Back to Journal

SM Virology

Advances in GCRV Research: Virus Molecular Type and Immunogen

[ ISSN : 3067-9974 ]

Abstract Keywords CITATION Introduction Discovery of Various Grass Carp Reoviruses Development of GCRV Vaccines References
Details

Received: 16-Jan-2016

Accepted: 10-Mar-2016

Published: 11-Mar-2016

Xing Ye*and Yuan-yuan Tian

Key Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Fisheries Resource Application and Cultivation, China Ministry of Agriculture; Pearl River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Guangzhou, China

Corresponding Author:

Ye Xing, China Ministry of Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China

Keywords

Grass Carp Reovirus; Molecular Type; Immunogen; Vaccine

Abstract

Grass carp reovirus, GCRV, belongs to the genus Aquareovirus (AQRV). It is the most virulent species of AQRV, and infection by GCRV causes hemorrhagic disease in grass carp. A new strain, GCRV-GD108, was found in China. Significant differences were found between GCRV-GD108 and GCRV as well as between GCRVGD108 and other known AQRVs. Moreover, similarities were found between GCRV-GD108 and Orthoreovirus (ORV), suggesting a closer evolutionary relationship between GCRV-GD108 and ORV than between GCRVGD108 and the known AQRVs. The discovery of different virus molecular types of GCRV indicates the importance of molecular diagnosis and the development of a specific vaccine. Vaccines have been developed that include inactivated tissue vaccines, inactivated cell vaccines, and attenuated viral vaccines. Great efforts have been made in recent years to investigate immunogen for the preparation of genetically engineered vaccines, which are expected to provide protection for the cultured grass carp.

Keywords

Grass Carp Reovirus; Molecular Type; Immunogen; Vaccine

CITATION

Ye X and Tian Y. Advances in GCRV Research: Virus Molecular Type and Immunogen. SM Virol. 2016; 1(1): 1003.

Introduction

The grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) is one of the most important aquaculture species in China. However, grass carp are vulnerable to pathogens such as GCRV, which can cause severe hemorrhage, resulting in a high mortality rate. GCRV was first isolated in China in 1983[1] and has been recognized by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTVs) as a species belonging to the genus Aquareovirus (AQRV) [2]. GCRV is icosahedral in symmetry with a diameter ranging between 70 and 90 nm. Its genome consists of 11 segments of dsRNA that are packaged into a two-shell capsid without an envelope. Through years of effort, great progress has been achieved in the study of the biological characteristics, invasion, replication, and assembly mechanism of GCRV [3-5], as well as in vaccine development [6-8]. In recent years, different molecular types of GCRV have been discovered, indicating the importance of the preparation of specific vaccines in order to effectively prevent hemorrhagic disease.

Discovery of Various Grass Carp Reoviruses

The reovirus that infects fish belongs to AQRV, which usually possesses a genome of 11 dsRNA segments. Seven AQRV genetic groups were established (designated A to G) in genus AQRV, and GCRV belongs to AQRV-C [9,10]. GCRV-873 is the representative strain of GCRV, and it is the f irst strain for which the entire genomic sequence was obtained [11]. In 2009, our group isolated a strain, GCRV-GD108, from diseased grass carp in Guangdong province, China, and proved that it is the pathogen responsible for the hemorrhage disease [12]. We obtained the entire sequence of the genome segment. Significant differences were found between GCRV-GD108 and GCRV-873, as well as between GCRV-GD108 and other known AQRVs [12]. Further investigations and comparisons of virus strains in Guangdong, Fujian, Hunan, and other provinces in China demonstrated that they share high molecular homology with GCRV-GD108, indicating that GCRV-GD108 is a representative strain in southern China [13].

