Back to Journal

SM Virology

Discovery and Roles of Virus-Encoded RNA Silencing Suppressors

[ ISSN : 3067-9974 ]

Abstract Citation Introduction Newly Identified RSSRs Encoded by Viruses in Plants and Animals Roles of RSSRs in the Host-Virus Interaction Conclusion References
Details

Received: 28-Apr-2016

Accepted: 08-Jun-2016

Published: 11-Jun-2016

Ma Lin*

The State Key Lab of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, College of life Sciences, Nanjing University, China

Corresponding Author:

Ma Lin, The State Key Lab of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, College of life Sciences, Nanjing University,China,

Abstract

RNA silencing is a general surveillance system in plants and animals which could protect hosts from virus infection. However, many virus species survived by expressing a series of proteins named as RNA Silencing Suppressors (RSSRs) to counteract this defense system. This review elaborated the newly discovered RSSRs encoded by virus including the recently discovered polymerase slippage product and some newly-identified RSSRs in mammalian cells. This review will also provide a comprehensive understanding of the role of RSSRs during the virus infection, especially with regard to its newly identified function in epidemic modification in hosts.

Citation

Lin M. Discovery and Roles of Virus-Encoded RNA Silencing Suppressors. SM Virol. 2016; 1(2): 1007.

Introduction

During virus infection in hosts, double strand RNA (dsRNA) as the virus replication intermediates could triggered the RNA silencing mechanisms in hosts [1]. Subsequently small RNA species of 21 to 24 nucleotides are processed by the dicer or dicer-like proteins and then are recruited into the homogenous virus template RNA and subsequently initate the virus template degradation by RISC complex [2]. Although it has been widely reported that RNA interference (RNAi) is a process of eukaryotic posttranscriptional gene silencing that functions in antiviral immunity in plants, nematodes, and insects. However, recent studies provided strong supports that RNAi also plays a role in antiviral mechanism in mammalian cells [3-4]. In order to counteract this defense system, many virus encode diverse RNA silencing supressors (RSSRs) through diverse mechanisms [5]. Here this review summarized several recently discovered RSSRs encoded by diverse virus species in plants and animals. We also elaborated the underlied roles of RSSRs in the host-virus interaction.

Newly Identified RSSRs Encoded by Viruses in Plants and Animals

Recently, many RNA silencing suppressors encoded by different virus species have been reported. By measuring the RNA silencing suppressor activity of proteins encoded by Lettuce Chlorosis Virus (LCV), Kenji Kubota found that P23 possessed the suppressor activity of local RNA silencing. Furthermore, Expression of P23 via agroinfiltration of Nicotiana benthamiana leaves induced local necrosis that increased in severity at elevated temperatures, a novelty given that a direct temperature effect on necrosis severity has not been reported for the other crinivirus VSRs [6-7].

Mingot have shown that a polymerase slippage mechanism in Sweet Potato Feathery Mottle Virus (SPFMV) (genus Potyvirus, family Potyviridae) produces transcripts bringing different ORFs in frame with the upstream polyprotein, thus leading to P1N-PISPO and P3N-PIPO products. The former product PIN-PISPO was found to have the ability to suppress RNA silencing and the WG/ GW motif was required for this interference [7].

Generally the function of binding virus RNA or virus derived small RNAs is the typical character of traditional RSSRs and many of them posess the RNA binding domains. However, it has been found by Kumar that Gemini virus - encoded AC2 have the ability to suppress RNA silencing activity. Meanwhile, unlike many other suppressors, AC2 protein does not bind to siRNA or dsRNA species but interacts with key components of the RNA silencing pathway such as RDR6 and AGO1 [8].

An integral RNA silencing system in plants requires not just the production of RNA silencing in local regions, but also requires the systemic transmission of RNA silencing signal, which is the so-called systemic RNA silencing. In Nguyen’s report, the effects of viral candidate proteins including Rice Grassy Stunt Virus (RGSV) genes s2gp1, s5gp2, and s6gp1 and Rice Ragged Stunt Virus (RRSV) genes s5gp1, s6gp1, s9gp1, and s10gp1were investigated by using the classical Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) agro infiltration method in Nicotiana benthamiana and it was found that p6 of RRSV displays mild silencing suppressor activity and affects long-range silencing by delaying the systemic silencing signal. In addition, nguyen also identified two new silencing suppressors that displayed mild activity: p2 of RGSV and p9 of RRSV [9].

