Back to Journal

SM Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Case Series and a Review of Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome

[ ISSN : 3067-977X ]

Abstract Citation Introduction Case Descriptions Discussion Author contributions: References
Details

Received: 25-May-2015

Accepted: 10-Oct-2015

Published: 02-Nov-2015

Yezaz A Ghouri¹, Jay Chouhan¹, Lauren Hoffman³ and Sushovan Guha¹,²*

¹Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, USA
²Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Texas Health Science Center, USA
³Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University, USA

Corresponding Author:

Sushovan Guha, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition; 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.234; Houston, Texas 77030, USA, Tel: 713-500-6677; Fax: 713-500-6699; Email: sushovan.guha@uth.tmc.edu

Keywords

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome; Cannabis; Vomiting

Abstract

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is a condition observed in patients with chronic use of cannabis. It is characterized with GI symptoms including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea. The patients tend to be chronic abusers for several years and experience these symptoms in a cyclical manner similar to the cyclical vomiting syndrome. They find relief after taking hot baths, a pathognomonic feature of CHS. We hereby describe 3 cases who presented with clinical features consistent with CHS. Cannabis acts through CB1 and CB2 receptors located in brain and gastrointestinal tract, respectively. There are no standard therapeutic measures available for management of CHS. We propose the idea of using short-acting cannabinoids including dronabinol. Also review of literature suggests treatments with drugs including clonidine, lorazepam and risperidone. Recent endeavors on legalization of recreational cannabis use have initiated several debates and we should be mindful of CHS as one of its long-term complications.

Citation

Ghouri YA, Chouhan J, Hoffman L and Guha S. Case Series and a Review of Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome. J Gastroenterol. 2015;1(1):1002.

Introduction

Cannabis is a widely used drug of abuse in the United States (US) with over 16.7 million users reported in 2009 [1]. Known for its psychedelic effects, it is mostly commonly abused by young individuals. Cannabis is also utilized by the medical field for a number of medicinal purposes, some of which have been well known for centuries. Most recently, the role of Cannabis as a medicinal agent has led to debates within several states about its legalization for non-medicinal or recreational use [2]. As of January 2014, Colorado became the first state to legalize cannabis for recreational use. Chronic cannabis users who are exposed to its active chemical ingredient, Δ9 Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), develop addiction at an early age. Many quit its use, but those who continue its use can sometimes develop certain unusual illnesses. One such condition known to us is the “Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome” (CHS), first described in 2004 by Allen and colleagues [3].

CHS is associated with a history of first or second hand exposure to cannabis for more than a decade, and it is almost exclusively reported in people who began daily use of cannabis during their teenage years [2, 4]. The affected individuals develop episodic nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and sometimes diarrhea. These vomiting episodes are cyclical, occurring every few weeks to months and lasting for days to weeks [1]. The acute episode develops spontaneously; some have been reported to be associated with exposure to foods that affected individuals dislike or after the ingestion of heavy meals. These patients almost exclusively find symptomatic relief after taking a hot water bath [2]. During these episodes they spend hours taking a warm shower or a hot water bath. We present three such cases of CHS who presented during exacerbation of their symptoms.

Case Descriptions

Case 1

A 45 year-old Caucasian man presented with a 10 day history of nausea, vomiting, generalized colicky abdominal pain and diarrhea. He found some relief of his symptoms with the use of narcotics but noticed significant relief after a hot bath. The patient was agitated and upset when he had no access to a hot shower in the emergency room but was equally content after he took a warm shower. He had similar presentations to several emergency rooms in the last 8 years and was hospitalized on multiple occasions. Some of these episodes were associated with development of acute renal failure secondary to dehydration, followed by renal recovery after intravenous (IV) fluid hydration. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in the past had shown reflux esophagitis and gastritis, likely from constant retching. He was also diagnosed with gastroparesis and gastroesophageal reflux disease and was on a proton pump inhibitor. He had been smoking cannabis from the age of 9 years and continued to abuse the drug.

