Back to Journal

International Journal of Fisheries Science and Research

Reconstruction of Historical Fisheries Profile of Cameroon

Abstract Citation Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion References
Details

Received: 28-Aug-2018

Accepted: 07-Sep-2018

Published: 12-Sep-2018

Nyatchouba Nsangue Bruno Thierry, Richard Kindong and Liuxiong Xu*

Department of Marine Sciences, shanghai Ocean University, China

Corresponding Author:

Liuxiong Xu, Department of Marine Sciences, shanghai Ocean University, China

Keywords

Small Scale Fisheries; Catches; production; Industrial Fishing; Aquaculture; EEZ; Inland Fishing

Abstract

This work attempts to reconstruct historical fisheries profile by filling in the missed underestimated catch information for some reasons of industrial fishing, artisanal fishing, inland fishing, illegal fishing, discards and aquaculture production of Cameroon from 1950 to 2016.This reconstruction was carried out based on data published by various authors, the Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock (MINEPIA), the Limbe Research Center on Fisheries and Oceans and FAO reports. The dataset allowed us to reconstruct the fishing profile of Cameroon by completing the missing data by interpolation. Then we compare the data obtained with those of FAO. Reconstructed catches were estimated at 13,834 tons and aquaculture production was estimated at 19 tons in 1950 compared to 12,000 tons and 14 tons published by FAO, With the agricultural reforms and development of projects focused on the primary industry, catches increased around 94,122 tons in 1977(compared to 70,167 tons reported by the FAO) to 102,975 tons in 1981(compared to 79,761 tons reported by the FAO), declined to 78,790 tons in 1986 because of the reduction of the Exclusive Economic Zone of Cameroon (EEZ) by the geographical presence of the insular part of Equatorial Guinea (Malabo Island), then increased to 186,204 tons in 2005(compared to 142,345 tons reported by the FAO), declined to 154,800 tons in 2008(compared to 129,000 tons reported by the FAO). Since 2011 it became stable and reached around 240,000 tons against 220,000 tons published by FAO. Overall, there are discrepancies between the reconstructed data and the data provided to FAO: the reconstructed data is 30% higher than the FAO data. This information about fisheries production in Cameroonian waters shows that many locals, fisheries managers and stakeholders depends on fish products for either incomes or food safety; therefore, the recent decline of fish production in Cameroon is of no good sign to the abovementioned persons. These observed fish production decline indirectly threatens the food security of the people of Cameroon and low financial income to the state coffers.

Citation

Thierry NNB, Kindong R and Xu L. Reconstruction of Historical Fisheries Profile of Cameroon. Int J Fisheries Sci Res. 2018; 2(2): 1008.

Introduction

Cameroon is located in central Africa, bordering Nigeria to the west, Chad to the northeast, the Central African Republic to the east, and Equatorial Guinea, Gabon and the Republic of the Congo to the south.

Cameroon coastline is about 402 km long extending from the border with Equatorial Guinea, south of the Campo River estuary (2°20’N) to the Nigerian border north of Akwayafe River (4°40’ N) (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Map of Cameroon representing its main maritime coastline borders (after, SNH/CPSP-ENVIREP, 2007).

The continental shelf area (up to 200 m depth) is about 13,000-14,000 km2, while the total Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) area is around 15,000 km2 (Folack & Galega, 1997). The territorial sea (50nm) is limited by the presence of the Island of Malabo (Equatorial Guinea). This coastline is characterized by estuaries, mangrove forests, muddy and sandy bottoms, and a dense river network as seen in Figure 1[1].

Abundant and varied fish populations show a clear predominance of warm water species. Cameroonian industrial fisheries and artisanal fisheries is dominated mainly by Parapenaeopsis atlantica (Guinea shrimp), Penaeus kerathurus (the Caramote prawn), Ethmalosa fimbriata; Sardinella maderensis; Pseudotolithus elongatus; Pseudotolithus senegalensis; Pseudotolithus typus; Chloroscumbus chrysurus, Penaeus monodon (tiger shrimp),Ethmalosa fimbriata and Sardinellamaderensis [2]. Inland fishery is dominated mainly by: Tilapia sp. Lates niloticus, Clarias spp., Heterobranchus, Auchenoglanis spp, Labeo spp., Mormyrus spp., Hemichromis sp. (Nguenga 2002; Gordon 1989, [3]. Freshwater aquaculture is dominated mainly by Nile tilapia, common carp and northern African catfish.

Presently, in Cameroon there is no data collection system in place for both marine and inland fisheries. The ARTFISH software, designed for collecting data on artisanal landings was put in place in Cameroon in 1998 by FAO and used in the 1995 frame survey. This program since then has been abandoned. Existing statistics in the artisanal sector are just vague estimations and extrapolations and the actual volume of fish production in this sector is unknown and ‘bycatch‘ is not taken into account in the national statistics, due to lack of log books on vessels [2].

