Back to Journal

JSM Veterinary Medicine and Research

Control of Tsetse Flies and Trypanosomiasis in Ethiopia

[ ISSN : 2689-1565 ]

Abstract Citation INTRODUCTION DISTRIBUTION OF TSETSE AND TRYPANOMOSIS IN ETHIOPIA IMPORTANCE OF THE DISEASE PREVENTION OF VECTOR AND TRYPANOSOMOSIS CONTROL METHODS TREATMENT CONCLUSION REFERENCES
Details

Received: 06-Aug-2025

Accepted: 26-Aug-2025

Published: 27-Aug-2025

Masresha Yehualashet*

Animal Health Institute, Kality Tsetse Fly Research Center, Ethiopia

Corresponding Author:

Masresha Yehualashet, Animal Health Institute, Kality Tsetse Fly Research Center P.O.Box 19917 Sebeta, Ethiopia

Keywords

Sit; Tsetse fly; Trypanosomiasis

Abstract

Animal trypanosomiasis is an economically devastating disease and a major constraint to livestock production in tropical Africa. Trypanosomiasis is a parasitic disorder caused by haemoprotzoan belonging to the genus, Trypanosoma of the family Trypanosomatidae, that multiply in the blood stream, lymphatic vessels and tissues including the cardiac muscles and the central nervous system. The causative agents mainly circulate in parts of Africa that contain the biological vector, the tsetse fly; however, they can also be found in nearby regions due to mechanical transmission and the movement of infected animals. Three species of trypanosome are recorded in Ethiopia and the most important trypanosomes, in terms of economics loss in domestic livestock, are the tsetse transmitted species: T. Congolese, T. vivax and T. brucei group. Tsetse fly eradication programmes are complex and logistically demanding activities and usually involve the integration of different control tactics, such as Trypanocidal drugs, impregnated treated targets (ITT), insecticide-treated cattle (ITC), aerial spraying (Sequential Aerosol Technique - SAT) and in some situations the release of sterile males (sterile insect technique – SIT). The disease can be managed by controlling the vector and thus reducing the incidence of the disease by disrupting the transmission cycle.

Citation

Yehualashet M (2025) Control of Tsetse Flies and Trypanosomia sis in Ethiopia. JSM Vet Med Res 4: 5.

INTRODUCTION

Animal trypanosomiasis is an economically devastating disease and a major constraint to livestock production in tropical Africa [1]. Trypanosomiasis is a parasitic disorder caused by haemoprotozoan belonging to the genus, Trypanosoma of the family Trypanosomatidae, that multiply in the blood stream, lymphatic vessels and tissues including the cardiac muscles and the central nervous system [2]. African trypanosomiasis in cattle represents a major constraint to agricultural and socio-economic development in vast areas of Africa. The disease is caused principally by three species of trypanosome (Trypanosoma congolense, T. vivax and T. brucei), which are transmitted by several species of tsetse flies (Glossina).

The causative agents mainly circulate in parts of Africa that contain the biological vector, the tsetse fly; however, they can also be found in nearby regions due to mechanical transmission and the movement of infected animals. One organism, Trypanosoma vivax, has become established in South America, where it is mainly transmitted by biting flies acting as mechanical vectors [3]. Tsetse flies in Ethiopia are confined to southwestern and northwestern regions between longitude 33o and 38o E and latitude 5o and 12o N covers an area of 240,000km² [4]. Around 14 million head of cattle are at the risk of contracting trypanosomosis at any one time [5]. Three species of trypanosome are recorded in Ethiopia and the most important trypanosomes, in terms of economics loss in domestic livestock, are the tsetse transmitted species: T. congolense, T. vivax and T. brucei group [6]. However, only five species namely, Glossina pallidipes, G. m. submorsitans, G. f. fuscipes, G. tachinoides and G. longipennis are known in different parts of Ethiopia (Amhara, Benishangul Gumuz, Oromia, Southern and Gambella) region of Ethiopia are infested with more than one species of tsetse fly [7]. No field vaccine is available for bovine Trypanosomosis and the methods currently employed for control includes chemotherapeutic and chemo prophylactic drugs, tsetse eradication or control and the use of Tryanotolerant cattle. Therefore the objectives of this seminar are

To review high light on the effective control and preventive strategies against the disease in Ethiopia.

DISTRIBUTION OF TSETSE AND TRYPANOMOSIS IN ETHIOPIA

Tsetse infests around 240,000 km2 of fertile land in south and southwestern parts of Ethiopia [8]. Five species of flies are epidemiologically important in the country: G. fuscipes fuscipes, G. morsitans submorsitans, G. pallipides G. tacnoieds and G. longipennis. Bovine Trypanomosis is thought to be the most important livestock disease in terms of economic development and influence on settlements. T. congolense, T. vivax and T. Bruce species reported in Ethiopia. Bovine Trypanomosis has also been reported as an important disease in other species especially in equines and goats. The surveys were conducted in the Jimma zone of the Oromia region which is known for its large cattle numbers and the economy is also heavily reliant on crop production. In this region cattle farmers attribute reductions in draft power and meat and milk off take, increased calving intervals and mortalities and impacts on breeds kept and cattle management to AAT. The morsitans group is distributed in Didessa valley near the village of Wonago and Lado on the eastern side of Lake Abaya, Shambo, on the Mugher River, on the Dabous River (Wollega), on the Baro and Gilo Rivers (Gambella district), Illubabor associated with Akobo River, in the Savannah near Turmi and near Mizan Teferi. G. pallidipes in Rift valley is connected with those in Omo River area, likely to be across the narrow strip which separates the upper part of the Galana Dulei valley (Woitto) with the Maze River valley (Daramalo) [9]. The G. fuscipes fuscipes is found in Maze, Gorgora, Bazo and Cuccia Rivers (GamoGofa), on the Ketto tributary and at Degeno of the Birbir (Wellega), on the tributary of the Gojeb (Kaffa), and near the bridge on the Omo River and Addis Ababa to Jimma high way [10].

