Back to Journal

SM Journal of Public Health & Epidemiology

Hierarchical Model of Factors Associated with Falls in Older Brazilian Community-Dwelling Women

[ ISSN : 2473-0661 ]

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Acknowledgment References
Details

Received: 16-Apr-2015

Accepted: 25-May-2015

Published: 12-Jun-2015

Ana Cristina Viana Campos¹*, Andrea Maria Duarte Vargas², Marcella Guimarães Assis³, Denise Vieira Travassos² and Efigenia Ferreira e Ferreira²

¹ School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil
² Department of Community and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
³ School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil

Corresponding Author:

Ana Cristina Viana Campos, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil, Tel: +55(31)3775-0989; Email: campos. acv@gmail.com

Keywords

Clavicle; Congenital pseudoarthrosis; Mandibular plate

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of falls in a group of older women and to measure the influence of risk factors associated with age.

Methods: Longitudinal study with a representative probability sample of the AGEQOL study (Aging, Gender and Quality of Life). This article is based on 1226 older Brazilian community-dwelling women. Participants were interviewed on falls in past 12 months, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, health status, functional ability and access to and use of health services. Poisson regression was used to confirm the association of decline in women with possible determinants, separated by age (60-74 years and ≥75 years).

Results: Overall, 250 women (54.2%) had a single fall, and the prevalence of falls was significantly different between age groups (p<0.001). Women aged less than 75 years old who smoked, drank, and reported nausea and imbalance had a higher prevalence of falls. Among the oldest women, a dose-response relationship was present between falls and functional capacity of ADL.

Conclusions: The prevalence of falls differed in each age group of women. For older women aged 60-74 years, the prevalence of falls was associated with self-reported health status and the type of health services used. In addition to performing ADL, worse health conditions, surgeries, and higher education were risk factors associated with a higher prevalence of falls in older women.

Introduction

Population aging is an important global phenomenon in public health. This new population profile requires the adoption of public and social solutions to develop policies [1]. In Brazil, there are approximately 25 million people aged 60 or older (10.8% of the population). Projections for 2030, estimate a life expectancy in Brazil around 77.4 years. In 2050 almost 30% of the Brazilian population will be 60 years and older, placing Brazil as one of the countries with the largest absolute number of older people worldwide [2].

However, ageing in Latin American countries is occurring even in the context of health inequalities, with high rates of poverty, relative low coverage and quality of health and pension systems [3]. In the older adults, health cannot be measured by the presence or absence of disease but by the degree of preservation of functional capacity (i.e., the ability to take care of oneself and to determine and perform Activities of Daily Living (ADL) with autonomy and independence, even with morbidities) [3]. Falls and fractures are major causes of morbidity and mortality in older adults [4-6]. Epidemiological studies show that approximately 30% of the population over the age of 65 suffer at least one fall per year [7,8]. This rate rises to 50% in people over 80 years old and those who are institutionalized [9].

The multifactorial etiology factors associated with falls, and recurring injuries, determined have been widely studied and reported in the literature [10-12]. Falling is not a normal event in the aging process. In the present, evidence-based interventions can be used in clinical or community settings to reduce fall risk [13,14]. Additionally, secondary prevention programs for falls and fractures are highly needed by identifying risks, performing environmental reorganization, and identifying functional rehabilitation factors [4,15].

In Brazil, most studies are epidemiological, observational, and few studies involved significant and representative sample of elderly living in communities. Risk factors for falls need to be further investigated so that preventive actions and public policies are proposed in the near future. Age and female gender are major risk factors for falls in the older adults [16], but they are not the only ones. We believe that association between falls and functional limitation, influenced by other factors is even more significant among older women. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of falls in a group of older women and to examine the influence of factors associated with age.

Materials and Methods

Participants

 “Aging, Gender and Quality of Life (AGEQOL)” is a cohort study in Sete Lagoas, Minas Gerais and Brazil with a representative sample of 1226 community-dwelling women, between the ages of 60 and 106 years (mean age of 71.03 ± 8.35 years). A complex sampling design was adopted for this study and consisted of a combination of probabilistic sampling methods for selecting a representative sample of the population. For this sampling, the following two calculations were performed: an estimation of the number of older adults and an estimation of the number of households to be visited. The sampling process was conducted in two stages: in the first, census tracts were selected and in the second, households within each sector were selected.

In each household, all residents aged 60 years or more of both genders, regardless of your marital status or kinship were interviewed. Data collection was conducted in the homes of the older adults between January and July 2012 and involved household interviews and examinations conducted by three examiners and three annotators. All persons 60+ years in the selected households were informed of the study and were asked to sign an informed consent form that had been previously approved by the Ethical Committee of the Federal University of Minas Gerais (CAAE-0413.0.203.000-11).

