Back to Journal

SM Otolaryngology

Mutational Analysis of GJB2 Gene in Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss from Patients at Children

[ ISSN : 2574-2418 ]

Abstract Introduction Subjectives and Methdodology Results and Disscussion Conclusion Acknowledgements References
Details

Received: 14-Jul-2017

Accepted: 26-Jul-2017

Published: 31-Jul-2017

Nguyen Dinh¹, Dung Huu Nguyen², Tran Huyen Lam², Kieu Tho Nguyen², Chuong Dinh Nguyen², Hoang Nguyen³*, Joseph P Kitzmiller³, Vu Anh Hoang⁴, Thuong Chi Bui⁵, Toan Thanh Pham⁶

¹Department of Otolaryngology, Children Hospital 1, Vietnam
²Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Medicine and Pharmacy at HCM City, Vietnam
³Department of Biological Chemistry and Pharmacology, The Ohio State University, USA
?The University of Medicine and Pharmacy at HCM City, Center of Molecular and Biomedicine, Vietnam
?Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, The University of Medicine and Pharmacy at HCM City, Vietnam
?University of Natural Science, Vietnam

Corresponding Author:

Hoang Nguyen, The Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Department of Biological Chemistry and Pharmacology, Columbus, Ohio, USA, Email: Hoang.Nguyen@osumc.edu

Keywords

GJB2 gene; Non-syndromic hearing loss; Congenital sensorineural hearing loss; p.V37I; c.23delC; c.109G>A

Abstract

Purpose: Hereditary hearing loss is associated with several mutated genes; among them mutant GJB2 is the main cause. We conduct this study to provide initial information about types, rates, and influences of mutations in Vietnamese patients.

Patients and Methods: Genomic DNA is extracted from peripheral blood samples of 96 childhood patients and 100 healthy control subjects. Primers are designed to amplify GJB2 gene, encoding Cx26 protein, followed by detecting mutations with Sanger sequencing technology.

Results: Exon 2 of GJB2 gene was sequenced from all 96 samples. We detected 9 variants of GJB2 gene from 56 patients (c.235delC, c.299_300delAT, c.634T>A, c.79G>A, c.608T>C, c.368C>A, c.11G>A, c.341A>G and c.109G>A). Of which, c.634T>A is a novel variant expected to be a causing disease mutation. Variants detected in 56 cases create 14 genotypes, including 2 causing disease genotypes (c.235delC and c.79G>A / c.299_300delAT), 7 genotypes with controversial role in disease (c.109G>A; c.11G>A; c.109G>A / c.341A>G; c.109G>A / c.608T>C; c.109G>A / c.634T>A; c.79G>A / c.109G>A / c.341A>G and c.79G>A / c.341A>G / c.368C>A), and 5 genotypes containing benign single nucleotide polymorphisms (c.79G>A; c.608T>C; c.79G>A / c.341A>G; c.79G>A / c.368C>A and c.79G>A / c.341A>G / c.368C>A).

Conclusion: We have detected the types and rate of mutations appearing on protein coding region of GJB2 gene from 96 Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss children. Most of the mutations are missense heterozygous or compound heterozygous and under controversy. We suspect that in Vietnamese population, hereditary hearing loss might be caused by interaction between disturbance of GJB2 and other genes such as GJB6, SLC26A4 or 12S rRNA on mitochondria. Next generation sequencing should be use to clarify multigenic defects of hereditary hearing loss in Vietnamese children.

Introduction

Hearing loss is the most common sensory deficit in humans with congenital/prelingual deafness affecting 1 in 1000 children [1]. Delays in treatment for profound sensorineural hearing loss will result in the inability for the patient to develop normal spoken speech and language skills [2]. Additionally, candidacy for cochlear implantation, currently the only medical treatment available for the treatment of profound sensorineural hearing loss, cannot be established without a comprehensive medical examination. Hereditary hearing loss has been acknowledged more than 100 years with nonsyndromic and syndromic form [3]. Nonsyndromic form account for approximately 67% of genetic deafness, whereas a specific syndrome can be identified in about 33% of cases. It is estimated that more than 70 locus may contribute to nonsyndromic deafness. On non-syndromic hereditary hearing loss, there are common list of genes are: GJB2, GJB3, GJA1, MYO6, SLC26A4, SLC26A4, POU3F4, KCNQ4, COCH and 12s4RNA. Single gene, GJB2 (also known as connexin 26) (mutated on chromosome 13q12), is the most common cause of congenital hereditary deafness in many populations [4]. The GJB2 gene encodes connexin 26, a component of gap junctions. Gap junctions are wide expressed in the cochlea and are thought to participate in the recycling of potassium ions from hair cells to the cochlear endolymph. The GJB2 gene contains the instructions for manufacturing a number of proteins, including Connexin 26. Connexin proteins in general are called “gap-junction proteins” which are necessary for cells to communicate with each other. Without sufficient levels of Connexin 26, the potassium flow from hair cells in the cochlea is disrupted, resulting in extremely high levels of potassium in the Corti’s organ, leading to the profound sensorineural hearing loss.Mutated variant gene GJB2 are varies at different races, for instance in Caucasian, African American, Middle East Asian, and Indian, mutations variant genes are: c.35delG, p.R143W, c.167delC, c.235delC and p.W24X [5]. Vietnam is one of the country has highest rate of hereditary hearing loss, however due to studies limited and not thorough enough. Dr Nguyen Tuyet Xuong [6] is one of the pioneer geneticist, who did the research on gene GJB2, GJB6 and 12S rRNA with co-pioneer Dr Nguyen Thuy Duong [4] on 76 loci of patients. Due to small sample size patients, this can’t reflect all complexicity of all genes within the Vietnam population. Therefore, thorough evaluation study of gene GJB2 will be a best meaningful project. This project will be a big hint for all the prevention, screening, and treatment guidelines of all hereditary hearing loss of children in Vietnam.