IMPORTANCE OF THE DISEASE

Economic-Importance

Tsetse flies infest 10 million square kilometers of Africa involving 38 countries. Hence, nagana is today the most important disease of livestock in the continent [11]. Since nagana is a wasting disease, affected animals are chronically unproductive in terms of milk, meat, manure and traction and the high. The disease in Africa costs livestock producers and mortality rate can be consumers an estimated US$1340 million each year. The anticipated losses due to T. vivax in South America exceed $160 million. Furthermore, the disease may impact on various immunization campaigns in endemic areas due to the fact that it can cause immune suppression [12].

Zoonosis Importance

The animal pathogens do not infect humans, but animals can serve as reservoirs of T. brucei rhodesiense and T. brucei gambiense, the causes of human sleeping sickness, which are morphologically human sleeping sickness, indistinguishable from T .brucei brucei. Human infections result from tsetse bites, generally in game parks, forest reserves and along streams or other rural setting [13]. The Glossina Species that is important as vectors of bovine trypanosomosis includes G. morsitans, G. palpalis, G. longipalpalis, and G.pallidipes and G. austeni. Since they do not feed on any other food rather than blood, they suck blood infected with the Trypanosoma species and transmit this disease to previously uninfected animals [14]. Although, the infection rate of Glossina with trypanosomosis is usually low, ranging from 1to 20% of the tsetse flies, each is infected for life and their presence in any number makes the rearing of livestock extremely difficult. These infection rates are determined by the parasite, the vector, the host and the environmental factors [15].

PREVENTION OF VECTOR AND TRYPANOSOMOSIS

Bovine Trypanosomosis have no vaccines are available nor likely in the near future because of the ability of trypanosomes to rapidly change their surface glycoprotein’s to avoid the immune response [16]. The disease can be managed by controlling the vector and thus reducing the incidence of the disease by disrupting the transmission cycle. Another tactic to manage the disease is to target the disease directly using surveillance and curative or prophylactic treatments to reduce the number of hosts that carry the disease. Economic analysis indicates that the cost of managing Trypanosomosis through the elimination of important populations of major tsetse vectors will be covered several times by the benefits of tsetse-free status [17]. Area-wide interventions against the tsetse and Trypanosomosis problem appear more efficient and profitable if sufficiently large areas, with high numbers of cattle, can be covered. Vector control strategies can aim at either continuous suppression or eradication of target populations. Tsetse fly eradication programmes are complex and logistically demanding activities and usually involve the integration of different control tactics, such as Trypanocidal drugs, impregnated treated targets (ITT), insecticide treated cattle (ITC), aerial spraying (Sequential Aerosol Technique - SAT) and in some situations the release of sterile males (sterile insect technique – SIT). To ensure sustainability of the results, it is critical to apply the control tactics on an area-wide basis, i.e. targeting an entire tsetse population that is preferably genetically isolated [18].

CONTROL METHODS

Chemical Control Methods

1. Live Bait Techniques: This method is based on insecticide treatment of livestock and exploits the blood sucking behavior of both sexes of tsetse fly. Tsetse flies, attempting to feed on cattle or other treated domestic livestock are killed by picking up a lethal deposit of insecticide on the ventral tarsal spines and on pre-tarsi whilst feeding [19]. The application of insecticides directly to cattle, the insecticide can be either is applied as a dip spray or as a pour-on formulation. The pour-on approach, applied monthly, is less error prone, and has been proven more flexible and adaptable in more remote regions, while allowing herders to adapt the approach as necessary [17]. The spraying solution of deltamethrin is prepared by adding, for example, 50 milliliter of the concentration to every 10 Litter of water in the knapsack sprayer and sprayed on the entire body of the animal. The insecticide treated animals are said to be mobile targets and are more attractive than the stationary targets and traps [18]. However, this pour on method is relatively costly. The lower cost of the dip spray, and the ability to combine it with tick control, makes this a very cost-effective measure to curb animal Trypanosomiasis [20].

2. Aerial application of non-persistent insecticides: An alternative method to ground spraying is the use of fixed wing aircraft (helicopters can also be used but are too expensive) to emit an aerosol of fine droplets containing insecticides over the tsetse habitat. As the droplets are small, they do not leave a persistent deposit in the habitat. The insecticide is dispersed 10-15 m above the tree canopy in swaths of 200-300 m in repeated treatments (5-6 times) with an interval of 9-10 days. Although the method can only be used on f l at terrain during temperature inversion conditions and requires sophisticated navigational equipment, it is not restricted to the dry season and does not require the deployment of large ground teams. Absolute perfect weather conditions are a prerequisite for the success with no margin for error (in case of imperfect inversion, mechanical failure etc. the entire spraying cycle has to be restarted). In comparison to spraying of residual insecticides, this technique is less. Contaminating for the environment and cheaper per km2. Insecticide drift however, remains a problem as the principle is still poorly understood. In the seventies, considerable success was achieved in Botswana, Zambia, Nigeria, Zimbabwe and Uganda using fixed wing aircraft [21].

