Abstract
Composition and abundance of larval fishes in Campeche Bay were studied during two seasons, winter, 2013 (24 stations) and summer, 2014 (31 stations). Sampling was carried out with open-close nets, mouth 75 cm and 505 µm mesh. The data of salinity and temperature allowed distinguishing three oceanic sub-regions: North, East, and West. There were 236 taxa, belonging to 74 families, 168 species, 154 taxa occurred in winter and 171 in summer; the composition in both cruises was similar with around 70 % of oceanic and 30 % of neritic larvae. The larval density was almost three times larger in summer than winter. The Campeche Bay hydrodynamics fits well with the results; the West sub-region is located where a cyclonic gyre takes place, the North and East sub regions are located in the area of influence of warm currents over the Yucatan shelf. The hydrodynamics also allows understanding the differences in the proportion of neritic larvae among the three oceanic sub-regions, the West and East with the lower and higher number of neritic larvae, respectively. The large difference among regions is related to some neritic taxa occurring exclusively in some of them. Of the total taxa, 55 neritic occurred only once and it means that more than a half of neritic taxa were represented by one organism, 31 from 85 neritic taxa occurred in the layers of 600 to 1000 m depth. Of the neritic larvae, only Syacium papillosum and Apogon sp. appear among the 20 more abundant.
Citation
Flores-Coto C, Zavala-García F and Sanvicente-Añorve L. Neritic Larval Fish Distribution in the Oceanic Area of the Campeche Bay, Gulf of Mexico. Int J Fisheries Sci Res. 2018; 2(1): 1003.
Introduction
The composition, abundance, and distribution of ichthyoplankton in the oceanic waters of Campeche Bay, the southern Gulf of Mexico have not been studied. Most the studies have been carried out on the continental shelf, and few include some oceanic stations but no samples below 200 m. It could mention the papers of Olvera-Limas et al., [1] on some particular species, Flores-Coto and Ordónez-López [2] on the mesopelagic fishes, Flores-Coto and Sánchez-Ramírez [3] on carangids, and Flores et al., [4] with a summary of ichthyoplankton research in the area.
Such papers let us have an idea of the dominant taxa in a general way, for an instant, the dominance in the oceanic area of families of mesopelagic species mainly Myctophidae and Gonostomatidae and those of neritic habitat on the continental shelf, like Sciaenidae, Carangidae, Clupeidae, Engraulidae.
Larval fish distribution around the world depends on the biology of the species and the hydrodynamic regime [5-10]. On the first item, the plankton biomass which means food availability is significant. In the southern Gulf of Mexico, the zooplankton biomass and ichthyoplankton density have a direct relationship, and their distribution patterns are similar, with the lowest values in the oceanic area [11,12]; high biomass densities occurred in the coastal regions of the main rivers [13].
In the continental shelf off Tabasco y Campeche, the hydrodynamics are dominated by a current over the Yucatan shelf (which is a branch of the Yucatán current) and the continental water discharges; environment very different from the oceanic adjacent area in the Campeche Bay where the hydrodynamic is driven by a semi-permanent cyclonic gyre [14] and coastal currents generated by wind force, which change of direction depending on the climatic season [15].
But also the Yucatan shelf current (from now on called YSC) has a significant role because the composition and distribution of larval fish assemblages are determinate firstly by the reproductive habits of the adults, but finally, modulated by the hydrographic stressors that characterize each area.
Richards et al., [16] in their analysis of larvae at the borders of the Loop current in the center of the gulf, recorded among the 25 more abundant families a high proportion of neritic components; however, one would expect in the oceanic waters of Campeche Bay a lower density of larvae and a lower proportion of neritic larvae, as it has been previously reported by Flores-Coto et al., [17] and Espinosa-Fuentes et al., [18].
The present paper analyzes the neritic larval fish composition and distribution in the oceanic waters of Campeche Bay from the surface to 1000m depth, during winter and summer seasons of 2013 and 2014, assuming that the dominant hydrographic features are the controlling factors and to a lesser extent, the larvae biology.
Materials and Methods
The study area was located in the oceanic waters of Campeche Bay, the southern Gulf of Mexico between 18º and 21º 30´N and 93º and 96ºW. The zooplankton samples were obtained, from 24 stations made during the winter (ZOOMEP I, January 23-February 3, 2013) and 31 in the summer (ZOOMEP II, June 4-14, 2014). In the sampling, we used open-close nets 75 cm mouth and 505µm mesh, in five 200 m strata (0 to 1000m) resulting in 270 samples (Figure 1).
Figure 1: Study area and stations located in Campeche Bay, Gulf of Mexico. a - Winter cruise, b - Summer cruise
Samples were initially preserved in 4% formalin neutralized with sodium borate and changed into 70% alcohol 48h later. Fish larvae were all extracted from each sample and identified to the lower taxonomic level as possible. Salinity and temperature data were obtained from a Conductivity, Temperature and Depth profiler (CTD).
For the recognition of larvae assemblages, the Bray-Curtis similarity index was applied [19].
Results
Oceanic regions
Temperature and salinity properties of the sampled water masses allowed the identification of three oceanic sub-regions, here designated as North (NOR), East (EOR), and West (WOR) (Figures 2a and 2b).
Figure 2: Oceanic sub-regions delimited by the average temperature of 0-200 m layer.
<20°C, West sub-region, >21°C North sub-region, between 20 and 21°C East sub-region.
During the winter cruise considering the average temperature of the first level (0 - 200 m) the NOR had values of > 21°C, the WOR of < 19.8°C and the EOR between 20 and 21°C (Figure 2a). Interestingly, during the summer cruise, the same sub-regions were also identified, in similar geographic areas. The NOR with temperatures of > 21°C, the WOR with < 20°C, and the EOR with values between previous sub-regions (Figure 2b). The differences among sub-regions in both cruises were lower but persisted to depth levels of 800 - 1000 m (Figures 3a and 3b).
Figure 3: Temperature profiles (0-1000 m) in three sub-regions of the Campeche Bay, Mexico, during winter and summer cruises.
Salinity differences among sub-regions were small, in the winter cruise. The average values were <36.35 in WOR, >36.4 in the NOR and 36.33 to 36.4 in the EOR. In the summer cruise the values were 34.42 to 36.25, in the NOR, 36.00 to 36.24 in the WOR and 36.17 to 36.26 in the EOR (Figures 4a and 4b).
Figure 4: Salinity profiles (0-1000 m) in three sub-regions of the Campeche Bay, Mexico, during winter and summer cruises.
