Back to Journal

SM Journal of Community Medicine

Intra-Articular Steroids; How Soon and How Often after the First Injection?

[ ISSN : 2573-3648 ]

Abstract Citation Introduction Conclusion References
Details

Received: 26-Apr-2016

Accepted: 26-Apr-2016

Published: 05-May-2016

Michael A. Malone¹*, Neha Kaushik¹, and Abdul Waheed¹

¹Family & Community Medicine, Penn State Hershey College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, USA

Corresponding Author:

Michael A. Malone, Penn State Hershey College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 845 Fishburn Road, Hershey, PA 17033-USA, Tel: +001-717- 531-8187; Email: mmalone@hmc.psu. edu

Abstract

Intra-articular steroid joint injections have been used for decades for a variety of common medical diseases. The intra-articular steroids have been shown to be more efficacious than some of their precursors such as formalin, glycerin, lipiodol, lactic acid, and petroleum jelly.

Citation

Malone MA, Kaushik N and Waheed A. Intra-Articular Steroids; How Soon and How Often after the First Injection?. SM J Community Med. 2016; 2(1): 1014

Introduction

Intra-articular steroid joint injections have been used for decades for a variety of common medical diseases. The intra-articular steroids have been shown to be more efficacious than some of their precursors such as formalin, glycerin, lipiodol, lactic acid, and petroleum jelly [1]. Some of the indications of using steroid injections include bursitis, tendonitis, trigger points, and joint conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Although it is a common practice to keep the minimum interval time between injections up to 3 months, the exact time is controversial.

Current Guidelines and Evidence

There is no clear consensus from American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine or American Medical Society for Sports Medicine to specifically address the time duration between joint injections. The American College of Rheumatology 2002 recommendations for rheumatoid management suggest local steroid injections be given to relieve symptoms but not to inject the same joint more than once every 3 months[2]. However, the reasoning behind waiting for this duration is not evident through any randomized controlled studies. Additional recommendations state that if there is a need for numerous injections in the same joint or in multiple joints, an assessment of the treatment regimen should take place [2]. More recent guidelines since 2002 do not further comment on the interval between injection times with supplement clarity.

For many primary care providers and sports medicine physicians, caution is taken for concern of systemic effects of glucocorticoids. These include tendon rupture, Cushing’s syndrome, radiologic deterioration of joints, fat necrosis, cataracts, and diabetes. There is some evidence from animal models that suggests cartilage breakdown of joint over time, and its acceleration through frequent glucocorticoid injections [3]. Interestingly enough, many clinical studies argue against this and frequent dosing of intra-articular injection has shown to provide cartilage safety. Gray and colleagues showed that patients with RA were able to absorb up to 10 injections per joint per year without any glucocorticoid-induced cartilage deterioration [4]. Clinical reports by Balch et al. showed that repetitive glucocorticoid injections were correlated with a low rate of accelerated osteoarthritic change [5]. This does not; however settle if the osteoarthritic changes that occurred were due to the natural progression of osteoarthritis or due to the numerous joint injections.

Numerous non-primate studies exist to support the use of frequent glucocorticoid intra-articular joint injections but primate-based randomized well-studied trials are lacking to show efficacy or lack thereof. For example, a study by Hills et al. was performed in equine models to determine if glucocorticoids could increase the secretion of lubricating surfactant, which in turn could reduce the tension at the cartilage surface, provide adequate cartilage hydration, and increase scavengers of free radicals. They found an increasing amount of surfactant production in the group receiving glucocorticoid injections compared to the control group receiving saline injections [6]. Other studies show that glucocorticoids not only increase surfactant levels but minimize the production capacity of collagenases and other metalloproteases which reduce cartilage destruction from rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis [7, 8]. These studies suggest that intra-articular glucocorticoid therapy may in fact provide a protective mechanism against the inflammation of rheumatologic and osteoarthritic diseases which begs the thought that perhaps physicians are too conservative in their notion to provide only four injections per year or waiting as often as they do before considering reinjecting into the same joint.

There is some patient-based research on a small and nonrandomized scale, showing that repeated intra-articular glucocorticoid injections such as ten injections per year did not show as severe a deterioration on X-ray imaging in the majority of the patient-panel [9]. In another well designed trial of 68 patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis, two groups received intra-articular glucocorticoids or placebo of saline solution every 3 months for 2 years, in a randomized fashion. Radiographic images and clinical assessments after 2 years did not demonstrate differing effects between cartilage thickness, proposing that repeated injections in OA patients is neither condor-destructive or chondro-protective[10]. Many other small-scale studies exist to support that frequent glucocorticoid injection may offer chondro-protection. Some data suggest that intra-articular injections show improved signs and symptoms in RA and juvenile idiopathic arthritis compared to OA.