3. Ground Spray: Trials with insecticides against tsetse fly started in 1945, when DDT and BHC (HCH) were the only synthetic compounds available. The application of residual deposits of persistent insecticides to tsetse fly resting sites was very widely used, but is now discouraged due to concerns about effects on non-target organisms. The first residual applications have been done against riverine species, like G. palpalis and G. fuscipes, with habitats restricted to water edge [22]. In larger gallery forests, it is sometimes possible to open paths in the forest, which will be extensively used by moving tsetse flies, and to treat then for controlling flies. DDT suspensions and emulsions, which have been used in the first experiments, have usually been replaced by dieldrin emulsions, which are assumed to be efficient almost one year and sometimes more than one year if applied at 4% [23]. Tsetse fly control by residual insecticides has not been carried out against high forest species and is only promising when the fly habitats are restricted.

4. Sequential Aerial Technique (SAT): The Sequential Aerosol technique is a ULV spray drift technique that amount of insecticide from aerosol generator fixed to low flying aircraft or helicopter. Because of the tsetse flies exquisite susceptibility to modern insecticides, high levels of tsetse control can be achieved by sequential aerial spraying, the use of aircraft for the application of insecticide has obvious advantages, the chief of which is their ability to cover large areas quickly [24]. Aerial applications of insecticides to control tsetse by the areas where tsetse live is sprayed with non-residual insecticide at interval designed to kill all adults initially and then subsequently to kill young adults after they emerge [25]. Insecticides aerosols have a very short residual effect and kill tsetse flies. It is essential that the area to be sprayed has economic potential and also negative impacts on the environment.

Use of attractive devices: traps, targets, animals treated with insecticides

1. Targets (Insecticide Treated Cloth): It has been shown that the low reproductive rates of tsetse fly mean that the kill rate needs only to be relatively low in order to have a major control effect (31). This can be achieved with targets. The aim was to control tsetse flies by attracting them to visual targets, which are baited with odor attractants and coated with insecticide. The control of tsetse flies using cost-effective and practical devices target was initiated in 1970s [26]. Targets are pieces of insecticide treated cloth measuring about1.15 m2 which are deployed in tsetse habitats. They are supported with either thin steel or wooded poles [27]. The color of the target is either black or a combination of blue black and deployed either hanged on the branches of a short tree, fixed to supporting poles or fixed to a thin stem of a plant [28]. Tsetse Flies are attracted by the blue segments and land on the black segment. The technique is quite simple, effective; non-pollutant, cost effective used for barrier establishment, integrated with other techniques and requires less frequent maintenance, but needs the use of insecticides and sometimes damaged bush fire, animals and people [29].

2. Traps (Insecticide Impregnated): Tsetse traps are a device made up of apiece of blue and black fabrics with white netting on the top created a sharp cone function by attracting the flies to that collects and/or kills them. Traps can be used for entomological surveillance, and also for control. Targets are simpler than traps, but are not used for surveillance. They are impregnated with biodegradable insecticides in order to kill any flies that alight on them. Traps and targets can both be used to eliminate a fraction of the tsetse population [30]. Traps are devices made up of apiece of blue and black fabrics with white netting on the top creating a sharp corner, and act as an effective means of tsetse control. They are used to catch flies both for control and monitoring purpose [31]. The blue screens of the traps are consternated with black screens to make flies settle. The flies subsequently move towards the upper parts of the trap in the direction of the light [32]. Effective traps attract all the flies from a distance of approximately 50m. Tsetse flies that enter the trap may die because of exposure to an insecticide impregnated in the trap material or because they are exposed to the sun [33]. Impregnated traps have the extra advantage of flies settling on the outside, but not entering is also killed. Attractive odors are available for the control of the flies that transmit animal Trypanosomiasis. These attractants includes cow urine, acetone octenol and phenols. They are non-pollutant, and relatively cost effective.

Sterile Insect Techniques (SIT)

The SIT relies on the production of large numbers of the target insect in specialized production centers, the sterilization of the males (or sometimes both sexes), and the sustained and systematic release of the sterile males over the target area in numbers large enough in relation to the wild male population to out-compete them for wild females. Mating of sterile insects with virgin, native female insects, results in no offspring [34].

The principle of the SIT is that fertile female insects are unable to produce normal offspring when they have mated with sterile male. Therefore, male flies are mass reared in the laboratory, sterilized by irradiation, and released to mate with wild females [35]. Sterilized males are still able to do their “job” the insemination of females with sterile sperm. As sterilized flies should not differ too much from wild flies laboratory-reared and irradiated flies are checked for their quality and behavior as compared to their wild counterparts. When sufficient sterile males are released over a long enough period, fertile mating does not occur and the pupation is eliminated. SIT has no effect on non-target organisms. Also, unlike other techniques, SIT becomes more efficient at lower fly densities, and is ideally suited to the final phase of local tsetse eradication [36]. It requires detailed knowledge on the biology and ecology of the target pest, and the insect should be amenable to mass rearing. The SIT has been successfully used in combination with other control tactics to eradicate, suppress, or contain pest populations of Diptera Coleoptera and Lepidoptera i.e. eradication of the New World screwworm fly Cochliomyia hominivorax in the USA, Mexico, Central America and Libya [37-40].