Subjectives and Methdodology

Research methodology

DNA genomic extraction: For molecular testing, DNA was extracted from 2 ml of peripheral blood samples using standard nonorganic protocols. Bloods were stored with EDTA agent, and transported to Molecular Genetic Institute at HCMU School of Medicine and Pharmacy. Genomic DNA was extracted by using QIAamp DNA kit (Quiagen, USA), followed by manufacturing instruction.

Probe and sequencing primers: Pairs of primer were designed based on primer 3 (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/). The primers for exon F2 were as follows: (5’-GTCCTAGCTAGTGATTCCTG-3’) and exon R2 (5’-GTTGCCTCATCCCTCTCATG-3’), a 803-bp product was obtained after amplification. The mutation spectrum and prevalence of mutations varies significantly among ethics groups. The p.V37I variation in GJB2 is highly prevalent in East Asian deafness, but there is a controversial relationship between some mutations, including p.V37I (c.109G>A), and the hearing phenotype.

In the present study, 96 patients with nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss, 56 normal-hearing individuals, and 32 patients were affected with V37I variant.Designed probe primer ASO-PCR based on the replacement of G become A at 109 position, we also switch 3’nucleotide to prevent false positive. At the un-mutated fragment, during probe primer MuR, we have 2 points where gene can’t replicate. At the mutated fragment, c.109G>A, there is one point at position 3’s, gene still be able to replicate. 152-bp product was obtained after amplification process.

PCR technique: Probe and sequence of PCR products of GJB2 gene is a common approach that has the advantage of detecting most alleles, and done by TaKara Taq HotStart Polymerase (Takara, Japan). PCR was conducted from 58-98 degree Celsius for 10 seconds to 3 minutes for 40 cycling (Table 1).

Table 1: Reaction of PCR and temperature/interval on gen GJB2.

PCR product were produced in agarose gel 2.0% with ethidium bromide and observed by camera photographer Geldoc-It (UVP, USA). Finally, PCR Wash buffered by QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen, USA) based on the manufacturing instruction.

DNA sequencing: PCR fragments were sequenced using the forward and/or reverse primers and ABI BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA) and ABI 3130 Genetic Analyzer. Finally, we plugged all data in and analyzed by PolyPhen Software.

Statistical analysis: Experiment Results were analyzed by Excel and IBM SPSS v.20.0 on the p.V37I with 95% Confident Interval (CI).

Results and Disscussion

General characteristic of experiments

Inclusion criteria were: 1) congenital; 2) clinical presentation: non-syndromic HL/no related medical finding; 3) type of hearing loss: sensorineural; 4) prognosis: stable/progressive HL; 5) both ears affected; 6) sporadic case in his/her family; and 7) persons with unaffected parents. Exclusion criteria were: 1) syndromic hearing loss; and 2) congenital hearing loss caused by infections. The period of study took place between the April, 2015 to the September 2016. Participants are based on ages, sex, and severity of hearing loss. Average ages of participants are 4.71, youngest one is 1 year old, and eldest one is 11. Ratio between Male: Female is 1:0.8 (52 male and 44 females) (Table 2).

Table 2: Characteristic of two experiences groups.

DNA and amino acid sequence variations in GJB2 among hearing loss cases

After DNA genomic extraction from 96 patients on GJB2 of protein Cx26. We found 56 cases with variation in gene GJB2, there are 3 cases of loss the nucleotide and 53 cases replacement of the nucleotide (Table 3).

Table 3: DNA and Amino Acid Sequence Variation in gene GJB2

GJB2 variants mutated c.235 delC were detected in approximately 2.08% (2 cases) of individuals with hearing loss in South region of Vietnam (Figure 1A). This number is little lower compared to other countries in Asia such as South Korea (6.8%) [8], Japan (7.0%) [9], China (20.3%) [10], and there is not much different compared to the North Region of Vietnam (3/76, 3.95%) [4]. Thus, the contribution of GJB2 variants to hearing loss varied between populations. Probably it is depended upon demographic; ethics could lead to mutation variants gene c.235delC differently. Most patients found homozygous for the c.35delC or p.W24x mutation, which will shorting and cause malfunction of protein Cx26, then lead to bilateral hearing impairment.