VSRs have been widely studied for plant viruses and insect viruses, but only a few have been defined for mammalian viruses currently. Recently, Cui L has discovered a novel VSR from Coronaviruses, a group of medically important mammalian viruses including Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus (SARS-CoV), and showed that the nucleocapsid protein (N protein) of Coronaviruses suppresses RNAi triggered by either short hairpin RNAs or small interfering RNAs in mammalian cells. In addition, the coronavirus N protein could function as a VSR through its double-stranded RNA binding activity [3].

Chen has found that Porcine Reproductive And Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) suppressed RNA silencing induced by short-hairpin (sh) RNA, double-strand (ds) RNA and microRNA (miRNA) and down regulated the expression of argonaute protein-2 (Ago-2), which is a key protein of the RNA silencing pathway in animal cells. Furthermore, exogenous introduction of siRNA and shRNA downregulated Dicer or Ago-2 proteins of the cellular RNA silencing apparatus, which, in turn, increased the viral replication and titers [4].

Roles of RSSRs in the Host-Virus Interaction

RSSRs is Required for Virus Infection During its Replication in Hosts

During initial RNA virus infection, the dsRNA replication is required. However, the synthesized viral dsRNA by viral RNA polymerase can also trigger the RNA silencing mechanism and the generation of primary vial siRNA in hosts (Figure 1A).

Figure 1: Roles of RSSRs in the host-virus interaction.

(A) Replication of RNA virus triggers the RNA silencing and counteracts its infection.

(B) RSSRs with the RNA binding domain encoded by virus suppress RNA silencing activity by direct binding with viral dsRNAs or viral small RNAs.

(C) RSSRs lacking the RNA binding domain suppresses RNA silencing activity by interfering with the components of RNA silencing (including dicer, RISC complex, et al.).

(D) RSSRs harrboring the NLS signal alter the expression of virus-resistance-related genes in an epigenetic way.

Then the secondary siRNAs derived from viral RNA templates were produced by host RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RDRs) [10]. Primary siRNAs are essential but not sufficient for anti-viral defense and the secondary siRNAs were required because loss of RDR1 or RDR6 activity causes increased susceptibility to viral systemic infection in Arabidopsis [11]. It is worth noting that RDR1 from Nicotiana Tabacum (Nt) suppresses the RDR6-mediated antiviral RNAi and enhances viral infection in Nicotiana Benthamiana [12]. Thus, to survive in the hosts in the presence of antiviral RNA silencing mechanism and fulfill the virus replication in hosts, RSSRs are encoded by diverse virus species and exercise their functions including their direct binding to viral dsRNAs or small RNAs and their indirect interference with the normal function of dicer, AGO or RDRPs proteins by binding with them (Figure 1B & C). Actually, virus species lacking of wild type RSSRs failed to successfully infect host cells again.

The Function of RSSRs Could Be Beneficial for the Hosts

Viruses encode RSSRs to facilitate its infection in hosts. However, recent pubulished data indicated that the RSSRs encoded by viruses seem to have effect on triggering antiviral immunity [13-15]. VSRs can be recognized by resistance (R) proteins and triggered its expression by inhibition of Posttranscriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) in hosts [16]. Also, some other VSRs can elicit Hypersensitive Response (HR) as effectors also triggered [17]. Thus, not only is the involvement of RSSRs essential for virus survival, but also is beneficial for the hosts.

Nucleus Entry of RSSRs Encoded By Virus Inhibits TGS in Hosts

Although the RSSRs are mostly found to have functions of inhibiting RNA silencing in host cytoplasm, it’s also been found that some RSSRs have the NLS signal and could enter the host nucleus, and thus change the TGS by interfering the well-balanced epigenetic events such as RNA-dependent DNA methylation in hosts (Figure 1D). It has been reported that 2b protein encoded by cucumber mosaic virus possesses the NLS signal and locates in the nucleus, and can reduce endogenous DNA Methylation [18]. P19 encoded by Tombusvirus may suppress TGS through binding 21-nt siRNAs or down regulating AGO1 mRNA, which plays a role in methylation of some endogenous loci [19-20].

Conclusion

RNA silencing plays a vital role in the host antiviral defense in plants and animals. To facilitate infection, viruses encode RSSRs to counteract antiviral defense. In conclusion, this review summarized in recent studies newly identified RSSRs encoded by viruses not only in plants but also in animals. During viral infection, antiviral silencing and VSRs have dual effects to maintain the balance between plant growth and virus infection. This review elucidated the underlied mechanisms in the balance between RNA silencing mechanism and its suppression by RSSRs, including the multiple functions of RSSRs encoded by virus species in hosts, revealing the central hub regulators of VSRs in dynamically integrated connections between hosts and viruses.

