Back to Journal

SM Journal of Environmental Toxicology

Organochlorine Pesticides (Aldrin, DDT) and PCBs in Market Available Cigarettes in Abeokuta, Ogun State, and Their Health Risks

Abstract Citation INTRODUCTION Effects of Pesticides on Humans Aldrin Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (Ddt) Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Pcbs) Pesticides in Cigarettes MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS AND DISCUSSION DISCUSSION CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS REFERENCES
Details

Received: 21-Nov-2024

Accepted: 03-Dec-2024

Published: 10-Dec-2024

Hussein Olatunde Bello*

Department of Environmental Management and Toxicology, University of Agriculture, Nigeria

Corresponding Author:

Hussein Olatunde Bello, Department of Environmental Management and Toxicology, University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Alabata, Ogun State, Nigeria

Keywords

DDT; Aldrin; Polychlorinated Biphenyls; Cigarettes; Human Health; Cancer.

Abstract

Cigarette smoking, or tobacco consumption, remains a significant health concern around the world. While there has been more focus on the harmful effects of nicotine in cigarettes, only little is known about some other components such as Polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides like DDT and Aldrin, which are used on tobacco farms. Human exposure to pesticide residues on tobacco occurs when residues remaining in cigarette smoke are inhaled.

This study was carried out with the aim of (i) investigating the concentration levels of organochlorine pesticides (Aldrin and DDT) and PCB in ten Market available cigarettes in Abeokuta, Ogun State, and (ii) assess the human health associated with the concentration levels found in the cigarettes.

The Mean concentration ranges of the pesticides in the cigarette samples were as follows; Aldrin (0.015µg/g - 0.048µg/g). DDT (0,116µg/g - 0.330µg/g), and PCB (0.223µg/g - 0.567µg/g). From the analysis, the hazard quotient for the pesticides and PCB were also very low and unable to cause any health problems, with the cancer risk in them also at a very minimal level. However, PCB is more likely to be carcinogenic due to its high cancer risk values, though it might not have a significant effect in contributing to non-carcinogenic adverse effects, just like with DDT and Aldrin.

Citation

Olatunde Bello H (2024) Organochlorine Pesticides (Aldrin, DDT) and PCBs in Market Available Cigarettes in Abeokuta, Ogun State, and Their Health Risks. SM J Environ Toxicol 7: 8.

INTRODUCTION

Pesticides are any substance or mixture of substances of chemical or biological ingredients intended for repelling, destroying, or controlling any pest, or for regulating plant growth [1]. Pesticides and agrochemicals, in general, became an important component of worldwide agriculture systems during the last century, allowing for a noticeable increase in crop yields and food production [2].

Use of plant protection chemicals, mainly pesticides, has become integral part of modern agricultural production systems around the world, not only to protect the crop but also to secure the optimum crop yield [3]. Organochlorine pesticides (also called chlorinated hydrocarbons) are organic compounds attached to five or more than five chlorine atoms. They represent one of the first categories of pesticides ever synthesized and are used in agriculture [4].

In 1972, over twelve thousand tons of pesticides were used on tobacco crops, and according to a study to determine the chlorinated pesticide residue levels in mainstream smoke, the rate of transfer of pesticides from tobacco into smoke averaged about 12% of that in the tobacco before combustion [5]

Pesticide residue can remain on tobacco leaves after harvesting and processing them into their manufactured forms. When tobacco is smoked, these residues, along with the tobacco and other additives, are burnt, and the resultant smoky mixture inhaled by active and passive smokers is known as pyrolysis products [5].

Effects of Pesticides on Humans

The characteristics of pesticides, such as high lipophilicity, bioaccumulation, long half-life and potential of long-range transport, have increased the chances of contaminating the air, water and soil, even after many years of application [6]. Due to lack of proper legislation, improper market regulations and ignorance shown by people, agricultural workers from developing countries are prone to experience high levels of agricultural chemicals, including pesticides [7]. Among agriculturalists of developing countries, pesticide exposure is the primary occupational hazard, which leads to health issues and environmental contamination associated with pesticide use [8-12]. Organochlorine pesticides may alter the proper function of the nervous system of the insects leading to disorders such as convulsions and paralysis followed by eventual death [13].

Aldrin

Aldrin is a colorless organochlorine insecticide spread to soils to kill termites, grasshoppers, corn rootworm, and other insect pests. It is highly lipophilic and its solubility in water is only 0.027 mg/L, which intensifies its persistence in the environment [14]. Aldrin is a synthetic organochlorine pesticide that is used as a broad-spectrum soil insecticide for protection of food crops, and as seed dressing for the control of pests such as ants and termites [15]. Aldrin exposure among the general population may result via dietary intake, however over time, it has become harder to find aldrin residue in food. Neurotoxic symptoms in humans include headache, dizziness, general malaise, muscular twitching, vomiting, or myoclonic jerks after prolonged exposure to lower dosages of these substances [15].

Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (Ddt)

In 1940s, DDT was used as the first modern synthetic insecticide to control insect in agriculture, housing, institutes and to combat insect-borne human diseases [16]. Although DDT use has generally been restricted since the early 1970s, exposure to the pesticide remains widespread [17]. Until present, there is no substitute for DDT in terms of comparable efficiency and operational possibility on vector-borne diseases control [18]. DDT was classified into class II (moderate toxic) in the WHO classification system for pesticides [19]. DDT exposure can occur by eating, breathing, or touching products contaminated with DDT [20]. Following exposure to high doses, human symptoms can include vomiting, tremors or shakiness, and seizures. Laboratory animal studies show DDT exposure can affect the liver and reproduction. DDT is a possible human carcinogen according to U.S. and International authorities [17].

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (Pcbs)

PCBs were first produced commercially in the 1920s, although it was not until the 1950s that the industrial application of PCBs increased significantly [21]. PCBs build up throughout the food chain. They spread to and concentrate in the liver and fat tissue after being quickly absorbed from the digestive system [22]. PCB exposure, especially during fetal and early life, reduces IQ and alters behavior. The PCBs alter thyroid and reproductive function in both males and females and increase the risk of developing cardiovascular and liver disease and diabetes. Women are at high risk of giving birth to infants of low birth weight, who are at high lifetime risk for several diseases [23].

Pesticides in Cigarettes

Manufacturers have described the cigarette as “a drug administration system for the delivery of nicotine in acceptable and attractive form” [24]. Smokers are exposed to a toxic mix of over 7,000 chemicals when they inhale cigarette smoke. The harmful chemicals in cigarette smoke can damage nearly every organ in the body. Nonsmokers are exposed to many of these same chemicals through secondhand smoke [25]. Pesticides sprayed on tobacco plantations are among the over 5,000 chemicals that can be found in tobacco products [3,26,27]. When tobacco is smoked, these residues can be degraded but usually not destroyed. Due to the huge number of toxic chemicals, the presence of pesticides in tobacco products and smoke is not treated as an additional alarming issue [5]. The wide range of pesticides used on tobacco crops includes Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and lindane, two organochlorine compounds whose use is today limited due to their toxic effects on both environment and human health [28]. DDT also belongs to the 98 tobacco smoke components for which risk assessment authorities have established a human inhalation risk value for cancer [29].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample Collection

The cigarette samples were collected at Osiele Market in Abeokuta, and transported to the Environmental Management and Toxicology Laboratory at the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. The samples include 10 different brands of cigarettes popular in Nigeria.

Sample Preparation

Each cigarette wrap was torn to remove the tobacco content for easier access to take samples for weighing. The dried tobacco samples were then wrapped in a white sheet of paper, after which small portions were gradually taken for weighing.

Sample Extraction

Exactly 2.0g of each tobacco sample was weighed twice into separate centrifuge tubes to serve as duplicate samples. In each centrifuge tube containing the weighed tobacco sample, 4ml of Formic acid was added to facilitate digestion. The tube was then placed in a water bath for 30 minutes at 90C and allowed to cool at room temperature. Thereafter, approximately 4ml of hexane was added, after which it was shaken for 5 minutes and centrifuged at 4000 revolutions per minute for 3 minutes. After centrifugation, two layers were obtained, comprising of the top and bottom layers. The top hexane layer was transferred into a clean sample vial using a teat pipette. Another 4ml of hexane was subsequently added to the centrifuge tube containing the residue, and extraction was repeated, followed by the subsequent transfer of the top hexane layer into the same sample vial. The extraction was repeated for a third time by adding 4 ml of ethanol into the centrifuge tube containing the residue, after which it was centrifuged. The top layer obtained is subsequently transferred into the sample vial used for extract collection.

Pesticide Analysis

Samples were analyzed by the use of a model PAS-1701 gas chromatograph (Agilent, GC Model 68900) equipped with a fused capillary column of (30m length × 0.32mm i.d. and 0.25-µm film thickness). Oven temperatures were programmed from an initial temperature of 160οC for 1 min, ramped to 260οC at a rate of 5οC/min, and then held at 260οC for 15 min. Nitrogen was then used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 3mL/ min. Residues were detected using an Electron Capture Detector (ECD).

Data Analysis

Organochlorine pesticide data were subjected to simple descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and inferential (Duncan Multiple Range Test) statistics using SPSS for Windows (version 22.0).

Health risk assessment

The health risk assessment of OCPs was calculated for Average Daily Dose (ADD), Hazard Quotient (HQ), Hazard Index (HI), and Cancer Risk (CR), using the formula highlighted by USEPA.

Where, ADD = Average daily dose (mg kg-1 day-1)
C = Concentration of OCPs in cigarette (mg kg-1),
IRing = Ingestion rate of cigarette (50 mg day-1),
IRinh = Inhalation rate of cigarette (20 m-3 day-1),
ED = Exposure duration (years) = 30 years for carcinogenic effects for adults,

EF = Exposure frequency (day/year) = 365 days year-1,
CF = Conversion factor = 10-6 kg mg−1 (4.2 x 10-2)
PEF = Particle emission factor = 1.36 x 109 m3 kg−1
AT = Averaging time or life expectancy = 54.5 years,AT = ED for non carcinogenic effects,
BW = Body weight (kg); 60 kg for an adult.