Collection of fishery statistical data in both the marine and inland sectors is rendered difficult by many factors including: 1) inadequate funding by government of the MINEPIA regional and divisional services and Fisheries Research Stations responsible for data collection [4], 2) the absence of landings of fisheries products in the Douala port by majority industrial fishing vessels fishing in Cameroon waters [5,6] & Ngoande, 2011) and 3)the multiplicity, fragmentary nature of distribution and difficult access to majority of the fishing camps both inland and along the coast. Here, we used data from documents published by Cameroonian fishery authorities, FAO and some research articles respectively in an attempt to reconstruct historical profile for Cameroon fishery. The result will be benefit to address the lack of fisheries catch data in Cameroon, improve the statistical system of fishing in Cameroon and analyze the impact of the different fisheries sectors.

Methods

Artisanal fishing

Different literature sources for different recorded data years such as: for 1967 and 1970, 1980 [7], 1987 [8], 1990 (Bamou 1997), 2003 [9], 2009 [2], 2012 (Anon 2013) and Minepia [10,11] have allowed us to collect some data to be able to reconstruct the artisanal catches. According to [12], artisanal catches were 20% higher in 1967 than in 1950, indicating the upward trend in the view point of documented catches (Lagoin and Salmon, 1970) percentage that allows us to estimate catches between 1950 and 1967 knowing the catch of 1950. We interpolated to determine the missing catches between 1950 and 2016.

Industrial Fishing

Following hypothesis presented by [12], the contributions of catches in Gabon were assumed to have increased linearly from 30% in 1960 to 80% in 1970 before drastically falling to zero in 1973. Data on industrial catches come from Douala by the National Institute of Statistics Cameroon, which is responsible for collecting industrial catches; however, data presented on their website are incomplete. In addition, catches exported by transshipment at sea, landed in Nigeria or landed at the Tiko military port are not reported [2,12].

The landed recorded data provided by different literature sources between 1950 and 2016 [13,7] Bamou, 1997; Djama and NNa Abo’o, 1999; Nnana Noah, 2010 [2,4,5] were interpolated and these provided us an insight on estimating shrimp fishing experience indicated that the fish to shrimp ratio in the catch is usually 4 to 1, i.e, 4 kg fish per kg shrimp, but only half of the fish caught is reported. This approach is very conservative because it assumes that all shrimp catches by the shrimp trawlers are reported and that all catches by demersal trawlers are also reported. Similarly, crab catches represent 1.33 times the shrimp catch. We applied this rate to shrimp catches and estimated unreported crab catches. Based on data from the Limbe Fisheries and Oceanographic Research Center (Oumarou NJIFONJOU 1996), the data from the 2014 to 2016 annual reports published by the MINEPIA allowed us to reconstitute the catches of the industrial fishery between 1950 to 2016 and by interpolating we determined the catches by species which permitted us to have an idea on the state of industrial catches.

Inland fisheries in Cameroon

Some authors have estimated catches in inland waters such as Van der Knapp who estimated catches in the Lagdo River in 1960, 1990 and 1991. Core Crul (1992) who estimated the production in the Mbakaou and Bamendjin dams respectively and in 2003 Tiotsop estimated fish production in inland waters and lakes in Cameroon. Thus, to evaluate the catches of the inland waters of Cameroon, we rely on data published by various authors in rivers and lakes such as Jean Calvin Njock (1993), Gabche et al (2001), Njifonjou, (12), Nguenga (2002), the report of the national statistical institute (statistical yearbook of Cameroon, editions 2014 and 2015) and then we compared with those published by the FAO from 1980 to 2016. Then, we interpolated these various data to be able to reconstruct fishing catches in the inland waters of Cameroon between 1950 and 2016.

Aquaculture in Cameroon

Fish farming started in Cameroon in 1948. By 1952, the colonial administration had built 22 aquaculture demonstration stations to strengthen the sector. In 1960, the number of private fishponds exceeded 10,000 (Satia1991). However, soon after independence in 1960, most ponds were abandoned. The development of the Cameroonian aquaculture sector since independence has been driven largely by international donors (Kouam 2002). Production is estimated in Cameroon in various large aquaculture production areas between the 1950s and the 1970s at: Noun estimated at 1263 kg/ha/years, Menoua estimated at 1600 kg/ha/years, Menne estimated at 2000 and Lekier estimated at 2100 (world fish center, 2008). This allows us to apply on average the data estimated in number of hectare of some years which have only the number of hectare per year as from 1950 to 1960 to apply an average of 1745.75 kg/ha/years.

We therefore took the data published in 2008 by Victor Pouomogne for IRAD Cameroon (Agricultural Research Institute for Development) and Diemuth E. Pemsl for The World Fish Center, Penang, Malaysia those published by the MINEPIA (statistical yearbook of Cameroon 2014 and 2015 editions) and finally we interpolated to find the data for the other missing years. Then we compared with those published by the FAO from 1980 to 2016.