TREATMENT

Early diagnosis and proper treatment, trypanosomiasis is curable. Treatment depends on what type of protozoa caused the infection and whether the infection has spread to other areas of your body. A small number of drugs have been licensed as veterinary treatments for trypanosomiasis. Diminazene aceturate and isometamidium chloride are used most often, but resistance to these agents is common in some regions. Various systems to maximize effectiveness and reduce the development of resistance, such as alternating drugs that are unlikely to induce cross-resistance, have been proposed for livestock. Drug resistance or inadequate treatment (or poor-quality drugs), can result in clinical cure but persistence of the infection. Drugs such as suramin, prothridium and isometamidium chloride (as a prophylactic) and diminazene aceturate (curative) can be used although drug résistance has been reported For camels melarsomine (cymelarsan) is very effective(curative) against T. evansi - so far this drug is only registered for use in camels

CONCLUSION

Tsetse flies are hematophagous insects of the family Glossinidae and are biological vectors of African trypanosomosis in both animals and man. The distribution of the genus Glossina is restricted to lowland rainforest and wooded savannah regions of sub-Sahara Africa. Among 31 species of tsetse flies, and five species Glossina G, pallidipes, G. morsitans, G. fuscipes, G. tachinoides and G. longipennis are known in different regions of Ethiopia (Amahara, Benishangul Gumuz, Gambella, Oromia and Southern Ethiopia. No field vaccine is available for bovine Trypanosomosis and the methods currently employed for control includes chemotherapeutic and chemo prophylactic drugs, tsetse eradication or control and the use of Tryano tolerant cattle. The disease can be managed by controlling the vector and thus reducing the incidence of the disease by disrupting the transmission cycle. Another tactic to manage the disease is to target the disease directly using surveillance and curative or prophylactic treatments to reduce the number of hosts that carry the disease. Vector control strategies can aim at either continuous suppression or eradication of target populations and usually involve the integration of different control tactics, such as impregnated treated targets (ITT), insecticide-treated cattle (ITC), aerial spraying (Sequential Aerosol Technique - SAT) and in some situations the release of sterile males.

Ø Effective control, prevent and treatment of bovine Trypanomosis is conducted by applying proper management (Restriction of pasture grazing in the tsetse belt), vector control and treatment of the infected animal.

Ø In endemic areas detailed study must be performed to know the communities perception to control the Trypanosomosis and other protozoa disease, Trypanosomosis and other protozoan disease.

REFERENCES

 1. Kikwai C, Ngeiywa M. Review on the Socio-Economic Impacts of Trypanosomiasis. 2022.

2. WeldeMariam DT, Demise E. Study on Current Status of Bovine Trypanosomiasis and Its Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Vectors in Ethiopia: Systematic Review. SM Trop Med J. 2024; 6.

3. Dagnachew S, Tsegaye B, Awukew A, Tilahun M, Ashenafi H, Rowan T, et al. Barry DJ, Terefe G, Goddeeris BM. Prevalence of bovine trypanosomosis and assessment of trypanocidal drug resistance in tsetse infested and non-tsetse infested areas of Northwest Ethiopia. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2017; 24; 40-49

4. Mohammed SHEMESIA. Current Status of Animal Trypanosomosisand Assesement on the Effectiveness of Control Effforts in Western Amhara Region. Ethiopia: MSc thesis, Gonder University. 2017.

5. MoARD. Tsetse and Trypanosomosis Prevention and Control Strategies. Paper presented on farming in Tsetse controlled areas (FITCA), Ethiopia. Final workshop, Adama, Ethiopia. Unpublished workshop proceedings. 2004; 27-28.

6. Abebe G. Trypanosomosis in Ethiopia Review Article: The Biological Society of Ethiopia. J bio Soci. 2005; 4: 75-112.

7. Lejebo F, Girma A. Isolation and Characterization of Midgut Symbiotic Bacteria from Tsetse Flies (G. Pallidipes) and Their Role in Biological Control Methods. Int J Res Stud Biosci. 2019: 1-11.

8. Cecchi G, Mattioli RC, Slingenbergh J, de la Rocque S. Land cover and tsetse fly distributions in sub-Saharan Africa. Med Vet Entomol. 2008: 364-373

9. Lejebo F, Atsa A, Hideto M, Bekele T. Prevalence of bovine trypanosomosis its associated risk factors, and tsetse density in Bonke Woreda, Gamo Zone, Ethiopia. Int J Res Stud Biosci. 2019; 7: 1-12.

10. Waldetensai A, Hailemariam A, Nigatu W. Gemechu F, Tasew G, Eukubay A. Tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossinidae) population in Ethiopia: A review. Adv Biochem. 2020; 8: 45.

11. WHO. Vector control Human African trypanosomiasis. World health organization (WHO). 2011.

12. Kukla BA, Majiwa PA, Young JR, Moloo SK, ole-MoiYoi OK. Use of species-specific DNA probes for detection and identification of trypanosome infection in tsetse flies. Parasitology. 1987; 95: 1-16.

13. Radostits OM, Gay CC, Hinchcliff KW, Constable PD. Veterinary Medicine: A textbook of the diseases of cattle, horses, sheep, pigs and goats, 10th. London, UK. 2007.

14. Woolhouse ME, Bealby K, McNamara JJ, Silutongwe J. Trypanosome infections of the tsetse fly Glossina pallidipes in the Luangwa Valley, Zambia. Int J Parasitol. 1994; 24: 987-993.

