A recent review addressed important aspects pertinent to the evaluation of forensic anthropologic expertise, emphasizing the importance of experience, as well as knowledge base. A “third leg” seems at least equally important. Forensic work is predicated upon integrity and those who present themselves as expert witnesses need to be above reproach. If review of their academic record reveals support and/or promotion of flawed/falsified concepts, it is unlikely that they would survive cross-examination. It is easy to fall into the trap of collective consciousness, accepting ideas/perspectives that have not actually been subjected to critical thinking. It is critical to transcend stalwart status quo ideation and to assure embracement of scientifically-documented premises and methodologies, if credibility is to remain unassailable