Where, ADD =Average daily dose (mg kg-1 day-1),
RfD =Reference dose (mg kg-1 day-1),
N=numbers of observed elements.
HQ > 1 denotes adverse health effects; HQ < 1 indicates no adverse effects,

Cancer Risk = ADD x SF (4)

Where, ADD = Average daily intake (mg kg-1 day-1),

SF = Slope factor (mg-1 kg day)

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The Mean Concentrations of Selected Organochlorine Pesticides; Aldrin, Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in cigarette samples from Osiele market in Abeokuta are shown in Table 2. The mean concentration of Aldrin ranges between 0.048 ± 0.001 µg/g and 0.015 ± 0.001 µg/g, DDT ranges between 0.330 ± 0.002 µg/g and 0.116 ± 0.002 µg/g, and PCB ranges between 0.567 ± 0.001 µg/g and 0.223 ± 0.001 µg/g.

Table 1: Names of the 10 selected cigarette brands

NAMES OF SELECTED CIGARETTE BRANDS

1

Rothmans Menthol

2

Time

3

B&H Switch

4

Bohem

5

Royal Standard

6

Edge Change

7

Edge

8

Pall Mall

9

Rothmans

10

B&H Special Filter

Table 2: Descriptive statistics of OCPs (µg/g) and PCB (µg/g) in cigarette

µg/g

 

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Minimum

Maximum

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aldrin

Rothmans Menthol

2

0.015a

0.001

0.014

0.016

 

Time

2

0.020bc

0.001

0.019

0.021

 

B&H Switch

2

0.037g

0.001

0.036

0.037

 

Bohem

2

0.026d

0.003

0.024

0.028

 

Royal Standard

2

0.018ab

0.001

0.017

0.019

 

Edge Change

2

0.024bc

0.002

0.022

0.025

 

Edge

2

0.034fg

0.001

0.033

0.035

 

Pall Mall

2

0.048h

0.001

0.047

0.048

 

Rothmans

2

0.033f

0.002

0.031

0.034

 

B&H Special Filter

2

0.028e

0.001

0.027

0.029

 

Total

20

0.028

0.01

0.014

0.048

DDT

Rothmans Menthol

2

0.206f

0.002

0.204

0.207

 

Time

2

0.177d

0.002

0.175

0.178

 

B&H Switch

2

0.219g

0.001

0.218

0.22

 

Bohem

2

0.155b

0.001

0.154

0.155

 

Royal Standard

2

0.225h

0.001

0.224

0.226

 

Edge Change

2

0.298i

0.004

0.295

0.3

 

Edge

2

0.116a

0.002

0.114

0.117

 

Pall Mall

2

0.330j

0.002

0.328

0.331

 

Rothmans

2

0.196e

0.003

0.194

0.198

 

B&H Special Filter

2

0.168c

0.004

0.165

0.17

 

Total

20

0.209

0.063

0.114

0.331

PCB

Rothmans Menthol

2

0.249b

0.004

0.246

0.251

 

Time

2

0.223a

0.001

0.222

0.224

 

B&H Switch

2

0.318d

0.001

0.317

0.319

 

Bohem

2

0.443h

0.005

0.439

0.446

 

Royal Standard

2

0.353f

0.005

0.349

0.356

 

Edge Change

2

0.313d

0.003

0.311

0.315

 

Edge

2

0.289c

0.004

0.286

0.292

 

Pall Mall

2

0.567i

0.001

0.566

0.568

 

Rothmans

2

0.338e

0.001

0.337

0.339

 

B&H Special Filter

2

0.403g

0.003

0.401

0.405

 

Total

20

0.349

0.098

0.222

0.568

Tables 3 and 4 also show the Hazard Quotient and Cancer risk of each organochlorine pesticide as determined for each brand.

Table 3: Hazard quotient values of OCPs and PCB in cigarette

 

 

 

Mean

 

Std. Deviation

 

Minimum

 

Maximum

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aldrin

Rothmans Menthol

0.00042

0.00004

0.00039

0.00044

 

Time

0.00056

0.00004

0.00053

0.00058

 

B&H Switch

0.00101

0.00002

0.001

0.00103

 

Bohem

0.00072

0.00008

0.00067

0.00078

 

Royal Standard

0.0005

0.00004

0.00047

0.00053

 

Edge Change

0.00065

0.00006

0.00061

0.00069

 

Edge

0.00094

0.00004

0.00092

0.00097

 

Pall Mall

0.00132

0.00002

0.00131

0.00133

 

Rothmans

0.0009

0.00006

0.00086

0.00094

 

B&H Special Filter

0.00078

0.00004

0.00075

0.00081

DDT

Rothmans Menthol

0.00034

0

0.00034

0.00035

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Time

0.00029

0

0.00029

0.0003

 

