SM Journal of Nephrology and Kidney Diseases

Archive Articles

Article Image 1

Argatroban Versus Heparin Catheter Locks for Haemodialysis Central Venous Catheters: A Single-Centre Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction : Argatroban is a promising locking solution regarding antithrombotic properties but has rarely been reported before. The objective of this study was to preliminarily verify the safety and effectiveness of argatroban as a catheter lock compared with sodium heparin.

Methods : This was an open-label randomized controlled trial of 50 consenting haemodialysis patients in one dialysis unit. Intervention: 2 weeks of use of 0.5 mg/mL argatroban or 1000 IU/mL heparin locked postdialysis in the dead space of the central venous catheter. Primary outcome of change from baseline (before a dialysis session) in the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) 30 min after locking. Secondary outcomes were changes in aPTT between baseline and before the next dialysis session, catheter thrombosis defined by catheter eradication or the use of urokinase lock and infusion, catheter-related bacteremia and exit-site infection, and bleeding events.

Results: The aPTT measured 30 min after locking was significantly higher in the heparin group than in the argatroban group (P<0.001). In addition, within-group comparisons showed that in the heparin group, the aPTT measured 30 minutes post locking was significantly higher than that measured at baseline and the end of the 1st HD (P<0.001), whereas the argatroban group showed no significant change in aPTT 30 minutes post locking compared to baseline and post HD values (P>0.05). Other secondary end points did not differ.

Conclusion: This study shows that argatroban can provide antithrombotic effects similar to those of heparin without affecting systemic coagulation. Argatroban locking solution is an effective short-term locking solution.

Yiqin Wang, Qingtao Zhang, Jianhui Zhou, Ping Li, Lei Zhang, Yong Wang, Xueying Cao, Li Zhang, Chan Li, Jie Wu, Shupeng Lin, Zhe Feng, Guangyan Cai, and Xuefeng Sun*


Article Image 1

Health Mindset and One Year Outcomes in Adult Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Patients

Background : Many patients who start peritoneal dialysis (PD) transition to hemodialysis (HD) after a PD-related complication. Patient psychological factors may influence clinical outcomes. One possible factor is health mindset, or patient belief that their health knowledge and ability can change. The goal of this study is to evaluate the longitudinal associations of baseline health mindset with patient outcomes after one year.

Methods : The Health Mindset Scale (HMS, score 3-18) was administered on paper during clinic to a convenience sample of 100 adult PD patients, to quantify patient mindset along a continuum from fixed mindset (lower scores) to growth mindset (higher scores). Participants were 31% African American, 4% Hispanic, and 64% White American. Demographic and comorbid information were abstracted from medical records. Outcomes assessed at 1 year were death, transition to HD, renal transplant, and maintaining PD.

Results : HMS scores were highest in patients who subsequently received a renal transplant (mean 15, SD 2.1), indicating a growth mindset. HMS scores in patients who died were lower (mean 10, SD 5.2) suggesting a more fixed mindset. Among those who maintained PD, HMS scores were between fixed and growth mindset (mean 12.8, SD 4.2) and similar to those who transitioned to HD (mean 13, SD 4.2). One-way ANOVA for difference in HMS scores by clinical outcome was p = 0.042.

Conclusions : This initial longitudinal study suggests associations between mindset and clinical outcomes. The HMS is a novel and easily administered instrument that quantifies one patient psychological component that could contribute to patient outcomes, and that could also be modified. The HMS may identify individuals who could benefit from specific interventions to favor a growth mindset, with the goal of supporting optimal clinical outcomes.

Rachel B. Fissell¹*, Marcus G. Wild², David Schlundt², Devika Nair¹, Ebele M. Umeukeje¹, Claudia Mueller³, Andrew Guide, Robert Greevy,  and Kerri L. Cavanaugh¹


Article Image 1

Does Hemodialysis Patients Have A Better Quality of Life Than Peritoneal Dialysis Patients?

Objective : To systematically evaluate the effect of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis on patients’ quality of life.

Methods : Computer searched the quality of life of patients comparing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in CNKI, Wanfang database, VIP database, the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of Science database, searching the database until November 30,2023. Statistical analysis and mapping were performed using the Review Manager 5.3 software.

