Back to Journal

International Journal of Fisheries Science and Research

Massive Chinese Fleet Jeopardizes Threatened Shark Species around the Galápagos Marine Reserve and Waters off Ecuador: Implications for National and International Fisheries Policy

Abstract Citation Editorial Acknowledgements References
Details

Received: 22-Sep-2017

Accepted: 26-Sep-2017

Published: 29-Sep-2017

Alava JJ1,2*, Barragán-Paladines MJ3, Denkinger J4, Muñoz-Abril L4, Jiménez PJ2, Paladines F5, Valle CA4, Tirapé A6, Gaibor N7, Calle M6, Calle P6, Reyes H8, Espinoza E8 and Grove JS9

1Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Canada 

2Fundación Ecuatoriana para el Estudio de Mamíferos Marinos (FEMM), Guayaquil, Ecuador 

3Department of Social Sciences, Development and Knowledge Sociology Working Group, Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research -ZMT, Bremen, Germany 

4Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Galapagos Science Center GSC, Ecuador 

5California Western School of Law, San Diego, USA 

6Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Campus Gustavo Galindo, Guayaquil, Ecuador 

7Instituto Nacional de Pesca, Letamendi 102 y La Ría Guayaquil, Ecuador 

8Direccion del Parque Nacional Galapagos, Ministerio del Ambiente, Avenida Charles Darwin, Galápagos, Ecuador 

9J.S. Grove Photography, USA

Corresponding Author:

Alava JJ, Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada; Tel: 604-291-0019

Abstract

Being a UNESCO-World Heritage Site, the Galápagos harbors the largest global shark biomass in the world’s oceans and a unique marine biodiversity.

Citation

Alava JJ, Barragán-Paladines MJ, Denkinger J, Muñoz-Abril L, Jiménez PJ, Paladines F, et al. Massive Chinese Fleet Jeopardizes Threatened Shark Species around the Galápagos Marine Reserve and Waters off Ecuador: Implications for National and International Fisheries Policy. Int J Fisheries Sci Res. 2017; 1(1): 1001.

Editorial

Being a UNESCO-World Heritage Site, the Galápagos harbors the largest global shark biomass in the world’s oceans [1] and a unique marine biodiversity [2]. However, the waters around the Galapagos Islands have regularly been susceptible to fishing assaults by local and foreign industrial fleets, including Colombian, Costa Rican, Japanese, Taiwanese and Korean, which have illegally practiced shark fining, i.e. the wasteful practice of removing of dorsal, pelvic and pectoral fins from sharks [2-4]. In 2001, the Galápagos National Park seized a Costa Rican vessel with >1000 shark fins, killing at least 200 sharks [3], while an Ecuadorian vessel containing a total of 379 sharks from seven shark species was seized by the Ecuadorian Navy and Galápagos National Park in 2011 [4]. This has now obviously become a persistent, problem within and around the Galápagos Marine Reserve (GMR) [2,3], evoking a classic case of the “Tragedy of the Commons” [5]. The removal of high tropic level fish and marine predators such as groupers, dolphin fish, marlins, tuna and sharks can cause severe trophic cascade effects in the Galápagos marine ecosystem [2] with serious consequences to the socio-economic welfare of Galápagos and Ecuador’s coastal small-scale fishing communities [6].

On the morning of 19 July, 2017, a report alarming the presence of Chinese vessels near to the Galápagos Islands drew attention to the Galapagos National Park and Ecuadorian Navy who immediately deployed a coast guard vessel, from the operation center at San Cristobal Island (Galápagos), to the site where the fleet was observed. Once in the location, approximately 300 vessels under Chinese flag were identified as long liners, as factory ships, as cargo ships and as tanker boats, transporting fuel. Due to the serious legal violation within Ecuadorian waters jurisdiction by the Chinese fleet, the Ecuadorian Navy ordered to deploy a naval aircraft to explore and confirm the illegal activity by producing photographic evidence about the event.