References

1. Eamens A, Wang MB, Smith NA, Waterhouse PM. RNA silencing in plants: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Plant Physiol. 2008; 147: 456-468.

2. Andika IB, Kazuyuki Maruyama, Liying Sun, Hideki Kondo, Tetsuo Tamada, Nobuhiro Suzuki. Different Dicer-like protein components required for intracellular and systemic antiviral silencing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signal Behav. 2015; 10: e1039214.

3. Cui L, Wang H, Ji Y, Yang J, Xu S, Huang X, et al. The Nucleocapsid Protein of Coronaviruses Acts as a Viral Suppressor of RNA Silencing in Mammalian Cells. Journal of virology. 2015; 89: 9029-9043.

4. Chen J, Shi X, Zhang X, Wang L, Luo J, Xing G, et al. Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) Inhibits RNA-Mediated Gene Silencing by Targeting Ago-2. Viruses. 2015; 7: 5539-5552.

5. Roth BM, Pruss GJ, Vance VB. Plant viral suppressors of RNA silencing. Virus research. 2004; 102: 97-108.

6. Kubota K & Ng JC. Lettuce chlorosis virus P23 Suppresses RNA Silencing and Induces Local Necrosis with Increased Severity at Raised Temperatures. Phytopathology. 2016; 106: 653-662.

7. Mingot A, Valli A, Rodamilans B, San León D, Baulcombe DC, García JA, et al. The P1N-PISPO Trans-frame Gene of Sweet Potato Feathery Mottle Potyvirus is produced during Virus Infection and Functions as RNA Silencing Suppressor. Journal of virology. 2016; 90: 3543-3557.

8. Kumar V, Mishra SK, Rahman J, Taneja J, Sundaresan G, Mishra NS, et al. Mungbean yellow mosaic Indian virus encoded AC2 protein suppresses RNA silencing by inhibiting Arabidopsis RDR6 and AGO1 activities. Virology. 2015; 486: 158-172.

9. Nguyen TD, Lacombe S, Bangratz M, Ta HA, Vinh do N, Gantet P, et al. p2 of Rice Grassy Stunt Virus (RGSV) and p6 and p9 of Rice ragged stunt virus (RRSV) isolates from Vietnam exert suppressor activity on the RNA silencing pathway. Virus genes. 2015; 51: 267-275.

10. Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1998; 391: 806-811.

11. Wang X-B, Qingfa Wua, Takao Itoa, Fabrizio Cilloc, Wan-Xiang Lia, Xuemei Chen, et al. RNAi-mediated viral immunity requires amplification of virus-derived siRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010; 107: 484-489.

12. Ying X-B, Dong L, Zhu H, Duan CG, Du QS, Lv DQ, et al. RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 1 from Nicotiana tabacum suppresses RNA silencing and enhances viral infection in Nicotiana benthamiana. The Plant Cell. 2010; 22: 1358-1372.

13. Soosaar JL, Burch-Smith TM, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Mechanisms of plant resistance to viruses. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2005; 3: 789-798.

14. Dodds PN, Rathjen JP. Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant pathogen interactions. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2010; 11: 539-548.

15. Jones JD, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006; 444: 323-329.

16. Boccara M, Alexis Sarazin, Odon Thiébeauld, Florence Jay, Olivier Voinnet, Lionel Navarro, et al. The Arabidopsis miR472-RDR6 silencing pathway modulates PAMP-and effector-triggered immunity through the post transcriptional control of disease resistance genes. PLoS Pathog. 2014.

17. Li HW, Lucy AP, Guo HS, Li WX, Ji LH, Wong SM, et al. Strong host resistance targeted against a viral suppressor of the plant gene silencing defence mechanism. The EMBO Journal. 1999; 18: 2683-2691.

18. Duan C-G, Fang YY, Zhou BJ, Zhao JH, Hou WN, Zhu H, et al. Suppression of Arabidopsis ARGONAUTE1-mediated slicing, transgene-induced RNA silencing, and DNA methylation by distinct domains of the Cucumber mosaic virus 2b protein. The Plant Cell. 2012; 24: 259-274.

19. Wang H, Zhang X, Liu J, Kiba T, Woo J, Ojo T, et al. Deep sequencing of small RNAs specifically associated with Arabidopsis AGO1 and AGO4 uncovers new AGO functions. THe plant journal. 2011; 67: 292-304.