B&H Switch

0.00037

0

0.00036

0.00037

 

Bohem

0.00026

0

0.00026

0.00026

 

Royal Standard

0.00038

0

0.00037

0.00038

 

Edge Change

0.0005

0.00001

0.00049

0.0005

 

Edge

0.00019

0

0.00019

0.0002

 

Pall Mall

0.00055

0

0.00055

0.00055

 

Rothmans

0.00033

0

0.00032

0.00033

 

B&H Special Filter

0.00028

0.00001

0.00028

0.00028

PCB

Rothmans Menthol

0.01035

0.00015

0.01025

0.01046

 

Time

0.00929

0.00006

0.00925

0.00933

 

B&H Switch

0.01325

0.00006

0.01321

0.01329

 

Bohem

0.01844

0.00021

0.01829

0.01858

 

Royal Standard

0.01469

0.00021

0.01454

0.01483

 

Edge Change

0.01304

0.00012

0.01296

0.01313

 

Edge

0.01204

0.00018

0.01192

0.01217

 

Pall Mall

0.02363

0.00006

0.02358

0.02367

 

Rothmans

0.01408

0.00006

0.01404

0.01413

 

B&H Special Filter

0.016792

0.000118

0.016708

0.016875

Table 4: Cancer risk values of OCPs and PCB in cigarette

 

 

 

Mean

 

Std. Deviation

 

Minimum

 

Maximum

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aldrin

Rothmans Menthol

0.00042

0.00004

0.00039

0.00044

 

Time

0.00056

0.00004

0.00053

0.00058

 

B&H Switch

0.00101

0.00002

0.001

0.00103

 

Bohem

0.00072

0.00008

0.00067

0.00078

 

Royal Standard

0.0005

0.00004

0.00047

0.00053

 

Edge Change

0.00065

0.00006

0.00061

0.00069

 

Edge

0.00094

0.00004

0.00092

0.00097

 

Pall Mall

0.00132

0.00002

0.00131

0.00133

 

Rothmans

0.0009

0.00006

0.00086

0.00094

 

B&H Special Filter

0.00078

0.00004

0.00075

0.00081

DDT

Rothmans Menthol

0.00034

0

0.00034

0.00035

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Time

0.00029

0

0.00029

0.0003

 

B&H Switch

0.00037

0

0.00036

0.00037

 

Bohem

0.00026

0

0.00026

0.00026

 

Royal Standard

0.00038

0

0.00037

0.00038

 

Edge Change

0.0005

0.00001

0.00049

0.0005

 

Edge

0.00019

0

0.00019

0.0002

 

Pall Mall

0.00055

0

0.00055

0.00055

 

Rothmans

0.00033

0

0.00032

0.00033

 

B&H Special Filter

0.00028

0.00001

0.00028

0.00028

PCB

Rothmans Menthol

0.01035

0.00015

0.01025

0.01046

 

Time

0.00929

0.00006

0.00925

0.00933

 

B&H Switch

0.01325

0.00006

0.01321

0.01329

 

Bohem

0.01844

0.00021

0.01829

0.01858

 

Royal Standard

0.01469

0.00021

0.01454

0.01483

 

Edge Change

0.01304

0.00012

0.01296

0.01313

 

Edge

0.01204

0.00018

0.01192

0.01217

 

Pall Mall

0.02363

0.00006

0.02358

0.02367

 

Rothmans

0.01408

0.00006

0.01404

0.01413

 

B&H Special Filter

0.016792

0.000118

0.016708

0.016875

DISCUSSION

Analysis of the mean concentration, as shown in Table 2, shows that the pesticide residue Aldrin has the lowest concentration of pesticides in the cigarettes. The brand with the highest concentration of Aldrin is Pall Mall, with a concentration of 0.048 µg/g, which varies widely from the concentration found in Rothmans Menthol, 0.015 µg/g, having the lowest concentration of Aldrin. The analysis also shows that PCB has the highest overall concentration of Pesticides. The cigarette brand, Pall Mall, has the highest concentration of 0.567 µg/g compared to the Time, which has the lowest PCB concentration with 0.223 µg/g. For DDT, overall concentration is just below that of PCB, and the result shows that Pall Mall has the highest concentration, 0.330 µg/g, while Edge has the lowest concentration, 0.116 µg/g.

Table 3 shows the analysis of the hazard quotient for all the pesticides in each cigarette brand. For Aldrin, Pall Mall has the highest hazard quotient at 0.00132, while Rothmans Menthol has the lowest at 0.00042. For DDT, Pall Mall recorded the highest value at 0.00055, while Edge recorded the lowest at 0.00019. For PCB, Pall Mall was determined to have the highest hazard quotient with 0.0263, compared to the value for the cigarette brand, Time, which has the lowest value of 0.00929. However, since a hazard quotient less than or equal to 1 indicates that adverse effects are not likely to occur and can be considered negligible,this means that the possibility for non-cancer health hazards to occur is extremely unlikely in all the selected cigarettes because they all have a hazard quotient less than one.