15. Krafsur ES. Tsetse flies: genetics, evolution, and role as vectors. Infect Genet Evol. 2009: 124-141

16. Budd L. DFID-funded tsetse and trypanosome research and development since 1980. Economic analysis. Aylesford, UK, DFID Livestock Production, Animal Health and Natural Resources Systems Research Programmes. 1999; 2.

17. Black SJ, Mansfield JM. Prospects for vaccination against pathogenic African trypanosomes. Parasite Immunology. 2016; 38: 735-743.

18. Hendrichs J. Strategic options in using sterile insects for area-wide integrated pest management. Sterile insect technique. CRC Press 2021; 841-884.

19. Leak SG. Tsetse biology and ecology: their role in the epidemiology and control of Trypanosomosis. 1999.

20. Aksoy S, Gibson WC, Lehane MJ. Interactions between tsetse and trypanosomes with implications for the control of trypanosomiasis. Adv Parasitol. 2003; 53: 1-83.

21. Leak S, Mulatu W, Rowlands G, d’Ieteren G. A trial of a cypermethrin ‘pour-on’insecticide to control Glossina pallidipes, G. fuscipes fuscipes and G. morsitans submorsitans (Diptera: Glossinidae) in South-west Ethiopia. Bull Entomol Res. 1995: 241-251.

22. Chadenga V. Analysis of the efficacy, practicality ad cost of various tsetse and trypanosomiasis control techniques in Zimbabwe. 1992.

23. Matthiessen P, Douthwaite B. The impact of tsetse fly control campaigns on African wildlife. Oryx. 1985; 202-209.

24. Olandunmade M, Takken W, Tenabe S, Onah J, Dengwat L, Feldmann U, et al. Eradication of Glossina palpalis palpalis (Robineau-Desvoidy) (Diptera: Glossinidae) from agropastoral land in central Nigeria by means of the sterile insect technique Sterile insect technique for tsetse control and eradication. 1990.

25. Kernaghan K. The ethics era in Canadian public administration.Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development. 1996

26. Rogers DJ, Hendrickx G, Slingenbergh JH. Tsetse flies and their control. Rev Sci Tech. 1994 ;13: 1075-1024.

27. Bourn D, Scott M. The successful use of work oxen in agricultural development of tsetse infested land in Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1978: 191-203.

28. Nagagi YP, Silayo RS, Kweka EJ. Advancements in bait technology to control Glossina swynnertoni Austen, the species of limited distribution in Kenya and Tanzania border: A review. J Vector Borne Dis. 2017; 16-24.

29. Welburn SC, Maudlin I. Tsetse-trypanosome interactions: rites of passage. Parasitol Today. 1999; 399-403.

30. Hao Z, Kasumba I, Lehane MJ, Gibson WC, Kwon J, Aksoy S, et al. Tsetse immune responses and trypanosome transmission: implications for the development of tsetse -based strategies to reduce trypanosomiasis. Proc Natl Acad. 2001

31. Okhoya N. Small insect is a big problem for agriculture and health: Eradicating tsetse flies from Africa. Bull Med. Mun Switzer. 2004; 12-14.

32. Kuzoe FA, Schofield C. Strategic review of traps and targets for tsetse and African trypanosomiasis control. 2005

33. Vale GM, Mutica G, Lovemore DF. Insecticide treated cattle for controlling tsetse flies (Diptera: Glossina). Bull Entomol. 1999; 569-578.

34. Nagagi YP, Silayo RS, Kweka EJ. Advancements in bait technology to control Glossina swynnertoni Austen, the species of limited distribution in Kenya and Tanzania border: A review. J Vector Borne Dis. 2017: 16-24.

35. Pilossof R. A Brief History of Tsetse Control Methods in Zimbabwe and Possible Effects of Climate Change on Their Distribution. International Journal of African Development. University of the Free State, South Africa. 2016; 432-443.

36. Feldmann U, Dyck V, Mattioli R, Jannin J, Vreysen M. Impact of tsetse fly eradication programmes using the sterile insect technique Sterile Insect Technique (pp. 1051-1080): CRC Press. For cosmetics. J Cosmetic Sci. 2021: 187-202.

37. Krafsur ES. Tsetse flies: genetics, evolution, and role as vectors. Infect Genet Evol. 2009; 9: 124-141

38. Kuzoe FA, Schofield C. Strategic review of traps and targets for tsetse and African trypanosomiasis control. 2005

39. Dyck VA, Hendrichs J, Robinson A. Sterile insect technique: principles and practice in area-wide integrated pest management: Taylor & Francis. 2021.

40. Lack SJ, Mansfield JM. Prospects for vaccination against pathogenic African trypanosomes. Parasite Immunol. 2016: 735-743 

Other Articles

Article Image 1

Effect of spirulina level on post-weaning growth of guinea pig Cavia porcellus in western Cameroon