On physical examination there was no abdominal tenderness but bowel sounds were hyperactive. His oral mucous membranes were dry, suggesting dehydration. He had scalded skin on his back and behind his neck as a result of taking showers for several hours. He was obese with a body mass index (BMI) of 35.81. Computerized tomography (CT) of his abdomen was normal. Laboratory data showed hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hypochloremia, a mild metabolic acidosis and elevated serum creatinine of 3.2 mg/dl (his baseline creatinine was known to be 1 to 1.5 mg/dl). We hypothesized that the low electrolyte values with elevated creatinine and dehydration lead to pre-renal acute kidney injury. To support this diagnosis his lactic acid level was elevated with an elevated creatinine phosphokinase level. A urine drug screen was found to be positive for cannabis use. He was treated with IV normal saline and pain relief was achieved with narcotic analgesics. Significant symptom control was observed following a hot shower. His renal function improved within 12 hours of IV hydration. He declined to try any medications to assist him in quitting cannabis abuse. Rehabilitation was provided as an option with cognitive behavioral therapy but the patient declined to try either of these options and was discharged.

Case 2

A 22-year-old Caucasian woman presented with nausea, several episodes of vomiting and generalized colicky abdominal pain for one day. She had similar episodes in the past 3 years which were alleviated with hot showers. The patient denied any fever, chills or changes in her stool habits during this period. She endorsed to using marijuana daily and took oxycodone for abdominal pain. These episodes occurred every 3 to 4 months and lasted for 3 to 4 days, usually relieved with anti-emetics, analgesics and after hot baths. She had numerous hospital and emergency room visits in the past for similar symptoms. Previous work up included an EGD and HIDA scan, which were negative and she was presumptively diagnosed to have cyclical vomiting syndrome (CVS).

On physical examination, the abdomen was found to be soft with a normal frequency of bowel sounds in all four quadrants. She was diffusely tender to abdominal palpation, but did not exhibit any guarding or rebound tenderness. Her BMI was 26.63 and all vital signs were within normal limits. Abdominal ultrasound was normal. Hemogram showed leukocytosis of 12.4 cells. She was initially treated empirically with broad spectrum antibiotics- ceftriaxone and metronidazole and urine culture showed growth of enterococci. She tested positive for opiates and THC on urine drug screen. Specialists in gynecology suggested long-term oral contraceptives to stabilize the ovarian cyst and stated that her current symptoms were not considered to be secondary to her ovarian cyst. The patient continued to have improvement of symptoms with hot baths. A diagnosis of CHS was made based on the patient’s clinical history and after ruling out her ovarian cyst as a cause of her symptoms. She was also started on dicyclomine, ondansetron, oral contraceptives and valproic acid. We offered drug counseling and rehabilitation for cessation of cannabis abuse, which the patient refused.

Case 3

A 31 year-old man presented with a 4 day history of episodic sharp epigastric abdominal pain and vomiting. The symptoms usually lasted for 8 hours and were relieved after taking hot baths. He was an active cannabis abuser and had been experiencing these episodes of abdominal pain with vomiting for the last 6 months. He had lost his appetite due to chronic nausea, which led to weight loss of 70 lbs over this period of time and had a BMI of 17.5 on current presentation.

Previously he was found to have H. Pylori antigen in his stool and had completed triple antibiotic therapy; however the vomiting and abdominal pain persisted. He also had an EGD, which only showed reflux esophagitis. On multiple previous hospitalizations his pancreatic lipase level was elevated and CT scans of his abdomen only showed some focal changes in the pancreas. His recurrent abdominal pain was labeled as chronic pancreatitis in the past and he was placed on pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. There was still incomplete relief from his symptoms and subsequent endoscopic ultrasound did not show any abnormalities in the pancreas. On physical examination he had mild tenderness in his left upper quadrant but no rebound tenderness.