On August 2017, a Chinese fishing fleet comprising about 300 boats (e.g., fishing, cargo and fuel boats and at least one factory ship) was detected in international waters (i.e. the high seas) and near the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ) of Galápagos Islands and waters off Ecuador’s coast in the Southeastern Tropical Pacific. This Chinese industrial fishing fleet has thus far emerged as an immediate threat for regional marine species [6], mainly apex predators such as hammerhead sharks that migrate through a regional marine corridor in close connection to the Galápagos’ sanctuary waters for breeding, feeding and refuging, located at the far north of the GMR and Galapagos Archipelago (i.e. Darwin and Wolf islands) [1,7,8].

On 13 August, 2017, a Chinese factory-mother ship (Fu Yuan Yu Leng 999) (Figure 1) navigating within the GMR (i.e. at about 0°38’37”S-89°03’09”W) was caught carrying ≈300 tons of fish; and subsequently, the vessel and the illegal fish catch were confiscated by Ecuador’s Armada and the Galápagos National Park [6,9-11].

Figure 1: The Chinese mother ship (Fu Yuan Yu Leng 999) containing 300 tons of fish that was seized by the Galápagos National Park and Ecuador’s Navy in August 2017. The ship was anchored at Bahía Tijeretas (Darwin Cove), San Cristóbal Island, Galápagos. Photo credit: Judith Denkinger.

The illegal marine catch was composed by tuna fish (Thunnus spp.), species which are currently undergoing a regional large-scale seasonal closure in the Southeastern Pacific, as per recommended by the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATCC), of which Ecuador and China are both signatory countries (https://www.iattc. org/HomeENG.htm). The illegal catch also included 6000 finned sharks that fall within categories of threatened species under the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) status, as the Vulnerable (VU) pelagic thresher shark (Alopias pelagicus, [12]), the Near Threatened (NT) silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis, [13]); and, of particular concern, the Endangered (EN) scalloped hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna lewini, [14]); [6,9,11], as shown in (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Thousands of sharks were found in a Chinese mother ship illegally f ishing in the jurisdiction of the Galápagos Marine Reserve’s waters in August 2017. Among the species caught, scalloped hammerhead sharks (S.lewini), which is an endangered shark under the IUCN threatened categories [14], were found (see white arrows in the photo).

Source: National Geographic (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2017/08/ wildlife-watch-galapagos-illegal-shark-fishing/) [9].

From the total number of sharks (i.e. 6000 individuals) harvested by this fleet, and assuming that both the first grade fins (i.e. the first dorsal fin, pair of pectoral fins and lower lobe of the tail, as most desirable fins) and lower grade fins (i.e. the second dorsal fin, pair of ventral fins and anal fin) were removed it is estimated that at least 48,000 fins were illegally extracted from these sharks to be traded in the Asian illegal market [3] where shark fin soup is still considered a delicacy and a status-symbol for Asian countries [3].

Similar to the shark species illegally harvested some stocks of tuna, including the yellow fin tuna (Thunnus albacares) and big eye tuna (Thunnus obesus) from the eastern Pacific Ocean, are considered as declining and categorized as Near Threatened (NT) and Vulnerable (VU), respectively, by the IUCN [15,16]. In 2004, The IATCC [17] imposed conservation measures (i.e. fishing closure) to maintain sustainable tuna stocks in this region of the Pacific [18]. Thus, the illegal harvest of tuna by the Chinese fleet is a looming threat for the recovery of both species that the entire region is trying to achieve through the IATTC agreement.

The material evidence of the illegal catch showed that the fishing system used by this fleet was long lines (1000 hooks/line) deployed near or within the jurisdiction of GMR’s waters [9]. It was reported that these long lines were deployed to create a kind of “fishing wall”, in which not only sharks were caught, but also sea turtles, manta rays and tuna. Because most of these species are highly migratory and move beyond the 200 miles of Ecuador’s EEZ, through the high seas and within the GMR (i.e. leaving and entering the GMR), it seems fair to claim that these species were illegally caught or by caught by this fleet hooks.

As aforementioned, China is a signatory member of the IATTC and also is part of the 1982 United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) [19]. As the actual fishing activity was conducted during an obligatory seasonal closure for the large-scale tuna fishing fleet (purse seiners) imposed by the IATTC to reduce fishing effort for tuna fisheries throughout the Southeastern Tropical Pacific, the Chinese fleet openly violated, first, their legal obligation to fulfill the IATTC regulations; second, the legal protection of the GMR provided by the Special Law of the Galapagos Archipelago; and, finally, the “Rights of Nature” represented by the fisheries and marine resources in the GMR, granted by the 2008 National Ecuadorian Constitution, which recognizes natural resources as subjects of legal recognition and juridical protection.