Common and exclusive taxa in the oceanic sub-regions
A total of 5,612 larvae were collected, only 3,431 larvae were identified corresponding to 236 taxa, 76 families, 148 genera, 161 species. In winter 154 taxa were recorded and 171 in the summer. About 88 taxa were common, 66 only occurred in winter and 83 in summer (Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4).
Table 1: Common taxa among oceanic sub-regions in Campeche Bay, Gulf of Mexico, during winter cruise (January 25 to February 3, 2013).
COMMON TAXA IN THREE OCEANIC SUB-REGIONS | |||||
Family | Taxa | Habitat | NOR | EOR | WOR |
Antenaridae | Antennarius spp. | Neritic | 0.013 | 0.01 | 0.032 |
Mugilidae | Mugil cephalus | Neritic | 0.006 | 0.01 | 0.004 |
Congridae | Rhynchoconger flavus | Neritic | 0.011 | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Sternoptychidae | Argyropelecus slandeni | Oceanic | 0.034 | 0.003 | 0.012 |
Sternoptychidae | Argyropelecus spp. | Oceanic | 0.127 | 0.101 | 0.077 |
Myctophidae | Benthosema suborbitale | Oceanic | 0.041 | 0.144 | 0.161 |
Bregmacerotidae | Bregmaceros atlanticus | Oceanic | 0.015 | 0.055 | 0.031 |
Bregmacerotidae | Bregmaceros cantori | Oceanic | 0.023 | 0.39 | 0.008 |
Chiasmodontidae | Chiasmodon niger | Oceanic | 0.015 | 0.032 | 0.03 |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone acclinidens | Oceanic | 0.01 | 0.002 | 0.03 |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone alba | Oceanic | 0.095 | 0.144 | 0.071 |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone braueri | Oceanic | 0.066 | 0.063 | 0.043 |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone pallida | Oceanic | 0.113 | 0.052 | 0.029 |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone pseudopallida | Oceanic | 0.038 | 0.06 | 0.036 |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone spp. | Oceanic | 0.053 | 0.092 | 0.043 |
Myctophidae | Diaphus mollis | Oceanic | 0.017 | 0.012 | 0.008 |
Myctophidae | Diaphus spp. | Oceanic | 0.119 | 0.158 | 0.047 |
Myctophidae | Diogenichthys atlanticus | Oceanic | 0.026 | 0.043 | 0.047 |
Myctophidae | Electrona rissoi | Oceanic | 0.011 | 0.063 | 0.041 |
Gonostomatidae | Gonostoma atlanticum | Oceanic | 0.033 | 0.071 | 0.056 |
Melamphaidae | Melampaes simus | Oceanic | 0.03 | 0.006 | 0.035 |
Myctophidae | Myctophum obtusirostre | Oceanic | 0.042 | 0.089 | 0.013 |
Myctophidae | Myctophum spp. | Oceanic | 0.035 | 0.02 | 0.008 |
Myctophidae | Notolychnus valdiviae | Oceanic | 0.028 | 0.106 | 0.138 |
Gonostomatidae | Sigmops elongatum | Oceanic | 0.059 | 0.025 | 0.024 |
Sternoptychidae | Sternoptyx diaphana | Oceanic | 0.039 | 0.089 | 0.063 |
Sternoptychidae | Sternoptyx pseudobscura | Oceanic | 0.03 | 0.142 | 0.155 |
COMMON TAXA IN NORTH AND WEST SUB-REGIONS | |||||
Family | Taxa | Habitat | NOR | WOR | |
Bothidae | Bothus ocellatus | Neritic | 0.015 | 0.007 | |
Tetraodontidae | Canthigaster spp. | Neritic | 0.005 | 0.025 | |
Scaridae | Scarus spp. | Neritic | 0.014 | 0.015 | |
Trichiuridae | Aphanopus intermedius | Oceanic | 0.006 | 0.004 | |
Sternoptychidae | Argyropelecus hemigymnus | Oceanic | 0.011 | 0.022 | |
Gonostomatidae | Gonosthoma spp. | Oceanic | 0.012 | 0.048 | |
Myctophidae | Myctophum asperum | Oceanic | 0.006 | 0.031 | |
Alepisauridae | Omosudis lowii | Oceanic | 0.021 | 0.004 | |
COMMON TAXA IN EAST AND WEST SUB-REGIONS | |||||
Family | Taxa | Habitat | EOR | WOR | |
Callionymidae | Callionymus bairdi | Neritic | 0.021 | 0.008 | |
Synaphobranchidae | Dysomma anguillare | Neritic | 0.05 | 0.01 | |
Scorpaenidae | Pontinus rathbuni | Neritic | 0.006 | 0.003 | |
Rachycentridae | Rachycentrum canadum | Neritic | 0.023 | 0.022 | |
Scorpaenidae | Scorpaena spp. | Neritic | 0.006 | 0.008 | |
Sternoptychidae | Argyropelecus affinis | Oceanic | 0.003 | 0.004 | |
Gonostomatidae | Bonapartia pedaliota | Oceanic | 0.014 | 0.006 | |
Bregmacerotidae | Bregmaceros spp. | Oceanic | 0.06 | 0.014 | |
Myctophidae | Hygophum taaningi | Oceanic | 0.016 | 0.014 | |
Myctophidae | Lampadena spp. | Oceanic | 0.007 | 0.004 | |
Paralepididae | Lestidiops affinis | Oceanic | 0.002 | 0.006 | |
Bothidae | Monolene sessilicauda | Oceanic | 0.007 | 0.005 | |
Phosichthyidae | Pollicththys mauli | Oceanic | 0.011 | 0.003 | |
Scopelarchidae | Scopelarchus spp. | Oceanic | 0.018 | 0.008 | |
COMMON TAXA IN NORTH AND EAST SUB-REGIONS | |||||
Family | Taxa | Habitat | NOR | EOR | |
Apogonidae | Apogon spp. | Neritic | 0.025 | 0.091 | |
Bothidae | Bothus spp. | Neritic | 0.01 | 0.021 | |
Mugilidae | Mugil curema | Neritic | 0.004 | 0.019 | |
Serranidae | Serranus spp. | Neritic | 0.03 | 0.021 | |
Myctophidae | Ceratoscospelus warmingii | Oceanic | 0.061 | 0.007 | |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone obscura | Oceanic | 0.005 | 0.005 | |
Gempylidae | Diplospinus multistriatus | Oceanic | 0.01 | 0.043 | |
Linophrynidae | Haplophryne mollis | Oceanic | 0.004 | 0.003 | |
Myctophidae | Lampanyctus nobilis | Oceanic | 0.005 | 0.007 | |
Myctophidae | Myctophum affine | Oceanic | 0.02 | 0.016 | |
Myctophidae | Myctophum nitidulum | Oceanic | 0.025 | 0.044 | |
Notosudidae | Scopelosaurus mauli | Oceanic | 0.021 | 0.008 | |
Myctophidae | Symbolophorus rufinus | Oceanic | 0.004 | 0.012 | |
Acropomatidae | Synagrops bellus | Oceanic | 0.004 | 0.004 | |
Phosichthyidae | Vinciguerria nimbaria | Oceanic | 0.005 | 0.011 |
Values = average density. NOR = North Oceanic sub-region, EOR = East Oceanic sub-region, WOR = West Oceanic sub-region.
