Introduction: Motor function is essential in our daily lives. Over 70% of stroke survivors have motor or other neurological functional disabilities. However, rehabilitation of motor function suffered from a stroke is rather difficult due to various reasons. Moreover, previous evidence for the effectiveness of physiotherapy for people with stroke that recover motor function is varied and limited in the chronic phase and therefore has never been reviewed systematically. With the progress of study in neurology and development of novel tools for rehabilitation, we can easily collect data from clinical trials now, so justifying conducting a systematic review.
Methods and analysis: This systematic review protocol is developed in accordance with the methodology recommended by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols, as well as the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Relevant studies,including Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English, published between January 2001 and January 2021, will be identified by searching the databases. We will perform searches for relevant studies in databases, including PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science, Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Cochrane Library databases. The reference lists of included articles and reviews will be searched manually. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions) approach will be used to systematically appraise the quality of methodology. We will assess the risk of bias of the RCTs included using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool and provide a qualitative synthesis and consider conducting a meta-analysis if the final data across outcomes shows sufficient homogeneity.
Ethics and dissemination: No ethical approval is needed as the proposed study does not involve the collection of primary data, and the results of this review will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.
Trial registration number: CRD42021267069.
Strengths and limitations of this study
• The main strength of the present study is that this is the first systematic review that different commonly used types of physiotherapy were included, which makes a big difference from the other trials that mostly focused on specific areas of physiotherapy.
• By systematic review, all relevant high-quality evidence will be identified and effect of interventions to promote motor recovery, including recovery of impairment or related function, after stroke will be investigated. Such that we can identify areas for which interventions show promise of efficacy according to the results of this review.
• It is anticipated that a limited meta-analysis may be conducted since there may be significant heterogeneity among the identified trials due to a wide range of outcome measures, the amount and methods of intervention, and the duration and frequency of training.
• It’s possible that the current review does not identify all evidence or limitations relevant to the research question because there are restrictions on both language and year of the articles included.
Shehong Zhang1 , Hongyu Xie3 , Chuanjie Wang4 , Fengfeng Wu1* and Xin Wang2*