Back to Journal

SM Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Strongyloides Stercoralis Hiperinfection Syndrome Review Article

[ ISSN : 3067-977X ]

Abstract Citation Introduction Epidemiology The lifecycle of strongyloides Key to the persistence of strongyloides infection Risk factors of Hiperinfection Syndrome Clinic Presentation Diagnosis Stool analysis Treatment References
Details

Received: 11-Jun-2024

Accepted: 25-Jun-2024

Published: 27-Jun-2024

Diana Carolina Hennessey Calderon¹*, Louis William Velásquez² and Lina Lorena Linares³

¹Departament of Internal Medicine, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
²Departament of Internal Medicine, Universidad San Martin, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
³Medicine, Universidad Corpas, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia

Corresponding Author:

Diana Carolina Hennessey Calderon, Department of Internal Medicine, National Institute of Cancer, Bogota, Colombia.

Abstract

Strongyloidiasis is a disease caused by Strongyloides stercoralis, is an endemic nematode in countries with a tropical and subtropical climate, sometimes the infection is asymtomatic but in other cases it can produce a hyperinfection syndrome, Which is characteristic of many more severe symptoms, such as severe respiratory distress, coughing up blood, events that can lead the person to be critically ill, the risk factors for this syndrome are: immunosuppression in general either due to HIV, transplantation, use of drugs, oncological diseases. Normally in the infection that is not so severe, anthelmintics such as albendazole can be used, but in severe cases there are studies with subcutaneous ivermectin in cases in which it cannot be administered orally or that simply has not worked.

Citation

Calderon DCH, Velásquez LW, Linares LL (2024) Strongyloides Stercoralis Hiperinfection Syndrome Review Article. SM J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6: 2.

Introduction

Strongyloidiasis is a disease caused by the nematode S.stercoralis that is endemic in rural regions of tropical and subtropical countries [1]. S.stercoralis is an intestinal helminth that infects humans through contact with soil containing the larvae [2].

Epidemiology

Its prevalence is unknown, but it is estimated that it affects between 10 and 40% of the world population, reaching up to 60% in populations of low socioeconomic status, especially those engaged in agriculture [3]. According to the study by Puthiyakunnon, et al. the countries with the highest prevalence are Namibia, Papua New Guinea, Gabon and Kenya [4]. As for Latin America, according to the study by Buonfrate, et al, the prevalence in Chile, Bolivia, Colombia and Mexico is 5% and, in Argentina, Ecuador and Venezuela, 20% [5].

The lifecycle of strongyloides

The S.estercolaris live in rural areas where there is no good sanitation, which generates contaminated soils. And the direct infection starts when the filariform larvae penetrate the skin through the feet [2]. Then the larva reaches a capillary and travels through the bloodstream to the heart, reaches the lungs, enters through the alveoli and ascends throughout the bronchial tree to mature larva. This reaches a larger size and migrates to the trachea, reaches the pharynx and is swallowed until reaching the small intestine, where it is in the intestinal submucosa, to mature into the adult female parasite. This parasitic female reproduces asexually and release eggs into the gastrointestinal tract. The eggs then hatch into non infectious rhabditiform larvae which comes out into the intestinal lumen and is the parasitic form that generally is eliminated in the stool [6].

Outside the human, the larva has two options, one of returning to the ground and transforming into the filariform larvae, which is one of the infectious forms and is ready to infect other hosts and start a new cycle, the other possibility is to reproduce sexually and produce eggs from which rhabditiform larvae hatch that mature into filariform larvae also infecting a new host, in an indirect life cycle [2].

This parasite also can reinfect the host through the gastrointestinal wall, where rhabditiform larvae transform into filariform larvae in a process known as internal autoinfection or they may have an external autoinfection process where they arrive a year where they also transform in filariform larvae that invade the perianal region to continue the life cycle [6].

Key to the persistence of strongyloides infection

S.stercoralis can reinfect the host through the wall of the gastrointestinal tract. This is called autoinfection and occurs when some of the rhabditiform larvae in the faeces transform into infectious filariform larvae in the host’s gastrointestinal tract. These larvae then penetrate the gut wall and re-enter the circulation back to the lungs to begin the cycle again [7]. This cycle of autoinfection occurs more frequently in hosts with some degree of immunosuppression [1].