Table 2: Exclusive taxa in each oceanic sub-region in Campeche Bay, Gulf of Mexico, during winter cruise (January 24 to February 3, 2013).
EXCLUSIVE TAXA IN EAST OCEANIC SUB-REGION | |||
Family | Taxa | Habitat | Average density |
Mugilidae | Agonostoma moticula | Neritic | 0.002 |
Serranidae | Anthias nicholsi | Neritic | 0.013 |
Labridae | Bodianus rufus | Neritic | 0.007 |
Paralichthydae | Citharichthys cornutus | Neritic | 0.011 |
Paralichthydae | Citharichthys gymnorhinus | Neritic | 0.004 |
Paralichthydae | Citharichthys macrops | Neritic | 0.006 |
Paralichthydae | Citharichthys spp. | Neritic | 0.003 |
Paralichthydae | Citharichthys spilopterus | Neritic | 0.014 |
Carangidae | Decapterus punctatus | Neritic | 0.025 |
Bothidae | Engyophrys senta | Neritic | 0.004 |
Paralichthydae | Etropus microstomus | Neritic | 0.016 |
Labridae | Halichoeres cyanocephalus | Neritic | 0.007 |
Sciaenidae | Micropogonias furnieri | Neritic | 0.013 |
Ophichthidae | Myrophis punctatus | Neritic | 0.004 |
Ophichthidae | Ophichthus spp. | Neritic | 0.004 |
Pomatomidae | Pomatomus saltatrix | Neritic | 0.006 |
Scorpaemidae | scorpaena plumieri | Neritic | 0.002 |
Sparidae | Sparisoma spp. | Neritic | 0.017 |
Paralichthyidae | Syacium papillosum | Neritic | 0.005 |
Cynoglosidae | Symphurus spp. | Neritic | 0.006 |
Synodontidae | Synodus foetens | Neritic | 0.011 |
Synodontidae | Synodus spp. | Neritic | 0.014 |
Alepisauridae | Alepisaurus ferox | Oceanic | 0.004 |
Percophidae | Bembrops gobioides | Oceanic | 0.007 |
Percophidae | Bembrops spp. | Oceanic | 0.007 |
Trichiuridae | Benthodesmus tenuis | Oceanic | 0.006 |
Bregmacerotidae | Bregmaceros houdei | Oceanic | 0.007 |
Ophidiidae | Brotula spp. | Oceanic | 0.016 |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone microdon | Oceanic | 0.018 |
Myctophidae | Diaphus brachycephalus | Oceanic | 0.011 |
Directmidae | Diretmichthys parini | Oceanic | 0.005 |
Microstomatidae | Dolicholagus longirostris | Oceanic | 0.007 |
Stomiidae | Eustomias spp. | Oceanic | 0.006 |
Evermanellidae | Evermannella melanoderma | Oceanic | 0.007 |
Congridae | Gnathophis spp. | Oceanic | 0.007 |
Myctophidae | Hygophum benoiti | Oceanic | 0.003 |
Myctophidae | Hygophum spp. | Oceanic | 0.045 |
Phosichthyidae | Icthyococus ovatus | Oceanic | 0.006 |
Myctophidae | Lampanyctus spp. | Oceanic | 0.004 |
Gempylidae | Lepidocybium flavobrunneum | Oceanic | 0.004 |
Trichiuridae | Lepidopus altifrons | Oceanic | 0.005 |
Myctophidae | Myctophum selenops | Oceanic | 0.006 |
Myctophidae | Nannobrachium spp. | Oceanic | 0.015 |
Gempylidae | Nealotus tripes | Oceanic | 0.014 |
Polynemidae | Polydactilus spp. | Oceanic | 0.006 |
Family | Taxa | Habitat | Averaje density |
Sternoptychidae | Polyipnus spp. | Oceanic | 0.004 |
Scorpaenidae | Pterois spp. | Oceanic | 0.006 |
Paralepididae | Sudis atrox | Oceanic | 0.007 |
Congridae | Uroconger syringinus | Oceanic | 0.007 |
Sternoptychidae | Valenciennellus tripunctulatus | Oceanic | 0.016 |
Phosichthyidae | Vinciguerria attenuata | Oceanic | 0.011 |
Phosichthyidae | Vinciguerria poweriae | Oceanic | 0.003 |
EXCLUSIVE TAXA NORTH OCEANIC SUB-REGION | |||
Family | Taxa | Habitat | Average density |
Diodontidae | Chilomycterus schoepfi | Neritic | 0.004 |
Priacanthidae | Heteropriacanthus cruentatus | Neritic | 0.02 |
Malacantidae | Malacanthus plumieri | Neritic | 0.017 |
Synodontidae | Synodus | Neritic | 0.013 |
Sternoptychidae | Argyropelecus acuelatus | Oceanic | 0.007 |
Myctophidae | Ceratoscospelus spp. | Oceanic | 0.043 |
Bothidae | Chascanopsettalugubris | Oceanic | 0.005 |
Myctophidae | Diaphus effulgens | Oceanic | 0.007 |
Ophidiidae | Dicrolene spp. | Oceanic | 0.007 |
Gonostomatidae | Margrethia obtusirostre | Oceanic | 0.011 |
Myctophidae | Nannobrachium atrum | Oceanic | 0.015 |
Myctophidae | Notoscopelus caudispinosus | Oceanic | 0.006 |
Gonostomatidae | Sigmops spp. | Oceanic | 0.032 |
Paralepididae | Stemonosudis rothschildi | Oceanic | 0.011 |
Cynoglosidae | symphuruspiger | Oceanic | 0.01 |
Phosichthyidae | Vinciguerria spp. | Oceanic | 0.025 |
EXCLUSIVE TAXA WEST OCEANIC SUB-REGION | |||
Family | Taxa | Habitat | Average density |
Tetraodontidae | Canthigaster rostrata | Neritic | 0.003 |
Mullidae | Mulloidichthys martinicus | Neritic | 0.013 |
Nettastomidae | Nettenchelys pygmaea | Neritic | 0.013 |
Sphyraenidae | Sphyraena spp. | Neritic | 0.013 |
Microstomatidae | Bathylagos spp. | Oceanic | 0.008 |
Berycidae | Beryx spp. | Oceanic | 0.01 |
Stomiidae | Chauliodus sloani | Oceanic | 0.005 |
Chiasmodontidae | Chiasmodon spp. | Oceanic | 0.008 |
Nomeidae | Cubiceps pauciradiatus | Oceanic | 0.008 |
Gempylidae | Gempylus serpens | Oceanic | 0.005 |
Myctophidae | Hygophum reinhardtii | Oceanic | 0.013 |
Myctophidae | Lampanyctus alatus | Oceanic | 0.017 |
Myctophidae | Lepidophanes gaussi | Oceanic | 0.006 |
Myctophidae | Lepidophanes guentheri | Oceanic | 0.005 |
Melanocetidae | Melanocetus johnsoni | Oceanic | 0.006 |
Microstomatidae | Melanolagus bericoides | Oceanic | 0.019 |
Myctophidae | Nannobrachium lineatun | Oceanic | 0.013 |
Myctophidae | Notoscopelus resplendens | Oceanic | 0.008 |
Alepisauridae | Omosudis spp. | Oceanic | 0.003 |
Nomeidae | Psenes pellucidus | Oceanic | 0.01 |
Scopelarchidae | Scopelarchus analis | Oceanic | 0.008 |
Phycidae | Urophycis spp. | Oceanic | 0.013 |
Table 3: Common taxa among oceanic sub-regions in Campeche Bay, Gulf of Mexico, during summer cruise (4-14 June 2014).
