmography. The Small Airways (SAW) are one of the most important targets for respiratory diseases and various studies underline their strict relations with chronic diseases like asthma or COPD, although it is nowadays recognized their role in a lot of other pathological entities. The evaluation of SAW is not always easy and often more than one functional test must be done. So, the possibility to known the “scenario” of available functional respiratory tests, both in clinical and research setting, represents a central point in the respiratory world. Moreover the correct interpretation of the lung function tests is necessary not only to better evaluate the actual clinical status of the respiratory disorders but also to allow the appropriate therapeutic choice. The aim of the current review is to direct the readers attention to the importance of lung function evaluation and its specific role both in clinical and research setting.

Dejan Radovanovic¹,², Giovanni Marchese², and Pierachille Santus¹,²*


Article Image 1

Saber Sheath Trachea: Functional and Clinical Correlations

Saber sheath trachea refers to diffuse coronal narrowing of the intra-thoracic portion of the trachea with concomitant widening of the sagittal diameter. It is considered to be widely associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The diagnosis is based on the calculation of the tracheal index which is the ratio of coronal to sagittal length in the axial plane measured 1cm above the upper margin of the aortic arch. Saber sheath trachea is considered to be present when the tracheal index is less than 0.67. The tracheal index has been associated with severity of obstruction and most notably with hyperinflation and extent of emphysema in COPD patients. Thus, it can have clinical importance. The presence of saber sheath trachea and its clinical implications should be further explored in COPD as well as in other diseases in which emphysema represents a major component, as Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis Emphysema (CPFE).

Vasilios Tzilas¹ and Demosthenes Bouros¹*


Article Image 1

Impact of Poor Glycemic Control on Severity and Clinical Course of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Patients with Co-Existing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - One Year Prospective Study

Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) are common and under diagnosed chronic non-communicable medical conditions in India. The escalating epidemic of DM is a great challenge for the clinicians treating COPD as large number of patients have Poor Glycemic Control (PGC). We undertook this trial to study the influence of PGC on severity and disease outcome in COPD subjects with concomitant DM.

Materials and methods: COPD patients either known or newly diagnosed DM cases as per WHO criteria were enrolled in the study and grouped into patients with PGC and Optimal Glycemic Control (OGC) based on HbA1c measurements. Subjects were closely monitored for 1 year.

Results: Of the 490 subjects analyzed, 336 (68.57%) had PGC and 154 (31.43%) had OGC. COPD patients with PGC had more severe disease compared to OGC (Mean FEV1% predicted 48.47 ± 13.7 vs 67.4 ± 13.86, p= 0.0061) and also DOSE score (4.35 ± 1.88 vs 3.18 ± 2.30 p= 0.0052) at the baseline. After 1 year, patients with PGC had statistically significant high rates of exacerbations. The mean DOSE scores were statistically greater in PGC patients after 12 months suggesting worsening of COPD symptoms and quality of life. Hospitalization was significantly frequent and longer in PGC patients. (6.56 ± 1.70 vs 4.16 ± 1.26 p= 0.0004).

Conclusion: Patients with PGC had more severe COPD, poor lung function, high symptom score, and increased risk of exacerbations with frequent and prolonged hospitalizations.

Vinay Mahishale*, Ajith Eti, Bhagyashri Patil, Mitchelle Lolly, and Sujeer Khan


Article Image 1

Use of Telehealth Data in Multidisciplinary Team Review of COPD

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a significant illness that lends itself well to telehealth – the remote monitoring of patients at home. Currently, COPD telehealth is usually led by community nurses. Given the multifaceted needs of patients with COPD, we argued that a Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) approach is a better way of holistically managing patients on telehealth. We present our experience of working as part of a community MDT to review patients already undergoing COPD telemonitoring. We collected data on the MDT activity during a six months period with the aim of highlighting deviations from best practice. The MDT prospectively reviewed 95 patients and issued 141 recommendations which were fed to the patient’s usual General Practitioner (GP) or directly implemented by the telehealth staff. We concluded that a multidisciplinary review of COPD telehealth patients is feasible and has the potential to add value to what is largely a technology-led service.

Ghassan A Hamad¹*, Michael Crooks², and Alyn H Morice³