Risk factors of Hiperinfection Syndrome

The most important are Immunosuppression due to medications such as corticosteroids, Hematologic malignancies (especially Lymphoma), Tuberculosis, Solid organ or bone marrow transplantation, Patients infected with human T-cell lymphotrophic virus type 1, Malnutrition, in this patient The migration of infective larvae, can reach a mortality of 100% [7].

Clinic Presentation

Most people with strongyloidiasis have no symptoms, some have abdominal pain and tenderness, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, they may lose their appetite, also can have Cough and wheels [8]. When is a severe infection the symptoms are more severe, shortness of breath and coughing up blood and the Gastrointestinal symptoms include Intestinal obstruction, Bleeding, Severe difficulties in absorbing nutrients (malabsorption). Other organs can also be infected, those affected may have inflammation of the tissues that line the brain and spinal cord (meningitis), a brain abscess, or hepatitis [9].

Diagnosis

In hyperinfection syndrome, large numbers of larvae usually appear in feces or other body fluids. In immunocompromised or clinically suspected patients, a search for the parasite should be performed.Among the laboratory tools for the diagnosis of strongyloidiasis we have stool tests and serological studies.

Stool analysis

Direct microscopic analysis of feces is performed identifying Strongyloides stercolaris larvae. It has a relatively low sensitivity (< 50%) [10]. since the parasite load is generally low and larval shedding is usually intermittent. The Ritchie technique can also be performed or concentration by centrifugation can improve the sensitivity in detecting the parasite [8].

Other techniques used to improve the detection of the parasite in feces are the Baerman concentration technique and agar plate culture. The Baerman’s technique consists of the biological concentration of the larvae through thermotropism and hydrotropism, where the stool sample is exposed to water with a temperature between 37°C and 40°C, producing migration of the larvae. The sensitivity of this method can reach 72%, with a specificity of up to 100%. The agar plate culture has better sensitivity than the Baerman technique in detecting the parasite, which can reach 89% [10]. Using this technique, a stool sample is placed on an agar plate which is incubated at 37°C. the present larvae will move on the plate spreading the bacteria attached to their body, creating bacterial growth patterns that will demarcate the larval trail [11]. The increased number of stool samples processed can improve the sensitivity of the test, reaching even 100% when studying up to 7 samples [12].

The Strongyloides nucleic acid amplification test in feces by means of PCR, can improve the specificity in the diagnosis, being superior to the parasitological methods. A study compared the performance of animated PCR and real-time PCR, finding a specificity and sensitivity of 100% and 91.6% respectively for animated PCR and for real-time PCR of 84.7% and 95.8% respectively [13].

Serological tests include Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISA), Indirect Immunofluorescence Microscopy (IFI), and gelatin particle agglutination and immunoblotting. These tests have a high negative predictive value, which can exclude infection by S. stercolaris. Sensitivity up to 89% and specificity d up to 97% have been reported [14].

Treatment

In the infection of the strongyloidiasis the treatment is based on the administration of anthelmintics, ivermectin has consistently been shown to be the drug of choice to achieve parasitological cure, the recommended dose is 200 µg / kg of body weight in a single dose for 2 days with this dose a cure rate of 100% is achieved, with few side effects are reported [15].

Without forgetting other options such as albendazole, this drug has a broad anthelmintic spectrum and has been used at doses of 400 to 800 mg / day for 3 to 6 days and cure rates have been achieved that exceed 75% of cases, and in immunosuppressed patients the dose and administration time should be doubled [15].

The other anthelmintic is the thiabendazole the recommended dose is 25 mg / kg / day distributed every 8 hours and for 5 to 7 days with which 90% efficiency is reported. In cases of hyperinfection the dose should be doubled and extended for 10 days [15]. The thiabendazole is highly toxic and commonly reported adverse reactions include dizziness, nausea, vomiting, headache, abdominal pain, and diarrhea [16].

We must remember that when the patient has the hyperinfection syndrome the treatment should last at least 7 days when ivermectin is not used. In the world there is no ivermectin in parenteral presentation for use in humans, and it’s difficult in those patients with intestinal obstruction or other problems of enteric absorption [17]. So there are some cases with the use of bovine presentation, in 2000 it was the first case report of the use of subcutaneous ivermectin in a patient with HTLV-1-associated lymphoma and a diagnosis of Strongyloides sp. Hyperinfection and achieved the cure [18].