COMMON TAXA IN THREE SUB-REGIONS | |||||
Family | Taxa | Habitat | NOR | EOR | WOR |
Bothidae | Bothus ocellatus | Neritic | 0.425 | 0.781 | 0.433 |
Sternoptychidae | Maurolicus weitzmani | Neritic | 0.206 | 0.318 | 0.645 |
Paralichthydae | Syacium papillosum | Neritic | 0.579 | 1.499 | 0.705 |
Sternoptychidae | Argyropelecus affinis | Oceanic | 0.471 | 0.201 | 0.304 |
Sternoptychidae | Argyropelecus hemigymnus | Oceanic | 0.208 | 0.281 | 0.171 |
Sternoptychidae | Argyropelecus sladeni | Oceanic | 0.289 | 0.369 | 0.639 |
Sternoptychidae | Argyropelecus spp. | Oceanic | 0.342 | 0.423 | 0.686 |
Myctophidae | Benthosema suborbitale | Oceanic | 0.506 | 0.77 | 0.692 |
Gonostomatidae | Bonapartia pedaliota | Oceanic | 0.222 | 0.227 | 0.154 |
Bregmacerotidae | Bregmaceros atlanticus | Oceanic | 0.91 | 1.016 | 0.76 |
Bregmacerotidae | Bregmaceros cantori | Oceanic | 1.132 | 0.589 | 1.325 |
Myctophidae | Centrobranchus nigroocellatus | Oceanic | 0.282 | 0.128 | 0.143 |
Myctophidae | Ceratoscopelus spp. | Oceanic | 0.227 | 0.377 | 0.638 |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone acclinidens | Oceanic | 0.335 | 0.598 | 0.426 |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone alba | Oceanic | 0.403 | 0.191 | 0.595 |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone braueri | Oceanic | 0.235 | 0.388 | 0.555 |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone microdon | Oceanic | 0.38 | 0.569 | 0.286 |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone pallida | Oceanic | 0.255 | 0.334 | 0.595 |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone pseudopallida | Oceanic | 0.229 | 0.418 | 0.207 |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone spp. | Oceanic | 0.547 | 0.53 | 0.535 |
Myctophidae | Diaphus mollis | Oceanic | 0.482 | 0.893 | 0.367 |
Myctophidae | Diaphus spp. | Oceanic | 0.843 | 1.264 | 0.844 |
Myctophidae | Diogenichthys atlanticus | Oceanic | 0.803 | 0.636 | 1.962 |
Gempylidae | Diplospinus multistriatus | Oceanic | 0.576 | 0.293 | 0.276 |
Microstomatidae | Dolicholagus longirostris | Oceanic | 0.129 | 0.239 | 0.255 |
Myctophidae | Electrona risso | Oceanic | 0.27 | 0.316 | 0.113 |
Gonostomatidae | Gonostoma atlanticum | Oceanic | 0.395 | 0.443 | 0.655 |
Myctophidae | Hygophum macrochir | Oceanic | 0.184 | 0.341 | 0.472 |
Myctophidae | Hygophum reinhardtii | Oceanic | 0.355 | 0.759 | 0.637 |
Myctophidae | Hygophum taaningi | Oceanic | 0.39 | 0.529 | 0.558 |
Myctophidae | Lampadena luminosa | Oceanic | 0.351 | 0.712 | 0.402 |
Myctophidae | Lampanyctus alatus | Oceanic | 0.16 | 0.756 | 0.269 |
Myctophidae | Lampanyctus spp. | Oceanic | 0.351 | 0.325 | 0.223 |
Myctophidae | Lepidophanes guentheri | Oceanic | 0.248 | 0.128 | 0.173 |
Melamphaidae | Melamphaes simus | Oceanic | 0.421 | 0.562 | 0.463 |
Myctophidae | Myctophum affine | Oceanic | 0.328 | 0.21 | 0.154 |
Myctophidae | Myctophum asperum | Oceanic | 0.55 | 0.518 | 0.414 |
Myctophidae | Myctophum nitidulum | Oceanic | 0.361 | 0.606 | 0.504 |
Myctophidae | Myctophum obtusirostre | Oceanic | 0.213 | 0.544 | 0.836 |
Myctophidae | Myctophum spp. | Oceanic | 0.59 | 0.363 | 0.559 |
Myctophidae | Notolychnus valdiviae | Oceanic | 0.88 | 1.022 | 0.549 |
Gonostomatidae | Sigmops elongatum | Oceanic | 0.464 | 0.902 | 0.405 |
Sternoptychidae | Sternoptyx diaphana | Oceanic | 0.335 | 0.354 | 0.346 |
Sternoptychidae | Sternoptyx spp. | Oceanic | 0.333 | 0.489 | 0.82 |
Myctophidae | Symbolophorus rufinus | Oceanic | 0.303 | 0.293 | 0.719 |
Sternoptychidae | Valenciennellus tripunctulatus | Oceanic | 0.329 | 0.415 | 0.367 |