GCRV-GD108 could be classified as belonging to the genus AQRV, according to criteria of demarcation [12]. However, it also exhibited a number of differences in relation to known species of AQRV. These include the following: 1) The VP5 of GCRV-GD108 did not exhibit high homology to AQRVs (24–25%), whereas among different AQRVs, VP5 exhibited high sequence identity (57 92%), suggesting that GCRV-GD108 may be a new species of AQRV;2) the GCRV-GD108 sigma 1-like protein (encoded by S7) was absent in AQRVs; 3)the S10 gene of GCRV-GD108 encoded a protein that was not homologous to the VP7 protein of AQRVs, and no homology to VP7 was found in GCRV-GD108[12].Furthermore, GCRV-GD108 displayed a closer evolutionary relationship to Orthoreovirus (ORV) than to the known species of AQRV. For example, like the ORVs, GCRV GD108 caused no syncytia, where as syncytia is a typical cytopathic effect of infection in a majority of AQRVs; the sigma-1-like protein encoded by S7 of GCRV-GD108, which was absent in AQRVs, was homologous to mammalian orthoreoviruses (MRVs).

To date, the full genomic sequences of at least 11 strains of GCRV have been obtained [14-18]. Most of these were isolated in China, except for the golden shiner reovirus (GSRV) and the American grass carp reovirus (AGCRV), which were isolated in the USA [19,20]. T hese strains could be divided into three groups [17]: The first group includes GCRV-GD108 and most strains of GCRV, the second group includes GCRV-873, and the third group contains only one member, GCRV-104(HGDRV) [18]. A phylogenetic tree has been constructed based on the sequences of the RdRp of AQRVs and ORVs in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Phylogenetic tree built based on the putative amino acid sequence of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, VP2 of partial members of Aquareovirus and Orthoreovirus, using Maximum parsimony method (MEGA5.03). Scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per aligned a position giving rise to the phylogram. Orthoreovirus: ARV (Avian orthoreoviruses, GenBank accession no. ACH72476); NBV (Nelson Bay orthoreoviruses, AEQ49381); BroV tentative Orthoreovirus species, ACU68602; BRV (Baboon orthoreovirus, strain Baboon reovirus, AEK86190; MRV (Mammalian orthoreovirus, strain Type 1 Lang, AAA47234); PRV (tentative Orthoreovirus species, strain Reovirus Salmo/GP-2010/NOR, GU994015). Aquareovirus: AQRV-A (strain Scophthalmus maximus reovirus, ADZ31977); AQRV-C (strain grass carp reovrius 873, AAG10436.1); AQRV-G (strain AGCRV PB01-155, ABV01040); tentative Aquareovirus species, strain GCRV GD108, ADT79734.1; tentative Aquareovirus species, strain GCRV-104, AFG73673.

A more detailed phylogenetic tree based on AQRVs and ORVs structural proteins can be referred to in the work of Nibert and Duncan [14]. The virus genotypes in diseased grass carp isolated in southern China by our group were similar to that of GCRV-GD108, and a low detection rate of GCRV-873 and GCRV-104 (HGDRV) was found by several other groups [private communication]. Whether these two genotypes, GCRV-873 and GCRV-104 (HGDRV), are now pathogenic to grass carp remains unknown. Regardless, the existence of various genotypes of GCRV suggests the importance of molecular diagnosis and the development of a specific vaccine.

Development of GCRV Vaccines

Because of the significant importance of grass carp aquaculture industry in China, great efforts have been made in the development of vaccines to prevent grass carp hemorrhage disease. In the early 1960s, an inactivated tissue vaccine was developed using the formalin-inactivated method to treat the diseased fish tissues, and it demonstrated efficacy in the prevention of hemorrhagic disease [8]. However, it has limitations, which include finite sources and regional variability. In the 1980s, a grass carp kidney cell line was successfully established, and inactivated viral vaccines were subsequently prepared [6-8]. In the late 1990s, an attenuated viral vaccine for grass carp was developed, which showed a 100% survival rate and immune protection rate [7]. This attenuated viral vaccine had obtained its approval number as a veterinary drug product in 2011 and is the first one permitted for use in Chinese aquaculture.

Compared with inactivated and attenuated viral vaccines, a genetically engineered vaccine has the advantages of low cost, no pathogencity, etc. However, selection of the appropriate antigen is the prerequisite for the preparation of a genetically engineered vaccine. T herefore, great efforts have been made in recent years to investigate the immunogen of GCRV for vaccine design.