References

1. Hernández-Chavarría F. Strongyloides stercoralis: Un parásito subestimado.Parasitol Día. 2001; 25: 40-49.

2. Greaves D, Coggle S, Pollard C, Aliyu SH, Moore EM. Strongyloides stercoralis infection. BMJ. 2013; 347.

3. Campo Polanco L, Gutiérrez LA, Cardona Arias J. Diagnosis of strongyloides stercoralis infection: Meta-analysis on evaluation of conventional parasitological methods (1980-2013). Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2014; 88: 581-600.

4. Puthiyakunnon S, Boddu S, Li Y, Zhou X, Wang C, Li J, et al. Strongyloidiasis--an insight into its global prevalence and management. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014; 8.

5. Buonfrate D, Mena MA, Angheben A, Requena-Mendez A, Muñoz J, Gobbi F, et al. COHEMI project study group. Prevalence of strongyloidiasis in Latin America: A systematic review of the literature. Epidemiol Infect. 2015; 143: 452-460.

6. Hernandez Castro Carolina. Strongyloides stercoralis: Un geohelminto olvidado. Parasitologia. Medicina & Laboratorio. 2014; 20: 383-398.

7. Kassalik M, Mönkemüller K. Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2011; 7: 766-768.

8. Siddiqui AA, Berk SL. Diagnosis of strongyloides stercoralis infection.Clin Infect Dis. 2001; 33: 1040-1047.

9. Marcos LA, Terashima A, Dupont HL, Gotuzzo E. Strongyloides hyperinfection syndrome: An emerging global infectious disease. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008; 102: 314-318.

10. Campo-Polanco LF, Lina GA, Cardona AJ. Infección por strongyloides stercoralis: Metanálisis sobre evaluación de métodos diagnósticos convencionales (1980-2013). Revista Española de Salud Pública. 2014; 88: 581-600.

11. Ramanathan R, Nutman T. Strongyloides stercoralis infection in the immunocompromised host. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2008; 10: 105-110.

12. Dreyer G, Fernandes-Silva E, Alves S, Rocha A, Albuquerque R, Addiss D. Patterns of detection of strongyloides stercoralis in stool specimens: Implications for diagnosis and clinical trials. J Clin Microbiol. 1996; 34: 2569-2571.

13. Sharifdini M, Mirhendi H, Ashrafi K, Hosseini M, Mohebali M, Khodadadi H, et al. Comparison of nested polymerase chain reaction and real-time polymerase chain reaction with parasitological methods for detection of strongyloides stercoralis in human fecal samples. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015; 93: 1285-1291.

14. van Doorn HR, Koelewijn R, Hofwegen H, Gilis H, Wetsteyn JC, Wismans PJ, et al. Use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and dipstick assay for detection of Strongyloides stercoralis infection in humans. J Clin Microbiol. 2007; 45: 438-442.

15. Martínez L, Pascual MGC, Villafranca RC. García ZA. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de la estrongiloidosis. Rev Cub Med Mil. 2011; 40: 157-167.

16. Moon TD, Oberhelman RA. Antiparasitic therapy in children. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2005; 52: 917-948.

17. Hennessey DC, Ballesteros ÓA, Merchán DJ, Guevara FO, Severiche DF. Ivermectina subcutánea en el tratamiento de unsíndrome de hiperinfección por Strongyloidesstercoralis. Biomédica. 2020; 40:228-232.

18. Chiodini PL, Reid AJ, Wiselka MJ, Firmin R, Foweraker J. Parenteral ivermectin in Strongyloides hyperinfection. Lancet. 2000; 355: 43-44.

Other Articles

Article Image 1

Outcomes and Safety of Open vs. Laparoscopic Surgery in Patients with Cirrhosis

Background & Aims: The risk of laparoscopic surgery in cirrhotics remains unclear. We report on outcome and safety of open versus laparoscopic surgery in cirrhotics.

Methods: Retrospective review of cirrhotics undergoing abdominal or pelvic surgery at a university hospital from 2000 to 2010. Pre-, intra-, and post-operative data was collected. Open and laparoscopic patients were compared for post-operative outcomes including minor and major complications, hepatic decompensation, and mortality. Patients were stratified by Child-Pugh and MELD scores, and emergent vs. elective surgery. 164 total patients were identified (131 open and 31 laparoscopic).