The interviews lasted 40 to 60 minutes. At the end of the interviews, each subject in the city received guidance regarding health care and activity options as well as the personal contact information of the researcher responsible for the questionnaire. Additional details of the methodology are described in Campos et al. [17].

Measurements

The definition of a fall used in this study was “an unintentional event that results in the change of position of the individual to a lower level relative to its initial position, with inability to fix in a timely manner” [10]. The dependent variable was a dichotomous question about recent falls: “Last year, (a) Mr. (a) has fallen?” The group that did not report falls (falls = no) was defined as the reference category. For women who responded positively, we also asked about the recurrence (more than one fall) and the occurrence of bone fracture resulting from the fall. The independent variables were grouped according to an adapted form of the hierarchical model proposed by Cruz et al. [18], in which the levels of assessment of the relationships between groups of variables include distal, intermediate, and proximal factors (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Hierarchical theoretical model for factors associated with falls in older women living in the community. ADL: Basic Activities of Daily Living IADL: Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

The block was formed by the following distal variables of socioeconomic information: marital status (married, single/widowed/ divorced), self-reported color (white, black, other), retirement (yes, no), education (illiterate, literate), median income (≤US$300, >US$300), caregiver (yes, no), living arrangement (live alone, live together), time of residence in the same home in years (≤ 24 years, >24 years), and household (alone, relatives/other). The health of the women was assessed by subjective aspects (selfreported conditions and self-reported health) and goals (diagnostic tests and screening).

The self-reported conditions investigated were the following: smoking (yes, no), alcohol (yes, no), trouble sleeping at night (yes, no), physical activity (yes, no), use of corrective lenses (yes, no), use of hearing aids (yes, no), medication use (yes, no), use of controlled medication (yes, no), health perception (very poor/ poor/fair, good/very good), self-assessment of weight (underweight, normal, overweight), self-reported diagnosis of arthritis (yes, no), and self-reported diagnosis of osteoporosis (yes, no).

Common symptoms related to aging were investigated by self-report, such as tremors (yes, no), dizziness (yes, no), imbalance (yes, no), fainting (yes, no), tinnitus (yes, no), and difficulty walking (yes, no). To measure cognitive ability, the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) validated in Portuguese [19] was used. This instrument consists of questions grouped into seven categories, each designed with the objective of assessing orientation, immediate memory and recall, concentration, calculation, and language.

The Geriatric Depression Scale short validated in Portuguese version with 15 items (GDS-15) is specifically targeted toward women and was used to assess mood and level of depression [20]. The scores of each instrument were dichotomized to evaluate cognitive impairment (yes, no) and depression (yes, no). To measure access to and use of health services, we used the following variables: medical treatment (yes, no), medical consultation in the last 6 months (yes, no), health insurance (yes, no), type of health service most used (public/plan/private), hospitalization in the past year (yes, no), and surgery in the past year (yes, no).

In this study, functional ability was analyzed separately by two instruments. The Katz index is an instrument used to measure independence in the performance of the following six ADL: bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding [21]. The Lawton - Brody Index (ILB) evaluates the patient’s ability to perform instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) [22]. ADL and IADL dependence was classified as total dependence, moderate dependence, or independence.

Data Analysis

All analyses were performed separately by age group using a cutoff defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) for developing countries [23]. The sample was divided into two groups: 60-74 years (n=842) and ≥75 years (n=384). Descriptive analyses included the calculation of the prevalence of falls, recurrence of falls, and bone fracture by age as well as association with the chi-square test. We used a significance level of 5%. In the crude analysis, the prevalence of falls was calculated for each group of independent variables.

The selection of variables that constituted the blocks in the multivariate analysis was obtained by adopting a critical level of significance equal to 0.20. Multivariate analysis was performed using Poisson regression with robust variance calculation of adjusted odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and significance level using the Wald test for heterogeneity and linear trend. The effect of the complex sample design was considered in all analyses. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical software version 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA).

Results

Overall, 250 women (54.2%) had a single fall, and the prevalence of falls was significantly different between age groups (p<0.001). The recurrence rate was higher in women under 75 years of age (46.5%) and older women with fractures (27.3%) (Table 1).

Table 1: Distribution of women residents in the community according to the occurrence of falls, recurrence and bone fracture by age group.

