Back to Journal

SM Musculoskeletal Disorders

The Sacro-Iliac Joint and Low Back Pain Syndromes

[ ISSN : 2576-5442 ]

Abstract Introduction References
Details

Received: 28-Nov-2016

Accepted: 29-Nov-2016

Published: 01-Dec-2016

J Saunders¹, M Cusi¹,³ and H Van der Wall¹,²*

¹ University of Notre Dame, Sydney Medical School, Australia
² Concord Nuclear Imaging, Australia
³ University of New South Wales, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Kensington, Australia

Corresponding Author:

M Cusi, Sport & Exercise Physician, University of Notre Dame Australia School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia, Email: manuel.cusi@gmail.com

Abstract

The twentieth century epidemic of low back pain has continued unabated into the 21st century. Up to 20% of the Australian population will experience low back pain at some stage of their lives

Introduction

The twentieth century epidemic of low back pain has continued unabated into the 21st century. Up to 20% of the Australian population will experience low back pain at some stage of their lives [1]. Causes of low back pain remain protean and obscure to the point where 85% of patients [2] will be classified as having ‘Non-Specific Low Back Pain’ (NSLB). It is a nihilistic exercise and ultimately, an admission of the inability to establish an accurate or specific clinical diagnosis. Absence of a specific diagnosis creates difficulty in devising effective therapeutic strategies, whether pharmacological, physical or chemical. Recent literature suggests that surgical interventions such as spinal fusions under these circumstances can be disastrous, particularly in the setting of work-related disability [3].

The contribution of the Sacro-Iliac Joint (SIJ) to low back pain has been a conundrum for over 100 years. Back pain due to dysfunction of the SIJ was first recorded in the medical literature in 1905 [4].

As with the history of genetics and the work of Mendel, this was pushed into the background and disappeared from view with publication of the seminal paper of Mixter and Barr in the New England Journal of Medicine 30 years later [5].

This paper propelled rupture of the lumbar intervertebral disc to be perceived as the major source of low back pain to this day, such that lateralising lower back pain with a non-diagnostic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) calls into question the integrity of the complaint [6]. Like the re-discovery of Mendel’s work more than 35 years after its publication by Correns, de Vries, Jasper and von Tschermak, interest in the SIJ as a source of lateralising lower back pain was re-awakened in the Northern European literature in the 1990s and 2000s.

Multiple publications on the pelvic girdle pain syndrome began to appear, addressing a disabling condition in peri-partum women [7-15]. Contemporaneously, an opus of work has subsequently confirmed that only 15% of lateralising lower back pain may be attributed to intervertebral disc prolapse, the remainder being classified as NSLBP [2]. Since the 1980’s a growing interest has evolved in the study of the role of the SIJ in the biomechanics of the lumbar spine and as a discrete source of pain. The early contributions of Vleeming [16-19], Snijders [20], and others [21-25] preceded a growing body of work in the Northern European literature in relation to pelvic girdle pain and pregnancy.

The World Congresses of Low Back & Pelvic Pain, initially held in 1992 and every three years since then, have witnessed the dialogue between clinicians and scientists that has delivered much of the progress made in the past 25 years, with multidisciplinary contributions from all over the world, from the Scandinavian countries to Canada, US and Australia. The dual mechanical role of load transmission and absorption of torsional stresses led to the proposed integrated model of function [26,27] and the concepts of force and form closure of the joint, to cater for the apparent contradiction of its dual mechanical role. Various studies suggest that the SIJ may be responsible for 20-25% of patients with ‘non specific low back pain’, which in turn has been estimated to account for 85% of cases of low back pain. Importantly, the initial premise that the pain generator in SIJ dysfunction was the joint has been laid to rest with the work of Murakami et al [28].

They elegantly demonstrated in a cross-over trial of lidocaine injection into the joint versus the dorsal sacroiliac joint ligaments that the ligament was the main pain generator. This basic understanding of pelvic biomechanics has facilitated the establishment of validated clinical examination standards. The European Guidelines - COST ACTION B13 “Low back pain: guidelines for its management” was issued by the European Commission, Research DirectorateGeneral, Department of Policy, Coordination and Strategy.

It included a Working Group B4 to work on the European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain [18]. These evidence-based guidelines stated that pelvic girdle pain is a group within the general classification of low back pain, and that the SIJ is a contributor to both.

Diagnostic and treatment guidelines have become available for the practicing clinician to alleviate the burden of disease to what has been estimated 20-25% of patients diagnosed with “low back pain”. This has shown success in approximately 80% of cases with directed physiotherapy [29].