Discards

Approximately 25% of trawl shrimp catches are discarded [2]. Herein, we multiplied the estimated industrial shrimp catches by 25% to estimate discards from 1950 to 2016. For the demersal trawl, Kelleher (2005) estimated that 0.6% of demersal trawl catches were discarded. Thus, demersal trawl discards range between 0.6% for demersal trawlto 25% fortrawl shrimp, we average these two values and applied 12.8% to the estimated industrial fishing catches between 1950 and 2016 because the industrial fleet is essentially composed of demersal trawlers and shrimp trawlers.

Illegal Fishing

Illegal fishing of foreign fishing boats was first reported in 1989 [2], the activities included catch caught in Cameroon water transshipped at high sea, then landed in foreign ports most often in Equatorial Guinea and Nigeria. 

According to FAO report, the annual output value of illegal fishing is estimated at $ 10 billion worldwide, among which $ 2 billion from African coastal waters. Aline Joel estimates that about 30% of the seafood extracted from oceans has not been included in any catch report (Aline Joel LEMBE. 2014). So, we apply this 30% to Cameroon’s industrial production.

Results

The species fished Industrial fishing in Cameroon, exclusively bottom trawling (trawlers) and shrimp and shrimp fishing, exploits only demersal species, with catches mostly found under 30 meters depth Njock 1990. Four families make up more than 80% of the catches landed in Cameroon, i.e, the Scianidae (Pseudotolithus spp.), Cynoglossidae (Cynoglossiis spp.), Ariidae (Anusspp.) and Polymenidae (Galeoides decadactylus and Pentanemus quinquarius) (Figure 2).

Figure 2: The most important catch species in Cameroon waters (1950-2016).

Marine Fishing

Marine fishing catches in Cameroon was estimated at 12,400 tons in 1950 against 12,000 tons declared by the FAO. Catches increased to the firs peak between 24,035 tons and 42,418 tons from 1970 to 1980 (compared to 20,734 tons and 22,876 tons declared by the FAO) and then declined from 68,822 tons in 1982 to 49,527 tons in 1986 (compared to 63,012 tons in 1982 and 50,636 tons in 1986 reported to the FAO) After the reduction of the EEZ of Cameroon and also political instability of the country. Catches will then increase later to reach 92,631 tons in 2000 to 100,625 tons in 2003 compared to 57,109 tons and 62,801 tons reported to the FAO, before declining to 81,000 tons in 2010 compared to 75,000 tons reported to the FAO. From 2011 until 2016 the production increased to 184,304 tons against 183,000 tons published by FAO. Between 2011 to 2013 the reconstructed data and those reported to the FAO are the same; between 2014 and 2016 difference is not large (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Reconstructed Marine fisheries and FAO Marine fisheries landing in Cameroon waters (1950-2016).

Artisanal fishing in Cameroon

The estimated artisanal catches varied between 1950 and 2016. The artisanal catches increased by 12,400 tons in 1950 to 18,700 tons in 1960. The production is in full growth since 2008 with 61,200 tons to 2016 with a quantity of 172,500 tons, passing by periods of decrease notably between 1961 and 1969 with catches ranging from 22,700 tons to 22,150 tons, and between 1980 and 1990 with catches ranging from 55,000 tons to 42,014 tons. Catches increased between 2010 and 2016 by more than 100,000 tons (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Reconstructed artisanal fishing in Cameroon waters (1950-2016).

Industrial fishing in Cameroon

Since a trawler first landed 60 tons catch in Douala in 1951, the Cameroonian industrial fleet has developed remarkably over the years, particularly in 1970 reached a production of 18,788 tons until reaching 23,175 tons in 1981. Since 1982 catches of fish have steadily declined from 14,230 tons in 1983 to between 5,000 tons and 10,000 tons from 1986 to 2001 and then suffered a total decrease in production in 2002 with production of 7,463 tons at 2010 with a production of 4,001 tons. In 2011 we have a production increase going from 15,021 tons then a decrease of 2012 with 13,000 tons until 2016 with a production of 11,804 tons (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Reconstructed industrial fishing, discard and Illegal fishing in Cameroon waters (1950-2016).

Discards

Estimated discards increased from about 8 tons in 1951 to a peak of 2,599 tons in 1980 following the industrial increase in catches from Cameroon, and then rapidly decreased to 590 tons in 2005. Between 2010 and 2016 there was a change of 513 tons at 1, 511 tons (Figure 5). All these discards come not only from the fact that 90% of fishing vessels in Cameroonian waters are shrimp trawlers, but also that some fisheries resources of Cameroonian waters are overexploited.

Illegal Fishing

Estimated illegal fishing increased from about 18 tons in 1951 to a peak of 6,090.6 tons in 1982 following the industrial increase in catches from Cameroon, and then rapidly decreased to 1,381 tons in 2005. Between 2010 and 2016 there was a change of 1,200 tons at 3,542 tons (Figure 5).