For post-weaning growth performance evaluation in Guinea pig (Cavia porcellus), an 8-week trial was conducted in West Cameroon. 59 weaned animals (3 weeks of age) from a breeding trial were used. After identification and weighing, animals were submitted on the same treatment as their mothers. Each animal receives daily between 8 and 9 am, an experimental food corresponding to its group. Animals of TS0 group received Trypsacum laxum and the concentrate with 0% spirulina, while others received in their diets 2% (TS2), 4% (TS4) and 6% (TS6) spirulina. Food refusal was collected and weighed before the new distribution, for feed intake determination. During the growth period, T. laxum, concentrate and nutrients (Dry Matter (DM), Organic Matter (OM), Crude fiber (CF) and Crude Protein (CP)) intake was significantly affected by treatments. Highest animal average weight (407.0g) was obtained with treatment TS2 and the lowest (396.64g) with control (TS0). The same tendency was observed with total (TWG) and daily weight gain (DWG). Thus, the highest TWG and DWG (222.06 g and 6.34 g / day) were obtained in TS2 treatments while the lowest (194.82 g and 5.57 g / day) was obtained with TS0. At 8 weeks regardless of the birth type, highest average weight, total and daily weight gain was obtained with treatment TS6. At the same period for the same parameters, no significant difference was observed between treatments TS0, TS2 and TS4. Based on the result, food intake as animal body weight can be improved by 2% of spirulina in the diet but at 6%, growth performance can be improved mostly for the twin’s births

Généviève NGUEDIA1 , Emile MIÉGOUÉ1*, Fernand TENDONKENG1 , Camara SAWA2 , Henry FEULEFACK DEFANG3 , Josué FOSSI1 , Mouchili MAMA1 , Dayan Agwah EBILE1 , Yannick FONGANGet Etienne TEDONKENG PAMO1


Article Image 1

Urgent Call for Action: Avoiding Spread of MosquitoBorne Diseases as a Major Public Health Problem

Mosquitoes are the most important vectors of pathogenic organisms. Diseases like malaria, dengue fever, yellow fever, zika and West Nile encephalitis have emerged or re-emerged in several countries of the world during the past decades [1-4].

These diseases have been ranked by World Health Organization (WHO) as the most important tropical diseases in the worldbecause each year, insects and other vectors transmit infectious pathogens to more than one billion people, causing more than 700,000 deaths worldwide [5]. The impact of these diseases on human and animal is enormous. They affect productivity and cause a vicious spiral of poverty and disability and in another hand affect food production and contribute to economic lost in different ways [6]. The distribution and seasonality of many of these diseases may be influenced by climate change. Mosquitoes are sensitive to temperature, humidity, rainfall patterns, for example when the temperature increaseswould tend to accelerate mosquito life cycles and would also decrease the incubation period of the parasite or virus. The weather patterns and other aspects of climate change can to contribute that the mosquito’s diseases will be increase [7]. These observed climatic changes have led to further water storage with accompanying poor water protection and scanty community participation creating more breeding sites for mosquitos like Aedesaegypti principal responsible of arbovirus transmission like dengue, zika, chikungunya and others [8]. For malaria vectors the rainfall patterns bring several temporal natural breeding sites and contribute to malaria transmission4 .Impacts on health would entail the emergence of a disease in new areas as well as the extension of the transmission season in areas where it is present [4,9], besides willbe to changes the geographical range of these vector/borne diseases for example the chikungunya outbreaks in Europe [10].

Maria del Carmen Marquetti Fernández1* and Andrés Bisset Marquetti2


Article Image 1

Phenotypic Characterization of Local Chickens (Gallus Gallus Domesticus) In Bekwarra Cross River State, Nigeria

This study was conducted in Bekwarra Local Government Area of Cross River State, Nigeria, to identify and determine some characteristics of local chickens. A total of 530 adult chickens of both sexes and 111 fresh eggs were carefully examined at seven administrative council wards of the local government. About 43.00% of the birds observed were male while 57.00% were females. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) was employed to carry out descriptive statistics on qualitative and quantitative data of identified chicken population in the respective areas.The result showed predominantly pea comb type (38.90%). Eye color was black (44.72%), light-brown (14.91%), dark-brown (12.83%), dark-red (11.30%), orange (11.32%), and pink (1.10%). For plumage colour, 36.23% were classified as black, 20.00% as white, 13.02% as brown, 9.43% as red, 7.93% as multicolored, 3.21% as black-white, 3.02% as grey, 2.45% as grey-white, 2.26% as black-brown, 0.94% as ash-black and 0.57% as ash respectively. Most chickens (31.90%) had yellow shanks, while 19.60%, 18.50%, 11.30%, 6.40%, 5.10%, 3.40%, 3.00%, 0.40%, had white, greenish, milky, ash, dark-ash, pink, red, and light brown respectively. An average live, body circumference, body length, shank, head and neck length were; 1.80kg, 42.7 ± 0.03cm,55.8 ± 0.21cm, 12.20 ± 0.4cm, 5.1 ± 0.03cm, and 8.9 ± 0.5cm. The average egg width, egg length and egg weight were; 5.2 ± 0.03cm, 7.6 ± 0.01cm, 31.6 ± 0.05g with 12 clutch size and 3 clutches per hen per year. The indigenous chicken population in Bekwarra, Nigeria, is mostly black with black eyes, white eggs and yellow shank. There were distinctive differences in almost all the measurable traits parameters examined. These distinctions provide the basis for which they could be classified and improved.