Phosichthyidae | Vinciguerria spp | Oceanic | 0.701 | 0.34 | 0.462 |
COMMON TAXA IN NORTH AND WEST SUB-REGIONS | |||||
Family | Taxa | Habitat | NOR | WOR | |
Exocoetidae | Cheilopogon spp. | Neritic | 0.294 | 0.679 | |
Myctophidae | Ceratoscopelus warmingii | Oceanic | 0.65 | 0.154 | |
Myctophidae | Gonichthys cocco | Oceanic | 0.229 | 0.424 | |
Myctophidae | Myctophum selenops | Oceanic | 0.467 | 0.272 | |
Myctophidae | Nannobrachium lineatum | Oceanic | 0.227 | 0.547 | |
Myctophidae | Nannobrachium spp. | Oceanic | 0.336 | 0.594 | |
Scopelarchidae | Scopelarchus spp. | Oceanic | 0.217 | 0.154 | |
Melamphaidae | Scopeloberyx spp. | Oceanic | 0.984 | 0.173 | |
Phosichthyidae | Vinciguerria poweriae | Oceanic | 0.183 | 0.36 | |
COMMON TAXA IN EAST AND WEST SUB-REGIONS | |||||
Family | Taxa | Habitat | EOR | WOR | |
Microdesmidae | Microdesmus lanceolatus | Neritic | 1.428 | 0.924 | |
Congridae | Rhynchoconger flavus | Neritic | 0.285 | 0.34 | |
Stomiidae | Chauliodus danae | Oceanic | 0.358 | 0.499 | |
Myctophidae | Hygophum benoiti | Oceanic | 0.358 | 0.164 | |
Myctophidae | Lampanyctus nobilis | Oceanic | 0.425 | 0.132 | |
Myctophidae | Notoscopelus spp. | Oceanic | 0.719 | 0.376 | |
Paralepididae | Stemonosudis rothschildi | Oceanic | 0.334 | 0.173 | |
Phosichthyidae | Vinciguerria attenuata | Oceanic | 0.734 | 0.154 | |
COMMON TAXA IN NORTH AND EAST SUB-REGIONS | |||||
Family | Taxa | Habitat | NOR | EOR | |
Scombridae | Auxis thazard | Neritic | 0.345 | 0.81 | |
Carangidae | Caranx spp | Neritic | 0.155 | 0.332 | |
Paralichthydae | Citharichthys spp. | Neritic | 0.259 | 0.152 | |
Diodontidae | Diodon spp. | Neritic | 0.129 | 0.274 | |
Synaphobranchidae | Dysomma anguillare | Neritic | 0.314 | 0.393 | |
Scombridae | Euthynnus alletteratus | Neritic | 0.223 | 0.945 | |
Howellidae | Howella spp. | Neritic | 0.416 | 0.369 | |
Carangidae | Selene setapinnis | Neritic | 0.187 | 1.735 | |
Carangidae | Selene spp. | Neritic | 0.323 | 0.184 | |
Serranidae | Serranus spp. | Neritic | 0.189 | 0.573 | |
Scombridae | Thunnus spp | Neritic | 0.232 | 0.373 | |
Bregmacerotidae | Bregmaceros spp | Oceanic | 0.227 | 0.663 | |
Stomiidae | Chauliodus spp. | Oceanic | 0.128 | 0.231 | |
Coryphaenidae | Coryphaena spp. | Oceanic | 0.259 | 0.376 | |
Myctophidae | Hygophum hygomii | Oceanic | 0.195 | 0.525 | |
Myctophidae | Hygophum spp. | Oceanic | 0.253 | 0.673 | |
Phosichthyidae | Ichthyococcus ovatus | Oceanic | 0.288 | 0.7 | |
Myctophidae | Lampadena spp. | Oceanic | 0.187 | 0.421 | |
Paralepididae | Lestidiops affinis | Oceanic | 0.339 | 0.611 | |
Paralepididae | Lestidiops spp. | Oceanic | 0.642 | 0.355 | |
Myctophidae | Lobianchia gemellarii | Oceanic | 0.259 | 0.661 | |
Gonostomatidae | Margrethia obtusirostre | Oceanic | 0.256 | 0.247 | |
Myctophidae | Nannobrachium atrum | Oceanic | 0.289 | 0.381 | |
Alepisauridae | Omosudis lowii | Oceanic | 0.972 | 0.837 | |
Chlorophthalmidae | Parasudis truculentus | Oceanic | 0.32 | 0.332 | |
Sternoptychidae | Polyipnus spp. | Oceanic | 0.146 | 0.917 | |
Scopelarchidae | Scopelarchus analis | Oceanic | 0.266 | 0.321 | |
Scopelarchidae | Scopelarchus michaelsarsi | Oceanic | 0.185 | 0.373 | |
Sternoptychidae | Sternoptyx pseudobscura | Oceanic | 0.47 | 0.411 | |
Paralepididae | Sudis atrox | Oceanic | 0.457 | 0.258 |
Values = average density. NOR = North Oceanic sub-region, EOR = East Oceanic sub-region, WOR = West Oceanic sub-region.
Table 4: Exclusive taxa in each oceanic sub-region in Campeche Bay, Gulf of Mexico during summer cruise (4-14 June 2014).