The encounter of the massive Chinese fleet around the Galapagos region is not an isolated event. China is currently fishing in international waters (i.e. the high seas) of numerous countries because this nation has already depleted local fish stocks and marine living resources from their own national waters [18]. The fisheries subsidies implemented by the Chinese government to enhance the expansion of fishing vessels to harvest in distant-water fisheries have increased the fishing effort of China’s fleet operation in many nations, including Asia, Africa, Central and South America [19]. In Senegal and other Africa’s western countries, marine resources have been seriously depleted due to corrupt government practices and fishing access agreements granted to China and other nations to exploit and profit from fishing resources within their national jurisdictions [19-21].

We claim that international, regional, and national legal instruments should be used in order to legally sanction China for its repeated and systematic violation of international regulations and sustainable fisheries practices. Controversies arise, however, concerning the role of China in the current Ecuador’s economy. In fact, China has provided about 60 percent of Ecuador’s government budget [22], and there has been portrayed that Ecuador has had an indulgent attitude with China, when other resources (e.g., protection of timber) have been affected in the Amazon rain forest [22].

While the Ecuador’s Armada and the Galápagos National Park have continued deploying substantial efforts (e.g., air, water and underwater control and surveillance systems by launching boats, helicopters, airplanes and even a submarine) to overcome illegal fisheries and control marine/maritime traffic, these government institutions still lack of sufficient and long-term funding to cover all the associated costs derived by the economic and logistic resources needed to successfully continue monitoring and implement concerted surveillance efforts (i.e. the combination of the Automatic Identification System (AIS) and satellite tracking technology with the globalfishingwatch.org initiative may well be a step in the right direction to combat illegal fishing) to safeguard and protect the marine ecosystems in the GMR and within the adjacent waters and high seas against assaults perpetrated by foreign industrial fishing fleets.

Ecuador, a country currently undergoing political challenges is in need of support from the international community to prevent and mitigate illegal fisheries and other anthropogenic impacts affecting the conservation of biodiversity in marine areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ). Many exploited species of sharks are globally declining [23] and several of them have been protected by national laws and international treaties because of their precarious conservation status [24,25]. Moreover, the need of shark conservation and sustainable use should be part of Ecuador’s national and international fisheries policy, using the case of shark fining and the multimillion dollar business of illegal international trafficking of shark fins as a strong rationale for preventing the continued depredation of sharks [26]. The international community is thus called to act accordingly to the mandates of UNESCO, UNCLOS, FAO’s Code of Conduct for Sustainable Fisheries, and the Voluntary Guidelines for Fisheries Sustainability. Meanwhile, the Ecuadorian government must be vigilant and support any decisions and action with proactive measures to prevent foreign fleets to illegally harvest our fishing resources, and also demand China and other countries to refrain from exploiting marine resources in Ecuador and to repair the ecological damages for their illegal activity.

Acknowledgements

The first author specially thanks the editor and editorial board of the International Journal of Fisheries Science and Research for the gentle invitation to contribute to the first inaugural issue of this journal.

References

1. Salinas de León P, Cuña-Marrero D, Rastoin E, Friedlander AM, Donovan MK, Sala E. Largest global shark biomass found in the northern Galápagos Islands of Darwin and Wolf. PeerJ. 2016; 4: e1911.

2. Schiller L, Alava JJ, Grove J, Reck G, Pauly D. The demise of Darwin’s f ishes: evidence of fishing down and illegal shark finning in the Galápagos Islands. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwater Ecosyst. 2014; 25: 431-446.

3. Jacquet J, Alava JJ, Pramod G, Henderson S, Zeller D. In hot soup: sharks captured in Ecuador’s waters. Environ Sci. 2008; 5: 269-283.

4. Carr LA, Stier AC, Fietz K, Montero I, Gallagher AJ, Bruno JF. Illegal shark f ishing in the Galapagos Marine Reserve. Mar Policy. 2013; 39: 317-321.

