Back to Journal

SM Musculoskeletal Disorders

Tibial Plateau Fractures in Children: Literature Review and Case Report

[ ISSN : 2576-5442 ]

Abstract Introduction Literature Revision Concerning the Fractures Classifications Description of the Case References
Details

Received: 16-Sep-2016

Accepted: 19-Oct-2016

Published: 28-Oct-2016

Omar Ferreira Miguel

Hospital Regional de Nova Andradina/MS, Unidade Regional de Pericias de Nova Andradina/MS, Brazil

Corresponding Author:

Omar Ferreira Miguel, Nova Andradina, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, Email: dromarortop@gmail.com

Keywords

Fractures; Bone/classification; Fractures; Bone/surgery; Child

Abstract

Although fractures of the epiphyseal cartilage injuries are common in childhood, epiphyseal fractures involving the proximal tibia entities are very rare and are usually caused by high-energy trauma, with an incidence ranging between 0.5 and 3.1% of patients; peak incidence between the ages 12-14 years in male patients. The aim of this report is describe a case of fracture of the epiphyseal cartilage of a 13 year old boy, a victim of sports trauma showing lateral tibial plateau fracture and epiphyseal cartilage fracture at the same side, not compatible with the classifications of fractures in children.

Introduction

Although the fractures of the epiphyseal cartilage injuries are common in the childhood, epiphyseal fractures involving the proximal tibia entities are very rare [1-7], being usually caused by high-energy trauma, with just an incidence of 0,5% of all epiphyseal fractures according to Burkhart and Peterson [1] 3%, to Beaty and Roberts [2] 0,5 to 3,1%, to Verzin et al. [5] 0,6 to 2,1%, to Mubarack et al.

[4], with the peak incidence between the ages of 12 to 14, in male patients. The reason of the occurrence of that fact is based on the privileged anatomy of the knee, where the proximal epiphysis of the tibia does not usually receive any type of the tendineae insert in its medial and lateral edges apart from the ligamentary ones - colateral ligaments - medial and lateral [2-4,6], along with that, the lateral portion also has the mechanical support of the head of the fibula [2].

Therefore, the most frequent traumas - varus or valgus - are streamed directly to the proximal metaphysis of the tibia. The front face of the proximal epiphysis of tibia includes a portion in shield/ tongue shape which includes the patellar ligament. That portion usually takes place as a shield, avoiding translational fractures of the proximal epiphysis of tibia, though it can promote the fracture to this level [2].

In spite of the fact that the cruciate ligaments are included in the physis portion of the proximal tibia, they do not seem to be associated to the fractures at this level, except in the interchondilar prominence fractures [2]. The major and most serious and catastrophic complication described in literature is the popliteal artery lesion [1,2], described yet as ligamentary lesion complications, compartmental syndrome of joint instability, growth disorders. The neurovascular involvement may reach to 10% [5].

Literature Revision Concerning the Fractures Classifications

The first physeal injuries were first described by Hippocrates, after in 1632 Marcus Aurelius Severnus described the separation of distal and proximal tibial epiphysis [8]. Malgaine in 1855 apud Peterson [8] noticed that the physeal injury was rarely confined to the epiphysis, generally being followed by a metaphyseal fragment, saving the epiphysis - being that the first probable fracture reference.

Foucher in 1863 apud Peterson [8]: three types: type 1 referred to epiphyseal divulsion which was a splitting between the epiphysis and the metaphysis; the type 2, referred as epiphyseal fracture, corresponding to a fracture of the proximal metaphysis, peri-physeal - referred as the peri-physeal fracture by other authors. Moreover, the third type, referred as pre- epiphyseal fracture, affecting the metaphysis, with due exception, this classification had been made without the radiographic examination.

In 1898, Poland apud Peterson [8] and Bright [9], describes that the physeal fractures were common entities and not rare ones, describing the first true injuries classification, based upon radiographic images. He proposed a classification of four types, including: type 1- fracture affecting only the physis, type 2 - fracture by the growth and metaphyseal plate, saving epiphysis, type 3 - fracture by the growth and epiphyseal plate, saving metaphysis, type 4 - the fracture trace affects the physis and epiphysis.