Inland Fisheries in Cameroon

With a fishing potential estimated at more than 80,000 tons per year, the inland fishery is growing every year, the catches increased from around 34,000 tons in 1950 to a firs peak of 50,000 tons in 1970, and then declined rapidly to 28,000 tons in 1980 compared to 20,000 tons reported to the FAO. Catches will then increase later between 2000 and 2016, production increases progressively, firstly around 70,000 tons in 2000(compared to 55,000 t tons reported to the FAO) to second peak of 105,000 tons in 2005(compared to 75,000 t tons reported to the FAO) and secondly around 160,821 tons in 2010 (compared to 75,000 tons reported to the FAO) to peak of and 189,018.6 tons in 2016(compared to 75,000 tons reported to the FAO) (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Reconstructed Inland fisheries in Cameroon (1950-2016).

Aquaculture

Aquaculture production in Cameroon was estimated at 19 tons in 1950 against 14 tons declared by the FAO. Catches increased to the firs peak of 478 tons (compared to 367declared by the FAO) and then declined to 56 tons (compared to 40 tons reported to the FAO). Catches will then increase later to reach second peak of 182 tons in 1985 compared to 130 tons reported to the FAO, and then declining to 80 tons in 1995 compared to 57 tons reported to the FAO. Before gradually increasing from 798 tons in 2010 tons (compared to 570 tons reported to the FAO) to the thirdly peak around 1116 tons in 2015 tons (compared to 840 tons reported to the FAO) (Figure 7).

Figure 7: Reconstructed aquaculture production in Cameroon waters (1950-2016).

Discussion

The constructed data sets are divergent with those published by the FAO in terms of amount and trend with a difference of more than about 30%. This divergence is due first of all to the fact that at the level of marine fisheries, the fishing vessel control system set up by the government is not effective. This lack of control pushes some fishing vessels to land their catches in the uncontrolled fishing camps or the military port of Tiko, especially Nigerian fishing vessels operating in Cameroonian waters.

Artisanal fishermen, 40% of whom are foreigners, including Nigerian and Ghanaian, who do not declare their catches and lack of control in this sector, where more than 45% of fishermen find themselves without a government-recognized fishing license whose catches are not reported to the National Statistical Institute which communicates the data to FAO.

At the level of inland fisheries, this divergence is due to the lack of control of the sector by MINEPIA and also due to the sharing of certain waters such as Lake Chad which is exploited by Cameroonians, Chadians and Nigerians, so that the control exact of the catches are almost impossible. Finally, note that the current state does not have the hand in this sector hence the estimate of data published by the FAO.

at the level of the aquaculture sector, This divergent between the reconstituted data and published by the FAO is due to the fact that some ponds are not declared to the government and also because MINEPIA has not established a control system for fish farmers. So, National Statistical Institute relies solely on data received by different research organizations, such as the Limbe Research Center on Fisheries and Oceans, also at Kribi, or by MINEPIA to estimate the annual production of aquaculture, and which transmits same data to FAO.

The coastal zone is an ecologically sensitive zone and trawling in this zone is susceptible of destroying habitats of small commercial important juvenile fishes of which most are often captured as bycatches, then are often thrown overboard by the artisanal fishers themselves. Illegal transshipment involves bags of young fish that are often seen in canoes of artisanal fishermen who go out with money or gifts after arrangements with the vessel captains in exchange for fish (illegal sales at sea). This adds the practice of discarding a great portion of catches overboard – bycatch which is not taken into account in the national statistics, due to lack of log books on vessels. In the same line, some vessels have escaped the Douala port, gotten matriculated in Limbe and land their catches unofficially in the Tiko military and commercial port. Even though fisheries service exists in Tiko, the landings effected are not well documented and don’t really reach the integrity of the national statistics.

we recommend that Cameroon take into account the recommendations of IPOA-IUU who recommends states to put in place an efficient monitoring, Control and Surveillance system (MCS) for fishing, notably by taking into consideration amongst others, regulated access to resources (Article 24 and it’s sub-articles). In an attempt to abide by to this, an MCS system is in place (Order N0. 0021/MINEPIA of 11 April 2002) in Cameroon, though poorly functional due to lack of trained staff and appropriate equipment [14-16] but there is no mechanism to regulate access. Presently, BCSAP (Control Brigade) have limited means to execute its mission because it lacks a coastal command center, a limited number of operational tools and sufficient finances. Procedures for collecting quality data for efficient monitoring and control are practically nonexistent. It is therefore necessary to develop and put in place tools to guarantee monitoring and effective control. Furthermore we recommend Cameroon to apply fishing management system formulated in 2011 by MINEPIA [2].

We also recommend to Cameroon to:

 Installing and improving the scale of data collection on all industrial vessels in collaboration with other administrative departments at ports. This will involve the institution of an official log book onboard industrial fishing vessels for regular declaration of catches by operators;

 Reinforcing MCS through an effective system of vessel monitoring, registering of vessels and proprietors, training of control agents and planning, financing and establishing a system of data-sharing and archiving;

Conclusion

The purpose of this article was to reconstruct the fishery profile in Cameroon for 1950 to 2016 based on published data by different authors, Ministry of Livestock Fisheries and Animal Husbandry (MINEPIA), Limbe Fisheries and Oceans Research Center and FAO reports. This dataset allowed us to reconstruct the fishing profile of Cameroon by completing the missing data by interpolation. Then we compare the data obtained with that of FAO.