His laboratory data showed a positive urine drug screen with no abnormalities detected on his electrolyte panel. The amylase and lipase levels were normal during his admission with a normal appearing pancreas on abdominal CT scan. Based on his history of cannabis abuse with episodic abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting; along with history of symptomatic relief by taking hot baths, he was presumptively diagnosed with CHS. The previous episodes of pancreatitis were suspected to be secondary to transient pancreatic ischemia induced by chronic marijuana abuse via activation of CB1 receptors. Oral diet was stopped and his symptoms slowly improved over 5 days. Hot baths continued to give him symptomatic relief. Before discharge he was able to tolerate an oral diet. The patient was advised to stop using cannabis and was offered rehabilitation. He was additionally prescribed marinol and clonidine to assist with withdrawal.

Discussion

Cannabis Sativum is a species of plant from which the active chemical ingredient Δ9Tetrahydrocannabinol is obtained. THC acts on the central nervous system (CNS) causing psychedelic effects, which include visual hallucinations, a sense of calmness, increased hunger, stimulatory ideation and psychomotor retardation. It also acts on the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) causing diarrhea secondary to stimulation of colonic THC receptors. The stool tends to be loose and watery due to the drug’s effect in expediting intestinal transit time, and subsequently decreasing the amount of water absorbed in the colon [5]. In addition, there are reports of substances used in the preparation of cannabis, such as preservatives or pesticides, which may also contribute to the symptoms of CHS [6].

THC works by stimulating the G protein-coupled CB receptors, two subtypes of which are known, namely the CB1 and CB2 receptors [5]. CB1 receptors are expressed in the CNS. CB2 receptors are expressed in gastrointestinal immune cells as well as the myenteric and Meissner’s plexus of the small bowel. CB2 receptors are likely associated with down-regulation of intestinal inflammation, visceral pain, and motility [7]. A naturally occurring form of THC-like peptide, which has been termed as ‘anandamide’, is produced in our body. The name of this protein was derived from the Sanskrit word “Anand”, which means bliss or pleasure, a commonly experienced feeling described by Cannabinoid abusers. Anandamide is a neuropeptide which activates THC receptors in the brain to produce effects similar to those seen after endorphins and enkephalins act on opioid receptors [5].

Individuals who abuse cannabis for several years tend to develop obesity. The mechanism, although not fully understood, could be explained by the increased desire for food caused by THC’s stimulation of the hunger center in the hypothalamus. THC is a lipophilic substance which tends to be stored in the adipocytes. Selective breeding of Cannabis sativum has increased the plant’s average THC content from 0.75% to as high as 16% [8], which may lead to an even greater concentration of THC to be retained in adipocytes. Obese individuals tend to have sustained levels of THC in their system even several days after their last exposure, which can lead to recurring effects of the drug. This phenomenon could have been the effect seen in the patients described in cases 1 and 2, who were classified as obese and pre-obese according to their BMI, respectively.

The most commonly noted GIT symptoms associated with CHS are nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain. CHS can be considered as a sub-type of CVS, which includes a broad range of clinical symptoms grouped together under this syndromic illness. The peculiar characteristic in CHS is that affected patients tend to find relief from nausea and vomiting after a hot bath. This mechanism is likely due to peripheral vasodilatation following exposure to warm water. This can be explained by an increase in cutaneous blood flow after the exposure to warm water, which drives blood away from the mesenteric circulation thereby decreasing the effect of THC on the GIT. However, this habit is a learned behavior and it may not be practiced during initial presentations [9]. All three of the patients described developed this behavior for relief of their symptoms. Some individuals may try to smoke cannabis during their exacerbations without any relief [3, 10]. Usually patients are anxious during episodes of CHS with increased sweating, tachycardia and repetitive retching [9, 11]. In patients with high clinical suspicion for CHS based on history and physical exam, extensive medical testing is not necessary [2]. Endoscopy may reveal associated esophageal and gastric mucosal trauma from retching [9]. EGD performed in our patients described above showed gastritis and reflux esophagitis in case 1 and case 2 respectively. The diagnosis of CHS becomes more obvious when patients present with episodic abdominal pain with nausea and vomiting for months to years and only find symptomatic relief with hot baths [12].