Best method treatment for this hereditary hearing loss by wearing implant electronic cholera or hearing aid device [11]. Early detection of mutated gene c.235del will be the best prognosis. The c.35delC mutation, also known as 30delC, with labeled as 299-300delAT, is predicted to inactivate connexin 26. The single base deletion within a stretch of six Gs between position 100 and 113, results in a frame shift leading to a UGA stop codon, two residues downstream and premature termination of the connexin 26 synthesis at the 100th amino acid. The c.71G>A (p.W24X) mutation is a nonsense mutation consisting of a T-to-G transition at position 79th. Normally at the 79th, Leucin is supposed to have CTG, however due to mutated gene, we only have TG left (Figure 1A), and so Cx26 protein is shorter than normal. This is the common mutated gene in Asia especially in Korea [12], Japan [9] and Taiwan [13].

Figure 1: Sequence of GJB2 gene fragments of patients on exchange of nucleotide on exon2 of GJB2 . A) Mutated c.235delC, B) Mutated c.299- 300delAT.

There is one patient (1.04%) with labeled c.T634A (p.Y212N), there is unknown carboxyl in protein Cx26 which can change the variation of gene GJB2 (Figure 2A). To eliminate the error during probe and sequence of DNA, we repeat again this step on PCR (machine Takara HS Taq); the result is still the same. Later, we use the PolyPhen-2 software to predict any pathogenic of this gene GJB2, result came out this is the pathogenicity gene with score =1.0. Tyrosine 212 of protein Cx26 is the best position for all alleles, analyze the function mutated of gene p.Y212N will clarify all the pathogenesis of this experiment. Variation gene c.11G>A, replacement of Glycine at 4th position within protein Cx26 became Aspartic Acid, 2.08% (2/96) on this experiment. This is based on previous experiment [13,14].

The allele frequency of gene c.109G>A is found 33.3% (32/96) in children (Figure 2B), majority is heterozygous allele. This is very higher number compare among other Asia population, China (8.86%)[15], Korea (19.4%) [16], Japan (16.5%) [17], and especially in South East Asia such as Thailand (11.1%) [18], Malaysia (62%) [19], and Vietnam (17.1%) [4]. At the beginning of this experiment, variation of gene GJB2 were not found in gene c.109G>A, later c.109G>A is found more on heterozygous or homozygous, thus pathogenic of allele are warranted [16,20-23].

Figure 2: Variation of nucleotide on exon 2 of GJB2. A) Mutated c.634T>A, B) Mutated c.109G>A.

The p.V37I is another GJB2 variant that is frequently found in East Asian Population. The variant resides in transmembrane M1 domain in beta connexins. The p.V37I variant has been frequently observed to be associated with mild to moderate hearing loss. At the position 37th of protein Cx26, Valine is considered as the most preservable amino acid [24]. Functional studies of electrical conductance between paired Xenopus oocytes demonstrated that the p.V37I mutant protein is non-functional, implying that the variant is pathogenic mutation, but it is not severe as c.235delC or c.2990delAT [11,12,16]. 

We started to observe the variation of p.V37I on the normal hearing patients with ASO-PCR technique, with the special probe at 58 degree Celsic. To eliminate for false positive result, we conducted experiments with water DNA, positive DNA variation confirmed p.V37I. PCR products were conducted with agarose gel 2.0%. A 152bp band indicative of amplification of the Del, breakpoint junction (Figure 3). Within 100 sample of water by ASO-PCR, 15% (15/100) of patients were normal variation c.109A>A. This statistical significant different between disease group (33.3%) vs. negative group (15%), p value=0.03.

Figure 3: Multiplex breakpoint on ASO-PCR was detected. Water 1,2,3,4,5,7 and 9: no variation. Water 6: variation of p.V37I. Water 8: variation is indicated. M: Control DNA.

Probably this is pathogenicity variant; however, it is depended upon other factors such as environment or genetic factors [25], or protein connexein related, which play important role of gene GJB2 variation p.V37I [18]. Thus, maybe within 23 cases, c.109A>A, heterozygous alleles have others variants of GJB6. We also found that replacement of amino acid p.V27I, p.E114G, p.T123N and p.I203T on area code of gene GJB2, were previously found non-pathogenic. And, variation p.V27I has highest frequency 37.5% among all the variations.

Contribution of variation of genotype GJB2 and hearing loss

We detected 14 variants of GJB2 gene from 96 patients. There are two variants confirmed to be pathogenic and caused very profound degree of deafness. Seven variants gene (c.109G>A; c.11G>A; c.109G>A/c.341A>G; c.109G>A/c.608T>C; c.109G>A/c.634T>A; c.79G>A/c.109G>A/c.341A>A and c.79G>A/c.341A>G/c.368C>A) are variant expected to be a causing disease mutation. 5 variants (c.79G>A; c.608T>C; c.79G>A/c.341A>G/c.368C>A and c.79G>A/ c.341A>G/c.368C>A) are confirmed as polymorphism nucleotide (SNP) non-pathogenic. Higher percent (89.28%, 50/56 cases) are identified within state of homozygote or heterozygote, only smaller percent (10.72%, 6/56 cases) are identified within state of homozygote (Table 4).