Results : A total of 26 articles were included for a total of 25501 study subjects. The results of the Meta-analysis showed that, Compared with the hemodialysis patients, The Peritoneal dialysis patients had better quality of life (MD= -9.36, 95%CI =-13.45~-5.26, P<0.001), In the physiological function (MD=2.34, 95%CI =0.134.56, P <0.05), physical pain (MD=3.82, 95%CI=0.836.81, P <0.05), general health (MD=1.57, 95%CI=1.052.08, P <0.05), psychological status (MD=1.94, 95%CI=0.033.85, P <0.05) and the domain differences were significant.

Conclusion: Peritoneal dialysis patients have better quality of life than hemodialysis patients

Zhao Ruobing¹*, Zhang Wei², Sun Mengdi¹ and Yang Chao¹


Article Image 1

Times in Range and Nutrition of Individuals on Hemodialysis and Diabetes

Individuals with diabetes and hemodialysis present a challenge in metabolic control and nutritional adjustment with high nutrient demand. Traditional blood glucose measurement controls, such as self-monitoring, glycated hemoglobin (A1C), and fructosamine, remain uncertain as they do not present the entire picture of glycemic incursions. This review seeks to collect evidence on the efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring, nutritional adjustment, and adequate metabolic control in people with diabetes and hemodialysis. Currently, continuous glucose monitoring plays an essential role in the metabolic control of these individuals, as well as in glycemic variability. No individual standard is exclusive to these conditions concerning the values of the times in range. However, the American Diabetes Association does allow the identification of the average values for high-risk populations and comorbidities associated with diabetes, such as kidney disease. Synchronous metabolic control and nutritional monitoring go hand in hand in people with diabetes and hemodialysis, this being a pillar in comprehensive management to reduce complications and improve the quality of life of these individuals.

Jenny L. Cepeda-Marte1*, Daniela D. Salado-Díaz1,2, Alma M. Hernández-Gómez2, Florangel Guzmán Lora2, Naomi Ruiz2, and Daniela Ortiz2


Article Image 1

Management Outcome and Associated Factors among Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease at Selected Tertiary Hospitals in Ethiopia: A Multi Center Prospective Observational Study

Aim: With an exponential rise in incidence and death over time, chronic kidney disease has become a major hazard to the world. Patients with chronic renal disease who were dependent on dialysis were dying at a rising rate in Ethiopia. The study’s objectives were to ascertain the management outcomes and associated factors for patients with chronic renal disease at selected Ethiopian tertiary hospitals.

Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out in a few Ethiopian tertiary hospitals from June 30, 2022 to March 30, 2023 among patients with chronic kidney disease who were not reliant on dialysis. Consecutively, 170 study participants were enrolled. Data abstraction, interviewer-administered surveys, and phone follow-up formats were used to gather data. Versions 4.6.0 and 25 of the Statistical Packages for Social Science were utilized for data entry and statistical analysis, respectively. Cox regression analysis, both bivariate and multivariate, was used to find the factors that predicted the death from chronic renal disease. A statistically significant p-value was one that was ≤ 0.05.

Result: Over 649.266 person-months, 170 patients were followed. Of these patients, 120(70.6%) were male and the mean (± SD) age of the patients was 45.19 ± 13.86 years. Overall, 71 (41.8%) were died with an estimated 109 deaths per 1000 person-months. The mean survival time was 116.9 days (95% CI:105.3-128.5). Hypertension (90%), anemia (95.8%), and edema (99.4%) were the most frequently prevalent comorbidity and complications. Severe anemia at admission [AHR=3.3, 95% CI,(1.39-7.8)], systolic blood pressure > 159 mmHg [AHR= 4.65, 95%CI(2.07-10.42)], modified Charleston comorbidity index score ≥ 5 [AHR=5.00, 95% CI(2.60-9.64)], and uremic encephalopathy [AHR=2.58, 95% CI,(1.45-4.5)] were predictors of chronic kidney disease patients’ mortality.

Conclusion: Among patients with chronic renal disease, the overall mortality rate was high. Hypertension, anemia, and edema were the common comorbidity and complications. Severe anemia, systolic blood pressure > 159 mmHg, modified Charleston comorbidity index ≥ 5, and uremic encephalopathy were predictors of mortality. As a result, patients with chronic renal disease would likely have a lower death rate if these factors were specifically managed.

Gorfineh Teshome Tesfaye¹, Aster Wakjira Garedow²*, Gosaye Mekonnen Tefera³, and Mengist Awoke Yizengaw²