5. Hardin G. The tragedy of the Commons. Science. 1968; 162: 1243-1248.

6. Alava JJ, Paladines F. Illegal fishing on the Galapagos high seas. Science 2017; 357: 1362.

7. Ketchum JT, Hearn A, Klimley AP, Espinoza E, Peñaherrera C, Largier JL. Seasonal changes in movements and habitat preferences of the scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini) while refuging near an oceanic island. Mar Biol. 2014; 161: 755-767.

8. Ketchum JT, Hearn A, Klimley AP, Peñaherrera C, Espinoza E, Bessudo S, et.al. Inter-island movements of scalloped hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna lewini) and seasonal connectivity in a marine protected area of the eastern tropical Pacific. Mar Biol. 2014; 161: 939-951.

9. Bale R. Thousands of sharks found on boat in huge illegal haul. National Geographic. 2017.

10. BBC News. Ecuador detains Chinese boat with endangered sharks. 2017.

11. EL UNIVERSO. WWF identificó especies bajo amenaza en carga detenida de barco chino. 2017.

12. Reardon M, Márquez F, Trejo T, Clarke SC. Alopias pelagicus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2009.

13. Rigby CL, Sherman CS, Chin A, Simpfendorfer C. Carcharhinus falciformis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2016.

14. Baum J, Clarke S, Domingo A, Ducrocq M, Lamónaca AF, Gaibor N, et al. Sphyrna lewini. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2007.

15. Collette B, Acero A, Amorim AF, Boustany A, Canales Ramirez C, Cardenas G, et al. Thunnus albacares. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2011.

16. Collette B, Acero A, Amorim AF, Boustany A, Canales Ramirez C, Cardenas G, et al. Thunnus obesus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2011.

17. IATTC. The Fishery for Tunas and Billfishes in the Eastern Pacific Ocean in 2007. In: IATTC Document IATTC-78-05 (ed.), IATTC 78th Meeting 23-27 June 2008. Panama. 2008.

18. UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea). Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea. Oceans and Law of the Sea. 1982.

19. Belhabib D, Sumaila UR, Lam VWY, Zeller D, Le Billon P, Abou Kane E, et al. Euros vs. Yuan: Comparing European and Chinese Fishing Access in West Africa. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10: 0118351.

20. Pauly D, Belhabib D, Blomeyer R, Cheung WWL, Cisneros-Montemayor AM, Copeland D, et al. China’s distant-water fisheries in the 21st century. Fish and Fisheries. 2014; 15: 474-488.

21. Standing A. Corruption and industrial fisheries in Africa. Michelsen Institute. Bergen: CHR. 2008; 7: 1-29.

22. Koening K. Amazon threatened by China-Ecuador loans for oil. China dialogue, china and the world discuss the environment. 2017.

23. Worm B, Davis B, Kettemer L, Ward-Paige CA, Chapman D, Heithaus MR, et al. Global catches, exploitation rates, and rebuilding options for sharks. Mar Policy. 2013; 40: 194-204.

24. Davis B, Worm B. The international plan of action for sharks: How does national implementation measure up? Mar Policy. 2013; 38: 312-320.

25. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. International plan of action for the conservation and management of sharks. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. 2012.

26. Chiriboga High DL. La conservación de las especies en la política internacional del Ecuador, caso: aletas de tiburón. Universidad de Guayaquil. 2013; 87.

Other Articles

Article Image 1

The Relationship between Behavior Responses and Brain Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) Activity of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) in Cadmium Stress

In this research, the toxic effects of Cadmium chloride (CdCl2 ), which can seriously pollute aquatic environment and threaten human health, are evaluated based on the behavior responses and the brain Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity of zebrafish (Danio rerio). The results showed that Behavior Strength (BS) of test groups (changed from 0.15 to 0.65), which was recorded using an online behavior monitoring system, was lower than the control groups (changed from 0.65 to 0.85). The behavior responses of zebrafish suggested that both dose and time effect relationships existed between Cd2+ stress and zebrafish BS. Meanwhile, the brain Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity of zebrafish were strongly inhibited by Cd2+: the AChE activities were lower than 60% after 0.5h Cd2+ exposure in both 1 TU (Toxic Unit) and 2 TU. The AChE activities in 0.1 TU Cd2+ treatment were about 60% in the first 2h and then increased to about 100% in 4h with a decrease tendency in the following exposure time (8h to 48h), which changed from 100% to 70%-80%. Totally, the brain AChE activities of zebrafish showed similar rules with BS after correlation analysis, which might provide an understanding of the ecotoxicological assessment of heavy metal Cd based on zebrafish.