20. Wu L, Mao L, Qi Y. Roles of dicer-like and argonaute proteins in TAS-derived small interfering RNA-triggered DNA methylation. Plant physiology. 2012; 160: 990-999.

Other Articles

Article Image 1

The Oncogenesis of John Cunningham Virus

The John Cunningham Virus (JCV) was isolated in culture from the brain of a case of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) complicating Hodgkin’s disease. JCV contains icosahedral capsids that are composed of three structural viral proteins and small, circular, double-stranded DNA genomes. JCV is a member of the polyomaviridae family and infects a large proportion of the population worldwide and may cause PML upon immunodeficiency. When the immune system is defective, JCV may be activated. JCV can be found in tonsillar tissue, and the respiratory and digestive tracts are deemed to be the leading sites for JCV to enter human body. Transgenic mouse model showed that T antigen might induce lung and lens tumors with tissue specificity, which is not linked to alternative splicing of its intron. Taken together, T antigen is considered to play a significant role in JCV oncogenesis. In future, we will establish transgenic mice expressing T antigen in various cells using cell-specific promoter and clarify the pathomolecular mechanisms of T-antigen-related tumors and its tissue specificity of oncogenesis.

Lei Fang1 and Hua-chuan Zheng2*


Article Image 1

Effects of Antiviral Treatment on Chronic Hepatitis B-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Recurrence after Surgical Treatment

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive malignancies, and the high rate of recurrence is a major obstacle to improving prognosis. Chronic Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) is one of the major causes of HCC, and high viral replication rate and related hepatic inflammation are major risk factors of HCC recurrence after surgical resection. Current approved antiviral medications for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B are interferon-α (IFNα) and nucleos (t) ide analogues (NAs), including lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, telbivudine, entecavir, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. IFNα treatment significantly reduces HBV-related HCC in sustained responders, but its usage is limited by adverse effects. NAs treatment significantly reduces disease progression into cirrhosis and thus HCC incidence, especially in HBV e antigen-positive patients. However, the long-term continuous treatment of NAs may result in drug resistance due to viral mutations. The effect of IFNα treatment on HCC recurrence remains controversial, while evidence has suggested that postoperative NAs therapy can improve both recurrence-free survival and overall survival in patients with HBV-related HCC. There is a great need to develop more effective and affordable new agents with a better safety record. More high-quality prospective trials are needed to quantitatively estimate treatment efficacy and identify predictive factors of HCC development and progression.

Xiaomei Hou1, Jue Wang2 and Yan Du2*


Article Image 1

Advances in GCRV Research: Virus Molecular Type and Immunogen

Grass carp reovirus, GCRV, belongs to the genus Aquareovirus (AQRV). It is the most virulent species of AQRV, and infection by GCRV causes hemorrhagic disease in grass carp. A new strain, GCRV-GD108, was found in China. Significant differences were found between GCRV-GD108 and GCRV as well as between GCRVGD108 and other known AQRVs. Moreover, similarities were found between GCRV-GD108 and Orthoreovirus (ORV), suggesting a closer evolutionary relationship between GCRV-GD108 and ORV than between GCRVGD108 and the known AQRVs. The discovery of different virus molecular types of GCRV indicates the importance of molecular diagnosis and the development of a specific vaccine. Vaccines have been developed that include inactivated tissue vaccines, inactivated cell vaccines, and attenuated viral vaccines. Great efforts have been made in recent years to investigate immunogen for the preparation of genetically engineered vaccines, which are expected to provide protection for the cultured grass carp.

Xing Ye*and Yuan-yuan Tian


Article Image 1

The Power of GPR for Predicting Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis May Be Affected By Different Scoring Systems of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B

We read with interest the article by Maud Lemoine et al [1] recently published in Gut. They found that Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT)-to-Platelet Ratio (GPR) may be acted as a simple, non-invasive and inexpensive alternative to liver biopsy and Fibro scan laboratory model in sub-Saharan Africa. The GPR was significantly better than Aspartate Transaminase-To-Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) [2] and Fib-4 (based on age, ALT, AST and platelet count) [3] in predicting liver extensive fibrosis (≥F2) and cirrhosis (≥F4) in patients with Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) in the Gambia and Senegal, but not in France. So we hypothesized that the predictive efficiency of these 3 markers may be heterogeneous in different race.