Figure 1, which shows the Hazard Index, also indicates that the cumulative values of all the hazard quotients will still be very unlikely to cause any problems as they all sum up to less than one. However, from Figure 2, which shows the contribution of these pesticides and PCB to non-carcinogenic adverse effects, PCB is more likely to pose a risk than Aldrin and DDT, both of which remain highly unlikely to cause any adverse effects.

Figure 1: Hazard index values of OCPs and PCB in cigarettes

Figure 2: Contribution of OCPs and PCB to non-carcinogenic adverse effects

Table 4 also shows cancer risk values of Aldrin, DDT, and PCB in the selected cigarettes. Since the risk of cancer due to exposure to a contaminant is commonly expressed in exponential terms of between 10-6 and 10-4 (USEPA, 2018), it can be seen that values for Aldrin and DDT are not within this range. However, for PCB, certain brands, such as B&H Switch, Bohem, Royal Standard, Edge Change, Edge, Rothmans, and B&H Special Filter, all fall within the possible risk range. Since they all have values ranging between 1.1 x 10-6 and 1.5 x 10-6, this means that the likelihood of cancer caused by PCB is one in 1,000,000, with other values not within this range having no possible risk factor.

Figure 3 shows the sum of cancer risk values, still indicating a low possibility of causing cancer. As also shown in Figure 4, PCB was determined to be more likely to cause cancer compared to the levels of Aldrin and DDT.

Figure 3: Sum of cancer risk values of OCPs and PCB in cigarette

Figure 4: Sum of cancer risk values of OCPs and PCB in cigarette

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The above study shows the likelihood of organochlorine pesticides and PCB posing a potential risk factor in cigarettes. In the brands of cigarettes selected for this study, Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) were present in greater amounts than seen for DDT and Aldrin, with Pall Mall being the brand with the highest amount of organochlorine pesticides and PCB.

In general, the study also shows that there is no significant amount of organochlorine pesticide that can cause serious health problems in the selected brands. However, PCB is more likely to be carcinogenic due to its high cancer risk values, though it might not have a significant effect in contributing to non-carcinogenic adverse effects, just like with DDT and Aldrin.

Controlling pesticide use when growing Tobacco is absolutely essential due to the negative effects these pesticides could potentially have on human health. Regular education and awareness campaigns on the risks of PCB exposure due to tobacco use or cigarette smoking should be conducted.

Additionally, the government should strongly oppose the import of pesticides. Also, to be avoided is soil that has been exposed to these chemicals. Pests should be managed using biological, cultural, and other less dangerous pest management techniques.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

First and foremost, I would like to Thank God for the successful completion of this project work. My sincere appreciation also goes to my undergraduate supervisor, Professor Olukayode Bamgbose, who was always there to provide advice on how to go about my research and report. I also appreciate my parents and siblings for their support and encouragement throughout the course of my research.

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

REFERENCES

1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Q&A on pests and pesticide management. FAO; 2021.

2. Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. FAO; 2012.

3. Khan ZS, Ghosh RK, Girame R, Utture SC, Gadgil M, Banerjee K, et al. Optimization of a sample preparation method for multiresidue analysis of pesticides in tobacco by single and multi-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2014; 1343: 200-206.

4. Abubakar Y, Tijjani H, Egbuna C, Adetunji CO, Patrick-Iwuanyanwu KC. Pesticides, history, and classification. Natural Remedies for Pest, Disease and Weed Control. 2020; 29: 29-42.

5. Chapman S. “Keep a low profile”: pesticide residue, additives, and freon use in Australian tobacco manufacturing. Tob Control. 2003; 12: 45-53.

6. Jayaraj R, Megha P, Sreedev P. Organochlorine pesticides, their toxic effects on living organisms and their fate in the environment. Interdisciplinary Toxicol. 2016; 9: 90-100.

7. Kim JH, Smith A. Distribution of organochlorine pesticides in soils from South Korea. Chemosphere. 2001; 43: 137-140.

8. Coronado GD, Thompson B, Strong L, Griffith WC, Islas I. Agricultural task and exposure to organophosphate pesticides among farmworkers. Environ Health Perspectives. 2004; 112: 142-147.

9. Konradsen F, van der Hoek W, Cole DC, Hutchinson G, Daisley H, Singh S, et al. Reducing acute poisoning in developing countries—options for restricting the availability of pesticides. Toxicol. 2003; 5: 249-261.

10. Mancini F, Van Bruggen AH, Jiggins JL, Ambatipudi AC, Murphy H. Acute pesticide poisoning among female and male cotton growers in India. Int J Occupational Environ Health. 2005; 11: 221-232

11. Remor AP, Totti CC, Moreira DA, Dutra GP, Heuser VD, Boeira JM. Occupational exposure of farm workers to pesticides: biochemical parameters and evaluation of genotoxicity. Environ Int. 2009; 35: 273-278.

12. Wesseling C, Aragón A, Castillo L, Corriols M, Chaverri F, Cruz EDL, et al. Hazardous pesticides in Central America. Int J Occupational Environ Health. 2001; 7: 287-294.