Meiyi Yang1,2#, Lizhen Ji1,2#, Xu Zhang2, Yuqi Fan1,2* and Zongming Ren1,2*


Article Image 1

Neritic Larval Fish Distribution in the Oceanic Area of the Campeche Bay, Gulf of Mexico

Composition and abundance of larval fishes in Campeche Bay were studied during two seasons, winter, 2013 (24 stations) and summer, 2014 (31 stations). Sampling was carried out with open-close nets, mouth 75 cm and 505 µm mesh. The data of salinity and temperature allowed distinguishing three oceanic sub-regions: North, East, and West. There were 236 taxa, belonging to 74 families, 168 species, 154 taxa occurred in winter and 171 in summer; the composition in both cruises was similar with around 70 % of oceanic and 30 % of neritic larvae. The larval density was almost three times larger in summer than winter. The Campeche Bay hydrodynamics fits well with the results; the West sub-region is located where a cyclonic gyre takes place, the North and East sub regions are located in the area of influence of warm currents over the Yucatan shelf. The hydrodynamics also allows understanding the differences in the proportion of neritic larvae among the three oceanic sub-regions, the West and East with the lower and higher number of neritic larvae, respectively. The large difference among regions is related to some neritic taxa occurring exclusively in some of them. Of the total taxa, 55 neritic occurred only once and it means that more than a half of neritic taxa were represented by one organism, 31 from 85 neritic taxa occurred in the layers of 600 to 1000 m depth. Of the neritic larvae, only Syacium papillosum and Apogon sp. appear among the 20 more abundant.

Flores-Coto C*, Zavala-García F and Sanvicente-Añorve L


Article Image 1

Effect of Photoperiod on Eggs Hatchability, Growth and Survivability of Hybrid Catfish (Heterobranchus bidorsalis X Clarias gariepinus) Larvae

This study was conducted to determine the effects of photoperiod on egg hatchability, growth and survivability of hybrid catfish (Heterobranchus bidorsalis X Clarias gariepinus) larvae, using hormone-induced spawning method. Eggs were stripped from two sexually matured and healthy female Clarias gariepinus of average weight of 1kg/each and fertilized with milt from two sexually matured male Heterobranchus bidorsalis of average weight of 2kg/each. An average of five hundred (500) eggs were introduced into each ten aquaria tanks of size 70cm x 45cm x 40cm/tank, using a pre- determined spoonful estimation at five photoperiod regimes: (T1) 24L:00D (Light:Darkness); (T2) 18L:6D; (T3) 12L:12D; (T4) 6L:18D and (T5) 00L:24D in two replicates. Aquaria tanks were arranged in a flow- through system at a flow rate of 1.5L/min with aerators to maintain good water condition. Provision of light during the night for illumination of the aquaria tanks was kept constant at 1200 1x, using solar panel (Mono)/inverter (Microtex) light energy. Growth and survivability of the fish larvae were monitored for six weeks. They were fed with laboratory-cultured live feed (Daphnia) to achieve maximum feed utilization. Percentage hatchability of eggs and best growth performance of fish larvae were significantly (p<0.05) highest (92.5%, 91.2 ± 0.21mg) respectively in T5 (00L:24D), while percentage survivability of hatchlings was significantly (p<0.05) highest (94.4%) in T3 (12L:12D). It was observed in this study that the highest hatchability of eggs and optimum growth performance of hatchlings were under complete darkness, with reduced survivability of fish, as a result of observed cannibalism. The fish were photophobic. To achieve a balance result in terms of hatchability of eggs, growth and survivability of fish fry, it is suggested that incubation and hatching of eggs should be done under complete darkness, while rearing of fry should be under equal light and darkness exposure.