Odah, E. O1*, Daikwo, S. I1 , Mbap S.T2 , and Okpanachi U3


Article Image 1

A Review on Bacterial and Fungal Diseases in Dogs

The objective of this article was to briefly review about the most common bacterial and fungal infections in pet animals especially dogs by describing information about the causative agent, clinical signs and symptoms, route of transmission and diagnosis of the infection. In last years, the pet population has increased and the interest in having pets where are became sharing in our daily life in many purposes such as protection, entertainment, hunting and helping their owner, etc... . Thus, the increase of the knowledge and awareness of dog owners regarding these diseases enable them to significantly reduce the occurrence of these infections. Bacterial infections such as Pasteurella, Salmonella, Brucella, Yersinia enterocolitica, Leptospira, Campylobacter, Bordetella bronchiseptica, and Coxiella burnetii, and fungal infections including Aspergillosis, Candidiasis and Dermatophytosis are the most common bacterial and fungal infections affecting dogs

Mohammad Elshahat Abd Alfatah*


Article Image 1

Study of Milk Yield and Factors Contributing to the Yield in Jersey and Holstein Breeds of Cattle in Rupandehi District

Survey was conducted in Mainahiya Village Development Committee, HarnaiyaVillage Development Committee, TilottamaMunicipality and Devdaha Municipality of Rupandehi district in the year April 2015 in order to study the milk yield and milk parameters in Jersey and Holstein cattle. Total sampling household were 13 and sampling size was 158. The primary data were collected through structure questionnaire and collected information were tabulated in Microsoft excel and SPSS version 16. Different statistical analyses were performed by SPSS version 16 and Mini Tab. Result showed that average milk yield of Holstein10.504±0.620ltr, fat 3.995±0.308%, protein 3.241±0.087% and SNF 8.830±0.208%. The average milk yield of Jersey 8.594±0.631, fat 4.476±0.314, protein 3.400±0.088 and SNF 9.016±0.212 were found. Milk yield was significantly(p<0.01) higher in Holstein breed than jersey and milk yield was significantly (p<0.01) higher in 4thlactation.Experiment showed the insignificant (p>0.01)negative correlation between milk yield and fat(r=-0.120),milk yield and protein (r=-0.49)and milk yield and SNF (r=-0.53)but significant(p<0.01)and positive correlation between fat and protein(r=0.485),fat and SNF(r=0.501) and protein and SNF(r=0.778).

Nabin Raj Gyawali*


Article Image 1

Emergence of Novel Canine Distemper Virus Strains-A Real Threat to Terrestrial Domestic and Wild Animals

Canine distemper virus (CDV) is one of the most important pathogens of domestic and wild animals and widely distributed virus around the world. It belongs to thegenus Morbillivirus within the Paramyxoviridae family. At least six orders and over 20 families of Mammals are susceptible to this virus. CDV is highly contagious and have high morbidity andmortality in wild and domestic animal populations. Although there is only one serotype of the virus, it has widest host range with a constant threat to the conservation of the multiple endangered species worldwide. The lack of ecoepidemiological information of CDV transmission other than dogs has led to investigate the importance of the infection in a multihost scenario. The ability to jump the species barrier to infect a variety of mammals including primates has made apprehension that it can infect human being in near future. It is the need of the hour to elucidate the transmissionof CDV in different environments, and to have better understanding about the intricate epidemiological dynamics of CDV in multiple hosts. Among the genes of CDV, H gene is preferred for phylogenetic analysis of different genotypes owing it high mutation rate. However, the full genome sequencing would offer better insights about the substitution rates, glycosylations, and homologous recombination points that would explain the pathogenicity, species jump ability and vaccine failure of this virus as well as enable us to explain in detail its evolutionary informations and better understanding about the intricate epidemiological dynamics of CDV in its multiple host infections. This review is aimed to provide an overview about the recent emergence of CDV genotypes in different species of wild animals, pathogenicity and diagnosis so that the disease can be prevented and control in an efficient and effective manner and it impact on the conservation of a galaxy of wild animals and control can be minimized to a great extent.

S.Nandi*, GK. Sharma, Vikas Gupta, Pallavi Deol, Vishal Chander, Ragini Mishra, UK De, and VK Gupta


Article Image 1

Global Scenario of Canine Parvovirus Mutants: Epidemiology, Diagnostics and Immunoprophylactic Agents

Canine parvovirus 2 (CPV-2) is one of the most important enteropathogen of dogs emerged in 1978 and manifested by two forms namely gastroenteritis and myocarditis. It is characterized by depression, loss of appetite, vomiting and leukopenia. CPV-2 is probably evolved from a very closely related virus in cats, feline panleukopenia virus (FPLV) or a closely related carnivore parvovirus. It caused high morbidity of 100% and low mortality of 10% in adult dogs and 91% in pups. Over the years a number of variants namely CPV-2a, CPV-2b, CPV-2c, New CPV-2a, New CPV-2b and Asp300 (2a/2b) have been reported from different countries in the world with varying degree of pathogenic potential. Although CPV-2 differ from FPV by 6 amino acids in the VP2 protein, subsequent variants differ from CPV-2 only in one or two places. Further, CPV-2 affects only dogs, new variants expanded their host range to cat as well. There are a number of different serological and molecular tests (PCR, nested PCR, SYBR Green based real time PCR, Taqman based real time PCR, Minor grove binding assay based PCR) available for prompt, specific and accurate diagnosis of the disease. Some molecular tests not only detect the CPV-2 but also identify the variant of CPV-2 involved in disease outbreak. Further, both live attenuated and inactivated vaccines are available to control the disease in animals. Besides, new generation vaccines namely recombinant vaccine, peptide vaccine and DNA vaccine have been developed for control of the disease in canines effectively and efficiently. However, new generation vaccines have not been issued license to be used in the field condition. Again, the presence of maternal antibodies often interferes with the active immunization with live attenuated vaccine and there always exists a window of susceptibility in spite of following proper immunization regimen. Lastly, judicious use of the vaccines in pet dogs, stray dogs and wild canids keeping in mind the new variants of the CPV-2 along with the proper sanitation and disinfection practices must be implemented for the successful control the disease.