Variables

Age

p

 

60-74 years

(n=842)

≥75 years

(n=384)

Total (n=1226)

 

 

n

%

n

%

n

%

 

Falls

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

303

36.0

158

41.1

461

37.6

<0.001

No

539

64.0

226

58.9

765

62.4

 

Recurrence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

141

46.5

70

44.3

211

45.8

0.972

No

162

53.5

88

55.7

250

54.2

 

Bone fracture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

60

19.8

43

27.2

103

22.3

0.069

No

243

80.2

115

72.8

358

77.7

 

In the crude analysis for the group aged 60-74 years, only lifestyle (smoking, alcohol, and use of hearing aids), health (imbalance and fainting), and the most widely used type of health service were associated with the occurrence of falls, at a significance level of 5% (Table 2).

Table 2: Crude analysis of the prevalence of falls in women 60-74 years of age, associated with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, lifestyle, health conditions, access and use of health services, and functional capacity.

Variables

Falls

Crude model

 

Yes

No

PR

IC 95% (PR)

p

Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics

n

%

n

%

 

 

 

Education

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-literate

64

33.3

128

66.7

1.07

0.97-1.19

0.191

Literate

239

36.8

411

63.2

1.00

 

 

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

≤R$622.00

214

35.6

387

64.4

1.05

0.95-1.16

0.370

>R$622.00

89

36.9

152

63.1

1.00

 

 

Retired

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

199

39.1

310

60.9

0.97

0.89-1.05

0.435

No

104

31.2

229

68.8

1.00

 

 

Marital status

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Married

139

36.1

246

63.9

1.06

0.97-1.16

0.189

Single/widowed/divorced

161

35.5

293

64.5

1.00

 

 

Self-reported color

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

White

102

36.7

176

63.3

1.08

0.98-1.18

0.131

Brown/ Black

50

36.5

87

 

1.01

0.89-1.15

0.849

Other

148

35.2

272

64.8

1.00

 

 

Caregiver

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

47

42.3

64

57.7

1.03

0.92-1.15

0.620

No

256

35.0

475

65.0

1.00

 

 

Living arrangement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Living alone

45

35.4

82

64.6

0.96

0.84-1.09

0.511

resides accompanied

257

36.0

457

64.0

1.00

 

 

Residence time

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

≤ 24 years

138

31.8

296

68.2

1.05

0.96-1.14

0.311

> 24 years

165

40.4

243

59.6

1.00

 

 

Household

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Own

289

35.7

521

64.3

1.13

0.91-1.41

0.272

Relatives/other

14

43.8

18

56.3

1.00

 

 

Health conditions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Smoke

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

20

30.3

46

69.7

1.14

1.03-1.26

0.013

No

283

36.5

493

63.5

1.00

 

 

Alcohol

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

37

39.8

56

60.2

0.84

0.74-0.94

0.003

No

266

35.5

483

64.5

1.00

 

 

Trouble sleeping the night

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

156

41.9

216

58.1

0.97

0.91-1.04

0.441

No

147

31.3

323

68.7

1.00

 

 

Practice physical activity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

88

34.8

165

65.2

0.91

0.84-0.98

0.016

No

215

36.5

374

63.5

1.00

 

 

Corrective lenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

219

36.6

385

63.7

1.04

0.96-1.13

0.297

No

84

35.3

154

64.7

1.00

 

 

Use hearing aid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

10

47.6

11

52.4

0.85

0.73-1.00

0.051

No

293

35.7

528

64.3

1.00

 

 

Use of medication

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

75

41.9

4

58.1

1.02

0.94-1.10

0.623

No

228

34.4

435

65.6

1.00

 

 

Prescription drug use

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

242

37.2

408

68.2

0.95

0.88-1.02

0.165

No

31

3.8

131

68.2

1.00

 

 

Self-assessment of weight

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overweight

123

40.1

184

59.9

0.97

0.85-1.10

0.612

In normal weight

149

32.0

316

68.0

1.05

0.93-1.18

0.456

Underweight

31

44.3

39

55.7

1.00

 

 

Self-rated health

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Very bad/poor/fair

189

43.5

245

56.5

0.99

0.91-1.07

0.724

Very good / good

114

27.9

294

72.1

1.00

 

 

Arthritis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

104

40.9

150

59.1

0.95

0.87-1.03

0.222

No

191

33.4

381

66.6

1.00

 

 

Osteoporosis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

74

43.0

98

57.0

0.93

0.85-1.02

0.127

No

220

33.8

430

66.2

1.00

 

 

Tremors

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

71

53.8

61

46.2

1.00

0.89-1.14

0.945

No

191

31.2

422

68.8

1.00

 

 

Dizziness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

115

48.5

122

51.5

0.97

0.85-1.10

0.638

No

173

30.0

404

70.0

1.00

 

 

Imbalance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

119

53.8

102

46.2

0.85

0.76-0.96

0.010

No

184

29.9

432

70.1

1.00

 