There have been published case reports on CHS. We present a series of 3 cases diagnosed with CHS. Case 1 and case 2 were found to have renal failure with elevated creatinine that was secondary to hypovolemia as a result of dehydration from repeated vomiting and diarrhea with poor intake of fluids. Over several years, episodes of acute renal failure from repeated episodes of hyperemesis and diarrhea may lead to nonreversible renal injury leading to chronic renal insufficiency. Therefore, chronic renal failure can be considered as a long-term complication of CHS. In case 3 we also noted recurrent pancreatitis, another possible complication of CHS. This was speculated to be the effect of CB1 receptor induced transient pancreatic ischemia causing episodic pancreatitis.

There are no published retrospective studies or prospective trails on management of CHS. Review of literature has shown that the majority of patients receive symptomatic treatment and achieve resolution of an acute exacerbation after a period of hours to days. It should be noted that vomiting associated with CHS is usually refractory to antiemetics [2]. Although the patients described above recovered in a similar fashion with symptomatic treatment, prevention of these episodes with drug therapy would be a reasonable approaching management of this condition. We propose the idea of prescribing medical forms of THC, such as dronabinol or marinol, which are short acting cannabinoid receptor agonists usually used for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. They can be given on a daily basis with a slow taper over months and have shown some utility in cannabis dependence [13,14]. However, it is unknown whether a cannabinoid receptor agonist would perpetuate or relieve the symptoms of CHS. We also would like to propose the idea of using clonidine, a centrally acting α-adrenergic antagonist in patients suffering from CHS. The rationale comes from the idea of inhibiting the adrenergic stimulation that causes vomiting and diarrhea. Roelofs et al, suggested a large dose of risperidone has been found to show some benefit in treating these episodes of CHS [15]. Nicholson et al, published a review which proposes the use of lorazepam for treatment of acute symptoms [6]. Hickey et al, recently published a case report of a patient with CHS presenting with CHS and intractable vomiting [16]. The patient was treated with a parenteral dose of haloperidol with relief of symptoms with 1 hour. Haloperidol could be considered in acute states especially when patients are agitated. For treatment of cannabis dependence, the only therapy reported to be of benefit for chronic treatment is cessation of cannabis use and cognitive behavior therapy with motivational enhancement [9,17].

We are aware that cannabis is a common drug of abuse and CHS has been a fairly new illness that has been described in clinical literature. However, with ongoing discussions for the legalization of recreational cannabis use and its recent approval in certain states in US in addition to its current medicinal use, we may encounter an increase in the number of CHS cases in the United States [2]. With this in mind, additional studies would be beneficial to determine potential risk factors for developing CHS with elimination of confounders like nicotine use, which is common among this group of drug abusers [6]. There are no standardized approaches for its treatment but some potential interventions that could be considered are dronabinol, clonidine and lorazepam. Clinical trials and retrospective case/control or cohort studies need to be undertaken to help determine treatment approaches with drugs for individuals who suffer this incapacitating illness for several years.

Author contributions:

Yezaz A Ghouri: Acquisition of case series, review and interpretation of available literature, and drafting of manuscript.

Jay Chouhan: Acquisition of case series and help with review of available literature.

Lauren Hoffman: Acquisition of case series and help with review of available literature.

Sushovan Guha: Critical review of available literature, revision of manuscript for important intellectual content, administrative, technical, or material support and supervision.

References

1. Colpe LJ, Barker PR, Karg RS, Batts KR, Morton KB, Gfroerer JC, et al., The National Survey on Drug Use and Health Mental Health Surveillance Study: calibration study design and field procedures. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010; 19: 36-48.

2. Wallace EA, Andrews SE, Garmany CL, Jelley MJ. Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome: literature review and proposed diagnosis and treatment algorithm. South Med J. 2011. 104: 659-64.