S.Nandi, GK Sharma, Vikas Gupta, Pallavi Deol, Vishal Chander, UK De* and VK Gupta


Article Image 1

Omega-3 Fatty Acid Enrichment Capacity in Egg Yolks from Laying Hens Fed either Corn Germ Oil or Corn Germ Meal

Enrichment of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in egg yolk via diets alternationhas been considered worldwide. The concentrations of alpha-linolenic (ALA), eicosapentaenoic (EPA), and docosahexaenoic acids (DHA) in the yolk can reachup to 250 mg/50 g whole egg. Corn germ meal (CGM), a rich source of ALA, iswidely used for omega-3 enrichment; however, the impact of dietary corn germ source: corn germ oil (CGO) and CGM on fatty acid transfer to egg yolk in laying hens is still a little known. Therefore, this study was aimed to evaluate the transfer of ALA, EPA, and DHA into egg yolk from extracted corn germ oil or corn germ meal. A total of 132 Hy-Line W-36 laying hens (from 25 to 33 wks. old) were randomly housed with 3 birds/cage (4 replicates/treatment) for each of the 11 treatment groups. Diets were isocaloric and consisted of a control diet, 5 corn germ oil diets (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, or 5.0% corn germ oil), and 5 corn germ meal diets (calculated corn germ oil concentration from corn germ meal 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 5.0%). Increasing dietary concentrations of corn germ oil and corngerm meal resulted in increased ALA, EPA, and DHA concentration in egg yolk, total fatty acid deposition from corn germ oil was 2 times greater than that of corn germ meal when fed at the same dietary inclusions (P < 0.01) but EPA and DHA concentrationsin egg yolk were not different due to oil or meal source (P = 0.22); however, increasing dietary inclusion rates of corn germ oil from either source increased yolk EPA and DHA (P < 0.01).Hens fed either corn germ oil or corngerm meal resulted in reduction of BW as dietary concentrations increased (P = 0.02). Feed efficiency increased as corn germ oil increased in concentration, while feeding corn germ meal decreased feed efficiency (P = 0.01). Analysis of the nitrogen corrected apparent metabolizable energy (AMEn) of corn germ oil resulted in 7,468 kcal/kg on an as-fed basic. Dietary corn germ oil improved feed efficiency and increased ALA deposition into yolk compared to that of the meal source, demonstrating that corn germ oil to be a viable alternative for ALA egg enrichment.

Nguyen Duy Hoan* and Mai Anh Khoa*


Article Image 1

Enterococcus saccharolyticus Es 3/11 D27 Isolated from Horses and its Postbiotic Activity

The species Enterococcus saccharolyticus is rarely occurred and identified. No information exists about this species strain bacteriocin/bioactive/postbiotic potential which could be utilized e.g. for bacterial prevention/protection. Standard microbiological methods as well as PCR analyses were used to basic characterization the strain 3/11D27. To test bacteriocin/ postbiotic potential, agar spot test was conducted and 158 indicator bacteria (147 Gram-positive and 11 Gram-negative). The strain E. saccharolyticus Es 3/11D27 was isolated from the inner part of the auricle mucosa of clinically healthy mare (Slovak breed Norik from Murá?) using sequence analysis. After sequencing, the strain was involved in GenBank with accession number MN822909. This strain has produced bacteriocin substance with inhibitory potential against Gram-positive and Gram-negative indicator bacteria non- depending on the indicator bacteria species. The inhibitory activity reached 100 up to 800 AU/ml. Es 3/11D27 has been also susceptible to antibiotics tested. It has been hemolysis-, deoxyribonuclease- negative with absence of virulence factors genes. Low-grade biofilm-forming ability using the plate assay was found in Es 3/11D27. It is first time presenting horses-derived species strain E. saccharolyticus with bacteriocin activity. Additional studies will be processed to determine detail characteristic of bacteriocin substance produced by the strain Es 3/11D27 with the aim for its further application potential in horses breeding.

Andrea Lauková1*, Eva Styková2 ,Valentína Focková1 and Marián Maďar2


Article Image 1

Characterization of Qualitative Morphological Traits in Indigenous Goats in Ethiopia Using Multivariate Analysis

Characterization of goat breeds based on morphological trait variations is essential for planning breed improvement programs and conservation strategies. This study aimed to use multiple correspondence analysis to evaluate qualitative morphological traits and identify traits that best describe the morphological structure of Hararghe goats. The results of the study show that there are significant differences in the distribution of some qualitative morphological traits among the three districts (Bedeno, Fedis, and Gorogutu) while others do not show significant differences. The first principal axis explained 15% of the principal inertia, the second principal axis explained 12%, and cumulatively the first two principal axes explained 27% of the principal inertia. The MCA method identified systematic relationships among traits and trait attributes. On the dimensions identified, the sample goat population of Fedis and Gorogutu clustered together with concave head profile, straight horn shape, obliquely upward horn orientation, presence of Toggle, and pigmented Muzzle; while the corresponding values of goats in Bedeno clustered together with the presence of horn, curved and spiral horn shape, backward and lateral horn and ear orientation with slope down from wither, slope up toward rump, and pendulous. These findings provide valuable information for better multivariate characterization and conservation of indigenous goat ecotypes.

Kefelegn Kebede*, Bushra Mohammad, Mengistu Urge and Ashenafi Getachew Megersa