Back to Journal

Journal of Radiation Oncology & Research

Radiotherapy of Malign Melanoma: A Single-Centre Experience from the Eastern Black Sea Region of Turkey

[ ISSN : 3068-0832 ]

Abstract Citation Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References
Details

Received: 13-Mar-2018

Accepted: 07-May-2018

Published: 14-May-2018

Mustafa Kandaz1*, Özlem Aynacı2, Alperen Tüysüz3, Emine Canyılmaz1 and Adnan Yöney1

1Department of Radiation Oncology, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey

2Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanuni Education and Research Hospital, Turkey

3Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey

Corresponding Author:

Mustafa Kandaz, Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Medicine Department of Radiation Oncology, Trabzon/Turkey, Tel: 04623775595

Keywords

Malign Melanoma; Radiotherapy

Abstract

Radiation therapy is used for adjuvant therapy on patients with recurrence or lymphadenectomy in the malignant melanomas. Treatment is used for palliative on metastatic patients. Between 1996 and 2017, 35 patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy and 55 patients who received palliative radiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 90 patients included in the study, 56 (62%) were men and 34 (38%) were women. Mean age of patients was 63 years (age range: 22–95 years). For all patients, the overall survival time was 32.23 months (95% CI, 16.8–47.6). As an adjuvant therapy, 48 Gy (hypofractionated) radiotherapy was used in 4 patients and 50-66 Gy radiotherapy was used in 31 patients. Overall survival in these patients was 66.14 (95% CI 36.6-95.6) months. Mean metastases that occur in patients is 37.19 months (range: 2-138 months), which are 37 (41%) patients in the brain, 12 (13%) patients in the bone and 6 (7%) patients in the non-regional lymph node metastasis. 20-30 Gy radiotherapy was used for metastasis treatment. Overall survival in brain metastasis, bone metastasis and lymph nodes metastatic patients were 4.22 (95% CI 2.62-5.82), 7.6 (95% CI 1.14-14.05) and 7.33 (95% CI 0-15.03) months respectively. Although, the regional nodal disease can be favorably controlled with lymphadenectomy and radiotherapy, the risk of distant metastases and the risk of disease-related death are high. In addition, metastasis-related symptoms (particularly pain) can be controlled by radiotherapy.

Citation

Kandaz M, Aynac? Ö, Tüysüz A, Cany?lmaz E and Yöney A. Radiotherapy of Malign Melanoma: A Single-Centre Experience from the Eastern Black Sea Region of Turkey. J Radiat Oncol Res. 2018; 2(1): 1004.

Introduction

Malignant Melanoma (MM) is the most aggressive skin cancer, originating from the pigment-producing cells known as melanocytes [1]. MMs typically occur in the skin, but may rarely occur in the eyes, gastrointestinal tract, meninges and various mucosal layers [2]. Despite the fact that MM accounts for only 4% skin cancers, it is the main reason for deaths associated with skin cancers [3]. The increased melanoma incidence is likely due to changes in lifestyle with regard to extreme exposure to sunlight (frequently leading to sunburn) [4].

Melanomas can develop anywhere in the body. Only 25% of MM develops over an existing nevüs, while most of them develop through the skin with normal appearance [5].

The clinical correct recognition, staging and prognostic evaluation of MM are the first essential steps. All lesions will be examined pathologically suspicious for melanoma. The detection of MM in an early stage is highly important, a step of successful treatment. Improved survival rates can be primarily attributed to earlier detection [6].

The primary treatment for melanoma is surgical excision. After surgery, the adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following lymphadenectomy in node-positive melanoma patients prevents local and regional recurrence.. However, RT as a definitive treatment is often suggested in clear situations, such as medical inoperability, lentiginous melanoma, mucosal melanoma, and ocular melanoma. Furthermore, RT is often used because it is highly effective in providing symptom palliation for metastatic melanoma.

Approximately 90% of MM are diagnosed with non-metastatic. For such tumors, the tumor-specific 10-year survival is 75-85% [2, 33]. The level of invasion (Clark’s level), mitotic rate, ulceration, Vertical tumor thickness (Breslow’s depth), increased age, family history, sex and location (i.e. truncal/head and neck tumors) are evaluated as clinical and histological prognostic factors.