The fishery production in Cameroon was marked by two main cycles: for the first cycle, catches increased to a first peak in the 1970s after major agricultural reforms and development projects focused on the primary industry, before the decline in 1982 partly due to the considerable reduction of the exclusive economic zone of Cameroon which saw the production drop to 70000 tons. The second cycle was marked by the highest peak of catches, which reached more than 220000 tons in 2013 and has been constant since then. Overall, reconstructed fisheries profile was about 30% higher than the data supplied to the FAO.

In this sense, this article proposes to treat the question of the sustainable development of fishing in Cameroon by proposing solutions facilitating the control of the catches in Cameroonian waters and Cameroon aquaculture production. The solutions permitting to have a good data collection system and finally have good fisheries management.

References

1. Amou’ou, Jam JP, Melingui A, Moukam J, Tchepanou A, et al. Cosatal conditions in West Africa. A review. Ocean and Coastal Management. 1985; 19: 199-240.

2. ENVIREP-CAM. Overview of Management and Exploitation of the Fisheries Resources of Cameroon, Central West Africa. Institut de Recherche Agricole pour le Développement, Yaoundé. 2011; 70.

3. Ngwa WM. Unequal probability catch assessment survey of Lagdo Reservoir, Garoua Rey Bouba district, Cameroon. (miméo). 1990.

4. MINEPAT. Loi de finances 2013, Ministère de l’Economie, de la Planification et de l’Aménagement du Territoire. 2009.

5. FAO. Accord for conservation and management of living resources in high can be retrived from the following site. 2017.

6. Chiambeng GY. Cameroon National Report on Marine and Coastal Biodiversity. Research Station for Fisheries and Oceanography, Cameroon. 2006; 61.

7. Ssentongo G, Njock J. Marine fishery resources of Cameroon: a review of exploited fish stocks. CECAF/ ECAF Series 87/44, FAO, Rome.1987.

8. Seck P. Catalogue des engins de pêche artisanale maritime du Cameroun. COPACE/PACE Series 87/43, FAO, Rome. 1987.

9. NOOA. International Agreements concerning living marine resources of interest to NOAA fisheries. National Marine Fisheries service, NOAA, US department of Commerce. Compiled and edited by Melani King. 2009. 216.

10. MINEPIA, Reports. Rapport Annuel d’activite de la delegation provinciale de l’elevage des pêches et industrie animale du littoral. Par Antoine Tchoubia. 2014.

11. MINEPIA. Projet Appui à la mise en place d’un système statistique informatisé pour la pêche artisanale Captures de la pêche continentale dans la province du Sud-Ouest. 2005.

12. Belhabib D, Hellebrandt D, Edward E and Pauly D. Reconstructing fisheries catches for Cameroon between 1950 and 2010. Sea Around Us, Fisheries Centre, Uni- versity of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. 2015; 10.

13. Laure J. Vingt ans de pêche industrielle au Cameroun. Extrait de La Pêche Maritime 136, ORSTOM. 1972; 4.

14. FAO. Accord for conservation and management of living resources in high. 2017.

15. FAO. Gestion participative et conservation de la biodiversite de mangroves. Volet Peche et Aquaculture. Projet mangrove FAO-Cameroon. TPC/ CMR/2908B. 2005.

16. FAO. Plan de development durable de l’aquaculture au Cameroon. 2009; 58.

Other Articles

Article Image 1

Massive Chinese Fleet Jeopardizes Threatened Shark Species around the Galápagos Marine Reserve and Waters off Ecuador: Implications for National and International Fisheries Policy

Being a UNESCO-World Heritage Site, the Galápagos harbors the largest global shark biomass in the world’s oceans and a unique marine biodiversity.

Alava JJ1,2*, Barragán-Paladines MJ3, Denkinger J4, Muñoz-Abril L4, Jiménez PJ2, Paladines F5, Valle CA4, Tirapé A6, Gaibor N7, Calle M6, Calle P6, Reyes H8, Espinoza E8 and Grove JS9


Article Image 1

The Relationship between Behavior Responses and Brain Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) Activity of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) in Cadmium Stress

In this research, the toxic effects of Cadmium chloride (CdCl2 ), which can seriously pollute aquatic environment and threaten human health, are evaluated based on the behavior responses and the brain Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity of zebrafish (Danio rerio). The results showed that Behavior Strength (BS) of test groups (changed from 0.15 to 0.65), which was recorded using an online behavior monitoring system, was lower than the control groups (changed from 0.65 to 0.85). The behavior responses of zebrafish suggested that both dose and time effect relationships existed between Cd2+ stress and zebrafish BS. Meanwhile, the brain Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity of zebrafish were strongly inhibited by Cd2+: the AChE activities were lower than 60% after 0.5h Cd2+ exposure in both 1 TU (Toxic Unit) and 2 TU. The AChE activities in 0.1 TU Cd2+ treatment were about 60% in the first 2h and then increased to about 100% in 4h with a decrease tendency in the following exposure time (8h to 48h), which changed from 100% to 70%-80%. Totally, the brain AChE activities of zebrafish showed similar rules with BS after correlation analysis, which might provide an understanding of the ecotoxicological assessment of heavy metal Cd based on zebrafish.