The GCRV capsid structure has two layers: a turreted core enclosed by an outer capsid shell [21]. The core consists of three proteins (VP1, VP3, and VP6), while the outer shell is constituted by VP5/VP7 dimers. The immunogenicity of the VP5 and VP7 proteins of GCRV has been well demonstrated [22-24]. Recently, Hao et al. further demonstrated that VP7 proteins induce a stronger immune response in grass carp than the other GCRV structural proteins, implying that the VP7 protein could be used as a preferred immunogen for vaccine design [25].

In contrast to other AQVRs, 11 dsRNA segments of GCRV GD108 encoded 11 proteins instead of 12 proteins. No homology to the VP7 protein of AQRVs was found in GCRV-GD108, while a homologous protein of MRV sigma-1-like protein encoded by the S7 gene of GCRV-GD108 was found to exist [12]. Our group demonstrated that this sigma-1-like protein possessed strong immunogenicity and protection efficiency, and it is supposed to be a cell attachment protein. Further investigation of its function is ongoing [unpublished data]. The VP4 protein encoded by the M6 gene of GCRV-GD108 is supposed to be a major outer capsid protein, and we have also demonstrated that a polyclonal antibody against recombinant VP4 protein could prevent viral infection efficiently and that recombinant VP4 protein provides good protection for grass carp, with a protection rate as high as 82% [26]. A genetically engineered vaccine of GCRV-GD108 that can provide effective protection has recently been developed by our group, and we are now applying for field trial. This vaccine is expected to be applied in grass carp aquaculture in the near future.

References

1. Chen BS, Jiang Y. Morphological and physico-chemical characterization of the hemorrhagic virus of grass carp. KexueTongbao. 1984; 29: 832-835.

2. Francki RIB, Fauquet CM, Knudson DL, Brown F. Classification and nomenclature of viruses. Fifth report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Arch. Viorl. 1991; 2: 186-192.

3. Fang Q, Ke LH, Cai YQ. Growth characterization and high titre culture of GCHV. Virol. Sin. 1989; 3: 314-339.

4. Zhang X, Jin L, Fang Q, Hui WH, Zhou ZH. 3.3 A cryo-EM structure of a nonenveloped virus reveals a priming mechanism for cell entry. Cell. 2010; 141: 472-482.

5. Cheng L, Fang Q, Shah S, Atanasov IC, Zhou ZH. Subnanometer-resolution structures of the grass carp reovirus core and virion. J Mol Biol. 2008; 382: 213-222.

6. Yang XL, Xia C, Zuo WG. Inactive vaccine for hemorrhage of grass carp: comparison of immunogenicity and immunizing dose between two strains. Journal of Fisheries of China.1989; 13: 138-144.

7. Xu SY, Li HL, Deng GC, Jiang L. The preparation and immune effect of attenuated live vaccine obtained through cell culture for hemorrhage of grass carp. Journal of Fisheries of China.1994; 18:110-117.

8. Zeng L, Yang X, He L, Ai X, He J, Zuo W. Batch processing technology of cell cultured killed vaccine against the hemorrhage of grass carp. J Fishery Sci China. 1998; 5: 62-67.

9. Rangel AA, Rockemann DD, Hetrick FM, Samal SK. Identification of grass carp haemorrhage virus as a new genogroup of aquareovirus. J Gen Virol. 1999; 80: 2399-2402.

10. Attoui H, Mertens PPC, Becnel J, Belaganahalli S, Bergoin M, et al. Reoviridae. In: King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ, editors. Virus Taxonomy: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. San Diego: Elsevier/Academic Press. 2012; 541-637.

11. Qiu T, Lu RH, Zhang J, Zhu ZY. Molecular characterization and expression of the M6 gene of grass carp hemorrhage virus (GCHV), an aquareovirus. Arch Virol. 2001; 146: 1391-1397.

