Back to Journal

SM Journal of Pulmonary Medicine

Obesity and Breathing Related Sleep Disorders: Concise Clinical Review

[ ISSN : 2574-240X ]

Abstract Introduction Effects of Obesity on Sleep Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome The Relationship between OSA and OHS Morbidity and Mortality Diagnosis Treatment Options Conclusion References
Details

Received: 06-Apr-2015

Accepted: 25-May-2015

Published: 12-Jun-2015

Ines Maria Grazia Piroddi¹, Sofia Karamichali², Cornelius Barlascini³, and Antonello Nicolini¹*

¹Respiratory Diseases Unit ASL4 Chiavarese, Italy

²Department of Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, IRCSS AOU San Martino-IST, Italy

³Hygiene and Health Medicine Unit ASL4 Chiavarese, Italy

Corresponding Author:

Antonello Nicolini, Respiratory Diseases Unit, Italy, Tel: +39 0185329145; Fax +390185329121; Email: antonellonicolini@gmail.com

Keywords

Obesity; Sleep related disorders; Obstructive sleep apnea; Obesity-hypoventilation syndrome

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of obesity has lead to an increase in the prevalence of sleep disordered breathing in the general population. Obesity is a serious disorder resulting in significant health impairment. Obese adults are at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from acute and chronic medical conditions. Obesity is associated with anatomic alterations that predispose to upper airway obstruction during sleep. Obesity and sleep related breathing disorders occur to a particular subgroup that includes obese patients with hypoventilation correlated with Hypercapnic-OSA (obstructive sleep apnea), Hypercapnic-OSA with OHS (hypoventilation syndrome) and OHS without OSA.

OHS is a disease entity distinct from simple obesity and OSA. OSA is a common disorder. Obesity and particularly central adiposity are potent risk factors for OSA. They can increase pharyngeal collapsibility through mechanical effects on pharyngeal soft tissues and lung volume, and through central nervous system–acting signaling proteins (adipokines) that may affect airway neuromuscular control. Specific molecular signaling pathways encode differences in the distribution and metabolic activity of adipose tissue.

The OHS is characterized by the combination of obesity (BMI>30 kg/m2 ), daytime awake hypercapnia and hypoxemia , in the presence of sleep-disordered breathing without other known causes of hypoventilation, such as severe obstructive or restrictive parenchymal lung disease, kyphoscoliosis, severe hypothyroidism, neuromuscular disease, and congenital central hypoventilation syndrome. It is estimated that 90% of patients with OHS also have OSA. Patients with OSA typically have normal control of breathing and obesity is not a necessary condition; patients with OHS are morbidly obese, have hypoventilation during wakefulness with increased arterial PCO2 and decreased arterial PO2 , as well as nocturnal hypoventilation. The gold standard for the diagnosis is monitored polysomnography during sleep. In stable hypercapnic patients therapeutic choice will depend on two factors: underlying diagnosis (presence or absence of OSA) and severity of hypercapnia.

Introduction

The increasing prevalence of obesity mostly in the developed world has lead to an increase in the occurrence of breathing disordered during sleep. As the obese people, due to consumption of too many calories, suffer from hypertension, dyslipidemia, coronary heart disease, peripheral vascular disease (both, venous and arterial), diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis and gout, they carry an increased risk of morbidity and mortality from these acute and chronic medical conditions. Here we are concerned with the consequence of obesity on respiratory diseases such as obstructive sleep apnea and hypopnea syndrome characterized by repeated airway collapse during sleep [1,2]. Sleep-Related Breathing Disorder (SBD) is a term used to describe a spectrum of respiratory disturbances that occur during sleep and comprises OSA, Central Sleep Apnea (CSA), and Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS) [1]. OSA remains an important medical condition because of its high prevalence and its association with numerous cardiovascular and non cardiovascular consequences if left untreated. Alveolar hypoventilation in obesity results from complex interactions between obesity, ventilatory mechanics, central ventilatory control, sleep apnea and degree of Forced Expiratory Volume /1 second (FEV1 ) abnormality [3]. OSA and OHS and CSA are often the frequent basic cause in the pathogenesis of hypoventilation in the obese subject [4]. They may be generated as a consequence of hyperventilation response that follows obstructive apnea. Moreover, there is a subset of patients in which obesity is associated with hypoventilation correlated with hypercapnicOSA, hypercapnic-OSA & OHS and OHS without OSA (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Obesity related respiratory failure disorders.

Effects of Obesity on Sleep

Obesity is associated with anatomic alterations that predispose to upper airway obstruction during sleep. These alterations may include excessive adiposity around the pharynx and chest. In the former, increases in neck circumference and fat deposited around the upper airway may narrow down the airway. It is known that the upper airway is more easily compressed and is higher in obese people compared with non-obese individuals. In these people the pharynx is not expanded by extending mandible. As for the chest, obesity and especially central obesity have been associated with reductions in lung volume, which leads to a loss of caudal traction on the upper airway, and an increased risk in pharyngeal collapse; thus obesity in the neck and thorax increases continuous positive airway pressure requirements and produce a greater severity of sleep apnea.