The traditional imaging of the SIJ (X-rays, CT scan, scintigraphy and more recently magnetic resonance imaging) has proved its success in the diagnosis of many conditions, from trauma (fractures) to infection, tumours and inflammatory arthropathies.

Only in recent years has the combination of scintigraphy with lowdose x-ray Computed Tomography (CT) - Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)/CT been able to confirm the biomechanics of the SIJ both in a disease-free population and in those with mechanical failure of the joint [6]. The term sacroiliac joint incompetence was coined to encompass either the post-partum variant of the pelvic girdle pain syndrome and localised trauma to the joint or pelvis. This is a relatively common condition that may account for over 20% of low back pain, especially in patients in the peri-partum period or after pelvic trauma. Many of these patients have previously been classified as either NSLBP or worse, as malingerers or manifestations of psychiatric disease.

The clinical diagnosis requires meticulous attention to detail and expertise in physical examination that may be problematic in general usage. The majority of patients in one study had reportedly normal MRI studies, adding to the difficulty in identification by the standard medical paradigms [6]. More recently, the concept of stability/instability is being replaced by the more sound concepts of dynamic control, which could be defined as adequate stability for the required functional demands of spine and pelvis.

Science and good clinical medicine has opened up a new field of therapeutics for the treatment of a disease that may benefit 20% of patients with lateralising low back pain. Targeted physiotherapy after an accurate diagnosis can avoid a nondiagnostic fate for a large number of patients with potential for vast social benefit and cost-savings.

Those that fail such therapy due to extensive dorsal SIJ ligament damage may go on to targeted imageguided prolotherapy [29] or platelet-enriched plasma injection into the ligaments, which is currently under study and showing promise (J. Saunders –personal communication). All that remains is to find acceptance in the controversial multi-disciplinary arena that the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain occupies.

References

1. Briggs A, Buchbinder R. Back pain: a National Health Priority Area in Australia? Med J Aust 2009; 190 : 499-502.

2. Andersson G. Epidemiological features of chronic lower back pain. Lancet . 1999; 354: 581-585.

3. Atkinson L, Zacest A. Surgical management of low back pain. Med J Aust. 2016; 204 : 299-300.

4. Goldthwaite JE, Osgood RB. A consideration of the pelvic articulation from an anatomical, pathological, and clinical standpoint. Boston Med Surg J. 1905; 152: 593-601.

5. Mixter WJ, Barr J. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med. 1934; 11: 210-215.

6. Cusi M, Saunders J, Van der Wall H, Fogelman I. Metabolic disturbances identified by SPECT-CT in patients with a clinical diagnosis of sacroiliac joint incompetence. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22: 1674-1682.

7. Mens JMA, Vleeming A, Snijders CJ, Stam HJ, Ginai AZ . The active straight leg raising test and mobility of the pelvic joints. Eur Spine J.1999; 8: 468-473.

8. Stuge B, Veierod M B, Laerum E, Vollestad N. The Efficacy of a Treatment Program Focusing on Stabilising Exercises for Pelvic Girdle Pain after Pregnancy: two-year follow-up of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Spine. 2004; 10: 197-203.

9. Wu W H, G. MO, Uegaki K, Mens JMA, van Dieën JH. Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. Eur Spine J. 2004; 13: 575-589.

10. Bastiaanssen JM, de Bie RA, Bastiaenen C, Essed G, van den Brandt PA . A historical perspective on pregnancy-related low back and/or pelvic girdle pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005; 120: 3-14.

11. Cook C, Massa L, Harm-Ernandes I, Segneri R, Adcock J. Interrater reliability and diagnostic accuracy of pelvic girdle pain classification. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007; 30: 252-258.

12. O’Sullivan PB, Beales D J. Diagnosis and classification of pelvic girdle pain disorders, Part 2: ilustration of the utility of a classification system via case studies. Man Ther. 2007; 12: 1-12.

13. Ronchetti I, Vleeming A, van Wingerden JP. Physical characteristics of women with severe pelvic girdle pain after pregnancy: a descriptive cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33: 145-151.

14. van Kessel-Cobelens AM, Verhagen AP, Mens J, CJ S. Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain: Intertester Reliability of 3 Tests to determine Asymmetric Mobility of the Sacro-iliac Joints. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008; 31: 130- 136.

15. Vøllestad N, Stuge B. Prognostic factors for recovery from postpartum pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J Published online 2009; 18: 718-726.

16. Vleeming A, Stoeckart R, Volkers ACW, Snijders CJ . Relation between form and function in the sacroiliac joint. Part I: Clinical anatomical aspects. Spine. 1990; 150:130-132.