12. Ye X, Tian YY, Deng GC, Chi YY, Jiang XY. Complete genomic sequence of a reovirus isolated from grass carp in China. Virus Res. 2012; 163: 275-283.

13. Chi YY, Tian YY, Ye X, Deng GC, Li J, Wang HJ. Molecular properties of grass carp reovirus in southern China and establishment of a duplex PCR detection method. Chin J Virol. 2011; 27: 358-364.

14. Nibert ML, Duncan R. Bioinformatics of recent aqua- and orthoreovirus isolates from fish: evolutionary gain or loss of FAST and fiber proteins and taxonomic implications. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e68607.

15. Zhang Q Y, Gui J F. Virus genomes and virus-host interactions in aquaculture animals. Sci China Life Sci. 2015; 58: 156-169.

16. Wang Q, Zeng W, Liu C, Zhang C, Wang Y, Shi C, et al. Complete genome sequence of a reovirus isolated from grass carp, indicating different genotypes of GCRV in China. J Virol. 2012; 86: 12466.

17. Pei C, Ke F, Chen ZY, Zhang QY. Complete genome sequence and comparative analysis of grass carp reovirus strain 109 (GCReV-109) with other grass carp reovirus strains reveals no significant correlation with regional distribution. Arch Virol. 2014; 159: 2435-2440.

18. Fan Y, Rao S, Zeng L, Ma J, Zhou Y, Xu J, et al. Identification and genomic characterization of a novel fish reovirus, Hubei grass carp disease reovirus, isolated in 2009 in China. J Gen Virol. 2013; 94: 2266-2277.

19. Plumb JA, Bowser PR, Grizzle JM, Mitchell AJ. Fish viruses: a double stranded RNA icosahedral virus from a North American cyprinid. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. 1979; 36: 1390-1394.

20. Mohd Jaafar F, Goodwin AE, Belhouchet M, Merry G, Fang Q, Cantaloube JF, et al. Complete characterisation of the American grass carp reovirus genome (genus Aquareovirus: family Reoviridae) reveals an evolutionary link between aquareoviruses and coltiviruses. Virology. 2008; 373: 310-321.

21. Zhu J, Cheng L, Fang Q, Zhou ZH, Honig B. Building and refining protein models within cryo-electron microscopy density maps based on homology modeling and multiscale structure refinement. J Mol Biol. 2010; 397: 835-51.

22. Zhang LL, Lei CF, Fan C, Fang Q, Jin-yu SHEN, Gui-jie HAO. Expression of outer capsid protein VP5 of Grass carp reovirus and analysis of its immunogenicity. Virol Sin. 2009; 24: 545-551.

23. He Y, Xu H, Yang Q, Xu D, Lu L. The use of an in vitro micro neutralization assay to evaluate the potential of recombinant VP5 protein as an antigen for vaccinating against grass carp reovirus. Virol J. 2011; 8: 132.

24. Shao L, Sun X, Fang Q. Antibodies against outer-capsid proteins of grass carp reovirus expressed in E. coli is capable of neutralizing viral infectivity. Virol J. 2011; 8: 347.

25. Hao GJ, Yuan XM, Pan XY, Xu Y, Yao JB, Lin LY, et al. The construction of pEGFP-n1-vp7 containing GCRV VP7 gene and studies on its immune efficacy. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica. 2015; 39: 751-757.

26. Tian Y, Ye X, Zhang L, Deng G, Bai Y. Development of a novel candidate subunit vaccine against grass carp reovirus Guangdong strain (GCRV GD108). Fish Shellfish Immunology. 2013; 35: 351-356.

Other Articles

Article Image 1

The Oncogenesis of John Cunningham Virus

The John Cunningham Virus (JCV) was isolated in culture from the brain of a case of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) complicating Hodgkin’s disease. JCV contains icosahedral capsids that are composed of three structural viral proteins and small, circular, double-stranded DNA genomes. JCV is a member of the polyomaviridae family and infects a large proportion of the population worldwide and may cause PML upon immunodeficiency. When the immune system is defective, JCV may be activated. JCV can be found in tonsillar tissue, and the respiratory and digestive tracts are deemed to be the leading sites for JCV to enter human body. Transgenic mouse model showed that T antigen might induce lung and lens tumors with tissue specificity, which is not linked to alternative splicing of its intron. Taken together, T antigen is considered to play a significant role in JCV oncogenesis. In future, we will establish transgenic mice expressing T antigen in various cells using cell-specific promoter and clarify the pathomolecular mechanisms of T-antigen-related tumors and its tissue specificity of oncogenesis.