Results: There was significantly more intra-operative blood loss (p<0.001) and minor complications (p=0.043) in the open group, but no other significant differences between the laparoscopic and open patients. All 5 deaths occurred in open patients (p=0.58). Increasing Child and MELD scores were predictive of adverse events. Overall complications, hepatic decompensation (p=0.015) and death (p<0.022) were more common in open emergent compared to open elective cases. In open emergent Child C patients, 100% had major complications and hepatic decompensation and 67% died. Of emergent open MELD>20 patients, 100% had major complications, 67% had hepatic decompensation, and 33% died.

Conclusion: Open and laparoscopic surgical approaches for cirrhotics yielded similar safety and outcomes. Child and MELD scores were predictive of adverse outcomes. Emergent cases were more likely to have complications than elective cases. Further studies including larger numbers of emergent laparoscopic patients are needed to better ascertain the risk of laparoscopy in cirrhotics.

Stanley Martin Cohen¹*, Aditya Dholakia², Thomas R VanderHeyden³, Anjana Pillai⁴ and Joseph Ahn⁵


Article Image 1

Case Series and a Review of Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is a condition observed in patients with chronic use of cannabis. It is characterized with GI symptoms including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea. The patients tend to be chronic abusers for several years and experience these symptoms in a cyclical manner similar to the cyclical vomiting syndrome. They find relief after taking hot baths, a pathognomonic feature of CHS. We hereby describe 3 cases who presented with clinical features consistent with CHS. Cannabis acts through CB1 and CB2 receptors located in brain and gastrointestinal tract, respectively. There are no standard therapeutic measures available for management of CHS. We propose the idea of using short-acting cannabinoids including dronabinol. Also review of literature suggests treatments with drugs including clonidine, lorazepam and risperidone. Recent endeavors on legalization of recreational cannabis use have initiated several debates and we should be mindful of CHS as one of its long-term complications.

Yezaz A Ghouri¹, Jay Chouhan¹, Lauren Hoffman³ and Sushovan Guha¹,²*


Article Image 1

Pharmacological Characterization of Muscarinic Receptor Subtypes Involved in Carbachol-Induced Contraction of the Chicken Proventriculus

Present study was designed to characterize the postjunctional muscarinic acetylcholine receptor mediating contraction of the chicken proventriculus by using muscarinic receptor agonists and antagonists. Muscarinic agonists caused concentration-dependent contraction. The ranking order of pEC50 values were muscarine > arecaidine propargyl ester > oxotremorine M > carbachol > methacholine > arecoline > acetylcholine > bethanechol = McN-A343 = pilocarpine. The responses to carbachol were competitively antagonized by AF-DX116 (pKb =5.9), AF-DX384 (6.84), 4-DAMP (8.79), methoctramine (5.81), pirenzepine (6.78), p-F-HHSID (7.41), atropine (8.43),tropicamide (6.91), himbacine (7.01), AQ-RA741 (6.6) and dimethindene (6.73). The correlation of pKb of the chicken proventriculus with that of the mammalian M3 receptor was the highest among five muscarinic receptors. The proventriculus membrane contained a single class of [3 H]-quinuclidinyl benzilate binding sites. pKi values of the antagonists in a binding displacement study correlated with that of the M3 subtype. Pertussis toxin(100µg/kg, i.p. for 72h) significantly decreased the contraction induced by a low concentration of carbachol. In 4-DAMP mustard and AF-DX116-pretreated muscle strips, AF-DX116 shifted the concentration-response curve for oxotremorine M to the right in the presence of 5-hydroxytryptamine and forskolin. The pKb value (6.22) was significantly higher than that obtained in the normal condition (5.78). Isoproterenol increased cyclic AMP, and carbachol significantly decreased the isoproterenol-induced increase in cyclic AMP. The results indicated that a muscarinic agonist mainly acts on the M3 receptor to cause contraction of the chicken proventriculus but the possible involvement of M2 /M4 receptors cannot be excluded as demonstrated in mammalian gastrointestinal tract.