 

Fainting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

40

60.6

26

39.4

0.86

0.75-0.99

0.040

No

263

34.0

510

66.0

1.00

 

 

Tinnitus

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

116

48.3

124

51.7

0.97

0.87-1.08

0.615

No

187

31.2

412

68.8

1.00

 

 

Difficulty walking

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

67

54.9

55

45.1

1.04

0.94-1.16

0.417

No

232

32.5

482

67.5

1.00

 

 

No

215

36.5

374

63.5

1.00

 

 

Corrective lenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

219

36.6

385

63.7

1.04

0.96-1.13

0.297

No

84

35.3

154

64.7

1.00

 

 

Use hearing aid

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

10

47.6

11

52.4

0.85

0.73-1.00

0.051

No

293

35.7

528

64.3

1.00

 

 

Use of medication

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

75

41.9

4

58.1

1.02

0.94-1.10

0.623

No

228

34.4

435

65.6

1.00

 

 

Prescription drug use

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

242

37.2

408

68.2

0.95

0.88-1.02

0.165

No

31

3.8

131

68.2

1.00

 

 

Self-assessment of weight

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Overweight

123

40.1

184

59.9

0.97

0.85-1.10

0.612

In normal weight

149

32.0

316

68.0

1.05

0.93-1.18

0.456

Underweight

31

44.3

39

55.7

1.00

 

 

Self-rated health

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Very bad/poor/fair

189

43.5

245

56.5

0.99

0.91-1.07

0.724

Very good / good

114

27.9

294

72.1

1.00

 

 

Arthritis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

104

40.9

150

59.1

0.95

0.87-1.03

0.222

No

191

33.4

381

66.6

1.00

 

 

Osteoporosis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

74

43.0

98

57.0

0.93

0.85-1.02

0.127

No

220

33.8

430

66.2

1.00

 

 

Tremors

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

71

53.8

61

46.2

1.00

0.89-1.14

0.945

No

191

31.2

422

68.8

1.00

 

 

Dizziness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

115

48.5

122

51.5

0.97

0.85-1.10

0.638

No

173

30.0

404

70.0

1.00

 

 

Imbalance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

119

53.8

102

46.2

0.85

0.76-0.96

0.010

No

184

29.9

432

70.1

1.00

 

 

 

Table 3 shows the crude analysis between falls and associated factors in women aged 75 years or older. The use of hearing aids, a diagnosis of osteoporosis, and a health plan were not associated with the outcomes. However, the variables achieved enough statistical significance (p≤0.20) to be included in the adjusted model.

Table 3: Crude analysis of the prevalence of falls in women aged 75 and older associated with demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, lifestyle, health conditions, access and use of health services, and functional capacity.

Variables

Falls

Crude model

 

Yes

No

PR

IC95% (PR)

p

Education

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-literate

63

42.9

84

57.1

0.77

0.65-0.92

0.003

Literate

95

40.1

142

59.9

1.00

 

 

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

≤R$622.00

111

40.2

165

59.8

1.00

0.88-1.15

0.946

>R$622.00

47

43.5

61

56.5

1.00

 

 

Retired

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

121

39.0

189

61.0

1.01

0.84-1.21

0.924

No

37

50.0

37

50.0

1.00

 

 

Marital status

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Married

31

36.9

53

63.1

0.96

0.79-1.18

0.715

Single/widowed/divorced

127

42.3

173

57.7

1.00

 

 

Self-reported color

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

White

57

39.9

86

60.1

0.98

0.85-1.13

0.797

Brown/ Black

15

29.4

36

70.6

1.20

1.02-1.41

0.026

Other

85

45.9

100

54.1

1.00

 

 

Caregiver

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

68

44.4

85

55.6

1.20

1.06-1.37

0.005

No

90

39.0

141

61.0

1.00

 

 

Living arrangement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Living alone

23

32.4

48

67.6

1.11

0.95-1.30

0.194

resides accompanied

134

4.1

177

56.9

1.00

 

 

Residence time

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

≤ 24 years

71

41.3

101

58.7

1.03

0.89-1.19

0.718

> 24 years

87

41.0

125

59.0

1.00

 

 

Household

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Own

144

41.0

207

59.0

1.05

0.74-1.50

0.771

Relatives/other

14

42.4

19

57.6

1.00

 

 

Health conditions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Smoke

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

5

31.3

11

68.8

1.19

1.02-1.40

0.027

No

153

41.6

215

58.4

1.00

 

 

Alcohol

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

12

36.4

21

63.6

0.95

0.79-1.15

0.612

No

146

41.6

205

58.4

1.00

 