Table 4: List of Identified Mutations after the Sequencing of GJB2 identified in the Hearing Impaired Vietnam Children.

There are 6/32 cases have variants gene c.109A>G (3 homozygote and 29 heterozygote), the rest are considered non-pathogenic mutated. In the East Asian population, two variants, p.V27I (c.79G>A) and p.E114G(c.3.41G>A), are considered benign polymorphisms since these variants have been identified in both hearing loss patients and normal hearing control. However, some studies in Thailand [26], and North America [27] have postulated that homozygote carrying both p.V27I and p.E114G variants could cause hearing loss. P.V27I means there is a substitution of valine for isoleucin in codon 27, c.79G>A) and p.E114G means there is a substitution of glutamic acid for glycine in codon 114, c.344A>G. These two variant are the most common variants cause higher percent (23.21%) (13/26 cases) of the impairing of hearing loss. Exceptionally, these two variants don’t cause any hearing loss pathogenicity in Turkey population [28]. Previously studies on construction of CX26 variants and transfection of HEK 293 Cells. HEK293 cell line is used widely for gap junction (GJ) studies, the results of these previous in vitro cell-based assays studies indicated that VG* and I*G* halotypes of GJB2 may play a role as pathogenic variants’ in hereditary hearing impairment [29].

Discussion

There are 6 cases carries 3 variant gene (c.608T>C, c.79G>A and c.79G>A/c.368C>A), are considered not related to cause any impair hearing loss. There are 40 cases; we did not find any variations on gene GJB2. All 46 patients were diagnosed as hereditary hearing loss from severe to profound state. It is hard to explain the cause of it; it could be due to genetic factors or nature of its gene. Sanger sequencing technique is little bit challenge for us, because it only allows us to analyze individual fragment. Given the need for precise sequence analysis in a clinical diagnostic laboratory, use of this fragment analysis technique should be considered as traditional method. Hopefully, there should be a yet powerful technique would provide us additional information that improves data interpretation over sequence analysis.

Conclusion

In summary, 6/56 (10.71%) cases within total 96 cases, we found variants of the GJB2 gene of known clinical significance in Vietnam with congenital NSHL. These most prevalent mutations are c.23delC and c.299_300delAT, which caused the degree of hearing loss from severe to profound form. Variant c.109G>A has the highest prevalent among all other variants. For those patients diagnosed with congenital NSHL but unfound variant gene GJB2, next generation sequencing technique should be used to identify the defects of other related gene. This will be the root solution to confirm diagnosis with better treatment.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all medical staffs, statistician for assistance with data analysis. The authors are grateful for the assistance and expertise in laboratory analysis of the laboratory staff of Department of Otolaryngology, Children Hospital 1, HCM City, Vietnam; The University of Natural Science, Department of Biochemistry, HCM City, Vietnam; The Center of Molecular and Biomedicine, The Department of Otolaryngology, and the Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology, of The University of Medicine and Pharmacy at HCM City, HCM City, Vietnam. Special thanks to scientists and professors at The Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Department of Biological Chemistry and Pharmacology, Columbus, Ohio, USA for re-evaluate, recommend and validate important basic intellectual concepts correlate to clinical. The authors are also thankful for the oversight of all aspects of this research but the Internal Review Boards (IRB) in Vietnam, as well as Department of Public Health, Board of Medicine in Vietnam.

References

1. Berg AL, Spitzer JB, Towers HM, Bartosiewicz C, Diamond BE. Newborn hearing screening in the NICU: profile of failed auditory brainstem response/ passed otoacoustic emission. Pediatrics. 2005; 116: 933–938.

2. Declau F, Boudewyns A, Van den Ende J, Peeters A, van den Heyning P. Etiologic and audiologic evaluations after universal neonatal hearing screening: analysis of 170 referred neonates. Pediatrics. 2008; 121: 1119– 1126.

3. Nejat Mahdieh BR. Genetics of hearing loss. Semin Hear. 2000; 21: 212–246.

4. Duong NT, Xuan NT, Ha NH, Ton ND, Hue HTT, Trang PTT, et al. Mutational analysis of GJB2, GJB6 and 12S rRNA genes in Vietnamese non-syndromic deaf children. Asian J Biomed Pharm Sci. 2015; 5: 1–7.

5. Mahdieh N, Rabbani B, Wiley S, Akbari MT, Zeinali S. Genetic causes of nonsyndromic hearing loss in Iran in comparison with other populations. J Hum Genet. 2010; 55: 639–648.