Bergenfeld in 1933 apud Peterson [8], publishes a study in which 295 pacients were studied with growth plate fractures, showing a new classification, with six subtypes in which it was included the three subtypes of Poland besides describing three more. What is known nowadays as SH type 2 was divided in two segments, where one was followed by a very small fragment (Bergenfeld 3), the type 4 is equivalent to type 3 of Poland, the type 5 occurs a fracture trace that attacks the epiphysis, the physis and the overlying metaphysis, remaining these fragments connected in one block, and type 6 is a fracture that attacks the metaphysis 2 to 3 mm of the physis such as the fracture decribed in Foucher’s type 2.

Aitken, 1936 apud Peterson [8] and Bright [9], discussing the physeal fractures describes three types, the first two ones corresponding to the classification proposed by Poland, and the third type would correspond to the type 5 of Bergenfeld. Brashear [10] 1958, makes a classification proposal, dividing it in four types: Type 1, which is equivalent to Poland’s type 2 , Bergenfeld’s types 2 and 3 and Aitken’s type 1; type 2, which is equivalent to the type 3 of Poland, 4 of Bergenfeld and 2 of Aitken; the type 3 equivalent to the type 5 of Bergenfeld and type 3 of Aitken, finishing with the type 4 where there had only occurred a physis crushing without damaging to the adjoining bone structure. Diagnosable at the radiographic examination (x-ray).

Salter and Harris [11] in 1963 proposed the classification that is currently the most acceptable and used worldwide. They divided the fractures into five types: the type 1 is equivalent to Foucher’s, Poland’s and Bergenfeld’s types 1; the type 2 is equivalent to the type 2 of Poland, 2 and 3 of Bergenfeld, 1 of Aitken and 1 of Brashear: type 3, corresponds to Poland’s type3, Bergenfeld’s type 4, Aitken and Brashear’s 2; the type 4 corresponds to Aitken and Brashear’s type 3 and to the type 5 of Bergenfeld; and type 5 to Brashear’s type 4.

Rang [12] in 1969 annexed to Salter and Harris’ classification the type 6 where there was the direct and exclusively occurrence by periosteal compression or from the perichondral ring, being described as a rare lesion. Weber [13] in 1980 made a proposal of a classification in order to help the physician distinguish among the physeal injuries that have good prognosis and can be treated conservatively. Type A - the ones with good prognosis that can be treated conservatively and the type B - the ones with questionable prognosis, which must be taken with exposure.

Subtype A1 fracture plane moves forward completely through the physis, with no ways to the bone, A2 when the fracture pass by the metaphysis. Fracture plane B1 going through the physis and fracture plane B2 going through the epyphysis, physis and metaphysis. Ogden [14] in 1981 proposed a classification of nine types, 12 subtypes and 21 collectively to 21 types of fractures.

Shapiro [15] 1982 proposed a physiological classification of the fractures, concerning to the prediction of the prognosis of these ones, correlating the bone lesions with the physeal circulation.

Peterson [8] 1994, proposed a new classification identifying six different types of classification, type 1 is a metaphyseal fracture: the type 2 corresponds to Polands’ type 2, Bergenfeld’s 2 and 3 , Aitken’s 1, Brashear’s 1 and 2 of SH, the type 3 is related to the Foucher, Poland, Bergenfeld and SH’s type 1; the type 4 corresponds to the Poland’s type 3, the Bergenfeld’s 4, the Aitken and Brashear’s 2 and SH’s 3, the type 5 corresponds to the Bergenfeld’s type 5, Aitken and Brashear’s 3, and 4 of SH: moreover, type 6 is related to a fracture which occurs at the epyphysis/ physis/ metaphysis, with the association of the bone substance loss. It should be also considered that in this classification type 1 is subdivided into 6 subgroups that go from A to F. Mubarack et al.

[4] 2009, proposed a classification based upon the trauma mechanism, fractures caused by traumas in varus/valgus, fractures in extension and fractures in flexo- avulsion. In Schazker [16] 1996, we can find a classification of the tibial plateau fractures, type I - fracture in wedge of the lateral plateau, type II - shearing fracture - lateral depression plateau, type III - fracture with pure depression of the lateral plateau, type IV - medial plateu fracture, type V - bicondylar fracture and type VI - fracture with metaphyseal - diaphyseal. The aim of this present study is to report a patient case (EPA), male, 13 years old and victim of the right knee (R) valgus trauma during a football match, in which the fracture cannot be found in any of the classifications used for children’s fractures.