Xueping Yu1,2, Jiming Zhang2* and Zhijun Su1*


Article Image 1

Vital Role of Phylogenetic Analysis as Evidence in Illegal Investigation of Virus Transmission

During recent years phylogenetic analysis has become progressively popular as a tool for the criminal investigation of viral transmission, where it is used to derive the ancestral relationships of viral infections from sampled genome sequences. It has been used to cases involving the transmission of the fast-evolving human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [1], Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) [2,3], hepatitis E (HEV) [4] and for tracking viral transmission in animal field. For example, for the first time phylogenetic analysis determined that the source of viral disease in aquaculture [5,6,7]. Aspects of the transmission of these viruses are impressed on the genetic variation of genomes [8]. These data revealed information about the patterns of virus emergence, viral epidemiology and evolutionary dynamics [9,8]. Analysis of molecular phylogenetic relationships must be based on a domain with a suitable level of evolution for the issue under investigation. Evaluation of recent transmission events requires the analysis of fast-evolving regions, whereas older events must be studied by sequencing more stable regions [2]. This analysis investigates small difference in virus genome using computational methods to calculate the variation between strains of viruses. This process is a critical complex scientific process which undertaken by virologist. The result of phylogenetic analysis has recently applied in illegal trials as evidence of responsibility for virus transmission [10]. In these events, the expert analysis of virologist has been discovered to be of critical importance. In the other hand, these trials can be applied to acquit individuals and keep out the possibility that defendant was responsible for virus transmission [10,11,8]. It is important to note that molecular analysis cannot prove the transmission virus between two individual, but it can support any information on the direction of that transmission [10,1]. It is necessary for molecular phylogenetic analysis to use the right comparison samples, because inappropriate samples could overstate the relationship between two viruses (of different geographical origin) as being conspicuously unique. In addition, many viruses frequently recombine and cause further opportunity for genetic novelty viral transmission from data commonly based on phylogenetic analysis [8]. Also, models of virus transmission and early diversification are the most important result of phylogenetic study. For example, Zika virus emerged in Africa and now circulates on all inhabited continents [12,13]. In another study demonstrated that isolated Dengue virus type 1 strain from Indonesia has a close phylogenetic relationship with strains of Japan [14]. In the recent decade, phylogenetic studies have matured with focus on the human RNA viruses such as influenza virus, HIV, dengue virus and HCV [8-10,15]. However, there are wide ranges of viruses to which phylogenetic analysis are used [9,16-18]. This review shortly outlines the importance of phylogenic analysis for viral transmission with focus on virus origin and shows phylogenetic approach to identify ecological and biological of virus transmission.

Maryam Dadar*


Article Image 1

Serosurveillance of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Ruminant Population of Karnataka, India

Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) is endemic in India and three serotypes viz, O, A, and Asia-1are prevalent in the country. In the current study a total of 7923 serum samples were collected randomly from 4639 cattle, 1363 buffaloe, 1187 sheep and 734 goats from different districts of Karnataka state, India. The samples were screened for antibodies against Non-Structural Proteins (NSPs) and Structural Proteins (SPs) of FMD virus to gather evidence with respect to the FMD virus circulation. The study revealed NSP antibodies in 33% bovines and 16% small ruminants. Higher level of NSP antibodies was observed in cattle (35%), buffaloes (27%), goats (23%) and lower prevalence in sheep (12%).The antibodies against SP was observed in 78% bovines and 18% small ruminants. The study reiterates the importance of strengthening of FMD surveillance in small ruminants as they could pose a potential risk of virus transmission to cattle.

Raveendra Hegde1*, Madhusudan Hosamani2 , Sreevatsava V1 , Rashmi KM1 , Srikanth Kowalli1 , K Nagaraja1 , NK Dharanesha1 , CM Seema1 , GV Nagaraj1 , K Srikala1 , KJ Sudharshana1 , SheshaRao1 , Rajashekar B1 , P Giridhara1 , and SM Byregowda1


Article Image 1

Zika and Its Preparedness in Nepalese Scenario

Zika virus came to known to public in 1947, when it was first isolated from a Rhesus monkey from Uganda [1-3]. Due to its unremitting spread in past decade, zika virus created havoc and gained its recognition as one of the prominent threat in public health across the globe [4-7]. In the March of 2015, Brazil confirmed its first zika infection. Following the zika cases, country had to face erupted increment in microcephaly cases [8]. In next nine month span, the cases of microcephaly increased from 150 cases to 400. After observing this trend, PAHO (Pan American Health Organization) issued an epidemiological alert on December 1st 2015, warning a suspected link between Zika and microcephaly [9].