6. Xương NT. Study on the charactristics and risk factors of hearing impairment of children from 2-5 years old of the elementary schools at downtown of Hanoi City, Vietnam. Vietnam National Immunology Institute. 2014.

7. Liu J, Huang S, Sun M, Liu S, Liu Y, Wang W, et al. An improved allele-specific PCR primer design method for SNP marker analysis and its application. Plant Methods. 2012; 8: 34.

8. Lee KY, Choi SY, Bae JW, Kim S, Chung KW, Drayna D, et al. Molecular analysis of the GJB2, GJB6 and SLC26A4 genes in Korean Deafness Patients. J Pediatr. 2009; 72: 1301–1309.

9. Tsukada K, Nishio S, Usami S. A large cohort study of GJB2 mutations in Japanese hearing loss patients. Clin Genet. 2010; 78: 464–470.

10. Liu XZ, Xia XJ, Ke XM, Ouyang XM, Du LL, Liu YH, et al. The prevalence of connexin 26 (GJB2) mutations in the Chinese population. Hum Genet. 2002;111: 394–397.

11. Matsushiro N, Doi K, Fuse Y, Nagai K, Yamamoto K, Iwaki T, et al. Successful cochlear implantation in prelingual profound deafness resulting from the common 233delC mutation of the GJB2 gene in the Japanese. Laryngoscope. 2002; 112: 255–261.

12. Park HJ, Hahn SH, Chun YM, Park K, Kim HN. Connexin26 mutations associated with nonsyndromic hearing loss. Laryngoscope. 2000; 110: 1535–1538.

13. Hwa HL, Ko TM, Hsu CJ, Huang CH, Chiang YL, Oong JL, et al. Mutation spectrum of the connexin 26 (GJB2) gene in Taiwanese patients with prelingual deafness. Genet Med. 2003; 5: 161–165.

14. Xin F, Yuan Y, Deng X, Han M, Wang G, Zhao J, et al. Genetic mutations in nonsyndromic deafness patients of Chinese minority and Han ethnicities in Yunnan, China. J Transl Med. 2013;11: 312.

15. Zheng J, Ying Z, Cai Z, Sun D, He Z, Gao Y, et al. GJB2 mutation spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlation in 1067 Han Chinese subjects with nonsyndromic hearing loss. PLoS One. 2015; 10: 1–12.

16. Kim SY, Park G, Han KH, Kim A, Koo JW, Chang SO, et al. Prevalence of p.V37I Variant of GJB2 in Mild or Moderate Hearing Loss in a Pediatric Population and the Interpretation of Its Pathogenicity. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e61592.

17. Abe S, Usami S, Shinkawa H, Kelley PM, Kimberling WJ. Prevalent connexin 26 gene (GJB2) mutations in Japanese. J Med Genet. 2000; 37: 41–43.

18. Wattanasirichaigoon D, Limwongse C, Jariengprasert C, Yenchitsomanus PT, Tocharoenthanaphol C, Thongnoppakhun W, et al. High prevalence of V37I genetic variant in the connexin-26 (GJB2) gene among non-syndromic hearing-impaired and control Thai individuals. Clin Genet. 2004; 66: 452–460.

19. Ruszymah BHI, Wahida IF, Zakinah Y, Zahari Z, Norazlinda MD, Saim L, et al. Congenital deafness: High prevalence of a V37I mutation in the GJB2 gene among deaf school children in Alor Setar. Med J Malaysia. 2005; 60: 269–274.

20. Kelley PM, Harris DJ, Comer BC, Askew JW, Fowler T, Smith SD, et al. Novel mutations in the connexin 26 gene (GJB2) that cause autosomal recessive (DFNB1) hearing loss. Am J Hum Genet. 1998; 62: 792–799.

21. Huang Y, Yang X, Chen W, Duan B, Lu P, Wang Y, et al. Prevalence of p . V37I variant of GJB2 among Chinese infants with mild or moderate hearing loss. 2015; 8: 21674–21678.

22. Li L, Lu J, Tao Z, Huang Q, Chai Y, Li X, et al. The p.V37I exclusive genotype of GJB2: A genetic risk-indicator of postnatal permanent childhood hearing impairment. PLoS One. 2012; 7: 7–10.

23. Huang S, Huang B, Wang G, Yuan Y, Dai P. The Relationship between the p.V37I Mutation in GJB2 and Hearing Phenotypes in Chinese Individuals. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0129662.

24. Palmada M, Schmalisch K, Böhmer C, Schug N, Pfister M, Lang F, et al. Loss of function mutations of the GJB2 gene detected in patients with DFNB1- associated hearing impairment. Neurobiol Dis. 2016; 22: 112–118.

25. Bruzzone R, Veronesi V, Gomès D, Bicego M, Duval N, Marlin S, et al. Lossof-function and residual channel activity of connexin26 mutations associated with non-syndromic deafness. FEBS Lett. 2003; 533: 79–88.