13. Zacharia JT. Identity, physical and chemical properties of pesticides. Pesticides in the Modern World-Trends in Pesticides Analysis. 2011; 21: 1-8.

14. Leshniowsky WO, Dugan PR, Pfister RM, Frea JI, Randles CI. Aldrin: removal from lake water by flocculent bacteria. Sci. 1970; 169: 993-995.

15. Honeycutt M, Shirley S. Aldrin. Encyclopedia of Toxicol. 2014; 1: 126-129.

16. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). DDT – a brief history and status. Washington (DC): EPA; 2012.

17. Beard J, Australian Rural Health Research Collaboration. DDT and human health. Sci Total Environ. 2006; 15: 78-89.

18. World Health Organization. Agrochemicals, health and environment: directory of resources. WHO; 2017.

19. Pretty J, Hine R. Pesticide use and the environment. Pesticide Detox. 2012; 23: 23-44

20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) factsheet. Atlanta (GA): CDC; 2021.

21. Kimbrough RD. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and human health: an update. Crit Rev Toxicol.1995; 25: 133-163.

22. Faroon OM, Keith SL, Smith-Simon C, De Rosa CT. Polychlorinated biphenyls: human health aspects. World Health Organization. 2003.

23. Carpenter DO. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): routes of exposure and effects on human health. Rev Environ Health 2006; 21: 1-23.

24. Teague CE. Research planning memorandum on some thoughts about new brands of cigarettes for the youth market. RJR Tobacco Company, 1973; 505101981-1992.

25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US), Office on Smoking and Health (US). How tobacco smoke causes disease: the biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2010.

26. Chen X, Zhang F, Yao H, Wang J, Qi D, Guo Y. Analyzing multiple pesticides in tobacco leaf using gas chromatography with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Separation Sci. 2018; 4: 1983-1989.

27. Rodgman A, Perfetti TA. The chemical components of tobacco and tobacco smoke. CRC Press. 2008; 1840.

28. Carvalho FP. Pesticides, environment, and food safety. Food Energy Security. 2017; 6: 48-60.

29. Talhout R, Schulz T, Florek E, Van Benthem J, Wester P, Opperhuizen A. Hazardous compounds in tobacco smoke. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011; 8: 613-628.

Other Articles

Article Image 1

Ecological Models for Predicting Contaminant Effects

Anthropogenic and natural environmental contaminants are a common problem and a source of concern to ecosystem health. Industrial toxins are one of the leading causes of pollution worldwide. Industrial toxins may arise as a result of air emissions, water releases, water seepage, air deposition or disposal and leaching of solid waste. The combination of natural and anthropogenic sources of toxins present challenges with respect to the protection of local ecological environments. Predicting the impacts of environmental contaminants on ecosystems become an important part of the decision-making process for managing environment problems. To protect ecological environments and species, it is necessary to assess the risk to organisms exposed to toxins, and find relevant factors that determine the persistence and extirpation of populations. Over the past several decades, ecotoxicological models have been widely applied to predict contaminant effects.

Qihua Huang*


Article Image 1

Solubilization of Metal Particles and Lung Toxicity

Inhaled particles are readily phagocytosed by alveolar macrophages (AMs) present in the lung. Other routes of particle exposure targeting the lung and frequently used with animal models include intratracheal instillation and oropharyngeal aspiration. The mechanism (s) by which AMs drive pulmonary toxicity downstream of particle uptake is not fully understood, as well as the contributing role of other phagocytic cell types present in the airways and lung including epithelial cells.

William M Gwinn*


Article Image 1

Changes in the Pituitary and hypothalamus Monoaminergic Neurotransmitters after Acute and Prolonged Stress Exposure to Benzo (α) Pyrene in Acanthopagrus latus

In this study, the effects of the Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Benzo (α) pyrene (BαP) exposure on the levels of serotonin (5-HT) and dopamine (DA) in the pituitary and hypothalamus of Yellowfin seabream, (Acanthopagrus latus) were examined. To assess the acute stress responses, vegetable oil (2 µl g-1) containing BαP (50 mg kg-1) was injected into the treatment group of fish (the vegetable oil alone was the control), and brain samples from different groups were collected 3 hr after injection. Base line group was not injected. To study the long-term stress, brains were collected from both injected groups after 72 hr. The amounts of serotonin, dopamine, and amine metabolites in the hypothalamus and pituitary were measured. Results showed that BαP influenced the serotonergic system more than the dopaminergic system for both acute and prolonged stress in both the hypothalamus and pituitary. Acute exposure to BαP induced significant decreases in DA and increases in DOPAC (3, 4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid) in the pituitary (P<0.05). Major changes induced by both acute and prolonged exposure to BαP included significant decreases in 5-HT, increases in 5-HIAA (5-hydroxy-3- indoleacetic acid) and increases in the 5-HIAA/5-HT ratio (P<0.05). These exposures might affect the synthesis, storage, uptake/release, and degradation of the neurotransmitters in the hypothalamus and pituitary of sea bream, especially the pituitary gland.