3. Allen JH, de Moore GM, Heddle R, Twartz JC. Cannabinoid hyperemesis: cyclical hyperemesis in association with chronic cannabis abuse. Gut, 2004. 53: 1566-1570.

4. Boeckxstaens GE. Cannabinoid hyperemesis with the unusual symptom of compulsive bathing. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005; 149: 1468-1471.

5. Howlett AC, Johnson MR, Melvin LS, Milne GM. Nonclassical cannabinoid analgetics inhibit adenylate cyclase: development of a cannabinoid receptor model. Mol Pharmacol. 1988; 33: 297-302.

6. Nicolson SE, Denysenko L, Mulcare JL, Vito JP, Chabon B. Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome: a case series and review of previous reports. Psychosomatics. 2012; 53: 212-219.

7. Izzo AA, Camilleri M. Emerging role of cannabinoids in gastrointestinal and liver diseases: basic and clinical aspects. Gut. 2008; 57: 1140-1155.

8. Heyman RB, Anglin TM, Copperman SM, Joffe A, McDonald CA, Rogers PD, et al. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Substance Abuse. Marijuana: A continuing concern for pediatricians. Pediatrics. 1999; 104: 982-985.

9. Sullivan S. Cannabinoid hyperemesis. Can J Gastroenterol. 2010; 24: 284-285.

10. Singh E, Coyle W. Cannabinoid hyperemesis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103: 1048-1049.

11. Carnett JB, Bates W. The Treatment of Intercostal Neuralgia of the Abdominal Wall. Ann Surg. 1933; 98: 820-829.

12. Sontineni SP, Chaudhary S, Sontineni V, Lanspa SJ. Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome: clinical diagnosis of an underrecognised manifestation of chronic cannabis abuse. World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15: 1264-6.

13. Levin FR, Mariani JJ, Brooks DJ, Pavlicova M, Cheng W, Nunes EV. Dronabinol for the treatment of cannabis dependence: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011; 116: 142-150.

14. Walsh D, Nelson KA, Mahmoud FA. Established and potential therapeutic applications of cannabinoids in oncology. Support Care Cancer. 2003; 11: 137-143.

15. Roelofs J, Vorel SK, Vorel-Havelkova E, Brombacher PJ. Cannabinoid hyperemesis with the unusual symptom of compulsive bathing. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005; 149: 2376.

16. Hickey JL, Witsil JC, Mycyk MB. Haloperidol for treatment of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome. Am J Emerg Med. 2013; 31: 1003.

17. Budney AJ, Roffman R, Stephens RS, Walker D. Marijuana dependence and its treatment. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2007; 4: 4-16.

Other Articles

Article Image 1

Outcomes and Safety of Open vs. Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients with Cirrhosis

Background & Aims: The risk of laparoscopic surgery in cirrhotics remains unclear. We report on outcome and safety of open versus laparoscopic surgery in cirrhotics.

Methods: Retrospective review of cirrhotics undergoing abdominal or pelvic surgery at a university hospital from 2000 to 2010. Pre-, intra-, and post-operative data was collected. Open and laparoscopic patients were compared for post-operative outcomes including minor and major complications, hepatic decompensation, and mortality. Patients were stratified by Child-Pugh and MELD scores, and emergent vs. elective surgery. 164 total patients were identified (131 open and 31 laparoscopic).

Results: There was significantly more intra-operative blood loss (p<0.001) and minor complications (p=0.043) in the open group, but no other significant differences between the laparoscopic and open patients. All 5 deaths occurred in open patients (p=0.58). Increasing Child and MELD scores were predictive of adverse events. Overall complications, hepatic decompensation (p=0.015) and death (p<0.022) were more common in open emergent compared to open elective cases. In open emergent Child C patients, 100% had major complications and hepatic decompensation and 67% died. Of emergent open MELD>20 patients, 100% had major complications, 67% had hepatic decompensation, and 33% died.

Conclusion: Open and laparoscopic surgical approaches for cirrhotics yielded similar safety and outcomes. Child and MELD scores were predictive of adverse outcomes. Emergent cases were more likely to have complications than elective cases. Further studies including larger numbers of emergent laparoscopic patients are needed to better ascertain the risk of laparoscopy in cirrhotics.