EXCLUSIVE TAXA IN EAST OCEANIC SUB-REGION | |||
Family | Taxa | Habitat | Average density |
Ophichthidae | Ahlia egmontis | Neritic | 0.332 |
Monacanthidae | Aluterus scriptus | Neritic | 0.296 |
Antennariidae | Antennarius spp | Neritic | 0.369 |
Serranidae | Anthias woodsi | Neritic | 0.332 |
Scombridae | Auxis spp | Neritic | 0.853 |
Balistidae | Balistes capriscus | Neritic | 0.358 |
Tetraodontidae | Canthigaster spp | Neritic | 0.425 |
Carangidae | Caranx crysos | Neritic | 0.358 |
Paralichthydae | Citharichthys arctifrons | Neritic | 0.126 |
Paralichthydae | Etropus crossotus | Neritic | 0.332 |
Paralichthydae | Etropus microstomus | Neritic | 0.332 |
Gerreidae | Eucinostomus spp. | Neritic | 0.622 |
Fistulariidae | Fistularia spp. | Neritic | 0.917 |
Lutjanidae | Lutjanus campechanus | Neritic | 0.425 |
Lutjanidae | Lutjanus spp. | Neritic | 1.712 |
Microdesmidae | Microdesmus longipinnis | Neritic | 0.88 |
Microdesmidae | Microdesmus spp. | Neritic | 0.136 |
Carangidae | Oligoplites saurus | Neritic | 0.358 |
Ophichthidae | Ophichthus gomesii | Neritic | 0.358 |
Ophichthidae | Ophichthus spp. | Neritic | 0.425 |
Ophidiidae | Ophidion nocomis | Neritic | 0.258 |
Rachycentridae | Rachycentron canadum | Neritic | 0.332 |
Scombridae | Scomberomorus regalis | Neritic | 0.229 |
Scorpaenidae | Scorpaena spp. | Neritic | 1.069 |
Carangidae | Selar crumenophtalmus | Neritic | 0.167 |
Carangidae | Selene vomer | Neritic | 0.373 |
Sphyraenidae | Sphyraena guachancho | Neritic | 1.712 |
Scombridae | Thunnus atlanticus | Neritic | 1.428 |
Alepisauridae | Alepisaurus spp | Oceanic | 0.837 |
Aulopidae | Aulopus nanae | Oceanic | 0.378 |
Percophidae | Bembrops spp | Oceanic | 0.185 |
Bregmacerotidae | Bregmaceros maclellandii | Oceanic | 0.185 |
Chiasmodontidae | Chiasmodon niger | Oceanic | 0.242 |
Nomeidae | Cubiceps pauciradiatus | Oceanic | 0.332 |
Gonostomatidae | Cyclothone obscura | Oceanic | 0.56 |
Stomiidae | Eustomias spp. | Oceanic | 0.358 |
Nettastomatidae | Hoplunnis tenuis | Oceanic | 0.35 |
Melamphaidae | Melamphaes spp. | Oceanic | 0.544 |
Gempylidae | Nealotus tripes | Oceanic | 0.285 |
Serranidae | Pronotogrammus aureorubens | Oceanic | 0.425 |
Nomeidae | Psenes spp. | Oceanic | 0.332 |
Scopelarchidae | Scopelarchoides danae | Oceanic | 0.369 |
Phosichthyidae | Vinciguerria nimbaria | Oceanic | 0.285 |
EXCLUSIVE TAXA WEST OCEANIC SUB-REGION | |||
Family | Taxa | Habitat | Average density |
Stomiidae | Chauliodus sloani | Oceanic | 0.127 |
Myctophidae | Diaphus brachycephalus | Oceanic | 0.238 |
Gonostomatidae | Gonostoma spp. | Oceanic | 0.169 |
Microstomatidae | Melanolagus bericoides | Oceanic | 0.388 |
Stomiidae | Melanostomias spp. | Oceanic | 0.34 |
Stomiidae | Photostomias guernei | Oceanic | 0.499 |
Scorpelarchidae | Scopelarchus guentheri | Oceanic | 0.216 |
Dactylopteridae | Dactylopterus volitans | Neritic | 0.34 |
Mirapinnidae | Eutaeniophorus festivus | Neritic | 0.16 |
Scombridae | Katsuwonus pelamis | Neritic | 0.679 |
Syngnathidae | Syngnathus louisianae | Neritic | 0.499 |
EXCLUSIVE TAXA NORTH OCEANIC SUB-REGION | |||
Family | Taxa | Habitat | Average density |
Paralichthyidae | Cyclopsetta fimbriata | Neritic | 0.195 |
Bothidae | Engyophrys senta | Neritic | 0.172 |
Muraenidae | Gymnothorax ocellatus | Neritic | 0.259 |
Nettastomatidae | Nettenchelys pygmaea | Neritic | 0.294 |
Pomacentridae | Stegastes spp. | Neritic | 0.243 |
Alepisauridae | Alepisaurus brevirostris | Oceanic | 0.146 |
Caproidae | Antigonia capros | Oceanic | 0.195 |
Chlorophthalmidae | Chlorophthalmus agassizi | Oceanic | 0.2 |
Coryphaenidae | Coryphaena equiselis | Oceanic | 0.328 |
Opisthoproctidae | Dolichopteryx binocularis | Oceanic | 0.227 |
Evermannellidae | Evermanella balbo | Oceanic | 0.294 |
Nettastomatidae | Facciolella spp. | Oceanic | 0.259 |
Ipnopidae | Ipnops murrayi | Oceanic | 0.745 |
Paralichthyidae | Cyclopsetta fimbriata | Neritic | 0.195 |
Myctophidae | Lepidophanes gaussi | Oceanic | 0.452 |
Trichiuridae | Lepidopus spp. | Oceanic | 0.195 |
Stomiidae | Leptostomias spp. | Oceanic | 0.984 |
Macrouridae | Mesobius spp. | Oceanic | 0.16 |
Myctophidae | Nannobrachium cuprarium | Oceanic | 0.289 |
Myctophidae | Notoscopelus caudispinosus | Oceanic | 0.648 |
Paralepididae | Paralepis spp. | Oceanic | 0.119 |
Nomeidae | Psenes arafurensis | Oceanic | 0.147 |
Paralepididae | Uncisudis advena | Oceanic | 0.294 |
Paralepididae | Uncisudis spp | Oceanic | 0.195 |
The taxa composition in both cruises was similar with around 70% of larvae from an oceanic stock and 30% of the neritic stock. The larval density in summer represents 66.8% of the total of both cruises, and the density of neritic larvae was 13.1% in winter and 26.5% in summer.
The more abundant and frequent species in both cruises were Diogenichthys atlanticus, Notolychnus valdiviae, Benthosema suborbitale, Bregmaceros cantori, B. atlanticus, Gonostoma atlanticum, Sternoptyx diaphana and the genera Diaphus, Cyclothone y Argyropelecus. Of the neritic larvae, only Syacium papillosum and Apogon sp. appear among the twenty-first more abundant.
The composition of the larval community was analyzed with Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index using the total taxa or only neritic larvae. However, the resulting stations groups did not correspond with the oceanic sub-region determined by temperature and salinity.
Considering, firstly that from the 236 total taxa, 151 and 85 were oceanic and neritic larvae, respectively and secondly, that there was no correspondence between the ocean sub-regions and stations groups, we analyzed the differences among oceanic sub-regions, considering common taxa in the three regions, as well as those occurring in two or only one (Tables 1,2,3 and 4).
The larger number of common taxa among three sub-regions was oceanic: 24 and 47 in winter and summer, respectively, with only three and five neritic larvae in each cruise. The number of common taxa among two sub-regions was lower. The low number of common taxa among the WOR with the other two, as well as its low number of neritic taxa, making it different. Therefore, the greatest similarity was among the NOR and EOR particularly in the summer (Table 5).
Table 5: Number of common and exclusive, neritic and oceanic taxa, occurring in each oceanic sub-region and season.