Description of the Case

This report is on a thin 13-year-old male patient, brown, (BMI 21), victim of the right knee trauma, in valgus, during a football match. In the initial exam we observed limitation of the range of motion besides pain upon bone palpation along the right knee lateral plateau as well as articular instability associated in valgus. In the initial x-ray it was verified the lateral plateau fracture (Figure 1), better studied by computed tomography (Figure 2), verified fracture of lateral, center-side plateau, with its enlargement, with no shearing, inconsisted with any of the classifications reported; therefore, we opted to classify it in the classification described by Schatzker10 1996, which could be compatible with a fracture type Schazker III.

Figure 1: A - Right Knee on AP Rx view, shown the fracture, B - Right Knee on lateral view.

Figure 2: A and B - tomographic images from the fractures, coronal images shown the fracture; C - Sagital image, D, E and F - 3D reconstruction shown the fracture.

It was not observed in the initial exam any kind of neurovascular change, the patient attends to the doctor appointment after 24 hr trauma, not mentioning at first having received treatment at an optional service, by a general practitioner when it was not noticed any fracture. Surgical treatment was done 48 hours after the initial trauma. It had been opted for a lateral access route, allowing a direct approach to the lateral tibial plateau. It was not possible to access the articular surface of the lateral plateau, in order to allow us to reduce it, without performing transverse osteotomy to the fracture. By performing osteotomy, a block central declination of the lateral plateau (approximately 15 mm) was noticed, with a severe impaction of the subchondral bone. The lifting of the fragment was conducted, just in the epiphysis with a temporary stabilization type “grate” and posterior definitive fixation with 4.0 canulated screw and washer, being implanted two screws in the epiphysis and one at the top of osteotomy (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Images taken on operating room immediately after the surgical procedure.

It was not used bone grafting, in the hope that we could avoid local epiphysiodesis, once the bone graft, in our view, would facilitate the occurrence of that. For the shear forces neutralization that would act in the synthesis, it was used a hybrid external fixator, assembled with a semicircle of external fixator type Ilizarov of 15cm in the anterior and proximal face of the knee, with 4.5mm Schanz pins and anterior single bar of 20cm, fixed to the tibial crest (Figure 4).

Figure 4: A and B - Images shown normal mobility and the external fixation used.

Keeping the patient without any type of immobilization to be able to go under early physiotherapy and preserve the movement amplitude of the operated knee. The synthesis of neutralization (hybrid external fixator) was removed in six weeks, being the bone loss in the lateral plateau level, caused by the declination of the subchondral bone, completely filled up by newly-formed bone verified in 12 weeks. In the post-operative 25 months the patient lost outpatient follow-up, however, he had already presented epiphysiodesis signs (Figure 5); yet, without presenting associated deformities or any other variation to walking as well as the movement amplitude (Figure 4). Tibial plateau fractures in children are rare clinical entities, with few cases described by literature.

Figure 5: A - radiographic image in internal rotation view with 25 month PO, B - radiographic image in AP view 25 month AP, C - radiographic image in lateral view 25 month PO, D - radiographic image ampliation of AP view showing ephifisiodesis on fracture focus.

Tibial plateau fractures in children are rare clinical entities, with few cases described by literature. The present case report has shown the therapeutic option adopted by the author and ineffectiveness of attempting to avoid epiphysiodesis. In post operative twenty five months could be observed by x-ray signs of the epiphysiodesis.

References

1. Burkhart SS, Peterson HA. Fractures of the proximal tibial epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979; 61: 996-1002.

2. Beaty JH, Roberts JM. Fraturas e luxações do joelho. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Wilkins KE, King RE. Fraturas em crianças. Translated by Vilma Ribeiro de Souza Varga. 3rd edn. São Paulo: Manole; 1993. p. 1196-1207.

3. Shelton WR, Canale ST. Fractures of the tibia through the proximal tibial epiphyseal cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979; 61: 167-173.