Adebayo IA*


Article Image 1

Empirical Assessment of Fish Diversity of Uttar Pradesh, India: Current Status, Implications and Strategies for Management

About 60-70% of world’s biological resourcesis contributed by India, of which fish represents 80% of the global fishes. Uttar Pradesh blessed with vivid aquatic bioresources in innumerable forms contributes about 14.68% of Indian fish biodiversity with substantial scope of inland fisheries development and aquaculture. Ganga, the mighty river of this state reportsabout 265 freshwater species from its river system [1]. Besides, other rivers viz. Ramganga, Gomti, Ghaghara, Yamuna, Gandak, Kosi and Damodaract as reservoir of different f ish stocks. In past, no study highlights the assessment of the fish biodiversity of this state in holistic way except by Khan (2000) who justreported a compilation of 129 fishes under 27 families [2]. To substantiate and revise the assessment, the fish diversity of this state was assessed by investigating these rivers, analyzing and documenting the information on different fisheries measurements including biology, distribution and conservation status. About 10,000 individuals were collected and the analysis of individuals revealed 126 fish species under 28 families and 74 genera nearly mitigating the earlier reports. The highest species diversity was recorded in the river Ganga (90) followed by Gerua (87) and then Gomati (68). 37 species were found common in Gomati, Ghaghara, Ganges, Son, Tons and Yamuna. Out of 90 species, 6 species were recorded from the river Ganga. In addition, the new distribution of a threatened torrent catfish Amblyceps mango is was recorded from the rivers Gomati, Ganga and Ramganga. The economical assessment unravels nearly 33% as ornamental, 87% as food and 10% as sport fishes.

Pathak AK*


Article Image 1

Stranding of Small Cetaceans with Missing Fins Raises Concerns on Cetacean Conservation in Ecuador: Bycatch or Targeted Fisheries?

Among anthropogenic threats to marine mammals, bycatch is one of the major and increasing concerns. This report describes three species of small cetaceans, including a short-beaked common dolphin (Delphinus delphis), a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus), and two dwarf sperm whales (Kogia sima), which were found stranded with pectoral fins, dorsal fins and caudal fin removed. The dolphins were found at the beaches of San José de Las Nuñez and San Pablo, respectively (Santa Elena Peninsula Province on 14 August 2017), while the dwarf sperm whales were found in Puerto Lopéz and Crucita (Manabí Province) in July 2014 and August 2015, respectively. Possible explanation for the dolphins and dwarf sperm whales missing fins support the event as a possible case of fishery interaction or bycatch with systematic removal of their fins. Although remnants of artisanal gillnets were not found near the two dolphin species, one of the dwarf sperm whales showed marks of artisanal gillnets on the body as evidence of bycatch. Trade of dolphin carcasses and their parts for bait by fishers cannot be ruled out as there is some evidence of this practice in the past. Both dolphins species are vulnerable species at the national level and commonly involved in incidental captures with gillnets of artisanal fisheries in Coastal Ecuador. Cetacean bycatch is a grave conservation problem affecting several cetacean species in Ecuador’s waters. Fisheries and environmental authorities must be vigilant and enforce actions to proactively mitigate possible anthropogenic impacts and promote environmental education activities in fishing communities to conserve vulnerable dolphin species in Ecuador’s waters. Further, to comply with new rules and regulations of the US Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) intended to reduce the bycatch of marine mammals in foreign commercial fishing operations that export fish and fish products to the United States, a regulatory program is urgently needed to mitigate and reduce fisheries interactions with marine mammals in Ecuador.

Pedro J Jiménez1, Juan José Alava1,2*, Cristina Castro3, Jorge Samaniego4 and Patricia Fair5


Article Image 1

Sodium Arsenite-induced Morphological, Behavioral, Hematological and Histopathological abnormalities in Labeo Rohita