The first location of metastasis is the regional lymph node (LN), followed by skin (transit metastases), lung and liver. The central nervous system metastases occur in nearly half of patients with metastatic melanoma and in 15–20% of these patients. The central nervous system (CNS) is the first site of relapse. The estimated median survival time for patients with CNS metastases is only 2-4 months [7]. The 10-year survival rate is 30-50% for transit metastases and 20-40% for clinically apparent lymph metastases [8].

The purpose of this study is to report the characteristics, treatment modalities and Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS) of patients with MM in the Eastern Black Sea Region.

Materials and Methods

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, project no: 2018-23. Records of 90 patients with a diagnosis of MM treated at our clinic between 1996 and 2017 were reviewed. Patients’ information about their age, gender, surgical treatment, local recurrence, distant metastases, and survival were recorded. The patients were grouped by treatment modality.

Treatment

Thirty-five patients were included, those who had been diagnosed with neck, axillary or inguinal LN metastases from MMs and were managed with lymphadenectomy and RT, with or without systemic therapy. Having LN extracapsular extension, an LN measuring 3 cm in size, four or more involved LN, or recurrent disease after previous LN dissection alone for the pathologically confirmed disease are features that increase the risk of regional LN recurrence after surgery and represent the indications for radiating most of the patients in this study.

Conventional RT was performed with a total of 50-66 Gray (Gy) RT per day 2 Gy. Hypofractionated RT was performed in 48 Gy of 20 fractions (2.4 Gy per fraction). We performed radiotherapy for symptom palliation in patients with metastatic melanoma. Metastatic patients were treated with 30 Gy of 10 fractions or 20 Gy of 5 fractions.

Follow-up

Patients were clinically examined by their complete blood test at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, and then at six month period. The OS was considered as the time between diagnosis and the last control or death date.

Statistical methods

The obtained data were subjected to the statistical analysis by using Statistical Package Of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16 software. The OS was calculated by using Kaplan–Meier method. The log-rank test was used in analyzing the differences between subgroups. The Cox regression analysis was performed to predict the factors with independent prognostic significance on survival. All tests were considered statistically significant at p<0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics

Of the 90 patients included in the study, 35 patients who received adjuvant RT and 55 patients who received palliative radiotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients’ ages at the time of presentation ranged from 22 to 95 years, with a mean of 63.04 years. 56 (62%) were men and 34 (38%) were women (a female-to-male ratio of 1:1.6). The mean age, 63.26 (range: 22 to 95) years for the women and 62.9 (range: 27 to 92) years for the men.

The primary site was the head and/or neck in 28 (31%) patients, the trunk in 19 (21%), upper extremity in 21 (23%) and lower extremity in 22 (25%).

Twenty-two patients with a primary site underwent wide local excision with macroscopic and microscopic clear surgical margins. The pathologic analysis of the surgical margins was not present in eight patients. In 5 patients the surgical margin was positive. In 20 patients the nodal metastases were identified by sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) biopsy or elective LN dissection. İnvolvement in the LN region, 1 in right neck, 1 in left neck, 1 in the bilateral neck, 6 in the axilla, 7 in left inguinal, 2 in right inguinal and 1 in bilateral inguinal.

Fifteen patients received 50-66 Gy conventional RT in the tumor bed.The 16 patients with positive lymph nodes, 50-66 Gy conventional RT had been delivered to the neck, axilla or inguinal lymph node region and 4 patients had received 48 Gy hypofractionated RT.

Fifty- five patients had metastases at diagnosis instantly, which 37 (41%) patients in the brain, 12 (13%) patients in the bone and 6 (7%) patients in the patients with non-regional lymph nodes metastasis. Also, bone metastasis occurred in eight patients with brain metastases. Metastatic patients had received 20-30 Gy palliative RT. This patients were treated with systemic treatment after RT.

Survival

For the thirty-five patients treated with adjuvant RT, the median follow-up period was 42.65 months (range, 3 to 182 months). Local recurrence was seen in three patients (8%) after treatment (range: 8 to 47 months) which two (6%) patients in the inguinal lymph nodes and one patient (2%) in the nasal septum. Four patients with local recurrence underwent systemic treatment. 4 (11%) had distant metastasis during the follow-up after curative treatment. Brain metastasis was seen in two patients, bone metastasis was seen in one patient and non-regional lymph node metastasis was seen in one patient (range: 3 to 13 months). Among the 35 patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, the OS time was 67.93 months (95% CI, 37.3–98.5).