Sara Rastgar, Abdol-Ali Movahedinia, Ahmad Savari, Hosein Pasha Zanosi, Morteza Behnam Rasoli, and Rashid Alijani Ardeshir*


Article Image 1

Policy-Practice Nexus: Pesticide Registration, Distribution and Use in Ethiopia

To promote environmental governance of pesticides, Ethiopia has developed a legal framework on pesticide registration, distribution and use. However, there is no clear answer to the question whether the policies on pesticide registration, distribution and use were implemented in an effective and sustainable way at the national and local levels. Therefore, this study is designed to assess the gap between the state pesticide policy and its implementation with respect to pesticides registration, distribution and use in Ethiopia. The data were collected from state’s pesticide experts (regulators), distributors (importers and retailers) and end users (vegetable framers) through structured and semi structured interview, observations and existed documents. The data were analyzed in combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. The empirical results indicated that existing law do not function in an adequate way due to inefficient implementation and missing legal instruments. Thus, present shortcomings and future endeavors may need to find ways to envisage better implementation of the law that is designed to govern pesticide use by farmers from registration to distribution and use and monitoring, including quality control. Last but not least, there is a need to increase capacity of state actors (human, financial and material) both in the national and local level and participation of private actors should be considered for sustainable pesticide governance that will benefit Ethiopia.

Belay Tizazu Mengistie*


Article Image 1

Biodegradation of Toxic Compounds by Aerobic Granulation Technology

Aerobic granulation technology is a strong contender to replace conventional wastewater treatment processes. Aerobic granules are microspheres of self-immobilized microorganisms and they can be easily separated from the liquid phase as they settle many times faster than sludge flocs. Biodegradation of toxic compounds is a crucial area where traditional wastewater treatment processes are still struggling. It is a relatively new research area for aerobic granulation technology, but it holds the key for this technology to establish itself as an effective alternative of present day wastewater treatment processes. This review covers the mostly explored toxic compounds which have been successfully treated by aerobic granulation technology. Present research trends of this technology in biodegradation of toxic compound have been critically analyzed to identify the future research directions. In addition to a summary of different reports, authors’ own opinions on this subject have been presented

Saurabh Jyoti Sarma¹ and Joo-Hwa Tay¹*


Article Image 1

Participatory Demonstration of Gully Treatment Method for Gully Rehabilitation in Dollo Schem, Kamba District, South Ethiopia

Gully erosion is the major environmental problem threating huge area of agricultural lands in south Ethiopia, particularly. The present study aimed at evaluating demonstrates gully treatment methods for gully rehabilitation in Kamba, South Ethiopia. On farm filed experiments, key informant interview and focus group discussion were used to collect and analyze experimental data. The result of this study indicates that integration of check dame with Elephant grass have significant effect on gully rehabilitation. This integration was reduced gully depth, slope gradient, gully volume and soil loss. Slope of gully bed was reduced by 60%, 46% 37% respective years. Similarly gully depth reduced by 2.54m, 1.72m and 1.456m while gully volume was reduced by 37.44m3, 8.81m3 and 4.32m3 due to check dam as the same order of slope changes. Data such as sediment deposition and biomass production were collected, to investigate their effectiveness in reducing soil erosion and biomass production. Over a period of two years practices caused measurable gully morphology resulted soil calculated was 248.41kg of soil were deposited in 12.76m2 area. According to Focus group discussion farmers viewed these gully rehabilitation measures was positively, apart from the high labour, input materials and technical requirements of stone check dam. Based on the results the study concluded that check dam integrated with Elephant grass in the gully bed have positive effective rehabilitate gully erosion in the study area. Therefore, farmers should use gully rehabilitation techniques to preserve their land.

Amare Gojjam¹*, Yenealem Gemi¹, Tademe Minase¹, Dagnaw Ademe¹ and Birhanu Wolde¹


Article Image 1

Growing of Ipomoea aquatica in Seaweed Supplemented Hydroponic System and Identifying Possible Genera of Microbes in the System

Hydroponic system is method of growing plant in nutrient rich solution. The seaweed biomass that is usually disposed as waste once the carrageenan component is extracted from it can be used as a fertilizer. Since nutrients in hydroponic system provide an ideal environment for microorganisms to grow, water-based microorganisms can be easily introduced into the system. This study compared the growth of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) grown in hydroponic system. The effects on the growth of plants in the hydroponic system when seaweed waste is used as the fertilizer were also studied. Furthermore, the possible genera of the microbes present in the water samples obtained from the hydroponic system were identified. The plants were grown in treated hydroponic tank (with seaweed waste fertilizer) and untreated hydroponic tank (without seaweed waste fertilizer). The mean heights of the plants in each condition were obtained and compared. Water samples were collected from the treated and untreated and biochemical tests were also carried out using the water samples collected to identify the possible genera of the microbes present in the hydroponic system. The plants height of treated tank is significantly taller than untreated tank. The microbe present in the treated tank was either Chromobacterium spp./ Vibrio spp./ Plesiomonas spp./ Aeromonas spp., Acinetobacter spp., Bordetella bronchiseptica/ Alcaligenes spp./ Shewanella spp./ Pseudomonas spp.(alkali producers), Kurthia spp. and Cardiobacterium spp., and in the untreated tank were Acinetobacter, Bordetella bronchiseptica / Alcaligenes spp./ Shewanella spp./ Pseudomonas spp. (alkali producers) and Chromobacterium spp./ Vibrio spp./ Plesiomonas spp./ Aeromonas spp. Further research need to be carried out to identify the exact bacterial strain of each microbe. By identifying the microbial population of the hydroponic system, further studies can be carried out to identify the beneficial and harmful bacteria. The harmful bacteria can then be eliminated from the hydroponic system to promote healthy growth of plants through hydroponic cultivation.