Meiyi Yang1,2#, Lizhen Ji1,2#, Xu Zhang2, Yuqi Fan1,2* and Zongming Ren1,2*


Article Image 1

Neritic Larval Fish Distribution in the Oceanic Area of the Campeche Bay, Gulf of Mexico

Composition and abundance of larval fishes in Campeche Bay were studied during two seasons, winter, 2013 (24 stations) and summer, 2014 (31 stations). Sampling was carried out with open-close nets, mouth 75 cm and 505 µm mesh. The data of salinity and temperature allowed distinguishing three oceanic sub-regions: North, East, and West. There were 236 taxa, belonging to 74 families, 168 species, 154 taxa occurred in winter and 171 in summer; the composition in both cruises was similar with around 70 % of oceanic and 30 % of neritic larvae. The larval density was almost three times larger in summer than winter. The Campeche Bay hydrodynamics fits well with the results; the West sub-region is located where a cyclonic gyre takes place, the North and East sub regions are located in the area of influence of warm currents over the Yucatan shelf. The hydrodynamics also allows understanding the differences in the proportion of neritic larvae among the three oceanic sub-regions, the West and East with the lower and higher number of neritic larvae, respectively. The large difference among regions is related to some neritic taxa occurring exclusively in some of them. Of the total taxa, 55 neritic occurred only once and it means that more than a half of neritic taxa were represented by one organism, 31 from 85 neritic taxa occurred in the layers of 600 to 1000 m depth. Of the neritic larvae, only Syacium papillosum and Apogon sp. appear among the 20 more abundant.

Flores-Coto C*, Zavala-García F and Sanvicente-Añorve L


Article Image 1

Effect of Photoperiod on Eggs Hatchability, Growth and Survivability of Hybrid Catfish (Heterobranchus bidorsalis X Clarias gariepinus) Larvae

This study was conducted to determine the effects of photoperiod on egg hatchability, growth and survivability of hybrid catfish (Heterobranchus bidorsalis X Clarias gariepinus) larvae, using hormone-induced spawning method. Eggs were stripped from two sexually matured and healthy female Clarias gariepinus of average weight of 1kg/each and fertilized with milt from two sexually matured male Heterobranchus bidorsalis of average weight of 2kg/each. An average of five hundred (500) eggs were introduced into each ten aquaria tanks of size 70cm x 45cm x 40cm/tank, using a pre- determined spoonful estimation at five photoperiod regimes: (T1) 24L:00D (Light:Darkness); (T2) 18L:6D; (T3) 12L:12D; (T4) 6L:18D and (T5) 00L:24D in two replicates. Aquaria tanks were arranged in a flow- through system at a flow rate of 1.5L/min with aerators to maintain good water condition. Provision of light during the night for illumination of the aquaria tanks was kept constant at 1200 1x, using solar panel (Mono)/inverter (Microtex) light energy. Growth and survivability of the fish larvae were monitored for six weeks. They were fed with laboratory-cultured live feed (Daphnia) to achieve maximum feed utilization. Percentage hatchability of eggs and best growth performance of fish larvae were significantly (p<0.05) highest (92.5%, 91.2 ± 0.21mg) respectively in T5 (00L:24D), while percentage survivability of hatchlings was significantly (p<0.05) highest (94.4%) in T3 (12L:12D). It was observed in this study that the highest hatchability of eggs and optimum growth performance of hatchlings were under complete darkness, with reduced survivability of fish, as a result of observed cannibalism. The fish were photophobic. To achieve a balance result in terms of hatchability of eggs, growth and survivability of fish fry, it is suggested that incubation and hatching of eggs should be done under complete darkness, while rearing of fry should be under equal light and darkness exposure.

Adebayo IA*


Article Image 1

Empirical Assessment of Fish Diversity of Uttar Pradesh, India: Current Status, Implications and Strategies for Management

About 60-70% of world’s biological resourcesis contributed by India, of which fish represents 80% of the global fishes. Uttar Pradesh blessed with vivid aquatic bioresources in innumerable forms contributes about 14.68% of Indian fish biodiversity with substantial scope of inland fisheries development and aquaculture. Ganga, the mighty river of this state reportsabout 265 freshwater species from its river system [1]. Besides, other rivers viz. Ramganga, Gomti, Ghaghara, Yamuna, Gandak, Kosi and Damodaract as reservoir of different f ish stocks. In past, no study highlights the assessment of the fish biodiversity of this state in holistic way except by Khan (2000) who justreported a compilation of 129 fishes under 27 families [2]. To substantiate and revise the assessment, the fish diversity of this state was assessed by investigating these rivers, analyzing and documenting the information on different fisheries measurements including biology, distribution and conservation status. About 10,000 individuals were collected and the analysis of individuals revealed 126 fish species under 28 families and 74 genera nearly mitigating the earlier reports. The highest species diversity was recorded in the river Ganga (90) followed by Gerua (87) and then Gomati (68). 37 species were found common in Gomati, Ghaghara, Ganges, Son, Tons and Yamuna. Out of 90 species, 6 species were recorded from the river Ganga. In addition, the new distribution of a threatened torrent catfish Amblyceps mango is was recorded from the rivers Gomati, Ganga and Ramganga. The economical assessment unravels nearly 33% as ornamental, 87% as food and 10% as sport fishes.