Stanley Martin Cohen¹*, Aditya Dholakia², Thomas R VanderHeyden³, Anjana Pillai⁴ and Joseph Ahn⁵


Article Image 1

Pharmacological Characterization of Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes Involved in Carbachol-Induced Contraction of the Chicken Proventriculus

Present study was designed to characterize the postjunctional muscarinic acetylcholine receptor mediating contraction of the chicken proventriculus by using muscarinic receptor agonists and antagonists. Muscarinic agonists caused concentration-dependent contraction. The ranking order of pEC50 values were muscarine > arecaidine propargyl ester > oxotremorine M > carbachol > methacholine > arecoline > acetylcholine > bethanechol = McN-A343 = pilocarpine. The responses to carbachol were competitively antagonized by AF-DX116 (pKb =5.9), AF-DX384 (6.84), 4-DAMP (8.79), methoctramine (5.81), pirenzepine (6.78), p-F-HHSID (7.41), atropine (8.43),tropicamide (6.91), himbacine (7.01), AQ-RA741 (6.6) and dimethindene (6.73). The correlation of pKb of the chicken proventriculus with that of the mammalian M3 receptor was the highest among five muscarinic receptors. The proventriculus membrane contained a single class of [3 H]-quinuclidinyl benzilate binding sites. pKi values of the antagonists in a binding displacement study correlated with that of the M3 subtype. Pertussis toxin(100µg/kg, i.p. for 72h) significantly decreased the contraction induced by a low concentration of carbachol. In 4-DAMP mustard and AF-DX116-pretreated muscle strips, AF-DX116 shifted the concentration-response curve for oxotremorine M to the right in the presence of 5-hydroxytryptamine and forskolin. The pKb value (6.22) was significantly higher than that obtained in the normal condition (5.78). Isoproterenol increased cyclic AMP, and carbachol significantly decreased the isoproterenol-induced increase in cyclic AMP. The results indicated that a muscarinic agonist mainly acts on the M3 receptor to cause contraction of the chicken proventriculus but the possible involvement of M2 /M4 receptors cannot be excluded as demonstrated in mammalian gastrointestinal tract.

Takio Kitazawa¹*, Nahoko Kondo¹ and Tetsuro Taneike¹


Article Image 1

A Case Report on Ulcerative Colitis with Interventional Outcomes

Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is a mucosal disease that usually involves the rectum and extends proximally to involve all or part of the colon. Main causes are gut microbiota, dysregulation of the host’s immune system, genetic susceptibility and environmental factors. Active disease can be associated with a rise in acute phase reactants [C - reactive protein (CRP)], platelet count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and a decrease in hemoglobin. Colonoscopy is used to assess disease activity and is often performed before treatment. In this case, recurrence UC was observed and it was treated with suitable therapy but some drug interactions like metronidizole additive effect with ofloxacin results in ST-T elevation and adverse effects like abdominal pain, burning pain in midsternal area radiating to epigastric region [Calcium+Vitamin-D] were seen. Those are monitored by the alternative therapy like dose management and drug alterations.