Toxic metals have contaminated the aquatic ecosystems to a large scale, and they eventually enter human systems by contaminated air, food, water and soil. Recently, arsenic toxicity has become an alarming concern around the globe. Major areas of North-Eastern states of India have been demarcated with an arsenic content of 50-1000 µg/l in drinking water sources and aquatic ecosystems. Arsenic range in Barak Valley is many folds higher than the permissible limit of WHO and BIS as 10µg/l and 50µg/l respectively, which is present in the form of Sodium Arsenite in water. Fishes are the major dwellers of aquatic ecosystem and serves as good bio-indicators for determination of health status of an aquatic ecosystem. They also form the staple diet of North Eastern people. Labeo rohita is one of the most commonly available and consumed in large scale. The present study was carried out in Labeo rohita in vivo. Labeo rohita (n=10) of similar size and weight were exposed to sodium aresnite at concentrations 100 µg/l and 250 µg/l along with controlled set up for 10 days. The morphological, behavioral, hematological and histopathological changes were evaluated. Fishes exposed to Sodium arsenite showed irregular ocular movement, fin movement, swimming pattern and loss in scales with higher prominence in 250 µg/l of arsenic group than those at 100 µg/l. The hematological indices revealed decrease in RBC count and increase in WBC count in both sodium arsenite exposed groups. The histopathological study of liver revealed parenchymal disorganization and atypical residual body in both sodium arsenite treated groups. Results obtained showed major damages to fishes due to contamination with sodium arsenite. These fishes, when consumed by humans, leads to increase in several thousand folds of sodium arsenite by means of biomagnification. High exposure of arsenic in human through fishes leads to several disorders. The possible way of eradicating sodium arsenite entry into humans is banning fishing activities in highly contaminated aquatic ecosystems. Community education and local participation are also essential to get a fruitful outcome.

Rajib Biswas1* and Soumitra Nath2


Article Image 1

Reconstruction of Historical Fisheries Profile of Cameroon

This work attempts to reconstruct historical fisheries profile by filling in the missed underestimated catch information for some reasons of industrial fishing, artisanal fishing, inland fishing, illegal fishing, discards and aquaculture production of Cameroon from 1950 to 2016.This reconstruction was carried out based on data published by various authors, the Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock (MINEPIA), the Limbe Research Center on Fisheries and Oceans and FAO reports. The dataset allowed us to reconstruct the fishing profile of Cameroon by completing the missing data by interpolation. Then we compare the data obtained with those of FAO. Reconstructed catches were estimated at 13,834 tons and aquaculture production was estimated at 19 tons in 1950 compared to 12,000 tons and 14 tons published by FAO, With the agricultural reforms and development of projects focused on the primary industry, catches increased around 94,122 tons in 1977(compared to 70,167 tons reported by the FAO) to 102,975 tons in 1981(compared to 79,761 tons reported by the FAO), declined to 78,790 tons in 1986 because of the reduction of the Exclusive Economic Zone of Cameroon (EEZ) by the geographical presence of the insular part of Equatorial Guinea (Malabo Island), then increased to 186,204 tons in 2005(compared to 142,345 tons reported by the FAO), declined to 154,800 tons in 2008(compared to 129,000 tons reported by the FAO). Since 2011 it became stable and reached around 240,000 tons against 220,000 tons published by FAO. Overall, there are discrepancies between the reconstructed data and the data provided to FAO: the reconstructed data is 30% higher than the FAO data. This information about fisheries production in Cameroonian waters shows that many locals, fisheries managers and stakeholders depends on fish products for either incomes or food safety; therefore, the recent decline of fish production in Cameroon is of no good sign to the abovementioned persons. These observed fish production decline indirectly threatens the food security of the people of Cameroon and low financial income to the state coffers.

Nyatchouba Nsangue Bruno Thierry, Richard Kindong and Liuxiong Xu*


Article Image 1

Effect of Fishmeal Substitution by Lima Bean Meal on the Zoo Technical Performances of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in the Bati