Pathak AK*


Article Image 1

Stranding of Small Cetaceans with Missing Fins Raises Concerns on Cetacean Conservation in Ecuador: Bycatch or Targeted Fisheries?

Among anthropogenic threats to marine mammals, bycatch is one of the major and increasing concerns. This report describes three species of small cetaceans, including a short-beaked common dolphin (Delphinus delphis), a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus), and two dwarf sperm whales (Kogia sima), which were found stranded with pectoral fins, dorsal fins and caudal fin removed. The dolphins were found at the beaches of San José de Las Nuñez and San Pablo, respectively (Santa Elena Peninsula Province on 14 August 2017), while the dwarf sperm whales were found in Puerto Lopéz and Crucita (Manabí Province) in July 2014 and August 2015, respectively. Possible explanation for the dolphins and dwarf sperm whales missing fins support the event as a possible case of fishery interaction or bycatch with systematic removal of their fins. Although remnants of artisanal gillnets were not found near the two dolphin species, one of the dwarf sperm whales showed marks of artisanal gillnets on the body as evidence of bycatch. Trade of dolphin carcasses and their parts for bait by fishers cannot be ruled out as there is some evidence of this practice in the past. Both dolphins species are vulnerable species at the national level and commonly involved in incidental captures with gillnets of artisanal fisheries in Coastal Ecuador. Cetacean bycatch is a grave conservation problem affecting several cetacean species in Ecuador’s waters. Fisheries and environmental authorities must be vigilant and enforce actions to proactively mitigate possible anthropogenic impacts and promote environmental education activities in fishing communities to conserve vulnerable dolphin species in Ecuador’s waters. Further, to comply with new rules and regulations of the US Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) intended to reduce the bycatch of marine mammals in foreign commercial fishing operations that export fish and fish products to the United States, a regulatory program is urgently needed to mitigate and reduce fisheries interactions with marine mammals in Ecuador.

Pedro J Jiménez1, Juan José Alava1,2*, Cristina Castro3, Jorge Samaniego4 and Patricia Fair5


Article Image 1

Sodium Arsenite-induced Morphological, Behavioral, Hematological and Histopathological abnormalities in Labeo Rohita

Toxic metals have contaminated the aquatic ecosystems to a large scale, and they eventually enter human systems by contaminated air, food, water and soil. Recently, arsenic toxicity has become an alarming concern around the globe. Major areas of North-Eastern states of India have been demarcated with an arsenic content of 50-1000 µg/l in drinking water sources and aquatic ecosystems. Arsenic range in Barak Valley is many folds higher than the permissible limit of WHO and BIS as 10µg/l and 50µg/l respectively, which is present in the form of Sodium Arsenite in water. Fishes are the major dwellers of aquatic ecosystem and serves as good bio-indicators for determination of health status of an aquatic ecosystem. They also form the staple diet of North Eastern people. Labeo rohita is one of the most commonly available and consumed in large scale. The present study was carried out in Labeo rohita in vivo. Labeo rohita (n=10) of similar size and weight were exposed to sodium aresnite at concentrations 100 µg/l and 250 µg/l along with controlled set up for 10 days. The morphological, behavioral, hematological and histopathological changes were evaluated. Fishes exposed to Sodium arsenite showed irregular ocular movement, fin movement, swimming pattern and loss in scales with higher prominence in 250 µg/l of arsenic group than those at 100 µg/l. The hematological indices revealed decrease in RBC count and increase in WBC count in both sodium arsenite exposed groups. The histopathological study of liver revealed parenchymal disorganization and atypical residual body in both sodium arsenite treated groups. Results obtained showed major damages to fishes due to contamination with sodium arsenite. These fishes, when consumed by humans, leads to increase in several thousand folds of sodium arsenite by means of biomagnification. High exposure of arsenic in human through fishes leads to several disorders. The possible way of eradicating sodium arsenite entry into humans is banning fishing activities in highly contaminated aquatic ecosystems. Community education and local participation are also essential to get a fruitful outcome.