WINTER | SUMMER | |||||||||
Taxa | Oceanic | Neritic | Oceanic | Neritic | ||||||
109 | 45 | 117 | 54 | |||||||
Total | 154 | 171 | ||||||||
WINTER | SUMMER | |||||||||
Common Taxa | N-W | N-E | W-E | ALL | Common Taxa | N-W | N-E | W-E | ALL | |
Oceanic | 5 | 11 | 9 | 24 | Oceanic | 8 | 19 | 6 | 47 | |
Neritic | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | Neritic | 1 | 11 | 2 | 5 | |
Total | 8 | 15 | 14 | 27 | Total | 9 | 30 | 8 | 52 | |
WINTER | SUMMER | |||||||||
Exclusive Taxa | North | East | West | Exclusive Taxa | North | East | West | |||
Oceanic | 12 | 30 | 18 | Oceanic | 18 | 15 | 7 | |||
Neritic | 4 | 22 | 4 | Neritic | 5 | 28 | 4 | |||
Total | 16 | 52 | 22 | Total | 23 | 43 | 11 |
N = North Oceanic subregion, E = East Oceanic sub-region, W = West Oceanic sub-region.
The large difference among sub-regions was attributed to a few neritic taxa occurring exclusively in some of them, those, in winter there were only four in the NOR and WOR and 22 in the EOR. Similarly, in summer cruise four and five neritic taxa occurred exclusively in the NOR and WOR, and 28 in the EOR (Table 5). The greatest diversity and frequency of neritic taxa corresponded to the EOR.
Vertical distribution
Distribution in the water column of the neritic and oceanic larvae was similar in winter and summer seasons; both groups of larvae presented greater density in the epipelagic layer, strongly declining towards the next level (200-400m); the density continued descending up to 1000 m, except in the summer cruise in which after 800m there was an increase to the next level (Figure 5).
Figure 5: Percentage of larvae density by depth levels.
The transport of larvae from the neritic to oceanic zones let us consider that this kind of larvae could remain in the epipelagic layer, but 31 from 85 neritic taxa occurred in the layers of 600 to 1000m depth.
Most of these taxa were represented by one organism, except Auxis thazard, Syacium papillosum and Bothus ocellatus, occurring several times in such depths (Table 6).
Table 6: Taxa present once.
WINTER | SUMMER | |||
Neritic | Oceanic | Neritic | Oceanic | |
Agonostoma moticula | Alepisaurus ferox | Ahlia egmontis | Alepisaurus brevirostris | |
Anthias nicholsi | Argyropelecus acuelatus | Antennarius spp. | Alepisaurus spp. | |
Bodianus rufus | Bathylagos spp. | Anthias woodsi | Antigonia capros | |
Canthigaster rostrata | Bembrops gobioides | Auxis spp. | Bembrops spp. | |
Chilomycterus schoepfi | Bembrops spp. | Balistes capriscus | Bregmaceros maclellandii | |
Citharichthys gymnorhinus | Benthodesmus tenuis | Canthigaster spp. | Chauliodus sloani | |
Citharichthys macros | Beryx spp. | Caranx crysos | Chiasmodon niger | |
Citharichthys spp. | Ceratoscopelus spp. | Citharichthys arctifrons | Chlorophthalmus agassizi | |
Engyophrys senta | Chascanopsetta lugubris | Cyclopsetta fimbriata | Coryphaena equiselis | |
Halichoeres cyanocephalus | Chauliodus sloani | Dactylopterus volitans | Cubiceps pauciradiatus | |
Heteropriacanthus cruentatus | Chiasmodon spp. | Engyophrys senta | Diaphus brachycephalus | |
Micropogonias furnieri | Cubiceps pauciradiatus | Etropus crossotus | Dolichopteryx binocularis | |
Mulloidichthys martinicus | Diaphus effulgens | Etropus microstomus | Eustomias spp. | |
Myrophis punctatus | Dicrolene spp. | Eutaeniophorus festivus | Evermannella balbo | |
Nettenchelys pygmaea | Diretmichthys parini | Fistularia spp. | Facciolella spp. | |
Ophichthus spp. | Dolicholagus longirostris | Gymnothorax ocellatus | Gonostoma spp. | |
Pomatomus saltatrix | Eustomias spp. | Katsuwonus pelamis | Hoplunnis tenuis | |
Scorpaena plumieri | Evermannella melanoderma | Lutjanus campechanus | Ipnops murrayi | |
Sphyraena spp. | Gempylus serpens | Lutjanus spp. | Lepidopus spp. | |
Syacium papillosum | Gnathophis spp. | Microdesmus spp. | Leptostomias spp. | |
Symphurus spp. | Hygophum benoiti | Nettenchelys pygmaea | Melanolagusbericoides | |
Synodus spp. | Hygophum reinhardtii | Oligoplites saurus | Melanostomias spp. | |
Synodus synodus | Ichthyococcus ovatus | Ophichthus gomesii | Mesobius spp. | |
Lampanyctus spp. | Ophichthus spp. | Nannobrachium cuprarium | ||
Lepidocybium flavobrunneum | Rachycentron canadum | Nealotus tripes | ||
Lepidophanes gaussi | Scomberomorus regalis | Paralepis spp. | ||
Lepidophanes guentheri | Selar crumenophtalmus | Photostomias guernei | ||
Lepidopus altifrons | Selene vomer | Pronotogrammus aureorubens | ||
Margrethia obtusirostre | Sphyraena guachancho | Psenes arafurensis | ||
Melanocetus johnsoni | Stegastes spp. | Psenes spp. | ||
Myctophum selenops | Syngnathus louisianae | Scopelarchoides danae | ||
Nannobrachium atrum | Thunnus atlanticus | Scopelarchus guentheri | ||
Nannobrachium lineatum | Uncisudis advena | |||
Nannobrachium spp. | Uncisudis spp. | |||
Notoscopelus caudispinosus | Vinciguerria nimbaria | |||
Notoscopelus resplendens | ||||
Omosudis spp. | ||||
Polydactilus spp. | ||||
Polyipnus spp. | ||||
Psenes pellucidus | ||||
Pterois spp. | ||||
Scopelarchus analis | ||||
Sigmops spp. | ||||
Stemonosudis rothschildi | ||||
Sudisatrox | ||||
Symphurus piger | ||||
Uroconger syringinus | ||||
Urophycis spp. | ||||
Vinciguerria poweriae | ||||
Vinciguerria spp. |
Of the total taxa, 59% occurred in only once, 85 oceanic and 55 neritic. This means that more than a half of neritic taxa were represented by a single organism and most of them were in the epipelagic layer, mainly in summer.