26. Kudo T, Ikeda K, Oshima T, Kure S, Tammasaeng M, Prasansuk S, et al. GJB2 (connexin 26) mutations and childhood deafness in Thailand. Neutrotol. 2001; 22: 858–861.

27. Pandya A, Arnos KS, Xia XJ, Welch KO, Blanton SH, Friedman TB, et al. Frequency and distribution of G]B2 (connexin 26) and G]B6 (connexin 30) mutations in a large North American repositOly of deaf probands. Genet Med. 2003; 5: 295–303.

28. Erkoc MA, Tufan T, Comertpay G, Yilmaz MB, Alptekin D. P.[V27i; E114g] Compound Heterozygous State in Gjb2 Gene Could Be an Indicator of the Severity of Congenital Hearing Loss. Otolaryngology. 2015; 5: 10–12. 

Citation

Dinh N, Nguyen DH, Lam TH, Nguyen KT, Nguyen CD, Nguyen H, et al. Mutational Analysis of GJB2 Gene in Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss from Patients at Children’s Hospital 1- Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. SM Otolaryngol. 2017; 1(2): 1009.

Other Articles

Article Image 1

Independent Predictors of Malignancy in Patients with Multinodular Goiter

Introduction: Thyroid nodule is a common clinical finding. Ultrasound (US) and Fine-needle Aspiration (FNA) are the main methods used for investigating thyroid nodules, with questionable predictive values in Multinodular Goiter (MNG) compared to Solitary Thyroid Nodule (STN) due to the presence of multinodularity.

Objective: The present study was conducted to detect the independent predictors of malignancy in patients with MNG.

Patients & Methods: Medical records of patients who were admitted for thyroidectomy at Alexandria Main University Hospital and Medical Research Institute Hospital between January 2013 and January 2016 were reviewed. Demographic and clinical data, US reports, FNA reports, and final histopathological results were recorded and analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Patients with a STN, hyper- or hypo-thyroidism, previous history of surgery for thyroid cancer or those with incomplete data were excluded.

Results: Reports of 1014 patients were reviewed, 419 patients with euthyroid MNG were included in the study. Malignancy rate was 19.3% (81/419). Micro-calcification, solid consistency, ill-defined margins, and presence of suspicious cervical lymph nodes by US were statistically significant predictors. Rate of malignancy in Bethesda II was 8.9% (false negative). Malignant rate increased with increasing in Bethesda rating from Bethesda IV (17.4%) to Bethesda V (51.7%), and lastly Bethesda VI (90.9%). Multivariate analysis revealed that micro-calcifications, suspicious cervical lymph nodes and Bethesda VI FNA were the independent predictors of malignancy. Other malignancy predictors that were only significant by univariate analysis were solid component of the nodule, and ill-defined margins.

Conclusion: Based on the data presented, it may be concluded that the independent predictors of malignancy in patients with MNG were US findings of micro-calcifications and suspicious cervical LNs as well as Bethesda VI on FNA

Mahmoud Sakr¹, Heba Jaheen², Essam Gabr¹, and Ahmed Talha²

 


Article Image 1

Numerical Survey of the Different Shapes of Human

The major aim of this article is to report experimental results about the numerical quantities of the different shapes of human are ear concha as well as to classify them into defined shape groups. To the best of the author knowledge this approach has never been applied. The results are based on 2425 pictures of ears. The major results are: (1) The author has succeeded to classify all ears concha into 36 groups demonstrated in Figure 2. On the left is the absolute number of concha of a certain type where on the right is the percentage of it. (2) The most widespread concha, number 29, is that which appeared 393 times and is 16.2% of the total number. The less widespread shape, number 34, appears one time namely 0.04% of the total. In addition to the numerical results the following subjects are elaborated with respect to human’s ear: its anatomy, its different shapes as well as their relation to human’s character

Abraham Tamir1 *


Article Image 1

Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Mucosal Contact Point Headache: Mucosal Contact Point Headache May Not be Accurately Diagnosed before Surgery

Objective: We aimed to investigate the differences in incidence of nasal anatomic abnormalities between the patients with and without headache and the outcome of surgical treatment for the headache patients with mucosal contact point.

Background: “Mucosal contact point headache” has been defined by Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Whether the type of nasal anatomic abnormalities associates with incidence of headache and whether surgical treatment is necessary remain undefined.

Study Design: Observational study.

Methods: We recruited 107 subjects without headache and 78 subjects with refractory headache for more than 2 years. Subjects underwent high-resolution sinus CT scans and the incidence of nasal anatomic abnormalities was calculated in both groups and results were compared. An additional 25 patients underwent surgical treatment.

Results: Mucosal contact points were observed in 85.9% of patients with refractory headache and also in 80.4% of subjects without headache. The most common mucosal contact point among headache group patients was between deviated nasal septum and lateral nasal wall (55.1%) and the incidence of this type of contact point was significantly different between groups (P <0.05). An additional 25 headache patients with mucosal contact point were corrected via endoscopic surgery. Average pain scale scores decreased significantly between pre- and post-operative measurements (P<0.001). Only 44% of patients had recovered from headache 7 days postoperatively.