Thus, obesity imposes mechanical loads on both the upper airway and respiratory system that predispose to upper airway narrowing, collapse, and airflow obstruction during sleep [5,6]. Obesity also is associated with structural defects that compromise the airway, but the correlation is not linear. Greater obesity does not correlate with degree of apnea and it is difficult to measure local adiposity [2,3]. There may be anatomical deformities in the nose, uvula, or tonsil which become critical when obesity is involved. The mechanisms causing these elevations in upper airway mechanical loads in obesity are not well understood. It needs to be said that more is known about therapy than pathophysiology in this kind of disorders [3- 5].

The pattern of obesity plays an important role in the ventilatory consequences. FEV1 is sometimes moderately reduced in patients with severe or massive obesity, but the Forced Expiratory Volume/1 sec / vital capacity (FEV1 /VC) ratio is normal in the absence of associated bronchial disease [3-6]. These effects may be mediated by circulating adipokines, which influence body fat distribution and CNS activity. As patients with sleep apnea lose weight, improvements in upper airway function and disease severity are likely to reduce according to the weight loss as well relative changes in protective and pathogenic adipokines, as shown below [5,6]. Obesity also induces an inflammatory state directly, because adipose tissues are abundant source of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), IL-6, as well as the profibrogenic adipokine leptin [7].

In addition, adipose tissue elaborates humoral factors that may act centrally on the regulation of upper airway neuromuscular control. Leptin has been demonstrated to stimulate CO2 ventilatory responses in mice [8,9]. Its action is antagonized by other adipose-related factors, namely the Soluble Leptin Receptor (sOB-R) and C - reactive protein (CRP), which bind circulating leptin and can decrease its Central Nervous System (CNS) uptake and action. Levels of sOB-R and CRP are elevated in sleep apnea compared with matched control patients and decline with weight loss and the loss of visceral compared with central adiposity [7].

There is also evidence that neuro-hormonal changes such as leptin resistance may have a fundamental role in ventilatory control of obese patients with hypercapania [7,10]. It has previously been observed that serum leptin was a better predictor for the presence of OHS in obesity than BMI or calculated body fat mass [10]. Central leptin resistance (indicated by increased circulating leptin levels) may not just reflect a resistance to the satiety effects of leptin but also a resistance to the respiratory stimulatory effects. Alternatively, the increased leptin levels in OHS relative to eucapneic OSA with obesity may reflect a compensatory rise to counter hypoventilation [10]. Current evidence indicates that sleep apnea is associated with fundamental disturbances in upper airway mechanical and neuromuscular control and suggests that a combined defect is required to produce sleep apnea [11].

Obstructive Sleep Apnoea

Obstructive sleep apnea is characterized by temporary but intermittent episodes of upper airway obstruction resulting in cessation of breathing or reduction in tidal volume in sleep. Apnea termination requires arousal and the resulting frequent awakenings lead to daytime symptoms such as daytime sleepiness, and impaired concentration [12], snoring, hypoventilation, hypoxemia, leading to sleep fragmentation, poor sleep, mood problems, and poor quality of life. Several risk factors, including obesity, gender differences; age, familial factors, enlarged tonsils and adenoids, and craniofacial abnormalities (retrognathia and micrognathia) have been associated with an increased prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in the general population. Among these, obesity is one of the strongest sleep apnea risk factors. It has been shown that OSA is present in more than 50 percent of a population of adult obese patients with a mean Body Mass Index (BMI) higher than 40 [13].

Nocturnal hypoventilation seems to be present in more than 29 percent of severe obese population. There is a relationship between body weight change and Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI): a 10% weight gain has been shown to predict an approximate 32% increase in the AHI; a 10% weight loss predicted a 26% decrease in the AHI, and a 10% increase in weight predicted a six fold increase in the odds of developing moderate to severe SBD [11,14]. OSA is common, under-diagnosed and treatable syndrome. In developed countries, it is reported to affect between 3-7% of middle-aged men and 2-5% of women. Furthermore, it has been reported that OSA is present in about 6% of population between the ages of 50-70 years [15].

OSA is more common in men than in women. This has been attributed to differences in anatomical and functional properties of the upper airway, differences in craniofacial morphology and fat deposition, and different ventilatory responses to arousal from sleep. Central obesity accounts for the strong male predominance of this disorder, whereas peripheral adiposity may protect women from developing sleep apnea [5]. In addition to fat distribution pattern in the upper airway, upper airway anatomy and function may also contribute to gender differences in OSA. Upper airway collapsibility is greater in males than in females. Some reports support that upper airway resistance during sleep is higher in males than in females [16,17]. Hormonal status may also have impact on sleep apnea susceptibility, particularly in women. Postmenopausal women demonstrate increase in sleep apnea prevalence and severity compared with pre-menopausal women [18,19].

Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome

Clinically OHS is considered to be a severe form of obstructive sleep-related breathing disorder in obese patients. Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS), formerly described as ‘‘Pickwickian syndrome’’ is characterized by the combination of obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2 ) , daytime awake hypercapnia (partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2 ) > 45 mm Hg at sea level) and hypoxemia (partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2 ) > 70 mm Hg at sea level) in the presence of sleep-disordered breathing without other known causes of hypoventilation, such as severe obstructive or restrictive parenchymal lung disease, kyphoscoliosis, severe hypothyroidism, neuromuscular disease, and congenital central hypoventilation syndrome [20].

It is estimated that 90% of patients with OHS also have OSA [21] because approximately 1.5% of the United States population has severe obesity and OSA, and 10-20% of the severely obese patients with OSA have OHS. The prevalence of OHS among the general adult population in the United States is estimated to be 0.15-0.3% [22]. The prevalence of OHS is 11% in patients with known OSA and 8% in bariatric surgical patients [23].

OHS is a disease entity distinct from simple obesity and OSA. Patients in whom OHS is diagnosed consume greater levels of healthcare resources than eucapnic patients with OSA [24]. In order to confirm the diagnosis of OHS, other pulmonary, thoracic, metabolic or neuromuscular diseases accounting for the gas anomalies should be excluded [25]. Daytime hypercapnia is the distinguishing feature of OHS that separates it from simple obesity and OSA. OHS is usually associated with OSA and pulmonary hypertension. Major clinical features are hyper somnolence, dyspnea and headache in combination with polycythemia, cyanosis and right heart failure [11,25].

Compared to similarly obese individuals without daytime hypercapnia, patients with OHS have significantly impaired respiratory system mechanics with a restrictive ventilatory pattern [26]. In addition to alveolar hypoventilation, also ventilation–perfusion mismatching secondary to pulmonary atelectasis contributes to hypoxemia in OHS [27]. There are three leading hypotheses for the pathogenesis of chronic daytime hypoventilation in OHS: i) impaired respiratory mechanics because of obesity, ii) leptin resistance leading to central hypoventilation, and iii) impaired compensatory response to acute hypercapnia in OSA. Compared with obese patients with eucapnia, patients with OHS demonstrate four main clinical features: i) more severe upper airway obstruction, ii) impaired respiratory mechanics, iii) blunted central respiratory drive, and iv) increased incidence of pulmonary hypertension [23].

The Relationship between OSA and OHS

There are many similarities between OHS and OSA and the clinical presentation is similar: excessive daytime sleepiness, fatigue and/or morning headaches. Furthermore, 11-15% of obese OSA patients present with hypercapnia, and a majority of the hypercapnic obese manifest OSA. Hypercapnia is more frequent in obese than in non-obese OSA subjects [28]. Patients with OSAS typically have normal control of breathing (without daytime hypoventilation) and for them obesity is not a necessary condition. Patients with OHS are morbidly obese, have hypoventilation during awakeness with increased arterial PCO2 and decreased arterial PO2 , as well as nocturnal hypoventilation [12] (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Pathophysiology of obesity related sleep disorders.

The mechanisms by which OSA may induce hypercapnia are not well understood. It may be that hypercapnia in OSA develops as a consequence of a reduced inspiratory effort against an obstructed airway. Therefore, ventilatory load compensation (the normal response to maintain alveolar ventilation in the face of mechanical impediments) is impaired in OSA. This impairment may be the result either of an inability of fatigued muscles to recover between apneic episodes or of diaphragmatic dysfunction as a consequence of periodic hyperventilation episodes following apneas [29]. Also, there may be depressed ventilatory response to chemical stimuli (bicarbonate, carbon dioxide, oxygen, pH etc.) producing a reduction in compensatory ventilation. The maintenance of eucapnia during sleep requires a balance between CO2 loading during apnea and CO2 clearance in the intervening period. Thus hypercapnia occurs when, after an apnea, the amount of ventilation is insufficient to eliminate the CO2 loading that occurred during apnea. Whether this type of blunted response is a consequence of increased load or represents a protective adaptation to chronic hypoxia, hypercapnia and sleep fragmentation is unknown. The hypothesis that OSA is a part of OHS has not been yet accepted. While OSA can exist with or without hypercapnia, hypercapnia in obesity patients is a defining feature of OHS. Furthermore, in these patients hypercapnia persists after eliminating apneas and hypo apneas after Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) ventilation. In fact some authors proposed calling the condition Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome ‘OHS without OSA. For them, this entity may be diagnosed in two situations: hypercapnia in obese patients without OSA or COPD (OHS without OSA); and persistence of hypercapnia in OSA patients who are receiving CPAP, OHS with OSA) [30,31]. Multivariate analysis showed that hypercapnia was associated independently with HCO3 levels and daytime oxygen saturation, and these parameters had high sensitivity and specificity in predicting OHS [32].

Evidence suggests that elevated bicarbonate levels and decreased oxygen saturation in obese OSA patients should prompt clinicians to exclude OHS [33]. Moreover, routine measurement of serum bicarbonate in obese patients can be a useful screening tool for early diagnosis of OHS and/ or sleep disordered breathing [22,23]. Further studies have shown considerable similarities between obese subjects with only elevated base excess or raised bicarbonate and no daytime hypercapnia and those obese patients with hypercapnic chronic respiratory failure.