Lei Fang1 and Hua-chuan Zheng2*


Article Image 1

Effects of Antiviral Treatment on Chronic Hepatitis B-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Recurrence after Surgical Treatment

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and aggressive malignancies, and the high rate of recurrence is a major obstacle to improving prognosis. Chronic Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) is one of the major causes of HCC, and high viral replication rate and related hepatic inflammation are major risk factors of HCC recurrence after surgical resection. Current approved antiviral medications for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B are interferon-α (IFNα) and nucleos (t) ide analogues (NAs), including lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, telbivudine, entecavir, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. IFNα treatment significantly reduces HBV-related HCC in sustained responders, but its usage is limited by adverse effects. NAs treatment significantly reduces disease progression into cirrhosis and thus HCC incidence, especially in HBV e antigen-positive patients. However, the long-term continuous treatment of NAs may result in drug resistance due to viral mutations. The effect of IFNα treatment on HCC recurrence remains controversial, while evidence has suggested that postoperative NAs therapy can improve both recurrence-free survival and overall survival in patients with HBV-related HCC. There is a great need to develop more effective and affordable new agents with a better safety record. More high-quality prospective trials are needed to quantitatively estimate treatment efficacy and identify predictive factors of HCC development and progression.

Xiaomei Hou1, Jue Wang2 and Yan Du2*


Article Image 1

The Power of GPR for Predicting Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis May Be Affected By Different Scoring Systems of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B

We read with interest the article by Maud Lemoine et al [1] recently published in Gut. They found that Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT)-to-Platelet Ratio (GPR) may be acted as a simple, non-invasive and inexpensive alternative to liver biopsy and Fibro scan laboratory model in sub-Saharan Africa. The GPR was significantly better than Aspartate Transaminase-To-Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) [2] and Fib-4 (based on age, ALT, AST and platelet count) [3] in predicting liver extensive fibrosis (≥F2) and cirrhosis (≥F4) in patients with Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) in the Gambia and Senegal, but not in France. So we hypothesized that the predictive efficiency of these 3 markers may be heterogeneous in different race.

Xueping Yu1,2, Jiming Zhang2* and Zhijun Su1*


Article Image 1

Vital Role of Phylogenetic Analysis as Evidence in Illegal Investigation of Virus Transmission

During recent years phylogenetic analysis has become progressively popular as a tool for the criminal investigation of viral transmission, where it is used to derive the ancestral relationships of viral infections from sampled genome sequences. It has been used to cases involving the transmission of the fast-evolving human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [1], Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) [2,3], hepatitis E (HEV) [4] and for tracking viral transmission in animal field. For example, for the first time phylogenetic analysis determined that the source of viral disease in aquaculture [5,6,7]. Aspects of the transmission of these viruses are impressed on the genetic variation of genomes [8]. These data revealed information about the patterns of virus emergence, viral epidemiology and evolutionary dynamics [9,8]. Analysis of molecular phylogenetic relationships must be based on a domain with a suitable level of evolution for the issue under investigation. Evaluation of recent transmission events requires the analysis of fast-evolving regions, whereas older events must be studied by sequencing more stable regions [2]. This analysis investigates small difference in virus genome using computational methods to calculate the variation between strains of viruses. This process is a critical complex scientific process which undertaken by virologist. The result of phylogenetic analysis has recently applied in illegal trials as evidence of responsibility for virus transmission [10]. In these events, the expert analysis of virologist has been discovered to be of critical importance. In the other hand, these trials can be applied to acquit individuals and keep out the possibility that defendant was responsible for virus transmission [10,11,8]. It is important to note that molecular analysis cannot prove the transmission virus between two individual, but it can support any information on the direction of that transmission [10,1]. It is necessary for molecular phylogenetic analysis to use the right comparison samples, because inappropriate samples could overstate the relationship between two viruses (of different geographical origin) as being conspicuously unique. In addition, many viruses frequently recombine and cause further opportunity for genetic novelty viral transmission from data commonly based on phylogenetic analysis [8]. Also, models of virus transmission and early diversification are the most important result of phylogenetic study. For example, Zika virus emerged in Africa and now circulates on all inhabited continents [12,13]. In another study demonstrated that isolated Dengue virus type 1 strain from Indonesia has a close phylogenetic relationship with strains of Japan [14]. In the recent decade, phylogenetic studies have matured with focus on the human RNA viruses such as influenza virus, HIV, dengue virus and HCV [8-10,15]. However, there are wide ranges of viruses to which phylogenetic analysis are used [9,16-18]. This review shortly outlines the importance of phylogenic analysis for viral transmission with focus on virus origin and shows phylogenetic approach to identify ecological and biological of virus transmission.