In a recent interview posted on the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons website, Dr. Constance Chu who co-authored a study on the effects of local anesthetics on articular chondrocytes in the March 2010 issue of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American articulated her views regarding effects of local anesthetics when combined with steroid injections as follows “The parallels between this research and research on cortisone injections are very important. Several studies back in the 1960s and 1970s-many performed by Henry J. Mankin, MD-suggested that corticosteroids might have a detrimental effect on the articular cartilage. But we continue to give steroid injections today, because they work so well to relieve the pain of osteoarthritis. But because of Dr. Mankin’s work, physicians are aware of the potential toxic effects on cartilage” [11, 12].

Conclusion

In conclusion, much controversy exists about the time frame between steroid injections into joints. The American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine and American Medical Society for Sports Medicine do not have specific guidelines of the timeline between joint injections. The 2002 American College of Rheumatology guidelines suggest waiting at least 3 months. This however is all very low level evidence, based mainly on animal models. Clinical evidence, on the contrary, indicates that frequent injections can minimize inflammation and serve as protective factor for cartilage while others show eventual degeneration and progression of disease. The effects of gluco-corticoid injections have variable effects on RA versus OA as well in terms of minimizing pain and eventual cartilage changes. The standard of care is to inject active and large joints affected by RA as often as once per month for three months, but with a limit of four injections per year for any given joint. For osteoarthritic joints, gluco-corticoid injections are performed every three months while no other therapy is available [13]. In patients who may go for total joint replacement, the frequency of injection may be increased although the systemic effects of steroid should be considered. All recommendations however are based on poor and old data. The need to have long-term well randomized clinical trials in human subjects is needed to determine appropriate time frame between joint injections as current recommendations from various expert institutions are unclear

References

1. Hollander JL, Brown EM Jr, Jessar RA, Brown CY. Hydrocortisone and cortisone injected into arthritic joints; comparative effects of and use of hydrocortisone as a local antiarthritic agent. J Am Med Assoc. 1951; 147: 1629-1635.

2. American College of Rheumatology subcommittee on Rheumatoid Arthritis Guidelines. Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: 2002 Update. Arthritis Rheum. 2002; 46: 328-346.

3. Behrens F, Shepard N, Mitchell N. Alterations of rabbit articular cartilage by intra-articular injections of glucocorticoids. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975; 57: 70-76.

4. Gray RG, Tenenbaum J, Gottlieb NL. Local corticosteroid injection treatment in rheumatic disorders. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1981; 10: 231-254.

5. Balch HW, Gibson JM, El-Ghobarey AF, Brain LS, Lynch MP. Repeated corticosteroid injections into knee joints. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1977; 16: 137 140.

6. Hills BA, Ethell MT, Hodgson DR. Release of lubricating synovial surfactant by intra-articular steroid. Br J Rheumatol. 1998; 37: 649-652.

7. Pelletier JP, Martel-Pelletier J, Cloutier JM, Woessner JF Jr. Proteoglycan degrading acid metalloprotease activity in human osteoarthritic cartilage, and the effect of intraarticular steroid injections. Arthritis Rheum. 1987; 30: 541 548.

8. Lohmander LS, Hoerrner LA, Lark MW. Metalloproteinases, tissue inhibitor, and proteoglycan fragments in knee synovial fluid in human osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1993; 36: 181-189.

9. Balch HW, Gibson JM, El-Ghobarey AF, Brain LS, Lynch MP. Repeated corticosteroid injections into knee joints. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1977; 16: 137 140.

10. Raynauld JP, Buckland-Wright C, Ward R, Choquette D, Haraoui B, Martel Pelletier J, et al. Safety and efficacy of long-term intraarticular steroid injections in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2003; 48: 370-377.

11. Chu CR, Coyle CH, Chu CT, Szczodry M, Sheshadri V, Karpie JC, et al. In vivo effects of single intra-articular injection of 0.5% bupivacaine on articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 599-608.

12. Porucznik MA. Raising a red flag on intra- articular injections. AAOS Now. 2010.

13. Intra-articular injections for osteoarthritis of the knee. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 2006; 48: 25-27

Other Articles

Article Image 1

Breaking Bad News in Cancer Patients

Editorial:

Breaking bad news gives us the same touch of fear, anxiety, and sadness that we experience as a child, when an epic hero collapses. Despite several approaches identified by clinical and psychological research to make this task less painful, a physician seldom feels totally prepared and the way to break bad news never gets easier. Having these conversations is inevitable in certain specialties like emergency medicine, surgery and oncology.