Sandeep RJ¹, Hari HC², Jyothsna RD² and Mahender V²*


Article Image 1

Prediction and Diagnosis of Fatty Liver in Dairy Cows

Fatty liver is defined as an accumulation of fat, mainly Triacylglycerol (TAG) in liver. Fatty liver in dairy cows is categorized into mild, moderate and severe fatty liver. Obesity in pregnant cow is crucial etiological factor for postpartal development of fatty liver. Namely, obese cows have a greater decrease in feed intake during the period around parturition and, therefore, have a more severe negative energy balance during early lactation which leads to increased lipolysis of adipose tissue. Non Esterified Fatty Acids (NEFA), released from the stored TAG in the adipose tissue, are readily taken up by liver. The excess of NEFA may be converted to TAG and deposit in liver. Liver biopsy is the only reliable method for the detection of fatty liver, especially for the determination of its severity through the estimation of total lipids and TAG. Ecography may be considered as noninvasive, on-farm method for diagnosis of fatty liver which is not commonly used do to the not widely achievable equipment. Since some metabolic and endocrine parameters are significantly correlated with fatty liver degree, they may be used as diagnostic indicators of fatty liver. The significance of those indicators for diagnosis of fatty liver is present in this review. Additionally, indicators that may be used for prediction of fatty liver are explained. Specially attention was given to glucose, NEFA, BHBA, liver enzymes, total bilirubin, total protein, albumin and urea as well as some hormones involved in lipid metabolism. Achievements of novel methods, like genomic and proteomic profiling of biological fluids of diseased cows, in providing tools for diagnosis and prognosis of this metabolic disease are presented.

Danijela Kirovski¹* and Zeljko Sladojevic²


Article Image 1

Primary Gastric Lymphoma

The treatment of primary gastric lymphoma is evolving in post-rituximab era. The role of Helicobacter pyroli eradication alone can cure not only Mucosa-Associated Lymphoepithelial Tumor (MALT) but also some of diffuse large B cell lymphoma with or without MALT component. The efficacy of rituximab containing chemotherapy is so effective that the role of surgery is overshadowed. There are many studies, although most of them were retrospective trials, however it highlights the current mainstay of immune-chemotherapy provided an outstanding long term survival more than 80-90%.H pylori In real world there are substantial patients may receive surgery first, yet still needs post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy for some of them has a risk of relapse of lymphoma. And recent studies showed there’s no statistical difference between the two modalities. The main reason for patients proceeded to surgery as primary treatment is the gastroenterologist preference and showed no difference in terms of progression free survival and overall survival. The rituximab was introduced to lymphoma treatment since 1999, and demonstrated a superior long term survival in diffuse large B cell lymphoma for R-CHOP relatively to CHOP regimen. The highly effective treatment made PGL being easily curable disease; furthermore there are new insights of why and how the antibiotic therapy as exclusive treatment for limited disease will be a mainstay in treating this malignancy. We make a proposal how to treat the primary gastric lymphoma and MALT, and highlight the changing treatment modalities with regards to the integration of Helicobacter pyroli eradication to conventional chemotherapy as well as the complimentary role of surgery and radiotherapy.

Ming-Chih Chang¹* and Sung-Hsin Kuo²*


Article Image 1

Bleeding Peptic Ulcer: Epidemiology, Treatment and Prognosis

Aims: The aim of this study was to demonstrate epidemiological, clinical and endoscopic characteristics of acute Upper Gi Bleeding (UGIB) with a focus on Peptic Ulcer Bleeding (PUB).

Methods: This study included 2198 consecutive patients that were referred to our emergency department due to acute Upper Gi Bleeding (UGIB) from January 2008 to December 2012. All patients under went urgent upper GI endoscopies within 24 hours of admission, and 842 patients diagnosed with PUB were enrolled and prospectively followed.

Results: The cumulative incidence of UIGB was 126/100000 for a 5-year period. Two out of five patients had a bleeding peptic ulcer, of which 440 (52.3%) patients had a bleeding gastric ulcer, 356 (42.3%) had a bleeding duodenal ulcer, 17 (2%) had both bleeding gastric and duodenal ulcers and 29 (3.5%) patients had bleeding ulcers on gastroenteric anastomosis. PUB was more common in men. Average patient age was 65.9 years. The majority of patients with PUB were taking agents that attenuate the cytoprotective function of the gastric and duodenal mucosa (57%).Half of the patients received a red blood cell transfusion, with a median of 2.2 units. Re-bleeding occurred in 77(9.7%) patients and 47 (5.9%) required surgical intervention. The thirty-day morality was 5.2%, and 10% of patients died from uncontrolled bleeding and concomitant diseases.

Conclusion: PUB is the main cause of UGIB, characterized by a significant re-bleeding rate and mortality.