Takio Kitazawa¹*, Nahoko Kondo¹ and Tetsuro Taneike¹


Article Image 1

A Case Report on Ulcerative Colitis with Interventional Outcomes

Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is a mucosal disease that usually involves the rectum and extends proximally to involve all or part of the colon. Main causes are gut microbiota, dysregulation of the host’s immune system, genetic susceptibility and environmental factors. Active disease can be associated with a rise in acute phase reactants [C - reactive protein (CRP)], platelet count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) and a decrease in hemoglobin. Colonoscopy is used to assess disease activity and is often performed before treatment. In this case, recurrence UC was observed and it was treated with suitable therapy but some drug interactions like metronidizole additive effect with ofloxacin results in ST-T elevation and adverse effects like abdominal pain, burning pain in midsternal area radiating to epigastric region [Calcium+Vitamin-D] were seen. Those are monitored by the alternative therapy like dose management and drug alterations.

Sandeep RJ¹, Hari HC², Jyothsna RD² and Mahender V²*


Article Image 1

Prediction and Diagnosis of Fatty Liver in Dairy Cows

Fatty liver is defined as an accumulation of fat, mainly Triacylglycerol (TAG) in liver. Fatty liver in dairy cows is categorized into mild, moderate and severe fatty liver. Obesity in pregnant cow is crucial etiological factor for postpartal development of fatty liver. Namely, obese cows have a greater decrease in feed intake during the period around parturition and, therefore, have a more severe negative energy balance during early lactation which leads to increased lipolysis of adipose tissue. Non Esterified Fatty Acids (NEFA), released from the stored TAG in the adipose tissue, are readily taken up by liver. The excess of NEFA may be converted to TAG and deposit in liver. Liver biopsy is the only reliable method for the detection of fatty liver, especially for the determination of its severity through the estimation of total lipids and TAG. Ecography may be considered as noninvasive, on-farm method for diagnosis of fatty liver which is not commonly used do to the not widely achievable equipment. Since some metabolic and endocrine parameters are significantly correlated with fatty liver degree, they may be used as diagnostic indicators of fatty liver. The significance of those indicators for diagnosis of fatty liver is present in this review. Additionally, indicators that may be used for prediction of fatty liver are explained. Specially attention was given to glucose, NEFA, BHBA, liver enzymes, total bilirubin, total protein, albumin and urea as well as some hormones involved in lipid metabolism. Achievements of novel methods, like genomic and proteomic profiling of biological fluids of diseased cows, in providing tools for diagnosis and prognosis of this metabolic disease are presented.

Danijela Kirovski¹* and Zeljko Sladojevic²


Article Image 1

Primary Gastric Lymphoma

The treatment of primary gastric lymphoma is evolving in post-rituximab era. The role of Helicobacter pyroli eradication alone can cure not only Mucosa-Associated Lymphoepithelial Tumor (MALT) but also some of diffuse large B cell lymphoma with or without MALT component. The efficacy of rituximab containing chemotherapy is so effective that the role of surgery is overshadowed. There are many studies, although most of them were retrospective trials, however it highlights the current mainstay of immune-chemotherapy provided an outstanding long term survival more than 80-90%.H pylori In real world there are substantial patients may receive surgery first, yet still needs post-operative adjuvant chemotherapy for some of them has a risk of relapse of lymphoma. And recent studies showed there’s no statistical difference between the two modalities. The main reason for patients proceeded to surgery as primary treatment is the gastroenterologist preference and showed no difference in terms of progression free survival and overall survival. The rituximab was introduced to lymphoma treatment since 1999, and demonstrated a superior long term survival in diffuse large B cell lymphoma for R-CHOP relatively to CHOP regimen. The highly effective treatment made PGL being easily curable disease; furthermore there are new insights of why and how the antibiotic therapy as exclusive treatment for limited disease will be a mainstay in treating this malignancy. We make a proposal how to treat the primary gastric lymphoma and MALT, and highlight the changing treatment modalities with regards to the integration of Helicobacter pyroli eradication to conventional chemotherapy as well as the complimentary role of surgery and radiotherapy.

Ming-Chih Chang¹* and Sung-Hsin Kuo²*


Article Image 1

Bleeding Peptic Ulcer: Epidemiology, Treatment and Prognosis

Aims: The aim of this study was to demonstrate epidemiological, clinical and endoscopic characteristics of acute Upper Gi Bleeding (UGIB) with a focus on Peptic Ulcer Bleeding (PUB).

Methods: This study included 2198 consecutive patients that were referred to our emergency department due to acute Upper Gi Bleeding (UGIB) from January 2008 to December 2012. All patients under went urgent upper GI endoscopies within 24 hours of admission, and 842 patients diagnosed with PUB were enrolled and prospectively followed.