This supports supporting the concept that obesity-related hypoventilation is a clinical spectrum. Metabolic compensation in the presence of eucapnia probably identifies subjects with early OHS at the milder end of the spectrum. Thus an obese patient with an isolated increased base level or raised bicarbonate should not be dismissed as normal. Whether early detection of obesity-related hypoventilation makes a difference in the long term needs to be tested in appropriate randomized controlled trials [34,35].

Morbidity and Mortality

Obesity and OSA are associated with a spectrum of co-morbidities such as coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke and metabolic syndrome, which result in increased morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, patients with OSA are at increased risk of developing postoperative complications including arrhythmias and hypoxemia. Several studies showed that patients with OHS may experience higher morbidity and mortality than patients who are similarly obese and have OSA. The mortality rate in patients with untreated OHS is high [23,36].

Diagnosis

An essential requirement for correct diagnosis of OSA is a correct anamnesis, recording the family history (history of OSAS) and personal antecedents such as tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy in childhood, alcohol intake, the use of muscle relaxant drugs, obesity, etc. It is also important to establish the profession of the patient, since in some professions OSAS constitutes a medical emergency. A proper physical examination is also required including height, weight, BMI, cardiovascular evaluation and exploration of the upper airway (nasal passages, oropharynx and hypo pharynx, and larynx). The clinical examination should be complemented by radiological study in the form of either conventional lateral X-rays or a multidimensional X-ray study, which will reveal the craniofacial anatomical alterations predisposing to OSAS [2]. The diagnosis of OSA is established by Polysomnography (PSG) which monitors the sleeping state, respiration, electrocardiogram, movements of the legs, oximetry and snoring. In addition, PSG records the distribution of the stages of sleep, the number of awakenings, the number of apneas or hypoapneas, the starting time of sleep, and the hours of efficient sleep (hours asleep/hours in bed) [37].

The gold standard is monitoring by polysomnography in a sleep laboratory. This modality uses multiple biometric recording devices to accurately quantify the number of apnea (a 90% reduction in tidal volume lasting 10 seconds) and hypoapnea (a reduction in tidal volume of 50-90%, lasting 10 seconds accompanied by 3% decrease in oxyhemoglobin saturation) episodes occurring during the experimental night’s sleep. PSG also provides the Apnea / Hypo-Apnea Index (AHI); in this context apnea is very serious and can only be treated surgically when AHI >30, while AHI 15-30 defines moderate apnea, and an AHI score of < 15 indicates mild apnea [37-39].

The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), arousal index (per hour frequency of arousals from sleep), minimum oxygen saturation (during sleep), the multiple sleep latency test (measurement of how quickly a subject will fall asleep during the day), the quality of life measure Functional Outcomes Sleep Questionnaire and compliance (measured as time per night using the device) are required to complete the diagnosis. Screening, such as the validated Stop-Bang questionnaire, can identify patients at high risk of OSA. The screening tool can further be complemented by the presence of low SpO2, increased PaCO2 , and serum HCO3 level to identify patients at high risk of OHS. Before major elective surgery, these patients should be referred to sleep medicine for polysomnography and C-PAP titration. An echocardiogram should be done to assess right ventricular function and pulmonary hypertension [23].

Treatment Options

The management of the treatment must include attempts to improve lifestyle of the patient and decrease obesity. The goals should be to treat respiratory sleep disturbances, diurnal hypercapnia as well as hypoxemia that may persist after correcting alveolar hypoventilation. NIV may be planned as first-line treatment to manage acute or sub-acute respiratory failure in these patients. In stable hypercapnic patients therapeutic choice will depend on two factors: underlying diagnosis (presence or absence of OSA) and severity of hypercapnia.

The recommended CPAP treatment to maintain upper airway patency eliminates apnea and hypo-apneas and restores daytime eucapnia [41]. If hypercapnia persists, despite adequate CPAP treatment, patients require augmentation of ventilation during sleep rather than simple stabilization of the upper airway, so it is recommended to use NIV [41,42].

Some published series identified greater BMI and more severe hypoventilation as predictors of lack of response to CPAP [42]. In patients with PaCO2 >50 mm Hg, the initial therapeutic choice may be NIV [43]. If, after some time under NIV, the patient becomes eucapnic, and sleep studies confirm OSA, it is advisable to switch off to CPAP (after performing a full-night titration to identify optimal pressure level). If the patient remains eucapnic, long-term CPAP may be carried out [39,40].