Vi Sion Chang and Swee Sen Teo*


Article Image 1

Neurolathyrism - A Case Report and Current Views

Neurolathyrism is caused by excessive consumption of Lathyrus sativus (grass pea) and seen in India and parts of sub-Saharan Africa. The disease manifests as irreversible spastic paraparesis and quadriparesis leading to permanent disability. We report two unique cases of Lathyrism secondary to consumption of Lathyrus sativus and review the literature available. Two brothers from a remote village in India presented with slowly progressive spastic paraparesis of unknown aetiology. On neurological examination, they were found to have motor neuron pattern of weakness. Routine laboratory work-up, CSF studies and imaging of the brain and spine were all found to be unremarkable. Upon further review, it was found that the patients had a prolonged history of consumption of Lathyrus sativus legume. There is no known cure for neurolathyrism. As a result, the legume was banned from staple diet. However, the legume continues to be consumed despite the ban and public education.

Khosa Shaweta¹, Khosa Gurveer S², and Mishra Shri K³


Article Image 1

Biodiversity, Application of Bioenergy for Energy Systems or Materials and Environmental Sustainability: Sustainable Energies Future Perspective through Energy Efficiency Development

The demand for energy continued to outstrip supply and necessitated the development of biomass option. Residues were the most popular forms of renewable energy and currently biofuel production became much promising. Agricultural wastes contained high moisture content and could be decomposed easily by microbes. Agricultural wastes were abundantly available globally and could be converted to energy and useful chemicals by a number of microorganisms. Compost or bio-fertilizers could be produced with the inoculation of appropriated thermophilic microbes which increased the decomposition rate, shortened the maturity period and improved the compost (or bio-fertilizer) quality. The objective of the present research was to promote the biomass technology and involved adaptive research, demonstration and dissemination of results. With a view to fulfill the objective, a massive field survey was conducted to assess the availability of raw materials as well as the present situation of biomass technologies. In the present communication, an attempt had also been made to present an overview of present and future use of biomass as an industrial feedstock for production of fuels, chemicals and other materials. We may conclude from the review paper that biomass technology must be encouraged, promoted, invested, implemented, and demonstrated, not only in urban areas but also in remote rural areas.

Abdeen Mustafa Omer*


Article Image 1

Utilization of two Bacterial Strains (Ochrobactrum Intermedium BC1 and Cupriavidus Taiwanensis LA) to Biodegrade Anthracene, Fluorene, and Naphthalene

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, known as PAHs, typically persist in the environment, exposing humans to a? considerable health hazard because of the toxins they contain and their capability of triggering cancer. Anthropogenic activities have introduced high levels of PAHs into Arabian Gulf countries’? soil and coastal waters. Numerous studies have indicated that diverse bacterial? strains can successfully break down PAHs. The deduction made is that biodegradation stands as the top choice in terms of? safety, effectiveness, and affordability when it comes to handling PAH-contaminated sites and locations. The efficiency of degrading three PAHs was analyzed in this study with the use? of two novel bacterial strains, considering the optimal temperature and pH requirements. Coastal sediments from the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia yielded pure cultures of Ochrobactrum intermedium BC1 and Cupriavidus? taiwanensis LA, which were subjected to spiking with 100ppm concentrations each for anthracene, fluorene, and naphthalene. They were then incubated at 25°C in? a shake incubator for 18 days. A solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) device was used. The extraction of residual PAHs? was the main objective of using the SPME device. Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) was utilized to quantify and? analyze the residues at predefined time intervals. By the conclusion of the 18-day timeframe, Ochrobactrum intermedium BC1 degraded naphthalene completely. Additionally, anthracene? experienced a reduction of approximately 87%, while fluorene underwent a decrease of about 67. Cupriavidus taiwanensis LA degraded anthracene, fluorene, and? naphthalene by 88%, 53%, and 91% respectively. The degrading efficiency of these novel strains of? bacteria is evidenced by these results. In closing, these strains can be considered potential members of a consortium of microbes? capable of degrading PAHs that can be employed effectively in various cleanup endeavors.

Mordecai J¹, Al-Thukair A²*, Jameel Al-Thagfi³, Basheer Chanbasha³, and Alexis Nzila²