4. Mubarak SJ, Kim JR, Edmonds EW, Pring ME, Bastrom TP. Classification of proximal tibial fractures in children. J Child Orthop. 2009; 3: 191-197.

5. Verzin EJ, Kealey D, Adair A, Sloan S, Dilworth GR. Salter harris type I fracture of the proximal tibial epiphysis. Ulster Med J. 2001; 70: 136-138.

6. Cole PA, Bhandari M. What’s new in orthopaedic trauma? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 2545-2561.

7. Parikh SN, Wells L, Mehlman CT, Scherl SA. Management of fractures in adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 2947-2958.

8. Peterson HA. Classification. In: Epiphyseal growth plate fractures. Berlin Hidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag; 2007. p. 21-91.

9. Bright RW. Lesões fisárias. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Wilkins KE, King RE. Fraturas em crianças. Translated by Vilma Ribeiro de Souza Varga. 3rd ed. São Paulo: Manole; 1994. p. 118-124.

10. Brashear HR. Epiphyseal fractures of the lower extremity. Southern Med J. 1958; 51: 845-851.

11. Salter RB, Harris WR. Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg. 1963; 45: 587-622.

12. Rang M. The Growth Plate and its disorders. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1969.

13. Webber BG, Brunner CH, Freuler F. Treatment of Fractures in Children and Adolescents, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1980.

14. Ogden JA. Injury to the growth mechanism of the immature skeleton. Skeletal Radiol. 1981; 6: 237-253.

15. Shapiro F. Epiphyseal growth plate fracture-separation. A pathophysiologic approach. Orthopedics. 1982; 5: 720-736.

16. Schatzker J. Fractures of the tibial plateau. In: Schatzker J, Tile M, editors. The rationale of operative fracture care. Berlin Springer-Velag; 1996. p. 419- 438.

Citation

Miguel OF. Tibial Plateau Fractures in Children: Literature Review and Case Report. SM Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 1(1): 1005.

Other Articles

Article Image 1

The Various Aspects of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders and Treatment Approaches

Occlusion is biologically defined as the coordinated functional interaction between the various cell populations forming the masticatory system as they differentiate, model, remodel, fail and repair

Talia Becker* 


Article Image 1

Sonographic Diagnosis of Acute Achilles Tendon Tear: A Case Report

Achilles tendon is a common site of foot and ankle discomfort but its rupture is not frequent. It’s a superficial tendon and this lends it to excellent evaluation by sonography instead of magnetic resonance imaging. Recently ultrasonography has been widely used in musculoskeletal practice. We present a case of Achilles tendon ruptures diagnosed based on fundamental sonographic findings.

Arash Babaei-Ghazani¹,², Safoora Ebadi¹,², Bijan Forogh¹,³, and Bina Eftekharsadat⁴*


Article Image 1

Endochondral Ossification Signals May be Important for the Osteoarthritis Progression

Osteoarthritis (OA), one of the most common skeletal disorders characterized by cartilage degradation and osteophyte formation in joints, is induced by accumulated mechanical stress; however, little is known about the underlying molecular mechanism. Several experimental OA models in mice by producing instability in the knee joints have been developed to apply approaches from mouse genetics. Although proteinases like matrix metalloproteases and aggrecanases have now been proven to be the principal initiators of OA progression, clinical trials of proteinase inhibitors have not been successful for the treatment, turning the interest of researchers to the upstream signals of proteinase induction. These signals include under graded and fragmented matrix proteins like type II collagen or fibronection that affects chondrocytes through distinct receptors. Another signal is pro inflammatory factors that are produced by chondrocytes and synovial cells; however, recent studies that used mouse OA models in knockout mice did not support that these factors have a role in the central contribution to OA development. Our mouse genetic approaches found that the induction of a transcriptional activator Runx2 in chondrocytes under mechanical stress contributes to the pathogenesis of OA through chondrocyte hypertrophy. In addition, chondrocyte apoptosis has recently been identified as being involved in OA progression. We hereby propose that these endochondral ossification signals may be important for the OA progression, suggesting that the related molecules can clinically be therapeutic targets of this disease.