A study on the effect of the substitution of fishmeal by Lima bean flour was conducted between March and May 2018 within the AIO ICG of the Batié District, with the global objective of contributing to the development of alternative sources of animal protein. Specifically, the aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the substitution of fishmeal by Lima bean flour on the growth performance, survival and feed cost of Clarias gariepinus. For this purpose, 300 fry of Clarias gariepinus with an average weight of 3 ± 1.41g were divided into five batches and fed three times a day with rations corresponding to 5% of their ichthyo biomass. The rations R0, R25 R50, R75 and R100 respectively corresponded to the substitution rates of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% of fish meal by that of Lima bean. The physic-chemical characteristics of the water (pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, nitrites and nitrates) were measured daily. The following results were obtained: The highest weight gains were obtained with the rations R25 (20.56 ± 0.40 g), R50 (20.64 ± 0.32 g), R75 (20.98 ± 0.46 g) and the lowest with the ration R100 (16.21 ± 0.28 g). For this average daily gain, the highest values were 0.36 ± 0.02 g; 0.37 ± 0.01 g, 0.38 ± 0.01 g respectively for the R0, R50 and R75 rations and the lowest with R100 (0.29 ± 0.01 g). The highest value of the specific growth rate (2.47 ± 0.07%) was obtained with the ration R0 and the lowest (1.61%) with the ration R100. The consumption index reached its highest and lowest values with the rations R100 (4.74 ± 0.42) and R50 (3.57 ± 0.43) respectively, compared to the value of the ration R0 (3.31 ± 0.37) for this parameter. Concerning the condition factor K, the highest value was recorded with the R50 diet (1.11 ± 0.49) while the lowest value was obtained with the R75 diet (0.95 ± 0.45). The cost of producing one kilogram of food was higher with the R25 ration (504.59 FCFA) and lower with the R100 ration (443.20 FCFA). This study found that incorporating 75% Lima bean flour into the feed increases the growth performance of Clarias gariepinus fry and reduces the cost of food production.

Emile Miégoué1*, Pégis Davy Tagning Zebaze2, Fernand Tendonkeng1, Lemoufouet Jules1, Nadège Elvire Njoh2, Ronald Komguep Nganyo2 and Etienne Tedonkeng Pamo1


Article Image 1

Comparative Effect of Monoculture and Polyculture in Two Species of Clariidae: Heterobranchus longifilis and Clarias gariepinus in Post Fingerlings Growth

In order to improve the production of Clariidae, a study on the type of cultivation of Heterobranchus longifilis and Clarias gariepinus in post fingerlings growth phase was carried out in tanks. It took place from March to May 2018 at the IRAD fish station in Koupa-Matapi (LN: 5º 21 ‘to 5º 58’ and LE: 10º 17 ‘to 11º 02’) west region Cameroon. For this fact 180 fry therefore 90 Heterobranchus longifilis and 90 Clarias gariepinus with an average weight 3.55 ± 0.68 g; 8.46 ± 0.41cm of total length and 7.37 ± 0.30 cm of standard length were used. The 180 fry were divided into three treatments of 60 individuals (T1 treatment: Clarias gariepinus, T2 treatment Heterobranchus longifilis and T3 treatment: Clarias gariepinus + Heterobranchus longifilis). Each treatment was repeated twice. The fish were fed twice per day at a rate of 10% of the ichthyobiomass readjusted each month after control fishing with a feed at 42% crude protein. From the results of this trial, it appears that unlike the higher mortality rates (11.66 ± 2.36%) recorded in monoculture Clarias gariepinus, the highest cannibalism rates were obtained in monoculture of Heterobranchus longifilis (13.33 ± 4.71%). The survival rate was not influenced by the type of culture. Nevertheless, the highest rate (94.44 ± 0.00%) was observed in Heterobranchus longifilis in polyculture. The highest growth values were recorded for C. gariepinus in polyculture and the weakest for H. longifilis in polyculture. For linear growth, the highest values were recorded in C. gariepinus in monoculture. In order to reduce the rate of cannibalism and mortalities in Clarias gariepinus and Heterobranchus longifilis in post f ingerlings growth phase, it is preferable to combine these two species.

Nana Towa Algrient¹, Nanmegni Rostand Romeo¹, Tonfackachille Peguy², Efole Ewoukem Thomas¹ and Jouokou Salifou²


Article Image 1

Delayed Fertilization of Landlocked Fall Chinook Salmon Eggs Stored with Oxygen at Two Temperatures

This study examined the use of supplemental oxygen and two temperatures (1° and 11°C) during the four hour storage of unfertilized landlocked fall Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) eggs from Lake Oahe, South Dakota, USA. There was a significant and positive effect of oxygen use on egg survival to the eyed-stage and hatch. In addition, survival to egg eye-up and hatch was significantly affected by storage temperature, with decreased survival at 1°C. However, there was no significant interaction observed between the use of oxygen and storage temperature. Mean survival to hatch ranged from 50% for those eggs stored with oxygen at 11°C compared 17.8% for those eggs stored on ice at 1°C in air. To maintain landlocked Chinook salmon egg fertility, storage with supplemental oxygen at 11°C is recommended.

Hunter Eide and Michael E Barnes*