Otherwise the patient may be switched back to NIV. In cases in which sleep studies do not show significant OSA, NIV will be the therapeutic choice. In this case, hypercapnia may be considered as obesity-related only, but additional causes such as COPD need to be sought. Therefore the proposed management of obese patients with sleeprelated breathing disorders should be:

• In eucapnic OSA patients use C-PAP in addition of oxygen therapy if hypoxemia coexists;

• In hypercapnic OSA patients try CPAP and if this corrects the hypercapnia, continue this therapy, if not, switch to NIV;

• In case of pure OHS without OSA start NIV in addition an oxygen therapy if hypoxemia coexists;

• In case of OSA and unknown OHS, try to start NIV and switch to CPAP if a normalization of parameters is obtained by CPAP; (in this case if the patient remains eucapnic we have a hypercapnic OSA patient. ) If after the switch the patient has hypercapnia again is very likely to have OSA+OHS, so return to NIV [41-43].

Conclusion

Obesity sleep related breathing disorders are largely underdiagnosed and the health-related costs are higher than those related to obese patients only. Although nocturnal positive airway pressure therapies represent first-line treatment and are effective in improving patient outcomes, there is a need to offer combined treatment strategies and to assess the effect of multimodal therapeutic strategies on morbidity and mortality

References

1. Morohunfolu E. Akinnusi, Saliba R, Porhomayon, El-Solh AA. Sleep disorders in morbid obesity, Eur J Intern Med. 2012; 23: 219-226.

2. Azagra-Calero E, Espinar-Escalona E, Barrera-Mora JM, Llamas-Carreras JM, Solano-Reina E. Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS). Review of literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012; 17: 925-929.

3. Rabec C, de Lucas Ramos P, Veale D. Respiratory Complications of Obesity, Review Article. Arch Bronconeumol. 2011; 47: 252-261.

4. Piper AJ. Obesity hypoventilation syndrome. The big and the breathless. Sleep Med Rev. 2011; 15: 79-89.

5. Schwartz AR, Susheel P, Laffan AM, Polotsky V, SchneiderH, Smith PL. Obesity and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008; 5: 185-192.

6. Berger KI, Goldring RM, Rapaport DM. Obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2009; 30: 253-261.

7. Shimura R, Tatsumi K, Nakamura A, Kasahara Y, Tanabe N, Takiguchi Y, et al. Fat accumulation, leptin, and hypercapnia in obstructive sleep apnea– hypopnea syndrome. Chest. 2005; 127: 543-549.

8. Basta M, Vgontzas AN. Metabolic abnormalities in obesity and sleep apnea are in a continuum. Sleep Med. 2007; 8: 5-7.

9. Teramoto S, Yamamoto H, Yamaguchi Y, Namba R, Ouchi Y. Obstructive sleep apnea causes systemic inflammation and metabolic syndrome. Chest. 2005; 127: 1074-1075.

10. Phipps PR, Starritt E, Caterson I, Grunstein RR. Association of serum leptin with hypoventilation in human obesity. Thorax. 2002; 57: 75-76.

11. Banno K, Kryger MH. Sleep apnea: Clinical investigations in humans. Sleep Med. 2007; 8: 400-426.

12. Resta O, Foschino-Barbaro MP, Legari G, Talamo S, Bonfitto P, Palumbo A, et al. Sleep-related breathing disorders, loud snoring and excessive daytime sleepiness in obese subjects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001; 25: 669- 675.

13. Peppard PE, Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J. Longitudinal study of moderate weight change and sleep- disordered breathing. JAMA. 2000; 284: 3015-3021.

14. Zamarron C, Gude F, Otero Y, Alvarez JM, Golpe A, Rodriguez JR. Prevalence of sleep disordered breathing and sleep apnea in 50- to 70-yearold individuals. A survey Respiration. 1999; 66: 317-322.

15. Mohsenin V. Effects of gender on upper airway collapsibility and severity of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep Med. 2003; 4: 523-529.

16. Brooks LJ, Strohl KP. Size and mechanical properties of the pharynx in healthy men and women. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992; 146: 1394-1397.

17. Bixler EO, Vgontzas AN, Lin HM, Ten Have T, Rein J, Vela-Bueno A, Kales A. Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in women: effects of gender. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001; 163: 608-613.

18. Resta O, Caratozzolo G, Pannacciulli N, Stefano A, Giliberti T, Carpagnano GE, et al. Gender, age and menopause effects on the prevalence and the characteristics of obstructive sleep apnea in obesity. Eur J Clin Invest. 2003; 33: 1084-1089.

19. Olson AL, Zwillich C. The obesity hypoventilation syn- drome. Am J Med. 2005; 118: 948-956.

20. Kessler R, Chaouat A, Schinkewitch P, Faller M, Casel S, Krieger J, et al. The obesity-hypoventilation syn- drome revisited: A prospective study of 34 consecutive cases. Chest. 2001; 120: 369-376.

21. Mokhlesi B: Obesity hypoventilation syndrome. A state-of- the-art review. Respir Care. 2010; 55: 1347-1362; discussion 1363-1365.

22. Chau EHL, Lam D, Wong J, Mokhlesi B, Chung F. Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome. A Review of Epidemiology, Pathophysiology and Perioperative Considerations. Anesthesiology. 2012; 117: 188-205.