 

Trouble sleeping the night

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

67

44.7

83

55.3

1.05

0.96-1.15

0.311

No

91

38.9

141

61.1

1.00

 

 

Practice physical activity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

33

43.3

43

56.6

0.82

0.72-1.15

0.004

No

125

40.6

183

59.4

1.00

 

 

Corrective lenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

94

41.2

134

58.8

1.14

1.03-1.15

0.010

Variables

Falls

Crude model

 

Yes

No

PR

IC95% (PR)

p

Education

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-literate

63

42.9

84

57.1

0.77

0.65-0.92

0.003

Literate

95

40.1

142

59.9

1.00

 

 

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

≤R$622.00

111

40.2

165

59.8

1.00

0.88-1.15

0.946

>R$622.00

47

43.5

61

56.5

1.00

 

 

Retired

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

121

39.0

189

61.0

1.01

0.84-1.21

0.924

No

37

50.0

37

50.0

1.00

 

 

Marital status

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Married

31

36.9

53

63.1

0.96

0.79-1.18

0.715

Single/widowed/divorced

127

42.3

173

57.7

1.00

 

 

Self-reported color

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

White

57

39.9

86

60.1

0.98

0.85-1.13

0.797

Brown/ Black

15

29.4

36

70.6

1.20

1.02-1.41

0.026

Other

85

45.9

100

54.1

1.00

 

 

Caregiver

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

68

44.4

85

55.6

1.20

1.06-1.37

0.005

No

90

39.0

141

61.0

1.00

 

 

Living arrangement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Living alone

23

32.4

48

67.6

1.11

0.95-1.30

0.194

resides accompanied

134

4.1

177

56.9

1.00

 

 

Residence time

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

≤ 24 years

71

41.3

101

58.7

1.03

0.89-1.19

0.718

> 24 years

87

41.0

125

59.0

1.00

 

 

Household

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Own

144

41.0

207

59.0

1.05

0.74-1.50

0.771

Relatives/other

14

42.4

19

57.6

1.00

 

 

Health conditions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Smoke

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

5

31.3

11

68.8

1.19

1.02-1.40

0.027

No

153

41.6

215

58.4

1.00

 

 

Alcohol

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

12

36.4

21

63.6

0.95

0.79-1.15

0.612

No

146

41.6

205

58.4

1.00

 

 

Trouble sleeping the night

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

67

44.7

83

55.3

1.05

0.96-1.15

0.311

No

91

38.9

141

61.1

1.00

 

 

Practice physical activity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

33

43.3

43

56.6

0.82

0.72-1.15

0.004

No

125

40.6

183

59.4

1.00

 

 

Corrective lenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

94

41.2

134

58.8

1.14

1.03-1.15

0.010

Table 4 shows the prevalence rate of falls (confidence interval 95%) of the independent variables in the subgroups stratified by age. Only variables with a significant association in the sample are described in the final model. Women aged less than 75 years old who smoked, drank, and reported nausea and imbalance had a higher prevalence of falls. Among the oldest women, a dose-response relationship was present between falls and functional capacity of ADL.

Table 4: Final model of multiple hierarchical Poisson regression of the relationship between falls and the independent variables organized by age.

60-74 years old

Variables

PR

95% CI (PR)

p-value

Health service

 

 

 

Public

0.92

0.87-0.98

0.011

Plans

0.96

0.90-1.10

0.113

Private

1.00

 

 

Nausea

 

 

 

Yes

1.10

1.10-1.18

0.005

No

1.00

 

 

Imbalance

 

 

 

Yes

1.12

1.07-1.18

0.001

No

1.00

 

 

Fainting

 

 

 

Yes

1.11

1.01-1.21

0.024

No

1.00

 

 

≥ 75 years

Variables

PR

95% CI (PR)

p-value

Education

 

 

 

Illiterate

0.85

0.76-0.96

0.007

Literate

1.00

 

 

Caregiver

 

 

 

Yes

1.14

1.03-1.26

0.014

No

1.00

 

 

Smoking

 

 

 

Yes

1.37

1.20-1.56

0.001

No

1.00

 

 

Controlled medication

 

 

 

Yes

1.25

1.12-1.41

0.001

No

1.00

 

 

Difficulty walking

 

 

 

Yes

1.37

1.21-1.55

0.001

No

1.00

 

 

Surgery in last year

 

 

 

Yes

1.16

1.04-1.29

0.007

No

1.00

 

 

ADL dependence

 

 

 

Total

1.26

1.09-1.46

0.002

Moderate

1.29

1.16-1.43

0.001

Independent

1.00

 

 

 

 