Results: The cumulative incidence of UIGB was 126/100000 for a 5-year period. Two out of five patients had a bleeding peptic ulcer, of which 440 (52.3%) patients had a bleeding gastric ulcer, 356 (42.3%) had a bleeding duodenal ulcer, 17 (2%) had both bleeding gastric and duodenal ulcers and 29 (3.5%) patients had bleeding ulcers on gastroenteric anastomosis. PUB was more common in men. Average patient age was 65.9 years. The majority of patients with PUB were taking agents that attenuate the cytoprotective function of the gastric and duodenal mucosa (57%).Half of the patients received a red blood cell transfusion, with a median of 2.2 units. Re-bleeding occurred in 77(9.7%) patients and 47 (5.9%) required surgical intervention. The thirty-day morality was 5.2%, and 10% of patients died from uncontrolled bleeding and concomitant diseases.

Conclusion: PUB is the main cause of UGIB, characterized by a significant re-bleeding rate and mortality.

Budimir I¹, Stojsavljevic S¹*, Nikolic M¹, Kralj D¹, Biscanin A¹, Kirigin LS², Zovak M³, Babic Z⁴, Bohnec S⁵ and Budimir I⁶


Article Image 1

An Update on Hepatorenal Syndrome

The Hepatorenal Syndrome (HRS) is one of many potential causes of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in patients with decompensated liver disease.

HRS is associated with poor prognosis and represents the end-stage of a sequence of reductions in renal perfusion induced by progressively severe hepatic injury.

The pathophysiology of HRS is complex with multiple mechanisms interacting simultaneously, although HRS is primarily characterised by renal vasoconstriction.

A recently revised diagnostic criteria and management algorithm for AKI has been developed for patients with cirrhosis, allowing physicians to commence treatment promptly.

Vasopressor therapy and other general management, such as antibiotic prophylaxis, need to be initiated while patients are assessed for eligibility for transplantation. Liver transplantation remains the treatment of choice for HRS but is limited by organ shortage.

Other management options, such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, renal replacement therapy and molecular absorbent recirculating system, may provide short term benefit for patients not responding medical therapy while awaiting transplantation.

Clinicians need to be aware of the pathophysiology and management principles of HRS to provide quality care for patients with multi-organ failure.

Samuel Chan*


Article Image 1

Abdominal CT Findings of Cholecystogastric Fistula

Enteric fistulas are abnormal connections between the gastrointestinal tract and other organs, chest or skin. Fistulas between the gall bladder and the gastrointestinal system are common [1]. Cholecystoduodenal and cholecystocolic fistulas are seen frequently while cholecystogstric ones are rare [2]. In our case, we accidentally discovered a cholecystogastric fistula in a 71 years old male patient with gastric adenocarcinoma in orally and intravenous contrast enhanced abdomen CT.

Husam Vehbi¹* and Cagri Agirgun²


Article Image 1

Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Carcinomas (PostCRCs): Have we Improved Over Time?

Background and Aim: There is an increasing concern on Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Carcinomas (PostCRCs). Little is known about how these figures have evolved over time. We aim to compare the rates of PostCRCs in two periods of time and identify the risk factors.

Methods: Retrospective control-case study in our Endoscopic Unit. We studied two separate intervals (March 2004-September 2011 and October 2011 - December 2016). In both periods of time all patients diagnosed with CRC were identified. Patients with a previous colonoscopy performed 12 to 60 months before were retrieved (cases) and compared with those who did not have a previous procedure (controls).

Results: 712 and 743 patients diagnosed with CRC in both periods of time. 24 patients in the first period (3.6%) and 28 patients in the second one (3.8%) had a previous colonoscopy performed. PostCRCs were mainly located on the right side of the colon (63% vs. 35% p=0.006 and 68% vs. 33% p< 0.001), were smaller in size (3.17 vs.4.46 p< 0.001 and 3.61 vs. 4.44 p=0.086), with a tendency to host a better TNM stage. No differences in sex and age were found.

More than half of PostCRCs (58.3% and 60.7%) were attributed to procedure causes, meanwhile10 PostCRCs in both periods were considered new developed CRCs.

Conclusions: Despite what could be expected, we did not find a decrease in the rate of PostCRCs over time. A combination of preventable as much as biological factors would account for their etiology.

María Lourdes Ruiz Rebollo¹* and María Fe Muñoz Moreno²