17. Vleeming A, Volkers ACW, Snijders CJ, Stoeckart R (1990) Relation between form and function in the sacroiliac joint. Part II: biomechanical aspects. Spine. 1990; 15: 133-136.

18. Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B (2008) European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J. 2008; 17: 794-819.

19. Vleeming A, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Hammudoghlu D, Stoeckart R, Snijders CJ. The function of the long dorsal sacroiliac ligament: its implication for understanding low back pain. Spine Phila Pa 1976. 1996; 21: 556-562.

20. Snijders CJ, Stoeckart R, Vleeming A. Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs Part 1: Biomechanics of self-bracing of the sacroiliac joints and its significance for treatment and exercise. Clin Biomech.1993; 8: 285- 294.

21. Larsen EC, Wilken-Jensen C, Hansen A, Jensen DV, Johansen S. Symptomgiving pelvic girdle relaxation in pregnancy. I: Prevalence and risk factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999; 78: 105-110.

22. Laslett M, Aprill CN, McDonald B, Young SB. Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Pain: Validity of individual provocation tests and composites of tests. Man Ther. 2005; 10: 207-218.

23. Mens J, Vleeming A, Snijders C, Koes B, Stam H . Validity of the Active Straight Leg Raise Test for Measuring Disease Severity in Patients With Posterior Pelvic Pain After Pregnancy. Spine. 2002; 27:196-200.

24. Ostgaard HC, Andersson GBJ, Karlsson K. Prevalence of back pain in pregnancy. Spine. 1991; 16: 549-552.

25. Ostgaard HC, Zetherstrom G, Roos-Hansson E. The posterior pelvic pain provocation test in pregnant women. Eur Spine J. 1994; 3: 258-260.

26. Lee D, Vleeming A . The management of pelvic joint pain and dysfunction. In: Boyling J, Jull G, eds. Grieve’s modern manual therapy. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone. 2004; 495-506.

27. Lee DG, Vleeming A . An integrated therapeutic approach to the treatment of pelvic girdle pain. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Stoeckart R, eds. Movement, stability & lumbopelvic pain, 2nd. London: Elsevier. 2007; 621.

28. Murakami E, Tanaka Y, Aizawa T, Ishizuka M, Kokubun S. Effect of periarticular and intraarticular lidocaine injections for sacroiliac joint pain: prospective comparative study. J Orthop Sci. 2007; 12: 274-280.

Citation

Saunders J, Cusi M and Wall HV. The Sacro-Iliac Joint and Low Back Pain Syndromes. SM Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 1(1): 1007. https://dx.doi.org/10.36876/smmd.1007

Other Articles

Article Image 1

The Various Aspects of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders and Treatment Approaches

Occlusion is biologically defined as the coordinated functional interaction between the various cell populations forming the masticatory system as they differentiate, model, remodel, fail and repair

Talia Becker* 


Article Image 1

Sonographic Diagnosis of Acute Achilles Tendon Tear: A Case Report

Achilles tendon is a common site of foot and ankle discomfort but its rupture is not frequent. It’s a superficial tendon and this lends it to excellent evaluation by sonography instead of magnetic resonance imaging. Recently ultrasonography has been widely used in musculoskeletal practice. We present a case of Achilles tendon ruptures diagnosed based on fundamental sonographic findings.

Arash Babaei-Ghazani¹,², Safoora Ebadi¹,², Bijan Forogh¹,³, and Bina Eftekharsadat⁴*


Article Image 1

Endochondral Ossification Signals May be Important for the Osteoarthritis Progression

Osteoarthritis (OA), one of the most common skeletal disorders characterized by cartilage degradation and osteophyte formation in joints, is induced by accumulated mechanical stress; however, little is known about the underlying molecular mechanism. Several experimental OA models in mice by producing instability in the knee joints have been developed to apply approaches from mouse genetics. Although proteinases like matrix metalloproteases and aggrecanases have now been proven to be the principal initiators of OA progression, clinical trials of proteinase inhibitors have not been successful for the treatment, turning the interest of researchers to the upstream signals of proteinase induction. These signals include under graded and fragmented matrix proteins like type II collagen or fibronection that affects chondrocytes through distinct receptors. Another signal is pro inflammatory factors that are produced by chondrocytes and synovial cells; however, recent studies that used mouse OA models in knockout mice did not support that these factors have a role in the central contribution to OA development. Our mouse genetic approaches found that the induction of a transcriptional activator Runx2 in chondrocytes under mechanical stress contributes to the pathogenesis of OA through chondrocyte hypertrophy. In addition, chondrocyte apoptosis has recently been identified as being involved in OA progression. We hereby propose that these endochondral ossification signals may be important for the OA progression, suggesting that the related molecules can clinically be therapeutic targets of this disease.