Rajib Biswas1* and Soumitra Nath2


Article Image 1

Effect of Fishmeal Substitution by Lima Bean Meal on the Zoo Technical Performances of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in the Bati

A study on the effect of the substitution of fishmeal by Lima bean flour was conducted between March and May 2018 within the AIO ICG of the Batié District, with the global objective of contributing to the development of alternative sources of animal protein. Specifically, the aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the substitution of fishmeal by Lima bean flour on the growth performance, survival and feed cost of Clarias gariepinus. For this purpose, 300 fry of Clarias gariepinus with an average weight of 3 ± 1.41g were divided into five batches and fed three times a day with rations corresponding to 5% of their ichthyo biomass. The rations R0, R25 R50, R75 and R100 respectively corresponded to the substitution rates of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% of fish meal by that of Lima bean. The physic-chemical characteristics of the water (pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, nitrites and nitrates) were measured daily. The following results were obtained: The highest weight gains were obtained with the rations R25 (20.56 ± 0.40 g), R50 (20.64 ± 0.32 g), R75 (20.98 ± 0.46 g) and the lowest with the ration R100 (16.21 ± 0.28 g). For this average daily gain, the highest values were 0.36 ± 0.02 g; 0.37 ± 0.01 g, 0.38 ± 0.01 g respectively for the R0, R50 and R75 rations and the lowest with R100 (0.29 ± 0.01 g). The highest value of the specific growth rate (2.47 ± 0.07%) was obtained with the ration R0 and the lowest (1.61%) with the ration R100. The consumption index reached its highest and lowest values with the rations R100 (4.74 ± 0.42) and R50 (3.57 ± 0.43) respectively, compared to the value of the ration R0 (3.31 ± 0.37) for this parameter. Concerning the condition factor K, the highest value was recorded with the R50 diet (1.11 ± 0.49) while the lowest value was obtained with the R75 diet (0.95 ± 0.45). The cost of producing one kilogram of food was higher with the R25 ration (504.59 FCFA) and lower with the R100 ration (443.20 FCFA). This study found that incorporating 75% Lima bean flour into the feed increases the growth performance of Clarias gariepinus fry and reduces the cost of food production.

Emile Miégoué1*, Pégis Davy Tagning Zebaze2, Fernand Tendonkeng1, Lemoufouet Jules1, Nadège Elvire Njoh2, Ronald Komguep Nganyo2 and Etienne Tedonkeng Pamo1


Article Image 1

Comparative Effect of Monoculture and Polyculture in Two Species of Clariidae: Heterobranchus longifilis and Clarias gariepinus in Post Fingerlings Growth

In order to improve the production of Clariidae, a study on the type of cultivation of Heterobranchus longifilis and Clarias gariepinus in post fingerlings growth phase was carried out in tanks. It took place from March to May 2018 at the IRAD fish station in Koupa-Matapi (LN: 5º 21 ‘to 5º 58’ and LE: 10º 17 ‘to 11º 02’) west region Cameroon. For this fact 180 fry therefore 90 Heterobranchus longifilis and 90 Clarias gariepinus with an average weight 3.55 ± 0.68 g; 8.46 ± 0.41cm of total length and 7.37 ± 0.30 cm of standard length were used. The 180 fry were divided into three treatments of 60 individuals (T1 treatment: Clarias gariepinus, T2 treatment Heterobranchus longifilis and T3 treatment: Clarias gariepinus + Heterobranchus longifilis). Each treatment was repeated twice. The fish were fed twice per day at a rate of 10% of the ichthyobiomass readjusted each month after control fishing with a feed at 42% crude protein. From the results of this trial, it appears that unlike the higher mortality rates (11.66 ± 2.36%) recorded in monoculture Clarias gariepinus, the highest cannibalism rates were obtained in monoculture of Heterobranchus longifilis (13.33 ± 4.71%). The survival rate was not influenced by the type of culture. Nevertheless, the highest rate (94.44 ± 0.00%) was observed in Heterobranchus longifilis in polyculture. The highest growth values were recorded for C. gariepinus in polyculture and the weakest for H. longifilis in polyculture. For linear growth, the highest values were recorded in C. gariepinus in monoculture. In order to reduce the rate of cannibalism and mortalities in Clarias gariepinus and Heterobranchus longifilis in post f ingerlings growth phase, it is preferable to combine these two species.

Nana Towa Algrient¹, Nanmegni Rostand Romeo¹, Tonfackachille Peguy², Efole Ewoukem Thomas¹ and Jouokou Salifou²


Article Image 1

Delayed Fertilization of Landlocked Fall Chinook Salmon Eggs Stored with Oxygen at Two Temperatures

This study examined the use of supplemental oxygen and two temperatures (1° and 11°C) during the four hour storage of unfertilized landlocked fall Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) eggs from Lake Oahe, South Dakota, USA. There was a significant and positive effect of oxygen use on egg survival to the eyed-stage and hatch. In addition, survival to egg eye-up and hatch was significantly affected by storage temperature, with decreased survival at 1°C. However, there was no significant interaction observed between the use of oxygen and storage temperature. Mean survival to hatch ranged from 50% for those eggs stored with oxygen at 11°C compared 17.8% for those eggs stored on ice at 1°C in air. To maintain landlocked Chinook salmon egg fertility, storage with supplemental oxygen at 11°C is recommended.

Hunter Eide and Michael E Barnes*