Discussion
Oceanic sub-regions
Differences in temperature and to a lesser extent of salinity allowed the recognition of three oceanic sub-regions in the Bay of Campeche; in the two seasonal periods studied, these subdivision seem promoted by an almost permanent phenomenon, generated by two hydrographic facts: One is the semi-persistent cyclonic gyre which occurs in the bay [20,21]; and the other, the intrusion of neritic waters from the YSC that flow over the Bay [15,22].
The station groups resulting from the application of the similarity index [19] did not correspond to the oceanic regions determined from temperature and salinity; the differences in temperature and salinity are probably not so severe as to limit the passage of the larvae of a region to another. Richards et al., [16] in their study at the border of the Loop Current, had similar results applying a cluster analysis that might not support their hypothesis of front assemblages; however, in their study of families, they did distinguish coastal and oceanic groups.
The hydrodynamics of Campeche Bay is consistent with the hydrographic sub-regions described in our results. Thus, the WOR is located where the cyclonic gyre takes place [20,21]. It is, the region with the lower temperatures and salinities caused by the upwelling of deep water; while the NOR, which had warmer temperatures and high salinity are formed in the area under the direct influence of the YSC with the east-west direction [15,22,23]. The EOR, on the other hand, with average values of temperatures and salinities strictly intermediate is also influenced by the same current, after flowing through the Campeche-Tabasco shelf.
Neritic and oceanic larvae in the oceanic sub-regions
In the pelagic zone of Campeche Bay predominated larvae from oceanic parents, epipelagic, mesopelagic, bathypelagic or demersal; the families Myctophidae, Gonostomatidae, Sternoptychidae, Bregmacerotidae regularly were the most abundant and frequent [2,18].
The distribution of oceanic species did not appear limited by temperature or salinity differences among the three recorded oceanic sub-regions.
The low densities of neritic larvae 13.1% in winter and 26.5% in summer shows the small influence of neritic communities on the oceanic area as it has already been mentioned by Flores-Coto et al., [11]. This is consistent with its neritic origin [6-10] and their dispersion generated by the warm current that flows over the Yucatan shelf which reaches the oceanic zone.
The higher neritic larvae concentration on the NOR and EOR concerning the WOR fits the trajectories of the surface currents described by Zavala-Sansón et al., [24].
The larval distribution of neritic species confirms the low connectivity that exists between Yucatan and Veracruz reefs [25]. That is to say, those planktonic organisms transported by YSC towards Campeche Bay, do not to reach the Western area off Veracruz. However, possibly some of the neritic larvae identified come from the Veracruz reefs, particularly in the most western stations, since many species of this work also have been recorded in this reef area [26-28].
The hydrodynamics of Campeche Bay explains the differences in the proportion of neritic and oceanic larvae among the three oceanic sub-regions.
In the WOR there were a low number of neritic larvae because it was the area with less influence of the neritic communities swept away by YSC; and also, because in this sub-region the most important physical feature is the cyclonic gyre which, closely occupies the center of the Campeche Bay and generates a boundary in its outer limit for the other two regions [22].
In contrast, the EOR presented the greatest number of neritic larvae, due to the significant influence of the communities coming from the Yucatan shelf, particularly of taxa whose parents are linked to the existing local reefs [26].
On the other hand, in addition to the low number of neritic larvae in the WOR and the low number of common taxa shared with the other two sub-regions, it demonstrated its significant difference with other two sub-regions. In contrast, NOR and EOR were more similar.
In the studied area, larval fish distribution, as observed in another world environment, depend on the parents habit mainly the spawning season and areas and larvae concentration or dispersion by the hydrodynamic regime [4-10,29,30].
Vertical distribution
The high density of larvae both oceanic and neritic in the epipelagic zone seems to be attributed to the increased availability of food in that layer, decreasing to the next depthlevels [31,33]. The increase in density of larvae between 800 and 1000m recorded during the summer cruise corresponded to juvenile and adult mesopelagic and bathypelagic species. However, the increase in larvae of neritic species has no explanation.
On the other hand, the concentration the larvae of neritic species in the surface layer of the water column, usually at depths less than 50 m is a common feature. However, the presence at depths of 600 1000 m larvae from neritic species, coming from areas with depths less than 200 m, suggests a vertical migration process by the larvae, not strictly to a turbulence mechanism. These considerations are based on the fact that 31 of the 85 neritic taxa, more one-third, were at greater depths, in all sub-regions during the two cruises, except in the summer when there were no neritic taxa at those depths in the WOR.
The presence of species represented by a single specimen in the oceanic waters seems a common fact. Richards et al., [18] reported 21.8%, and we recorded 59% in our study: 55 neritic and 85 oceanic taxa.
Many neritic species form schools as adults and larvae, as part of their life strategy, including reproduction and spawning; the shoals of larvae swept away by currents are highly dispersed in oceanic waters. Therefore, the capture of a single specimen of a species in the oceanic area could be considered normal. However, the presence of an individual of an oceanic species, particularly mesopelagic must obey to other causes, such as that not all species form dense schools during the reproduction process, or by a high mortality rate of larvae by inanition or predation.
The presence of the same three oceanic sub-regions in the Campeche Bay, in two different seasonal periods, winter and summer, recorded here, underlines the high relevance of its hydrographic regime upon zooplankton communities. We conclude that the distribution of taxa is not limited by salinity or temperature differences between the ocean’s three sub-regions. However, the distribution of neritic larvae is determined by the mesoscale hydrographic stressors that characterize the area, mainly the YSC and the cyclonic gyre.
The presence of neritic larvae in deep layers seems to obey to a vertical migration process, rather than to an advection mechanism.
Acknowledgment
The authors express their gratitude to the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México by support the cruises ZOOMEP I and II.
References
9. Fiuman LA. Special considerations of fish eggs and larvae. Fishery Science. 2002; 1-32.
11. Flores-Coto C, Sanvicente-Añorve L, Pineda-López R, Rodríguez MA. Composición, distribución y abundancia ictioplanctónica del sur del Golfo de México. Universidad y Ciencia. 1998; 5: 65-84.
20. Padilla-Pilotze AR, Salas de León D, Monreal-Gómez MA. Evidencia de un giro ciclónico en la Bahía de Campeche. Ciencias Marinas. 1990; 16: 1-14.
27. Carricat-Ganivet JP, Horta-Puga G. Arrecifes de coral de México. In: Salazar Vallejo SI, González NE. Biodiversidad marina y costera de México. Comisión Nacional de la Biodiversidad y CIQRO, México. 1993; 80-92.