There were distant metastases in fifty-five patients. There was distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis in the sixteen patients (29%). For 39 patients (71%), distant metastasis was diagnosed during and after the end of treatment.Mean metastases that occur in patients is 37.19 months (range: 2-138 months), which are 37 (67%) patients in the brain, 12 (22%) patients in the bone and 6 (11%) patients in the non-regional lymph node metastasis.The overall survival in all metastatic patients was 5.74 months (95% CI, 3.76–7.71), the overall survival in brain metastasis, bone metastasis and lymph nodes metastatic patients were 4.22 (95% CI 2.62-5.82), 7.6 (95% CI 1.14-14.05) and 7.33 (95% CI 0-15.03) months respectively.

Discussion

MM is a cancer of the melanocytes that migrate from the neural crest to the epidermis, as well as from the uveal truck, meninges, and ectodermal mucosa. Melanoma is a cancer with the rapid increase incidence worldwide (the melanoma thought to be triggered by ultraviolet rays is more common in areas where exposure to sunlight is high) and a high mortality rate. When diagnosed early, there is a chance of complete cure.

The anatomical origin of skin, which melanomas originated from are different in men and women. In males, while melanoma is frequently in a trunk, it often occurs in the extremities in women and axillary tumors have the worst prognosis [9]. Regardless of the distribution of localizations by sex in our study the primary region is the head and/or neck respectively, while the other regions are the trunk, upper extremity, and lower extremities respectively. Taş et al. reported that skin-derived melanomas were more frequently observed in the extremities with 43.4% unlike our results [10]. İsmail et al., [11] showed that cases of their study was examined according to tumor location, it was seen that the most common site of the tumor was the lower extremity. Also in our country, Karasoy et al. found the most frequent tumor site at head and neck region and lower extremity [12]. In our series, 1/3 of the lesions were located in the head and neck region.

Alfred et al., [13] reported that the mean age of skin melanoma cases was 55.3 years and male/female: 1.19 in an analysis of 84,836 patients diagnosed with melanoma in the US between 1985-1994 in the National Cancer Database registry. In our study patients’ ages were ranged from 22 to 95 years, with a mean of 63 years and the male-female ratio in our patient population was 1/1.6.

The prognosis depends on whether the malignant melanoma is localized, regional, or metastatic at the time of diagnosis [14]. Gender, location, tumor size, depth of invasion, ulcer, staging and sentinel lymph node metastasis were related to patient prognosis as shown by previous studies on the prognostic factors for malignant melanoma [15]. The thickness of Tumor is singlythe most important significative of prognosis, followed by the histologic ulceration and mitotic rate.

Staging of the cutaneous melanoma results in the local, regional and metastatic disease being separated from each other. This difference is directly proportional to survival rates. Stage I and II are defined as early (low risk) and partially early (medium risk) disease respectively. Some features that increase the risk of recurrence of the disease have been observed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) in 1992 and staging systems have been established. In 2000, the staging was re-examined [16]. Distant Metastasis (M1) in both systems representa stage IV, regional lymph node metastasis (N1-3) stage III malignant melanoma.

If the melanoma can be diagnosed and treated at an early stage, it can be cured over 90%, but in advanced stages, survival rates are very low despite promising improvements in treatment. The primary treatment model for cutaneous melanoma is the surgery accompanied by full-thickness excision in order to be able to perform the right staging as well as the treatment [17]. There are 5 randomized controlled trials conducted to date to determine the excisional biopsy limit for melanoma diagnosis.

In a prospective randomized study involving 8 years of the World Health Organization Melanoma Program and 612 patients; in lesions with a depth of invasion of less than 2 mm, excision limits of 3 cm were compared with 1cm excision margin and no difference between disease-free survival and total survival in the study with a mean follow-up of 90 months [18].

In a study of the French Malign Melanoma study group with nine centers located in Europe, 226 patients treated within 5 years were followed up for a mean of 16 years, comparing 2 and 5 cm surgical margins similar to the Swedish group. The 10-year survival and local recurrence rates of the patients were not different in this study [19].

