Back to Journal

SM Musculoskeletal Disorders

Peroneal Nerve Palsy after Arthroscopic Partial Lateral Meniscectomy

[ ISSN : 2576-5442 ]

Abstract Case Presentation Etiology Discussion References
Details

Received: 21-Apr-2017

Accepted: 11-May-2017

Published: 12-May-2017

Ten Cate NJ* and Albers GHR

AVE Orthopaedic Surgery Clinics, Huizen, The Netherlands

Corresponding Author:

Ten Cate NJ, AVE Orthopaedic Surgery Clinics, Huizermaatweg 400A, 1276 LL Huizen, The Netherlands, Tel: +31612842948; Email: nicolaastencate@gmail.com

Abstract

A 46 year old, healthy weight female patient visited our outpatient clinic with complaints of the right knee. Since a few months she experienced symptoms of a locked knee without explainable cause and localized pain on the lateral side.

Case Presentation

A 46 year old, healthy weight female patient visited our outpatient clinic with complaints of the right knee. Since a few months she experienced symptoms of a locked knee without explainable cause and localized pain on the lateral side. During physical examination no remarkable findings came up, except for recognizable pain and crepitus when pressure was applied on the lateral joint space. At radiographic imaging nothing aberrant was to be seen.

So the patient was planned for an arthroscopy of the right knee to remediate the lateral com-partment and inspect the meniscus. Work diagnosis was logically a lateral meniscus lesion. Routine knee arthroscopy placing was executed and a padded thigh tourniquet inflated to 250 mmHg was adjusted. Anterolateral and anteromedial portals were made.

Two trocars were inserted. There after the knee was distended with fluid. Varus force was routinely applied in 20⁰ flexion. A flap tear in the posterior part of the lateral meniscus was found. After removing the tear with a cutting device a 4.5mm Dyonics (Smith&Nephew©) shaver was introduced to smoothen the remaining part of the posterior meniscus.

This was performed by repetitive motion along the tissue in oscillating mode of the shaver blade. No concomitant pathology was identified in the knee during arthroscopy. The complete procedure lasted around 15 minutes and went uneventfully. After the operation (and emptying the knee of fluid) a swelling was noticed subcutaneously around the location of the fibular head. This decreased quickly after removing the tourniquet. Back in the recovery room when the patient came by, she noticed that she could not move her right foot properly. Skin sensibility of the right foot and lower leg was impeded as well.

This persisted for hours after the operation. There were no symptoms of compartment syndrome. We assumed reversible common peroneal nerve palsy occurred. The following day we checked on the patient again to see if there was improvement of neural function. This was not the case, as the patient came walking in on two crutches with a foot drop. She also complained about having no sensation under her foot and a part of her ankle. We were endorsed in our assumption of the nerve injury and sent the patient to an orthopedic instrument facility for an ankle-foot orthosis. Also we arranged an appointment with her neurologist to acquire more information about peroneal function and reversibility of injury by means of an EMG.

Etiology

There are several reasons to mention for damage to the peroneal nerve in knee arthroscopy.

Traction

Varus force needs to be applied for good exposure of the lateral meniscus. By doing so, traction on the peroneal nerve is possible especially if more pressure is adjusted to reach the farther posterior part of the lateral meniscus with the shaver. We estimate this cause as plausible.

Aberrant Course of Peroneal Nerve

Anatomic variations of the peroneal nerve are described previously, e.g. due to tunnel formation of the posterior and distal extents of the biceps femoris muscle. There could have been an anatomical variation in our case, in which the peroneal nerve may be located closer to the joint capsule and thus more likely susceptible to damage. Though we reck on the chance this being the reason of peroneal damage to be small.

Direct Injury Due To Instrumentation

Instrumentation used in arthroscopy consists of the trocars, camera, working tools and the shaver. Trocars are placed carefully with the knee flexed in hanging position, hence not in proximity of the nerve. Working tools are used for hooking up the meniscus and feel its mobility; the shaver is used to remove tears and smoothen the surface. Both are inserted through the trocars and thus in a protected manner. Therefore we consider this to be an unlikely cause of injury in our case.

Tourniquet

We know that tourniquet time is a predictor for complications (see discussion). However the operation time in our case is quite short, i.e. around 15 minutes. Also the tourniquet pressure was 250mmHg, which is lower than Kim et al. report in literature. They state that neurological problems can occur due to tourniquet usage, but only in an operation time from 30 minutes to 3 hours and pressures of 300mmHg or more [1]. We think our tourniquet management is of minor influence on the injury. Our thoughts on the cause of the nerve dysfunction remain uncertain. We presume a tear occurred in the joint capsule on the posterolateral side of the knee, caused by shaving the lateral meniscus. Compression on the nerve is likely to have taken place due to fluid flowing extraarticular through the joint capsule into the space around the nerve. However, 5 months after the procedure no recovery of peroneal function was observed.