Conclusion: Some patients with recurrent headache and mucosal contact point may not meet the diagnostic criteria of mucosal contact point headache since pain was not resolved within 7 days after surgical treatment.

Jia Wang MS, Jin-shu Yin MS* and Hong Peng BS


Article Image 1

Analysis on Correlation between SP and NK-1R and Intranasal Mucosal Contact Point Headache

Objectives: To observe difference of Substance P (SP) and NK-1 Receptor (NK-1R) expression in tissues at contact point and non-contact point among the patients with intranasal mucosal contact point headache and speculate the role of SP and NK-1R in mucosal contact point headache.

Methods: SP and NK-1R in tissues of contact point and non-contact point among 40 patients with intranasal mucosal contact point headache were stained histologically by immunohistochemistry, and the mRNA level was detected by RT-PCR.

Results: SP was located in cytoplasm of acini epithelial cells, distributed in nasal mucosa tissues at both contact point and non-contact point. But stain intensity was significantly increased at contact point (Z=-2.554, P<0.05). NK-1R was located in cytoplasm of acinar epithelial cells, inflammatory cells and nerve fibers of contact point; only in cytoplasm of acinar epithelial cells and nerve fibers of non-contact point. Tinctorial rate of NK-1R increased significantly at contact point (χ2 =40.438, P<0.01). mRNA level of SP and NK-1R was up-regulated in nasal mucosa at contact point compared with non-contact point.

Conclusion: Distribution of SP and NK-1R, especially NK-1R, in nasal mucosal tissue at contact point was higher compared with non-contact point. It was suggested that SP and NK-1R were associated with mucosal contact point headache.

Guomin Zhao¹, Jinshu Yin²*, Hong Peng², and Jing Wang³


Article Image 1

Numerical Survey of the Different Shapes of Human Nose

The major aim of this article is to report experimental results about the numerical quantities of the different shapes of human nose as well as to classify them into defined shape groups. To the best of the author knowledge this approach has never been applied. The results are based on 1793 pictures of noses of which 403 are artworks, 498 are photographs taken by the author in Europe - Holland, Belgium and France - while visiting these places, 801 were photographed in Israel and 91 are not clear where exactly photographed. 1081 were photographs of men and 712 of women. The author has succeeded to classify all the noses into 14 groups demonstrated in Figure 2 where for each nose shape it was possible to find also an artistic demonstration. The detailed results for the number of noses versus their shape and sources: artworks and photographing places - Europe and Israel - are reported in Table 1. The most widespread nose is shape 1, the fleshy nose in Figure 2, 24.2%, where the less widespread nose is shape 4, turned-up nose, 0.45%. It should be emphasized also that shape 14 photographed in Israel is extremely unique and the only one existing among the 1793 noses that were considered. In addition to the numerical results the following subjects are elaborated with respect to human’s nose: its anatomy, its different shapes as well as their relation to human’s character and facial attractiveness. And finally it is important to mention the development of electronic/artificial noses as systems for the automated detection and classification of odors, vapors, and gases.

Abraham Tamir*


Article Image 1

Associated Factors of Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss among Sudanese Patients

Background: Hearing loss is a leading cause of disability worldwide and it is a significant public health problem.

Objectives: To determine the associated factors of unilateral sensorineural hearing loss among different age groups in Sudanese patients.

Methods: 115 Sudanese patients presented to Khartoum state ENT hospitals complaining of unilateral hearing loss were included.

Results: In this study 115 patients were included. Male to female ratio 1:1.3, 49 patients (42.6%) were from Khartoum state and the rest were from different areas in Sudan. The most frequent age group was from 1-15 years representing (38.3%) with a mean age of 24.48 ± 1.5. The commonest associated factor in this study was mumps and it was found in 47 of patients (40.9%), tinnitus was the commonest presenting symptoms in unilateral Sensorineural hearing loss 81 patients (70.4%) were assessed audiologically with pure tone audiometry and 34 patients (59.1%) assessed by Auditory Brain Stem Response (ABR).

Conclusion: Unilateral Sensorineural hearing loss commonly presents during school-age. Mumps is the most common associated factor. Pure tone audiometry and auditory brain stem response are suitable method for the assessment and the diagnosis.