Budimir I¹, Stojsavljevic S¹*, Nikolic M¹, Kralj D¹, Biscanin A¹, Kirigin LS², Zovak M³, Babic Z⁴, Bohnec S⁵ and Budimir I⁶


Article Image 1

An Update on Hepatorenal Syndrome

The Hepatorenal Syndrome (HRS) is one of many potential causes of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in patients with decompensated liver disease.

HRS is associated with poor prognosis and represents the end-stage of a sequence of reductions in renal perfusion induced by progressively severe hepatic injury.

The pathophysiology of HRS is complex with multiple mechanisms interacting simultaneously, although HRS is primarily characterised by renal vasoconstriction.

A recently revised diagnostic criteria and management algorithm for AKI has been developed for patients with cirrhosis, allowing physicians to commence treatment promptly.

Vasopressor therapy and other general management, such as antibiotic prophylaxis, need to be initiated while patients are assessed for eligibility for transplantation. Liver transplantation remains the treatment of choice for HRS but is limited by organ shortage.

Other management options, such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, renal replacement therapy and molecular absorbent recirculating system, may provide short term benefit for patients not responding medical therapy while awaiting transplantation.

Clinicians need to be aware of the pathophysiology and management principles of HRS to provide quality care for patients with multi-organ failure.

Samuel Chan*


Article Image 1

Abdominal CT Findings of Cholecystogastric Fistula

Enteric fistulas are abnormal connections between the gastrointestinal tract and other organs, chest or skin. Fistulas between the gall bladder and the gastrointestinal system are common [1]. Cholecystoduodenal and cholecystocolic fistulas are seen frequently while cholecystogstric ones are rare [2]. In our case, we accidentally discovered a cholecystogastric fistula in a 71 years old male patient with gastric adenocarcinoma in orally and intravenous contrast enhanced abdomen CT.

Husam Vehbi¹* and Cagri Agirgun²


Article Image 1

Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Carcinomas (PostCRCs): Have we Improved Over Time?

Background and Aim: There is an increasing concern on Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Carcinomas (PostCRCs). Little is known about how these figures have evolved over time. We aim to compare the rates of PostCRCs in two periods of time and identify the risk factors.

Methods: Retrospective control-case study in our Endoscopic Unit. We studied two separate intervals (March 2004-September 2011 and October 2011 - December 2016). In both periods of time all patients diagnosed with CRC were identified. Patients with a previous colonoscopy performed 12 to 60 months before were retrieved (cases) and compared with those who did not have a previous procedure (controls).

Results: 712 and 743 patients diagnosed with CRC in both periods of time. 24 patients in the first period (3.6%) and 28 patients in the second one (3.8%) had a previous colonoscopy performed. PostCRCs were mainly located on the right side of the colon (63% vs. 35% p=0.006 and 68% vs. 33% p< 0.001), were smaller in size (3.17 vs.4.46 p< 0.001 and 3.61 vs. 4.44 p=0.086), with a tendency to host a better TNM stage. No differences in sex and age were found.

More than half of PostCRCs (58.3% and 60.7%) were attributed to procedure causes, meanwhile10 PostCRCs in both periods were considered new developed CRCs.

Conclusions: Despite what could be expected, we did not find a decrease in the rate of PostCRCs over time. A combination of preventable as much as biological factors would account for their etiology.

María Lourdes Ruiz Rebollo¹* and María Fe Muñoz Moreno²


Article Image 1

Renal Metastasis from Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Colon in a 70 Year Old Male: A Case Report

Distal Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) mostly spread to the lymph node, liver, peritoneum and lung. The kidney metastasis from colorectal cancer considered to be unusual and rare sites of metastasis. The most important factor which affects the prognosis of colorectal cancer is distal metastasis. The present study reported the case of a 70-yr-old Saudi man metastatic mucinous adenocarcinoma of the colon in the right kidney at the time of initial presentation.

Sultan H AlSaigh¹* and Aseel A AlSaeed²