Discussion

This study showed a high prevalence of falls in Brazilian women, especially among older women. These results are similar to other Brazilian studies [5,17,23], Latin American studies [24], and studies from other countries [10,11,25]. In the present study, the risk of falling was 1.08 times higher in women aged 75 years and older than in younger women (41.1%). The percentage is particularly high compared to data from the SABE study (Salud, Bienestar y Envejecimiento) that was conducted in Sao Paulo with younger women (33.0%) and women over 75 years of age (36.9%) [26]. The literature reveals that a higher incidence of falls is associated with advanced age [2,6,17]. A qualitative study explored why older women No seek care after a fall. Some women No seek help because they believe that their fall-related injury or fall is not serious enough to go to a healthcare provider.

These data highlight the importance of the theme of this study because this prevalence may be higher [27]. Of the 461 women who suffered falls in the previous year, 45.7% had more than one fall, and 22.3% suffered a bone fracture. However, no statistically significant differences were found between age groups. Other studies have shown fall recurrence rates between 30% and 45% and a prevalence of bone fracture between 12% and 19% [6,11,17,23]. These results show that certain age groups are at high risk. Recurrent falls are often associated with minor injuries, whereas a lack of recurrent falls may have greater consequences [11,14]. In this study, women who had a single fall had a lower prevalence of bone fracture compared with those who experienced two or more falls in the previous year, but the difference was not statistically significant. Chronic diseases [28,29], including depression [28-30], osteoporosis [17], and arthritis [28], are known risk factors to increase the probability of falling [31]. In this study, these variables were not associated with outcomes, suggesting that these factors No explain the differences in prevalence between younger and older women.

A possible explanation for these findings is the low prevalence of these diseases in the women in this study We observed that physical activity helped to prevent falls in women of both age groups. However, this association did not remain in the final model. A plausible explanation may be the small number of women who reported some physical activity and experienced no decline in our study (27.2%). A way to minimize the loss of balance due to aging is the practice of physical activities [6,32]. The results from the three-year Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) suggest that the relationship between physical activity and recurrent falling differs by type of activity and is modified by physical performance [32]. In the older group of women, poor visual acuity represented by the use of corrective lenses was associated with a fall ratio of 1.14 (p=0.10). The decrease in visual acuity with increasing age may lead directly to falls because of decreased postural stability or indirectly because of reduced mobility and physical function [15]. The risk model of falls for women aged 60-74 years old was formed by self-report fainting, nausea, and imbalance, which are common symptoms of aging. These variables are related to weakness of the muscles and joints and reduced lower limb strength and functional mobility that are common in this stage of life [29]. These changes may cause difficulty in adapting to an environment and predispose women to falling [17]. Younger women who used public services had a lower incidence of falls compared with those who attended private practices.

A similar study indicated a lower incidence of falls in women who were assisted by the Brazilian public service, but according to these authors, no statistically significant association between falls and health services was found [17]. Considering that approximately 40% of the women over 75 years of age were illiterate, our results should be interpreted with caution. Regarding the caregiver, we must understand this association as a direct reflection of the loss of autonomy and independence that is common in this age group. A low educational level and lack of a caregiver are risk factors for increased incidence of falls in women. Women over 75 years old who used prescription drugs had a 26% increase in the prevalence of falls. Previous studies [6,11,28] show that higher use of medications increases falls. These findings indicate the need for reductions in the number and dosage of prescription drugs and a medication review of women who have suffered a fall to prevent a recurrence [6,28]. The prevalence rate of falls in women who have difficulty walking was 1.37 times higher compared with the women without any limited A statistically significant association was present between smoking and falls in the women, a result also found in another Brazilian study [33].

In the oldest old, surgeries due to falls and fractures are common [34]. The types of surgeries women had undergone were investigated in this study. In this context, the relationship between the prevalence of falls in women who had surgery and fractures is unclear. A fall greatly impacts the lives of women with regard to ADL functioning [23,25,34,36]. Total and moderately ADL-dependent women had a prevalence of falls 26% and 29% higher than the fully independent women, respectively. In, other Brazilian study showed that poor physical performance is associated with more advanced age, more illnesses and less functional independence among older adults fallers [35]. In Project Epidoso - Epidemiology of Aging, which was conducted in Sao Paulo with 1667 older adults using the Brazilian Version of the Multidimensional Functional Assessment Questionnaire (BOMAFQ), the authors observed a direct relationship between female ADL difficulty and incidence of falls [7]. The relationship between falls and functional capacity using the same questionnaires were investigated by other study [17]. Although most independent women had not fallen, this association did not remain in the adjusted model.