Discussion

In a review of literature on this subject Rodeo et al. describe an overall complication rate ranging from 0.6 to 8.2% after arthroscopic procedures. Five reports are known where injury to the peroneal nerve was associated with arthroscopy and two of these involved meniscal repair. After six months complete sensory and motor function had recovered [2].

Another case report by Johnson et al. state that complete and incomplete saphenous nerve lesions with few relating to the common peroneal nerve occurred by direct damage due to instrumentation. The cause in this particular case was a traction injury due to patient positioning [3]. Kim et al. report a neurologic injury incidence of 0.01 - 0.06% after arthroscopic knee surgery.1 Involvement of the peroneal nerve was reported to be 5% of this incidence, the majority was subscribed to the saphenous nerve and in 47% the nerve was not specified.

Also they conclude that a posterior incision and usage of a deflecting retractor for meniscal repair is considered to be very essential in avoiding unwanted damage to neurovascular structures. Another risk for peroneal nerve damage is its anatomy during surgery. Sherman et al. say the highest rate of instrument breakage is associated with partial removal of the lateral meniscus. Also, the surgeon related experience with arthroscopic procedures does not involve the rate of complications.

Age and tourniquet time were evident predictors of complications, illustrated by multiple regression analysis [4]. Overall, peroneal nerve palsy following arthroscopic lateral meniscectomy is an uncommon but serious complication as recovery of the nerve is a slowly process. Full patient rehabilitation requires collaboration of the surgeon with a neurologist, paramedical therapists and even in some cases necessitates neurosurgical intervenience. Statistically the odds of curing of this impairment are high, because it almost seems impossible to directly harm the peroneal nerve.

This damage during routine arthroscopic lateral meniscectomy is very rare, where pressure of fluid and traction due to varus stress appear to be the most important agents. In our case nevertheless, a time frame of almost six months without signs of recovery is unfavorable according to literature.

References

1. Kim TK, Savino RM, McFarland EG, Cosgarea AJ. Neurovascular Complications of Knee Arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30: 619-629.

2. Rodeo SA, Sobel M, Weiland AJ. Deep Peroneal-Nerve Injury as a Result of Arthroscopic Meniscectomy. A case report and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg AM. 1993; 75: 1221-1224.

3. Johnson DS, Sharma DP, Bangash IH. Common peroneal nerve palsy following knee arthroscopy. Case report. Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 773-774.

4. Sherman OH, Fox JM, Snyder SJ, Del Pizzo W, Friedman MJ, Ferkel RD et al. Arthroscopy-”no-problem surgery”. An analysis of complications in two thousand six hundred and forty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986; 68: 256- 265.

Citation

Cate TNJ and Albers GHR. Peroneal Nerve Palsy after Arthroscopic Partial Lateral Meniscectomy. SM Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 2(2): 1016.

Other Articles

Article Image 1

The Various Aspects of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders and Treatment Approaches

Occlusion is biologically defined as the coordinated functional interaction between the various cell populations forming the masticatory system as they differentiate, model, remodel, fail and repair

Talia Becker* 


Article Image 1

Sonographic Diagnosis of Acute Achilles Tendon Tear: A Case Report

Achilles tendon is a common site of foot and ankle discomfort but its rupture is not frequent. It’s a superficial tendon and this lends it to excellent evaluation by sonography instead of magnetic resonance imaging. Recently ultrasonography has been widely used in musculoskeletal practice. We present a case of Achilles tendon ruptures diagnosed based on fundamental sonographic findings.

Arash Babaei-Ghazani¹,², Safoora Ebadi¹,², Bijan Forogh¹,³, and Bina Eftekharsadat⁴*


Article Image 1

Endochondral Ossification Signals May be Important for the Osteoarthritis Progression

Osteoarthritis (OA), one of the most common skeletal disorders characterized by cartilage degradation and osteophyte formation in joints, is induced by accumulated mechanical stress; however, little is known about the underlying molecular mechanism. Several experimental OA models in mice by producing instability in the knee joints have been developed to apply approaches from mouse genetics. Although proteinases like matrix metalloproteases and aggrecanases have now been proven to be the principal initiators of OA progression, clinical trials of proteinase inhibitors have not been successful for the treatment, turning the interest of researchers to the upstream signals of proteinase induction. These signals include under graded and fragmented matrix proteins like type II collagen or fibronection that affects chondrocytes through distinct receptors. Another signal is pro inflammatory factors that are produced by chondrocytes and synovial cells; however, recent studies that used mouse OA models in knockout mice did not support that these factors have a role in the central contribution to OA development. Our mouse genetic approaches found that the induction of a transcriptional activator Runx2 in chondrocytes under mechanical stress contributes to the pathogenesis of OA through chondrocyte hypertrophy. In addition, chondrocyte apoptosis has recently been identified as being involved in OA progression. We hereby propose that these endochondral ossification signals may be important for the OA progression, suggesting that the related molecules can clinically be therapeutic targets of this disease.