23. Berg G, Delaive K, Manfreda J, Walld R, Kryger MH. The use of health-care resources in obesity-hypoventilation syn- drome. Chest. 2001; 120: 377-383.

24. Heinemanna F, Budweisera S, Dobroschkea J, Pfeifer M. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation improves lung volumes in the obesity hypoventilation syndrome, Respir Med. 2007; 101: 1229-1235.

25. Nowbar S, Burkart KM, Gonzales G, Fedorowicz A, Gozansky WS, Gaudio JC, et al. Obesity- associated hypoventilation in hospitalized patients: prevalence, effects and outcome. Am J Med. 2004; 116: 1-7.

26. Jokic R, Zintel T, Sridhar G, Gallagher CG, Fitzpatrick MF. Ventilatory responses to hypercapnia and hypoxia in relatives of patients with the obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Thorax. 2000; 55: 940-945.

27. Karason K, Lindroos AK, Stenlof K, Sjostrom L. Relief of cardio respiratory symptoms and increased physical activity after surgically induced weight loss: results from the Swedish Obese Subjects study. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160: 1797-1802.

28. Resta O, Foschino-Barbaro MP, BonfittoP, Talamo S, Legari G, De Pergola G, et al. Prevalence and mechanisms of diurnal hypercapnia in a sample of morbidly obese subjects with obstructive sleep apnoea. Respir Med. 2000; 94: 240-246.

29. Weitzenblum E. Pickwickian syndrome reconsidered. Relations between sleep apnea syndrome and obesity-hypoventilation syndrome. Rev Prat. 1992; 42: 1920-1924.

30. Rabec CA. Obesity hypoventilation syndrome: what’s in a name? Chest. 2002; 122: 1498.

31. Macavei VM, Spurling KJ, Loft J, Makker HK. Diagnostic Predictors of Obesity-Hypoventilation Syndrome in Patients Suspected of Having Sleep Disordered breathing, J Clin Sleep Med. 2013; 9: 879-884.

32. Basoglu OK, Tasbakan MS. Comparison of clinical characteristics in patients with obesity hypoventilation syndrome and obese obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a case-control study. 2014; 8:167-174.

33. Manuel AR, Hart N, Stradling JR. Is raised bicarbonate, without hypercapnia, part of the physiological spectrum of obesity-related hypoventilation? Chest. 2015; 147: 362-368.

34. Mokhlesi B, Saager L, Kaw RQ. Should we routinely screen for hypercapnia in sleep apnea patients before elective non cardiac surgery? Cleve Clin J Med. 2010; 77: 60-61.

35. Ward S, Chatwin M, Heather S, Simonds AK. Randomized controlled trial of non-invasive ventilation for nocturnal hypoventilation in neuromuscular and chest wall disease patients with daytime normocapnia. Thorax. 2005; 60: 1019-1024.

36. Kushida CA, Littner MR, Morgenthaler T, Alessi CA, Bailey D, Coleman J, et al. Practice parameters for the indications for po- lysomnography and related procedures: Sleep. 2005; 28: 499-521.

37. Mokhlesi B, Tulaimal A. Recent advances in obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Chest. 2007; 132; 1322-1336.

38. Piper AJ, Grunstein RR. Obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Mechanisms and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011; 183: 292-298.

39. Borel JC, Borel AL , Monneret D, Tamisler R, Levy P, Pepin J. Obesity hypoventilation syndrome : from sleep-disordered breathing to systemic co morbidities and the need to offer combined treatment strategies. Respirology. 2012; 17: 601-610.

40. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Clinical Guidelines for the manual titration of positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2008; 4: 157-171.

41. Piper AJ, Wang D, Yee BJ, Barnes DJ, Grunstein RR. Randomized trial of CPAP vs bi-level support in the treatment of obesity hypoventilation syndrome without severe nocturnal desaturation. Thorax. 2008; 63: 395-401.

42. Storre JH, Seuthe B, Fletcher R, Milioglu S, Dreher M, Sorichter S, et al. Average volume-assured pressure support in obesity hypoventilation. A randomized crossover trial. Chest. 2006; 130: 815-821.

43. Piper AJ. Obesity hypoventilation syndrome: therapeutic implications for treatment. Expert Rev Resp Med. 2010;4:57-70.

Citation

Piroddi IMG, Karamichali S, Barlascini C and Nicolini A. Obesity and Breathing Related Sleep Disorders: Concise Clinical Review. SM J Pulm Med. 2015; 1(1): 1002.

Other Articles

Article Image 1

The Overview of the Clinical Significance of Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis

Due to lack of the practical application guidelines for Interferon-Gamma Release Assays (IGRAs), the testing result of IGRAs may be misinterpreted in clinical practice in China. Therefore, we clarify some important issues related to IGRAs based on the available evidences in this review. The available data reveals that IGRAs can be used to assist the diagnosis of Latent TB Infection (LTBI) and combined with HIV infection; while for the definite diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of active TB have no value. In addition, IGRAs showed no better performance than TST in low income countries. It should make practical guidelines to TB diagnostic tools and further strengthen the training and guide for the clinicians the low income countries, so as to more scientifically manage TB.