Mahmoud Abdelbagi Mahmoud Taha¹, Sharfi Abdelgadir Omer Ahmed²* and Muna Ahmed Abdulrahim³


Article Image 1

Cochlear Implantation in Far Advanced Otosclerosis: A Case Report

T he term far-advanced otosclerosis was introduced by House and Sheehy  to indicate clinical otosclerosis with air conduction thresholds of more than 85 dB HL, Theotosclerotic process commonly involves the otic capsule and may cause quite widespread demineralisation which leads to a progressive and often profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

Rogério Hamerschmidt¹, Gislaine Richter¹, Adriana Kosma Pires de Oliveira², Mohamad Feras Al-Lahham²* and Valéria Kutianski¹


Article Image 1

Subglottic Lobular Capillary Hemangioma: A Case Report

Lobular Capillary Hemangioma (LCH) is a benign proliferation of capillary blood vessels adopting a lobular configuration. A laryngeal origin of LCH is exceedingly rare. Here, we describe a case of an 11-year-old boy presenting with a subglottic lesion, leading to a subglottic stenosis. Histopathologic findings of the lesion implicated an LCH, which was removed successfully by a coblator. This is the first report of a subglottic LCH. Physicians should be aware of this unique lesion and laryngeal LCH should be considered in diagnosing the cause of a subglottic stenosis. Additionally, coblation should be an effective treatment for laryngeal LCH.

Vinh Ly Pham Hoang¹, Nguyen Pham Dinh¹, Hoang Nguyen²*, Joseph P Kitzmiller², Linh Bui Doan Hai¹, and Huy Nguyen The¹


Article Image 1

A De Novo from Mutational Analysis in PAX3 in Hearing Loss Children Caused Waardenburg Syndrome Type 1 at Children Hospital-1 in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Purpose: To detect a de novo paired box gene 3 (PAX3) mutations, mutational analysis, and associated phenotypes in the Vietnamese Children patients with Waardenburg syndrome type I (WS1). We conduct this study to provide initial information about types, rates, and influences of this particular PAX3 mutations gene in the Vietnamese patients.

Patients and Methods: Three unrelated patients with suspected WS1 were selected from our Genomic extraction DNA, probe and sequence the primers, PCR technique. PAX3 were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and then amplicons PCR were analyzed by cycle sequencing. Variations were detected, documented and recognized as “de novo” mutation. We also compared the severity of hearing impairment, phenotypically variations among these individual affected patients.

Results: Number variations of mutations in PAX3 were detected in three patients, respectively: c.955delC (Gln319fsX380), c.667C>% (Arg223Stop). One mutation proved to be de novo as their parents did not carry the mutations, and had never been found in any previous study in Vietnam. All three patients with PAX3 mutations had different iris color, fundi between their two eyes, dystopia canthorum and profound hearing loss. We report the phenotypic expression of WS1 in these three patients and explore the implications for possible genotype phenotype correlations. Sensorineural hearing loss was present in 80% of affected individuals, and spectrum of hearing loss with very high frequency.

Conclusion: De novo mutation in PAX3 has not been reported in Vietnam before. Finally, our finding has detected deletion mutation c.667>T (p.Arg223X) in PAX3 identified in three children individual with WS1. Our analyses indicated that these mutations might constitute a pathogenic-genetic-hearing loss associated with WS1. It is very clinical importance as such patients may be misdiagnosed as congenital hearing loss since it is uncommon in Southern Vietnamese population.

Nguyen Dinh Pham¹, Dung Huu Nguyen², Tran Huyen Lam², Kieu Tho Nguyen², Chuong Dinh Nguyen², Hoang Nguyen³*, Joseph P Kitzmiller³, Vu Anh Hoang⁴, Thuong Chi Bui⁵, and Toan Thanh Pham⁶


Article Image 1

Anterior Chest Wall Abscess Secondary to Odontogenic Infection: A Case Report

Purpose: To detect a de novo paired box gene 3 (PAX3) mutations, mutational analysis, and associated phenotypes in the Vietnamese Children patients with Waardenburg syndrome type I (WS1). We conduct this study to provide initial information about types, rates, and influences of this particular PAX3 mutations gene in the Vietnamese patients.

Patients and Methods: Three unrelated patients with suspected WS1 were selected from our Genomic extraction DNA, probe and sequence the primers, PCR technique. PAX3 were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and then amplicons PCR were analyzed by cycle sequencing. Variations were detected, documented and recognized as “de novo” mutation. We also compared the severity of hearing impairment, phenotypically variations among these individual affected patients.

Results: Number variations of mutations in PAX3 were detected in three patients, respectively: c.955delC (Gln319fsX380), c.667C>% (Arg223Stop). One mutation proved to be de novo as their parents did not carry the mutations, and had never been found in any previous study in Vietnam. All three patients with PAX3 mutations had different iris color, fundi between their two eyes, dystopia canthorum and profound hearing loss. We report the phenotypic expression of WS1 in these three patients and explore the implications for possible genotype phenotype correlations. Sensorineural hearing loss was present in 80% of affected individuals, and spectrum of hearing loss with very high frequency.

Conclusion: De novo mutation in PAX3 has not been reported in Vietnam before. Finally, our finding has detected deletion mutation c.667>T (p.Arg223X) in PAX3 identified in three children individual with WS1. Our analyses indicated that these mutations might constitute a pathogenic-genetic-hearing loss associated with WS1. It is very clinical importance as such patients may be misdiagnosed as congenital hearing loss since it is uncommon in Southern Vietnamese population.

Khemanand Maharaj* and Steven Liggins*