Dipesh Uprety* and Vineela Kasireddy


Article Image 1

Evidence of Validity of the Brazilian Version of ADS: Assessment of Attitudes towards Disabilities

Introduction: The number of people with disabilities in Brazil and worldwide has grown considerably in recent decades. However, prejudice and stigma faced by this population have not decreased yet. Negative attitudes towards people with disabilities can impose barriers to functionality and quality of life. Cross-cultural measures of attitudes towards disability can help identify these barriers and contribute to the development of intervention strategies. Objectives: To provide evidence of validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of a World Health Organization cross-cultural instrument designed to assess attitudes towards disability (Attitudes to Disability Scale, ADS) from the perspective of people with physical disabilities (ADS-D) and Intellectual Disabilities (ADS-ID).

Methods: A total of 162 people with physical disabilities and 156 with intellectual disabilities participated in the study. Classical psychometrics was used to analyze the two samples independently. Evidence of criterion validity (concurrent type) was obtained by Mann-Whitney test for non-normal distributions. Evidence of reliability was calculated with Cronbach alpha for the instrument scales and subscales. Test-retest reliability was assessed for people with intellectual disabilities through intraclass correlation coefficient and Wilcoxon test.

Results: ADS-D showed better levels of internal consistency than ADS-ID. Evidence of discriminant validity was verified. Evidence of test-retest reliability was not conclusive. Conclusion: Results suggest the maintenance of the factor structure revealed in the cross-cultural study to assess the attitudes towards disabilities in the Brazilian population. Studies with larger samples are needed for the investigation of additional evidence of validity and reliability.

Juliana Bredemeier1,2,3*, Marilyn Agranonik1,2,3,4, Tatiana Spalding Perez3 and
Marcelo Pio de Almeida Fleck1,2


Article Image 1

Maternal Smoking during Pregnancy and Adolescent Smoking Initiation and Continuation: A Prospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Our study uses data on smoking by mother before pregnancy, during pregnancy and their current smoking to examine the risk of tobacco smoking and early initiation of smoking by their adolescent children in a middle-income country

Methods: The present analysis is based on data from the Ukrainian component of the European Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood (ELSPAC). Main exposure was smoking by mother. Smoking status of the adolescent and age of smoking initiation, reported at the 16-years-old follow-up, were outcome measures. Data were analyzed using multivariate binary logistic regression model separately for boys and girls.

Results: Of 2148 women who agreed to participate, 1020 were available for complete follow-up until their study children were 16-years-old. The odds of current smoking among girls whose mothers smoked during pregnancy was higher (OR = 2.48, CI = 1.09-5.64) compared to girls with non-smoking mothers. Boys whose mothers currently smoked, but didn’t smoke during pregnancy, had twice higher odds (OR=2.08, CI = 1.16-3.74) to be smokers, compared to boys with mothers who never smoked. After control for confounders, the risk of early initiation of smoking by adolescent girls was still higher (OR= 2.05, CI=0.94-4.48) among girls whose mothers smoked during pregnancy

Conclusions: Prenatal tobacco exposure was associated with increased risk of early initiation of cigarette smoking and current smoking by adolescent girls, but not by boys. The possible explanation is that biological influences are more important for girls, but boys are more susceptible to social influences.

Olena Iakunchykova1, Tatiana I. Andreeva1*, Zoreslava Shkiryak-Nizhnyk2, Yuri
Antipkin2, Daniel Hryhorczuk3, Alexander Zvinchuk2 and Natalia Chislovska2


Article Image 1

The Burden of Malnutrition in India: Time to Strengthen Human Resource and Infrastructure

Globally, about 20 million children less than five years of age suffer from Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM), and nearly 33 million children experience Moderately Acute Malnutrition (MAM).

Ahankari Anand¹˒²* and Marufu Takawira¹


Article Image 1

Prehypertension - An Unnoticed Catastrophe in Bangladesh

The term ‘Hypertension’ is very familiar to us and is one of the undeniable public health concerns in Bangladesh. Research indicates that higher the blood pressure, the higher the risk of getting ischemic heart disease, stroke, heart failure and kidney diseases.

Fakir Md. Yunus¹˒²*


Article Image 1

Community Initiatives and Medical Education: Time to Strengthen the Commitment

It is obvious that today’s health crisis in industrialized nations has shifted from communicable infectious issues to non-communicable diseases, especially ones of lifestyle (e.g., diabetes, coronary artery disease, substance abuse).

Panagis Galiatsatos*


Article Image 1

The Emerging Co-epidemics of TB-Diabetes

Tuberculosis infects, about 9.0 million people worldwide every year. It killed 1.5 million people in the year 2014. It is a communicable disease of the lung, which is transmitted from person to person. Tuberculosis can be cured if the proper medicines are taken for the prescribed period of time under direct supervision of the health worker (called DOTS program).