Maryam Dadar*


Article Image 1

Serosurveillance of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Ruminant Population of Karnataka, India

Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD) is endemic in India and three serotypes viz, O, A, and Asia-1are prevalent in the country. In the current study a total of 7923 serum samples were collected randomly from 4639 cattle, 1363 buffaloe, 1187 sheep and 734 goats from different districts of Karnataka state, India. The samples were screened for antibodies against Non-Structural Proteins (NSPs) and Structural Proteins (SPs) of FMD virus to gather evidence with respect to the FMD virus circulation. The study revealed NSP antibodies in 33% bovines and 16% small ruminants. Higher level of NSP antibodies was observed in cattle (35%), buffaloes (27%), goats (23%) and lower prevalence in sheep (12%).The antibodies against SP was observed in 78% bovines and 18% small ruminants. The study reiterates the importance of strengthening of FMD surveillance in small ruminants as they could pose a potential risk of virus transmission to cattle.

Raveendra Hegde1*, Madhusudan Hosamani2 , Sreevatsava V1 , Rashmi KM1 , Srikanth Kowalli1 , K Nagaraja1 , NK Dharanesha1 , CM Seema1 , GV Nagaraj1 , K Srikala1 , KJ Sudharshana1 , SheshaRao1 , Rajashekar B1 , P Giridhara1 , and SM Byregowda1


Article Image 1

Discovery and Roles of Virus-Encoded RNA Silencing Suppressors

RNA silencing is a general surveillance system in plants and animals which could protect hosts from virus infection. However, many virus species survived by expressing a series of proteins named as RNA Silencing Suppressors (RSSRs) to counteract this defense system. This review elaborated the newly discovered RSSRs encoded by virus including the recently discovered polymerase slippage product and some newly-identified RSSRs in mammalian cells. This review will also provide a comprehensive understanding of the role of RSSRs during the virus infection, especially with regard to its newly identified function in epidemic modification in hosts.

Ma Lin*


Article Image 1

Zika and Its Preparedness in Nepalese Scenario

Zika virus came to known to public in 1947, when it was first isolated from a Rhesus monkey from Uganda [1-3]. Due to its unremitting spread in past decade, zika virus created havoc and gained its recognition as one of the prominent threat in public health across the globe [4-7]. In the March of 2015, Brazil confirmed its first zika infection. Following the zika cases, country had to face erupted increment in microcephaly cases [8]. In next nine month span, the cases of microcephaly increased from 150 cases to 400. After observing this trend, PAHO (Pan American Health Organization) issued an epidemiological alert on December 1st 2015, warning a suspected link between Zika and microcephaly [9].

Bishnu Prasad Upadhya1, Rajani Malla1, Krishna Das Manandhar1, Birendra Prasad Gupta2*, Anurag Adhikari2 , Ramanuj Rauniyar3, Chirik Shova Tamarkar4 , Bimlesh Kumar Jha5 and Roshan Kurmi6


Article Image 1

Long-Term Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B with Normal Alanine Aminotransferas

Background: The Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) level is considered as a risk factor for the progression to liver cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) in patients infected with Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and remains a subject of debate.