Yulu Gao¹#, Shencong Mei²#, Jun Wang⁴#, Zhonghua Liu⁶, Qinyun Li³, Zongshuai Gao³, Changtai Zhu³,⁶, and Yongning Sun⁵


Article Image 1

Tracheal Diverticulosis Presenting as Chronic Cough

A 62 year old female patient with mild intermittent asthma was seen in the pulmonary clinic with a history of a productive cough for two years. She had required multiple courses of antibiotics over the past year. She underwent a CT scan of the chest which showed central bronchiectasis and multiple discrete diverticula projecting posteriorly from the membranous trachea measuring up to 2.3 x 1.7 x 1.7 cm.  The diverticula involved nearly the entire course of the trachea (Figure 1). A bronchoscopy was performed which showed tracheal pouches and indentations (Figure 2). There were no prior scans and therefore it is unclear for how long she had the diverticula. Her symptoms improved with antibiotics and she remains relatively well with chest physiotherapy and bronchial hygiene.

Humam Farah¹*, Parth Parikh¹, Michael Bukstein¹, and Ruxana T Sadikot²,³


Article Image 1

Emphyema Due to Hepatic Abscess

A 36 year-old man with previous biliary surgery due to pancreatitis with pseudo cyst formation five years earlier, had one week of right upper-quadrant pain. Although the pain was pleuritic, he had no respiratory symptoms and a normal chest radiograph.

Joseph R Shiber¹* and David Skarupa²


Article Image 1

Primary Soft-Tissue Nocardial Abscess with a Complication of Severe Pneumonia: A Case Report and Literature Review

Although very rare, nocardiosis is considered as an important opportunistic infection, especially in immunocompromised patients with long-term corticosteroid use or organ transplantation. Lung and skin involvements are frequent, but primary soft-tissue nocardiosis is very rare. Herein, we described a 48 year-old Chinese man with a primary soft-tissue nocardial abscess caused by multidrug-resistant nocardia asteroides, which was sensitive only to imipenem and resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and other antibiotics like amikacin and vancomycin.An initial treatment with a combination of surgical drainage and imipenem was conducted, but a secondary severe pneumonia was complicated two weeks later. Then, the antimicrobial regimen was shifted to sulbactam sodium/cefoperazone and itraconazole injection for the severe pneumonia. For nocardiosis, drainage was continued and minocycline was administered instead of imipenem for maintenance therapy for 9 months. Eventually, the patient recovered well from the primary soft-tissue nocardial abscess and the secondary severe pneumonia. To our knowledge, this is the first case with a combination of primary softtissue nocardial abscess, multidrug-resistant nocardia asteroides and complication of severe pneumonia.

Shufang Zhang¹#, Feifei Zhou²#, Xiuhui Lin³, Liuhong Wang⁴, Wei Cui³, and Gensheng Zhang³*


Article Image 1

Superior Vena Cava Obstruction in Lung Carcinoma

We report a case of Pancoast tumor with Superior vena cava obstruction and thoracic outlet syndrome in 60 year old patient who has been diagnosed to have undifferentiated lung carcinoma on evaluation. Patient was a chronic smoker from 40 years on treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and presented with hoarseness of voice, puffiness of face, pain in right arm and chest.

Chest radiography and computerized tomography of thorax showed homogenous density in right upper lobe extending in to superior mediastinum with involvement of multiple groups of lymphnodes. CT guided biopsy confirmed diagnosis of undifferentiated large cell carcinoma. Patient developed clinical features of superior vena caval obstruction in a period of 15 days.

Sreenivasa Rao Sudulagunta¹*, Shyamala Krishnaswamy Kothandapani², and Mahesh Babu Sodalagunta³


Article Image 1

The Role of Lung Function and the Importance to Measure Small Airways Modifications

Normally in clinical practice the evaluation of lung pathophysiology follows a functional and mechanical evaluation primarily through spirometry and plethysmography. The Small Airways (SAW) are one of the most important targets for respiratory diseases and various studies underline their strict relations with chronic diseases like asthma or COPD, although it is nowadays recognized their role in a lot of other pathological entities. The evaluation of SAW is not always easy and often more than one functional test must be done. So, the possibility to known the “scenario” of available functional respiratory tests, both in clinical and research setting, represents a central point in the respiratory world. Moreover the correct interpretation of the lung function tests is necessary not only to better evaluate the actual clinical status of the respiratory disorders but also to allow the appropriate therapeutic choice. The aim of the current review is to direct the readers attention to the importance of lung function evaluation and its specific role both in clinical and research setting.