This relationship needs to be investigated further because studies have suggested that functional capacity can be a causal determinant as a consequence of the fall [11], especially in older women. Limitations Given that various female populations are different from each other; epidemiological studies comparing age groups represent an important advantage for advancing scientific knowledge of the aging process. However, better standardization of age groups for greater power is needed to compare studies. In this study, the use of the hierarchical theoretical model that includes a proximal functional capacity factor allowed us to analyze the influence of factors on each block and to compare the direct and indirect effect on measures of association for each age group. We recommend replicating this statistical model considering the number of falls as the dependent variable and other independent variables including nutrition, lifestyle, and the environment.

Moreover, the results create a baseline for studies investigating active aging. We were unable to determine whether a temporal relationship exists between the occurrence of falls and other variables. The type of shoes and environmental characteristics at the time of the fall [11], fear of falling [5,11,36], chronic pain [30], and need for medical care [11] are important risk factors that were not investigated in this study. The fall site is another risk factor in various age groups. Falls that occur outdoors are more common in people younger than 75 years, which suggests that these people are more active. In contrast, falls within the domicile occur more often in the most vulnerable, usually the older women [11,37]. Finally, it is important to discuss the data collection methodology. The prevalence of falls was estimated by interviews and could have been directly influenced by memory, the physical and psychological characteristics of the interviewees, and contextual and cultural aspects of each population group.

Conclusion

Despite these limitations, base line AGEQOL study confirmed that the prevalence of falls differed between the two age groups. For women aged 60-74 years, the prevalence of falls was associated with self-reported health status and the type of health services used. Ability to perform ADL, worse health conditions, surgeries, and higher education were risk factors associated with higher prevalence of falls in older women. Others studies are needed to confirm these associations, but our results provide evidence for public policies to address these risk factors to preserve functional independence and autonomy, especially in older women.

Acknowledgment

The study was conducted with financial help from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development – CNPq (481672/2011-7, 305032/2012-7 and 141307/2011-0); the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education – CAPES (process 8314/13-6); Pro-Reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – PRPq/UFMG; and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais – FAPEMIG.

References

1. Veras, R. Envelhecimento populacional contemporâneo: demandas, desafios e inovacoes. Rev Saude Publica. 2009; 43: 548-554.

2. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Search national household sample. Brazil. 2010.

3. Fuentes-García A, Sánchez H, Lera L, Cea X, Albalá C Desigualdades socioeconómicas en el proceso de discapacidad en una cohorte de adultos mayores de Santiago de Chile. Gac Sanit. 2013; 27: 226-232.

4. Gomez F, Curcio CL, Suriyaarachchi P, Demontiero O, Duque G. Differing approaches to falls and fracture prevention between Australia and Colombia. Clin Interv Aging. 2013; 8: 61-67.

5. Gai J, Gomes L, Nóbrega OT, Rodrigues MP. Factors associated with falls in older community-dwelling women. Rev. Assoc Med Bras. 2010; 56: 327-331.

6. Boyé ND, Mattace-Raso FU, Van Lieshout EM, Hartholt KA, Van Beeck EF, Van der Cammen TJ. Physical performance and quality of life in single and recurrent fallers: Data from the Improving Medication Prescribing to Reduce Risk of Falls study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015; 15: 350-355.

7. Perracini, MR, Ramos, LR. Fall-related factors in a cohort of elderly community residents. Rev. Saúde Pública. 2002; 36: 709-716.

8. Gschwind, YJ, Bridenbaugh, SA, Kressig, RW. Gait Disorders and Falls. GeroPsych. 2010; 23: 21-32.

9. American Geriatrics Society, British Geriatrics Society, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel on Falls Prevention. Guidelines for the prevention of falls in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001; 49: 664-672.

10. Kallin K, Lundin–Olsson L, Jensen J, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Predisposing and precipitating factors for falls among older people in residential care. Public Health. 2002; 116: 263-271.

11. Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing. 2006; 35: ii37-41.

12. Agmon M, Belza B, Nguyen HQ, Logsdon RG, Kelly VE. A systematic review of interventions conducted in clinical or community settings to improve dualtask postural control in older adults. Clin Interv Aging. 2014; 25: 477-492.

13. Irez GB, Ozdemir RA, Evin R, Irez SG, Korkusuz F. Integrating Pilates Exercise into an Exercise Program for 65+ Year-Old Women to Reduce Falls. J Sports Sci Med. 2011; 10: 105-111.

14. Hanley A, Silke C, Murphy J. Community-based health efforts for the prevention of falls in the elderly. Clin Interv Aging. 2011; 6: 19-25.

15. Gama ZAS, Gómez-Conesa A. Factores de riesgo de caídas en ancianos: revisión sistemática. Rev. Saúde Pública. 2008; 42: 946-956.