Generally, tumors of 0.5 cm in situ melanomas, 1 cm in 1 mm thin tumors (T1), 1-2 cm in 1-2 mm deep tumors, 2 cm in 2 mm thick tumors (T3 and T4) surgical excision with surgical margin is recommended [20]. In our study, 22 patients (22,4%) with a primary site underwent wide local excision with macroscopic and microscopic clear surgical margins regarding the thickness of tumors. Adjuvant therapy is recommended to reduce risk after surgery in patients at high risk for tumor recurrence.

Regional lymph node metastasis are regarded as a major determinant of the outcome for many malignancies, including melanoma. In addition to tumor thickness over the years, lymph node involvement has become one of the main determinants of the prognosis of the disease. Sentinel lymph node(s) is (are) the first node(s) draining the primary tumor site along the lymphatic pathway. Elective lymph node dissection, lymphedema, nerve damage, wound site problems of any center have clinically, radiologically and pathologically prefer to sample the SLN at the lymph node stage in patients without distant metastases. Lymph node dissection is recommended in cases with a positive SLN sampling [21]. In our study, 20 patients, the nodal metastases were identified by SLN biopsy or elective LN dissection.

RT as a primary treatment is often presented in well-defined cases, such as medical inoperability, lentiginous melanoma, mucosal melanoma and ocular melanoma, although melanoma is a relatively radioresistant tumor [22] and also the adjuvant RT following lymphadenectomy in node-positive melanoma patients prevents local and regional recurrence.

Multiple retrospective studies further defined the role of adjuvant RT. A report from the Sydney Melanoma Unit suggests that the postoperative RT may be an advantage for local control in patients with microscopic positive margins and adverse pathologic features [23]. Karakousis et al. reported that the overall rate of local recurrence was 3.8% [24]. In our study, adjuvant RT was applied to 35 patients. The rate of local recurrence was 8% after treatment which two 6% patients in the inguinal lymph nodes and one patient 2% of the nasal septum. In this study, 35 patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, the overall survival time was 67.93 months.

On the other hand, RT is quite effective and widely used in providing symptom palliation for metastatic melanoma [25]. RT was used in the treatment of fifty- five patients with the intent of palliative in our study. The mean survival time of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma is less than a year. Sandru et al. reported that the median overall survival for patients with metastases was about 5.3 months, smaller than that described in large series of patients, in average 7-8 months [26, 27]. The overall survival in all metastatic patients was 5.74 months in our study.

Melanoma is mainly radio-resistant, cell culture studies have shown a broad shoulder in the cell survival curves. This indicates a higher response per fraction, better response and unusual high repair capacity [28]. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Trial 83-05 was a prospective randomized study comparing hypofractionation to conventional fractionation. The results showed no difference in partial or complete response rates between the two schedules, and the overall response rates were ∼70% [29]. They declared that hypofractionation and conventional fractionation are equally efficacious. In our study, fifteen patients received 50-66 Gy conventional RT and only 4 patients had received 48 Gy hypofractionated RT.

Brain metastasis, a specific form of stage IV melanoma, is one of the most common and difficult to treat complications of melanoma. The percentage of malignant melanomas among cases diagnosed with metastatic intracranial cancer has been reported to be about15.7% [30]. Chason et al., [31] revealed that over 90% incidence of CNS metastases isin their autopsy series. In this series of 122 patients with disseminated malignant melanoma, 46% developed signs and symptoms of CNS disease and 75% had gross evidence of CNS metastases on autopsy. Chiarion- Sileni et al. found that the median survival of melanoma patients with CNS metastases ranges between 2 and 8 months. In our study, the overall survival in brain metastases was 4.2 months.

Skeletal metastases generally occur in patients with widespread metastatic disease and usually represent a late site of recurrence [32]. A large series from Duke University Medical Centre reported BMs in 6.9% of 1677 patients diagnosed with all stages, MM revealed that the mean survival from the diagnosis of bone metastases was about 3.6 months [24]. Cohn-Cedermark et al. reported that the median survival of patients with bones as the first site of metastasis was 2.4 months [33]. In this study, the overall survival in bones was 7.6 months.