*Gajananda Prakash Bhandari


Article Image 1

Community Health Workers Can Have an Integral Role in Community Medicine

In the editorial of last month’s issue, Dr. Galiatsatos challenged young physicians to “Motivate the Community, Implement Health and Wellness Initiatives, and Thus Empower Our Patients to Better Manage their Diseases”. This is a daunting task for physicians to do themselves, even with community partnerships. Nonetheless, physicians can be effective team leaders in this effort if they build the patient centered medical home and use their healthcare team members wisely.

Wayne C Miller*


Article Image 1

Dual Contraceptive Utilization and Associated Factors among People Living with HIV Attending ART Clinic in Fitche Hospital, Ethiopia

Background: HIV/AIDS continues to have disastrous medical, economic, social, and physical impacts on individuals, their communities and the nations of the world. Sub-Saharan Africa is at the epicenter of the epidemic and continues to carry the full brunt of its health and socioeconomic impact. Dual protection is a strategy that prevents both unwanted pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs), including HIV, is emerging as an important preventive approach in reproductive health. Evidence relating to dual contraceptive utilization and reproductive intentions among PLHIV is rare, despite the fact that more than 80% of PLHIV are of reproductive age. The aim of the study was to determine dual contraceptive utilization and associated factors among PLHIV attending ART clinic in Fitche Hospital.

Methods: A facility based cross-sectional study design with both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods was employed from February 21st-April 20th, 2013. The study participants were selected by using simple random sampling technique. A pre-tested structured questionnaire was used to collect data. Both bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify associated factors.

Result: The prevalence of dual contraceptive utilization of PLHIV in Fitche Hospital was 81 (32%) with 95% CI of (26.4% -38.2%) had dual contraceptives users by themselves or their partners. With regarding to married/ cohabited partner’s HIV status 143 (70.4%) were HIV-Positive (concordant) and 60 (29.6%) were Negative (discordant). This study identified that factors found to be associated with dual contraceptive utilization were: Age at first marriage < 18 years (Early marriage) [AOR = 3.44, 95% CI: 1.27- 9.29)], had more than 4 biological living children [AOR =10.24, 95% CI: 1.29- 81.06)], faced pregnancy since HIV diagnosis [AOR =2.05, 95% CI: 1.78- 5.46)], had no fertility desire [AOR = 8.58, 95% CI: 3.42- 21.52)] and had sexual practiced with Husband/wife [AOR =4.9, 95% CI: 1.59- 15.07)] were some of the factors significantly associated with dual contraceptive utilization.

Conclusion: The prevalence of dual contraceptive utilization of PLHIV in Fitche Hospital was 81 (32%). In this study: Age at first marriage, biological living children, pregnancy since HIV diagnosis, fertility desire and sexual practiced were demonstrated significantly associated with dual contraceptive utilizations among PLHIV, therefore, these factors should be emphatically considered during PLHIV’s reproductive health program development.

Dereje Bayissa Demissie¹*, Teka Girma¹, and Gizachew Abdissa²


Article Image 1

Trauma, PTSD, and Traumatic Grief among Palestinian Children

Aim: The aim of this study was to find the relationship between war traumatic experiences due to war on Gaza, PTSD, and traumatic grief in Palestinian children.

Methods: The sample included randomly selected 374 children aged 6-16 years. Children completed measures of experience of traumatic events (Gaza Traumatic Checklist), Child Post Traumatic Stress Reaction Index, and Traumatic Grief inventory.

Results: Palestinians children experiences variety of traumatic events. No sex differences in reporting trauma. Mean traumatic events reported by children was 12.80 traumatic events. The study showed that 9.3% of the participants lost someone during the war. Mean traumatic grief in boys was 19.96 and 18.29 in girls. For PTSD, 1.3% of children showed no PTSD, 7.2% reported mild PTSD reactions, 29.9% showed moderate PTSD reactions, and 61.5% showed severe to very severe PTSD reactions. Trauma exposure was significantly associated with PTSD. No sex differences in PTSD.

Conclusions: This study revealed that children living in area of conflict and war are at risk of developing mental health problems. Study showed that children with traumatic grief need psychosocial support from families and community to enable them of passing through their grief. Moreover, parents have to be involved in all activities given to their children and to be part of such activities to enable them better communication with their children and being able of detecting children with pathological grief and enable them of helping children in overcoming the effect of grief and trauma.

Thabet AA¹*, Ahmad Abu Tawahina², Raija-Leena Punamäki³, and Panos Vostanis⁴