Hiroshi Kawaguchi 


Article Image 1

Observations on the Knee Functional Axis During Active Movements

Estimating the Knee Functional Axis (KFA) is crucial to both correctly implanting the prosthesis and accessing the joint kinematics. Researchers have mainly reported KFA by manual management of flexion extension movements, which are passively performed without any voluntary movements. Active touch and movement refers to what is ordinarily called as touching, which is defined as variations in skin stimulation caused by variations in a person’s motor activity.

The difference is very important for the individual. However, it has not been emphasized in the biomechanical literatures. This study aims to confirm the distinction between touching and being touched. We are particularly interested in measuring the Instantaneous Axes of the Knee (IAK) during locomotion. This geometrical “pattern” of the IAK is altered along with the touch pattern by the mechanical necessities of terrestrial movement.

Wangdo Kim¹, Young Choi², and Hong-Gi Lee³*


Article Image 1

Tibial Plateau Fractures in Children: Literature Review and Case Report

Although fractures of the epiphyseal cartilage injuries are common in childhood, epiphyseal fractures involving the proximal tibia entities are very rare and are usually caused by high-energy trauma, with an incidence ranging between 0.5 and 3.1% of patients; peak incidence between the ages 12-14 years in male patients. The aim of this report is describe a case of fracture of the epiphyseal cartilage of a 13 year old boy, a victim of sports trauma showing lateral tibial plateau fracture and epiphyseal cartilage fracture at the same side, not compatible with the classifications of fractures in children.

Omar Ferreira Miguel


Article Image 1

MRI in Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD): A Proposal for Imaging Standardization in Regenerative Medicine

In the last few years, clinical applications of regenerative medicine have been increasing their way in medical practice.

Valerio Di Nicola¹,² and Mauro Di Pietrantonio³*


Article Image 1

Musicians’ Woes: Playing Related Musculoskeletal Disorders

Music is the most essential ingredient of any entertainment. In order to create successful entertaining event musicians plays an imperative role. Musicians are wizards who spread the fragrance of joy by absorbing woes, in the form of Playing Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (PRMDs), for themselves. Like other occupations, musicians also suffer from work related musculoskeletal disorders which are often disabling

Wricha Mishra 


Article Image 1

Visualization of Dupuytren’s Contracture Borders Spread According to MRI Data

Dupuytren’s Contracture (DC) is a fibro-proliferative tumor according to ICD 10 - fascial fibromatosis of unknown etiology (M 720), accompanied by a stable bending contracture of fingers. In CD in the postoperative period extremely high rate of surgical complications is observed: intraoperative (injury of blood vessels, nerves, tendons), general postoperative (hematoma, necrosis, odema, stiffness, etc.), late postoperative (recurrence, spread, progression). In the last case according to the data of different authors, complications frequency is depend upon the degree (from partial up to the total) and the accuracy of excision of the affected aponeurosis ?almaris. One of the problems in choosing the type of operation and technology is the complexity of the cutoff determination boundaries of the affected CD. Up to now there is no suitable for use in the practical CD surgery algorithm of the affected aponeurosis ?almaris spread non invasive visualization in a particular patient. The most appropriate method for the solution of this problem is a method of MRI. The technology of identifying the boundaries of surgery of the affected aponeurosis palmaris in Dupuytren’s contracture by means of MRI has been elaborated. It has been shown that MRI is a highly informative method in the assessment of topographic anatomy of aponeurosis palmaris in normal and CD states. PD, T1, T2 - weighed images allow objectively to visualize the border areas of the affected aponeurosis in I - III stages of CD. PD fsat (fat tissues signal saturation) MRI mode is not recommended for use.

Baikeev RF¹, Mikusev GI², Osmonaliyev IZh², Zakirov RH² and Afletonov EN²*


Article Image 1

Metallosis Die Hard

Metallosis is an aseptic fibrosis, local necrosis, inflammation, or loosening of an implant device secondary to metallic corrosion and release of wear debris. The condition has been highlighted recent years due to the clinical complications caused by metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacement. Although some major types of MoM hip prostheses have been recalled from the market, metallosis is far from over as not only there are still a million implanted MoM hip prosthetic cases worldwide, but also it has been found in non-MoM hip prostheses and other metal implants. This mini review aims to provide recent findings of implants related metallosisin skeletal tissue.

Zhidao Xia 


Article Image 1

Osteoarthritis of the Temporomandibular Joint

Osteoarthritis (OA), a degenerative disease of the articular cartilage, is one of the most frequent pathologies of the Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ), characterized by spontaneous pain at rest or in function, decreased range of motion, and articular noise.

Talia Becker