References

1. McCourt C, Dolan O, Gormley G. Malignant Melanoma: A pictorial review. Ulster Med. J. 2014; 83: 103-110.

2. Garbe C, Peris K, Hauschild A, Saiag P, Middleton M, Bastholt, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of melanoma. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline- Update 2016. European Journal of Cancer. 2016; 63: 201-217.

3. Garbe C, Peris K, Hauschild A, Saiag P, Middleton M, Spatz A, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of melanoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline. Eur J Cancer. 2010; 46: 270-283.

4. Parlak A, Çayırlı M, Parlak N, Ekinci Ş. Melanoma genel bakış. Konuralp Tıp Dergisi. 2014; 6: 22-27.

5. Mosqueira JR, Gomez E, Bravo F, Vega JD and Soto L. Malignant Melanoma: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Open Access J Trans Med Res. 2017; 1: 00008.

6. Naveed S, Singh G, Hasina Quari H. Subungual Malignant Melanoma: Difficulty in Early Diagnosis. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science. 2013; 12: 322-324.

7. Douglas JG, Margolin K. The treatment of brain metastases from malignant melanoma. Semin Oncol. 2002; 29: 518-524.

8. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, Thompson JF, Atkins MB, Byrd DR, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 6199-6206.

9. Balch CM, Karakousis C, Mettlin C, Natarajan N, Donegan WL, Smart CR, et al. Management of cutaneous melanoma in the United States. Surg Gyneco lObstet. 1984; 158: 311-318.

10. Tas F, Kurul S, Camlic, H, Topuz, E. Malignant melanoma in Turkey: a single institution’s experience on 475 cases. Jpn J ClinOncol. 2006; 36: 794-799.

11. Şahin İ, Andaç A, Alhan D, Zor F, Öztürk S, Eski M, et al. Malign melanoma olgularının retrospect if değerlendirilmesi. Gülhane Tıp Derg. 2011; 53: 177-181.

12. Karasoy A, Karşıdağ S, Tatlıdere S. Malign melanomada 13 yılda 65 hastadaki deneyimimiz: Retrospektif çalışma. Türk Plastik Rekonstrüktif ve Estetik Cerrahi Dergisi. 2004; 12: 153-157.

13. Chang AE, Karnell LH, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on cutaneous and noncutaneous melanoma: a summary of 84,836 cases from the past decade. The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Cancer. 1998; 83: 1664-1678.

14. Plym A, Ullenhag GJ, Breivald M, Lambe M, Berglund A. Plym A, et al. Clinical characteristics, management and survival in young adults diagnosed with malignant melanoma: A population-based cohort study. Acta Oncologica. 2014; 53: 688-696.

15. Russo AE, Ferrau F, Antonelli G, Priolo D, McCubrey JA, Libra M. Malignant melanoma in elderly patients: biological, surgical and medical issues. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2015; 15: 101-108.

16. Morton DL, Foshag LJ, Hoon DS, Nizze JA, Famatiga E, Wanek LA, et al. Prolongation of survival in metastatic melanoma after specific immunotherapy with a new polivalent melanoma vaccine. Ann Surg. 1992; 216: 463-482.

17. Penegaricano J, Ratanatharathorn V. Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. Decision Making. Chapter 32, 977-994.

18. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N. Narrow excision (1-cm margin). A safe procedure for thin cutaneous melanoma. Arch Surg. 1991; 126: 438-441.

19. Khayat D, Rixe O, Martin G, Soubrane C, Banzet M, Bazex JA, et al. Surgical margins in cutaneous melanoma (2 cm versus 5 cm forlesionsmeasuringlessthan2.1-mm thick). Cancer. 2003; 97: 1941-1946.

20. Bishop JA, Corrie PG, Evans J, Gore ME, Hall PN, Kirkham N, et al. UK guidelines for the management of cutaneous melanoma. Br J Dermatol. 2002; 146: 7-17.

21. Stebbins WG, Garibyan L, Sober AJ. Sentinel lymph node biopsy and melanoma: 2010 update Part I. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010; 62: 723-734.

22. Ward W, Farma J. Cutaneous Melanoma Ethiology and Therapy. 2017; 101 120.

23. Stevens G, Thompson JF, Firth I, O’Brien CJ, McCarthy WH, Quinn MJ. Locally advanced melanoma: Results of postoperative hypo fractionated radiation therapy. Cancer. 2000; 88: 88-94.