Dejan Radovanovic¹,², Giovanni Marchese², and Pierachille Santus¹,²*


Article Image 1

Saber Sheath Trachea: Functional and Clinical Correlations

Saber sheath trachea refers to diffuse coronal narrowing of the intra-thoracic portion of the trachea with concomitant widening of the sagittal diameter. It is considered to be widely associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). The diagnosis is based on the calculation of the tracheal index which is the ratio of coronal to sagittal length in the axial plane measured 1cm above the upper margin of the aortic arch. Saber sheath trachea is considered to be present when the tracheal index is less than 0.67. The tracheal index has been associated with severity of obstruction and most notably with hyperinflation and extent of emphysema in COPD patients. Thus, it can have clinical importance. The presence of saber sheath trachea and its clinical implications should be further explored in COPD as well as in other diseases in which emphysema represents a major component, as Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis Emphysema (CPFE).

Vasilios Tzilas¹ and Demosthenes Bouros¹*


Article Image 1

Impact of Poor Glycemic Control on Severity and Clinical Course of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Patients with Co-Existing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus - One Year Prospective Study

Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) are common and under diagnosed chronic non-communicable medical conditions in India. The escalating epidemic of DM is a great challenge for the clinicians treating COPD as large number of patients have Poor Glycemic Control (PGC). We undertook this trial to study the influence of PGC on severity and disease outcome in COPD subjects with concomitant DM.

Materials and methods: COPD patients either known or newly diagnosed DM cases as per WHO criteria were enrolled in the study and grouped into patients with PGC and Optimal Glycemic Control (OGC) based on HbA1c measurements. Subjects were closely monitored for 1 year.

Results: Of the 490 subjects analyzed, 336 (68.57%) had PGC and 154 (31.43%) had OGC. COPD patients with PGC had more severe disease compared to OGC (Mean FEV1% predicted 48.47 ± 13.7 vs 67.4 ± 13.86, p= 0.0061) and also DOSE score (4.35 ± 1.88 vs 3.18 ± 2.30 p= 0.0052) at the baseline. After 1 year, patients with PGC had statistically significant high rates of exacerbations. The mean DOSE scores were statistically greater in PGC patients after 12 months suggesting worsening of COPD symptoms and quality of life. Hospitalization was significantly frequent and longer in PGC patients. (6.56 ± 1.70 vs 4.16 ± 1.26 p= 0.0004).

Conclusion: Patients with PGC had more severe COPD, poor lung function, high symptom score, and increased risk of exacerbations with frequent and prolonged hospitalizations.

Vinay Mahishale*, Ajith Eti, Bhagyashri Patil, Mitchelle Lolly, and Sujeer Khan


Article Image 1

Use of Telehealth Data in Multidisciplinary Team Review of COPD

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a significant illness that lends itself well to telehealth – the remote monitoring of patients at home. Currently, COPD telehealth is usually led by community nurses. Given the multifaceted needs of patients with COPD, we argued that a Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) approach is a better way of holistically managing patients on telehealth. We present our experience of working as part of a community MDT to review patients already undergoing COPD telemonitoring. We collected data on the MDT activity during a six months period with the aim of highlighting deviations from best practice. The MDT prospectively reviewed 95 patients and issued 141 recommendations which were fed to the patient’s usual General Practitioner (GP) or directly implemented by the telehealth staff. We concluded that a multidisciplinary review of COPD telehealth patients is feasible and has the potential to add value to what is largely a technology-led service.

Ghassan A Hamad¹*, Michael Crooks², and Alyn H Morice³


Article Image 1

Home-Based System for Recording Pulmonary Function and Disease-Related Symptoms in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD - A Pilot Study

Introduction: Many patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) suffer from acute exacerbations characterized by an increase in symptoms beyond normal day-to-day variation. The prognosis of patients with frequent exacerbations is poor and effort to curb these worsening episodes has great potential to improve the patient’s quality of life and to reduce associated costs. Telemonitoring has been proposed as a promising strategy in this respect. However, information on what physical signs or symptoms that should be recorded and how recorded data should be interpreted is largely missing in the literature.

Methods: A new home-based system, based on a tablet computer, which can guide COPD patients to perform spirometry (inspiratory capacity, IC and forced expiratory volume in one and six seconds, FEV1 and FEV6) and record symptoms (COPD assessment test, CAT) was developed. The system was evaluated for 8-12 weeks in four patients with moderate to severe COPD with the aims to; i) assess the feasibility of the system to be used unsupervised by COPD patients and, ii) to evaluate the quality and ability of recorded parameters to reveal early signs of an exacerbation. Pearson bivariate correlation was performed between all outcome measures and descriptive information about inherent subject properties were presented.

Results: The system was well accepted by all study subjects and the study generated a total of 253 measurements of which 94.5% were considered acceptable for analysis. One of the subjects developed an acute exacerbation towards the end of the study, whereas the other three subjects remained stable. Descriptive analysis of the data suggest that trends in the CAT score may indicate changes in health status and that IC tends to be more responsive to these changes compared to FEV1.

Conclusion: The system developed in this study is well suited to be used unsupervised by COPD patients. Recorded data, in particular CAT, may be sensitive enough to detect early signs of an acute COPD exacerbation, although more data is needed to fully resolve the nature of such an association.

Ohberg F¹*, Karin Wadell², Anders Blomberg³, Kenji Claesson⁴, Urban Edstrom⁵, and Asa Holmner⁶