Bishnu Prasad Upadhya1, Rajani Malla1, Krishna Das Manandhar1, Birendra Prasad Gupta2*, Anurag Adhikari2 , Ramanuj Rauniyar3, Chirik Shova Tamarkar4 , Bimlesh Kumar Jha5 and Roshan Kurmi6


Article Image 1

Long-Term Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B with Normal Alanine Aminotransferas

Background: The Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) level is considered as a risk factor for the progression to liver cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) in patients infected with Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and remains a subject of debate.

Methods: We prospectively compared the incidence of HCC between HBV infected patients with normal ALT and those with elevated ALT.

Result: A total of 378 HBV-infected patients (102 with normal ALT and 276 with elevated ALT) were included. The median follow-up period was 8.2 years. The incidence rates of HCC development were significantly lower in the normal ALT patients than in patients with elevated ALT (0.55 vs 2.20 per 100 person-years, P = 0.021, while the incidence rates of hepatic decompensation (0.43 vs 1.23 per 100 person-years) and survival (53.8% vs 47.4% at 10 years) did not significantly differ between the two groups (Kaplan-Meir analysis). The main causes of death were on-hepatic diseases in patients with normal ALT. Multivariate Cox analyses model revealed that the risk of HCC was lower in patients with normal ALT than in patients with elevated ALT (hazard ratio (HR), 0.28, Confidence intervals (CI) (0.14-0.78)), while the risk of hepatic decompensation and mortality was the same in the two groups of patients.

Conclusion: The risk for HCC and liver decompensation normal ALT was markedly reduced in HBV-patients with normal ALT. Aged patients with HBV with normal ALT should therefore maintain long-term surveillance for HCC. Future studies aimed to better identify those with remaining long-term risk for HCC are needed.

Blaise K Kutala1,2,3*, Emilie Estrabaud1 , Nathalie Boyer2,3, Corinne Castelnau³, Nathalie Giuily2,3, T Asselah1,3 and P Marcellin1,2,3


Article Image 1

LncRNA: A Rising Star in Virus-Host Cross-Talk during HIV-1 Infection

The Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a retrovirus that has been aroused worldwide concern, due to its chronic and persistent infection, ultimately leading to a causal result of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are non-protein coding transcript longer than 200 Base Pairs (bp) and being considered to be key regulators that involved in various biological processes, such as chromatin modification, transcriptional regulation, post-transcriptional regulation, intracellular trafficking and etc. What deserves to be noticed is that lncRNAs are recently being reported to link with viruses closely, and lncRNAs are differentially expressed after a variety of virus infections, including HIV-1 infection. In this paper, we review the rapidly advancing field of lncRNAs, focus on the current progress of lncRNAs in HIV-1 infection, and briefly discuss their different roles in host gene regulation and viral replication during the establishment or maintenance of viral latency. Interestingly, lncRNAs may emerge as novel biomarkers of antiviral drugs and provide potential targets for new therapeutics of AIDS.

Liujun Chen1 , Shanshan Xu1 , Luoshiyuan Zuo3 , Song Han1,2, Jun Yin1,2, Biwen Peng1,2, Xiaohua He1,2 and Wanhong Liu1,2*


Article Image 1

Fungal Viruses: Promising Fundamental Research and Biological Control Agents of Fungi

Fungal viruses (mycoviruses) exist in all major groups of fungi. The primary focus of this review is viruses of filamentous fungi, especially plant pathogens, with emphasis on the molecular characterization of fungus-virus interactions. There are two main hypotheses about the origin of mycoviruses isolated from plant pathogenic fungi. The origin of these mycoviruses may be ancient but they may also have evolved from plant viruses. Many characterized mycoviruses are in unencapsidated dsRNA forms without any coat protein in fungi. Mycoviruses are efficiently spread in two ways, vertically by spore formation and horizontally via hyphal fusion. Replication cycle of RNA mycoviruses doesn’t have the extracellular route of infection under natural conditions. Typically, fungal infections cause no obvious phenotypic alterations. Although the interaction of mycoviruses and their host is largely limited, those aspects including the transcriptional profiling and RNA silencing are of help to understand the co-existence mechanism of virus and fungi. Mycoviruses are potential agents of biological control of important plant pathogenic fungi.

Shuangchao Wang1,2, Marc Ongena2 , Dewen Qiu1 and Lihua Guo1*