Methods: We prospectively compared the incidence of HCC between HBV infected patients with normal ALT and those with elevated ALT.

Result: A total of 378 HBV-infected patients (102 with normal ALT and 276 with elevated ALT) were included. The median follow-up period was 8.2 years. The incidence rates of HCC development were significantly lower in the normal ALT patients than in patients with elevated ALT (0.55 vs 2.20 per 100 person-years, P = 0.021, while the incidence rates of hepatic decompensation (0.43 vs 1.23 per 100 person-years) and survival (53.8% vs 47.4% at 10 years) did not significantly differ between the two groups (Kaplan-Meir analysis). The main causes of death were on-hepatic diseases in patients with normal ALT. Multivariate Cox analyses model revealed that the risk of HCC was lower in patients with normal ALT than in patients with elevated ALT (hazard ratio (HR), 0.28, Confidence intervals (CI) (0.14-0.78)), while the risk of hepatic decompensation and mortality was the same in the two groups of patients.

Conclusion: The risk for HCC and liver decompensation normal ALT was markedly reduced in HBV-patients with normal ALT. Aged patients with HBV with normal ALT should therefore maintain long-term surveillance for HCC. Future studies aimed to better identify those with remaining long-term risk for HCC are needed.

Blaise K Kutala1,2,3*, Emilie Estrabaud1 , Nathalie Boyer2,3, Corinne Castelnau³, Nathalie Giuily2,3, T Asselah1,3 and P Marcellin1,2,3


Article Image 1

LncRNA: A Rising Star in Virus-Host Cross-Talk during HIV-1 Infection

The Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a retrovirus that has been aroused worldwide concern, due to its chronic and persistent infection, ultimately leading to a causal result of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are non-protein coding transcript longer than 200 Base Pairs (bp) and being considered to be key regulators that involved in various biological processes, such as chromatin modification, transcriptional regulation, post-transcriptional regulation, intracellular trafficking and etc. What deserves to be noticed is that lncRNAs are recently being reported to link with viruses closely, and lncRNAs are differentially expressed after a variety of virus infections, including HIV-1 infection. In this paper, we review the rapidly advancing field of lncRNAs, focus on the current progress of lncRNAs in HIV-1 infection, and briefly discuss their different roles in host gene regulation and viral replication during the establishment or maintenance of viral latency. Interestingly, lncRNAs may emerge as novel biomarkers of antiviral drugs and provide potential targets for new therapeutics of AIDS.

Liujun Chen1 , Shanshan Xu1 , Luoshiyuan Zuo3 , Song Han1,2, Jun Yin1,2, Biwen Peng1,2, Xiaohua He1,2 and Wanhong Liu1,2*


Article Image 1

Fungal Viruses: Promising Fundamental Research and Biological Control Agents of Fungi

Fungal viruses (mycoviruses) exist in all major groups of fungi. The primary focus of this review is viruses of filamentous fungi, especially plant pathogens, with emphasis on the molecular characterization of fungus-virus interactions. There are two main hypotheses about the origin of mycoviruses isolated from plant pathogenic fungi. The origin of these mycoviruses may be ancient but they may also have evolved from plant viruses. Many characterized mycoviruses are in unencapsidated dsRNA forms without any coat protein in fungi. Mycoviruses are efficiently spread in two ways, vertically by spore formation and horizontally via hyphal fusion. Replication cycle of RNA mycoviruses doesn’t have the extracellular route of infection under natural conditions. Typically, fungal infections cause no obvious phenotypic alterations. Although the interaction of mycoviruses and their host is largely limited, those aspects including the transcriptional profiling and RNA silencing are of help to understand the co-existence mechanism of virus and fungi. Mycoviruses are potential agents of biological control of important plant pathogenic fungi.

Shuangchao Wang1,2, Marc Ongena2 , Dewen Qiu1 and Lihua Guo1*