Hiroshi Kawaguchi 


Article Image 1

Observations on the Knee Functional Axis During Active Movements

Estimating the Knee Functional Axis (KFA) is crucial to both correctly implanting the prosthesis and accessing the joint kinematics. Researchers have mainly reported KFA by manual management of flexion extension movements, which are passively performed without any voluntary movements. Active touch and movement refers to what is ordinarily called as touching, which is defined as variations in skin stimulation caused by variations in a person’s motor activity.

The difference is very important for the individual. However, it has not been emphasized in the biomechanical literatures. This study aims to confirm the distinction between touching and being touched. We are particularly interested in measuring the Instantaneous Axes of the Knee (IAK) during locomotion. This geometrical “pattern” of the IAK is altered along with the touch pattern by the mechanical necessities of terrestrial movement.

Wangdo Kim¹, Young Choi², and Hong-Gi Lee³*


Article Image 1

MRI in Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD): A Proposal for Imaging Standardization in Regenerative Medicine

In the last few years, clinical applications of regenerative medicine have been increasing their way in medical practice.

Valerio Di Nicola¹,² and Mauro Di Pietrantonio³*


Article Image 1

The Sacro-Iliac Joint and Low Back Pain Syndromes

The twentieth century epidemic of low back pain has continued unabated into the 21st century. Up to 20% of the Australian population will experience low back pain at some stage of their lives

J Saunders¹, M Cusi¹,³ and H Van der Wall¹,²*


Article Image 1

Musicians’ Woes: Playing Related Musculoskeletal Disorders

Music is the most essential ingredient of any entertainment. In order to create successful entertaining event musicians plays an imperative role. Musicians are wizards who spread the fragrance of joy by absorbing woes, in the form of Playing Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (PRMDs), for themselves. Like other occupations, musicians also suffer from work related musculoskeletal disorders which are often disabling

Wricha Mishra 


Article Image 1

Visualization of Dupuytren’s Contracture Borders Spread According to MRI Data

Dupuytren’s Contracture (DC) is a fibro-proliferative tumor according to ICD 10 - fascial fibromatosis of unknown etiology (M 720), accompanied by a stable bending contracture of fingers. In CD in the postoperative period extremely high rate of surgical complications is observed: intraoperative (injury of blood vessels, nerves, tendons), general postoperative (hematoma, necrosis, odema, stiffness, etc.), late postoperative (recurrence, spread, progression). In the last case according to the data of different authors, complications frequency is depend upon the degree (from partial up to the total) and the accuracy of excision of the affected aponeurosis ?almaris. One of the problems in choosing the type of operation and technology is the complexity of the cutoff determination boundaries of the affected CD. Up to now there is no suitable for use in the practical CD surgery algorithm of the affected aponeurosis ?almaris spread non invasive visualization in a particular patient. The most appropriate method for the solution of this problem is a method of MRI. The technology of identifying the boundaries of surgery of the affected aponeurosis palmaris in Dupuytren’s contracture by means of MRI has been elaborated. It has been shown that MRI is a highly informative method in the assessment of topographic anatomy of aponeurosis palmaris in normal and CD states. PD, T1, T2 - weighed images allow objectively to visualize the border areas of the affected aponeurosis in I - III stages of CD. PD fsat (fat tissues signal saturation) MRI mode is not recommended for use.

Baikeev RF¹, Mikusev GI², Osmonaliyev IZh², Zakirov RH² and Afletonov EN²*


Article Image 1

Metallosis Die Hard

Metallosis is an aseptic fibrosis, local necrosis, inflammation, or loosening of an implant device secondary to metallic corrosion and release of wear debris. The condition has been highlighted recent years due to the clinical complications caused by metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacement. Although some major types of MoM hip prostheses have been recalled from the market, metallosis is far from over as not only there are still a million implanted MoM hip prosthetic cases worldwide, but also it has been found in non-MoM hip prostheses and other metal implants. This mini review aims to provide recent findings of implants related metallosisin skeletal tissue.

Zhidao Xia 


Article Image 1

Osteoarthritis of the Temporomandibular Joint

Osteoarthritis (OA), a degenerative disease of the articular cartilage, is one of the most frequent pathologies of the Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ), characterized by spontaneous pain at rest or in function, decreased range of motion, and articular noise.

Talia Becker