16. Campos ACV, Vargas AMD, Ferreira EF. Satisfação com saúde bucal de idosos brasileiros: um estudo de gênero com modelo hierárquico. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2014; 30: 757-773.

17. Cruz DT, Ribeiro LC, Vieira MT, Teixeira MTB, Bastos RR, Leite ICG. Prevalence of falls and associated factors in older people individuals. Rev. Saúde Pública. 2012; 46: 138-146.

18. Brucki SM, Nitrini R, Caramelli P, Bertolucci PH, Ivan H. Okamoto IH. Sugestões para o Uso do Mini-Exame do Estado Mental no Brasil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2003; 61:777-781.

19. Almeida OP, Almeida AS. Confiabilidade da versão brasileira da Escala de Depressão em Geriatria (GDS) versão reduzida. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1999; 57: 421-426.

20. Duarte YAO, Andrade CL, Lebrão ML. O Índex de Katz na avaliação da funcionalidade dos idosos. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2007; 41:317-325.

21. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969; 9: 179-186.

22. Organización Mundial De La Salud. Aplicacion de la epidemiologia al estúdio de los ancianos: informe de um grupo científico de la OMS. Genebra OMS. 1984.

23. Fhon JRS, Wehbe SCCF, Vendruscolo TRP, Stackfleth R, Rodrigues RAP. Accidental falls in the elderly and their relation with functional capacity. Rev. Latino–Am. Enfermagem. 2012; 20: 927-934.

24. Reyes-Ortiz CA, Al Snih S, Markides KS. Falls among older people persons in Latin America and the Caribbean and among older people Mexican– Americans. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005; 17: 362-369.

25. Lin CH, Liao KC, Pu SJ, Chen YC, Liu MS. Associated factors for falls among the community–dwelling older people assessed by annual geriatric health examinations. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e18976.

26. Lebrão MC, Laurenti R. H Saúde, bem-estar e envelhecimento: o estudo SABE no Município de São Paulo. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2005; 8: 127-141.

27. Dollard J, Braunack–Mayer A, Horton K, Vanlint S. Why older women do or No seek help from the GP after a fall: a qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2014; 31: 222-228.

28. Lawlor DA, Patel R, Ebrahim S. Association between falls in older people women and chronic diseases and drug use: cross sectional study. BMJ Primary care. 2003; 327: 712-717.

29. Stalenhoef PA, Diederiks JP, Knottnerus JA, de Witte LP, Crebolder HF. The construction of a patient record–based risk model for recurrent falls among older people living in the community. Fam Pract. 2000; 17: 490-496.

30. Mirelman A, Herman T, Brozgol M, Dorfman M, Sprecher E, Schweiger A, et al. Executive function and falls in older adults: new findings from a five–year prospective study link fall risk to cognition. PLoS One. 2012; 7: 40297.

31. Perracini MR, Teixeira LF, Ramos JL, Pires RS, Najas MS. Fall–related factors among less and more active older outpatients. Braz. J. Phys. Ther. 2012; 16: 166-172.

32. Peeters GM, Verweij LM, van Schoor NM, Pijnappels M, Pluijm SM, Visser M, et al. Which types of activities are associated with risk of recurrent falling in older persons? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010; 65: 743-750.

33. Coutinho ESF, Silva SD. Uso de medicamentos como fator de risco para fratura grave decorrente de queda em idosos. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2002; 18: 1359-1366.

34. Garcia R, Leme MD, Garcez–Leme LE. Evolution of Brazilian older people with hip fracture secondary to a fall. Clinics. 2006; 6: 539-544.

35. Gomes GAO, Cintra FA, Diogo MJD, Neri AL, Guariento ME, Sousa MLR. Physical performance and number of falls in older adult fallers. Braz. J. Phys. Ther. 2009; 13: 430-437.

36. Párraga MI, Navarro BB, Pretel FA, Denia Muñoz JN, Elicegui MRP, López-Torres,et al. Miedo a las caídas en las personas mayores no institucionalizadas. Gac Sanit. 2010; 24: 453-459.

37. Mänty M, Heinonen A, Viljanen A, Pajala S, Koskenvuo M, Kaprio J, Rantanen T. Outdoor and indoor falls as predictors of mobility limitation in older women. Age Ageing. 2009; 38: 757-761.

Citation

Campos ACV, Vargas AMD, Assis MG, Travassos DV and e Ferreira EF. Hierarchical Model of Factors Associated with Falls in Older Brazilian Community-Dwelling Women. SM J Public Health Epidemiol. 2015; 1(1): 1001.