Hiroshi Kawaguchi 


Article Image 1

Observations on the Knee Functional Axis During Active Movements

Estimating the Knee Functional Axis (KFA) is crucial to both correctly implanting the prosthesis and accessing the joint kinematics. Researchers have mainly reported KFA by manual management of flexion extension movements, which are passively performed without any voluntary movements. Active touch and movement refers to what is ordinarily called as touching, which is defined as variations in skin stimulation caused by variations in a person’s motor activity.

The difference is very important for the individual. However, it has not been emphasized in the biomechanical literatures. This study aims to confirm the distinction between touching and being touched. We are particularly interested in measuring the Instantaneous Axes of the Knee (IAK) during locomotion. This geometrical “pattern” of the IAK is altered along with the touch pattern by the mechanical necessities of terrestrial movement.

Wangdo Kim¹, Young Choi², and Hong-Gi Lee³*


Article Image 1

Tibial Plateau Fractures in Children: Literature Review and Case Report

Although fractures of the epiphyseal cartilage injuries are common in childhood, epiphyseal fractures involving the proximal tibia entities are very rare and are usually caused by high-energy trauma, with an incidence ranging between 0.5 and 3.1% of patients; peak incidence between the ages 12-14 years in male patients. The aim of this report is describe a case of fracture of the epiphyseal cartilage of a 13 year old boy, a victim of sports trauma showing lateral tibial plateau fracture and epiphyseal cartilage fracture at the same side, not compatible with the classifications of fractures in children.

Omar Ferreira Miguel


Article Image 1

MRI in Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD): A Proposal for Imaging Standardization in Regenerative Medicine

In the last few years, clinical applications of regenerative medicine have been increasing their way in medical practice.

Valerio Di Nicola¹,² and Mauro Di Pietrantonio³*


Article Image 1

The Sacro-Iliac Joint and Low Back Pain Syndromes

The twentieth century epidemic of low back pain has continued unabated into the 21st century. Up to 20% of the Australian population will experience low back pain at some stage of their lives

J Saunders¹, M Cusi¹,³ and H Van der Wall¹,²*


Article Image 1

Musicians’ Woes: Playing Related Musculoskeletal Disorders

Music is the most essential ingredient of any entertainment. In order to create successful entertaining event musicians plays an imperative role. Musicians are wizards who spread the fragrance of joy by absorbing woes, in the form of Playing Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (PRMDs), for themselves. Like other occupations, musicians also suffer from work related musculoskeletal disorders which are often disabling

Wricha Mishra 


Article Image 1

Visualization of Dupuytren’s Contracture Borders Spread According to MRI Data

Dupuytren’s Contracture (DC) is a fibro-proliferative tumor according to ICD 10 - fascial fibromatosis of unknown etiology (M 720), accompanied by a stable bending contracture of fingers. In CD in the postoperative period extremely high rate of surgical complications is observed: intraoperative (injury of blood vessels, nerves, tendons), general postoperative (hematoma, necrosis, odema, stiffness, etc.), late postoperative (recurrence, spread, progression). In the last case according to the data of different authors, complications frequency is depend upon the degree (from partial up to the total) and the accuracy of excision of the affected aponeurosis ?almaris. One of the problems in choosing the type of operation and technology is the complexity of the cutoff determination boundaries of the affected CD. Up to now there is no suitable for use in the practical CD surgery algorithm of the affected aponeurosis ?almaris spread non invasive visualization in a particular patient. The most appropriate method for the solution of this problem is a method of MRI. The technology of identifying the boundaries of surgery of the affected aponeurosis palmaris in Dupuytren’s contracture by means of MRI has been elaborated. It has been shown that MRI is a highly informative method in the assessment of topographic anatomy of aponeurosis palmaris in normal and CD states. PD, T1, T2 - weighed images allow objectively to visualize the border areas of the affected aponeurosis in I - III stages of CD. PD fsat (fat tissues signal saturation) MRI mode is not recommended for use.

Baikeev RF¹, Mikusev GI², Osmonaliyev IZh², Zakirov RH² and Afletonov EN²*


Article Image 1

Metallosis Die Hard

Metallosis is an aseptic fibrosis, local necrosis, inflammation, or loosening of an implant device secondary to metallic corrosion and release of wear debris. The condition has been highlighted recent years due to the clinical complications caused by metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacement. Although some major types of MoM hip prostheses have been recalled from the market, metallosis is far from over as not only there are still a million implanted MoM hip prosthetic cases worldwide, but also it has been found in non-MoM hip prostheses and other metal implants. This mini review aims to provide recent findings of implants related metallosisin skeletal tissue.

Zhidao Xia