24. Karakousis CP, Balch CM, Urist MM, Ross MM, Smith TJ, Bartolucci AA. Local recurrence in malignant melanoma: long-term results of the multi institutional randomized surgical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 1996; 3: 446-452.

25. Fogarty GB, Hong A. Radiation therapy for advanced and metastatic melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 2014; 109: 370-375.

26. Wasif N, Bagaria SP, Ray P, Morton DL. Does metastasectomy improve survival in patients with Stage IV melanoma? A cancer registry analysis of outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2011; 104: 111-115.

27. Petersen RP, Hanish SI, Haney JC, Miller CC, Burfeind WR Jr, Tyler DS, et al. Improved survival with pulmonary metastasectomy: an analysis of 1720 patients with pulmonary metastatic melanoma. J Thorac Cardio vasc Surg. 2007; 133: 104-110.

28. Rofstad EK. Radiation biology of malignant melanoma. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1986; 25: 1.

29. Sause WT, Cooper JS, Rush S, Ago CT, Cosmatos D, Coughlin CT, et al. Fraction size in external beam radiationtherapy in the treatment of melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991; 20: 429-432.

30. Vieth RG, Odom GL. Intra cranial metastases and their neurosurgical treatment. J. Neurosurg. 1965; 23: 375-383.

31. Russo AE, Ferrau F, Antonelli G, Priolo D, McCubrey JA, Libra M, et al. Malignant melanoma in elderly patients: biological, surgical and medical issues. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2015; 15: 101-108.

32. Balch CM, Soong SJ, Shaw HM, Urist MM, McCarthy WH. An analysis of prognostic factors in 8500 patients with cutaneous melanoma. In: Balch CM, Houghton AN, Milton GW, Sober A, Soong SJ, editors. Cutaneous melanoma. Philadelphia: J-B Lippincot; 1992; 165-171.

33. Cohn-Cedermark G, Månsson-Brahme E, Rutqvist LE, Larsson O, Singnomklao T, Ringborg U, et al. Metastatic patterns, clinical outcome, and malignant phenotype in malignant cutaneous melanoma, Acta Oncol. 1999; 38: 549-557.

Other Articles

Article Image 1

Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Versus 3D Conformal Planning Technique for Esophageal Cancer: Should Field Based Planning Be the Universal Standard?

Carcinoma of the esophagus is among the most rapidly increasing cancers in incidence. With the use of aggressive bimodality and trimodality treatment strategies, the reduction of treatment toxicity is of prime importance [1]. Radiotherapy plays a key role in definitive, adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment for carcinoma of the esophagus. Due to extensive vascular and lymphatic drainage, and therefore tendency to present at an advanced stage, the volumes required to adequately cover gross disease are substantial. Other critical organs in close proximity are therefore at risk for radiotherapy-induced toxicity, including the lung parenchyma, heart, spinal cord, stomach and others. Conventional 3D conformal radiotherapy techniques (3 field or 4 field) have traditionally been used at our center to provide adequate coverage to the target volume of the esophageal tumor and lymph nodes; however as a consequence doses delivered to these Organs At Risk (OARs) may be high. Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Arc Radiotherapy (VMAT) has also been considered in the past, however comparisons of these plans have shown variable results in normal tissue sparing. Furthermore these techniques may impart a higher volume of low dose radiotherapy to substantial amounts of normal tissue. We compared conventional 3D CRT plans with IMRT or VMAT plans for a series of esophageal cancer patients with tumors of varying location at our center to determine the optimal treatment planning strategy.

Elysia Donovan1*, Tom Chow2, Jack Skoczny1 and Ranjan Sur1


Article Image 1

Definitive Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older

Background: The factors affecting survival were evaluated in patients aged ≥ 70 years with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive Radiotherapy (RT).

Methods: Between January 1996 and April 2012, 52 patients were treated. The median age was 73 (range 70-80) and 73% and 75% of patients with stage III according to AJCC 2002 and AJCC 2010 staging, respectively. Radiotherapy was performed median 6160 cGy (range: 3600-6660 cGy) and CHE were given 75% of the patients.

Results: Median follow-up was 12.5 (range: 2.5-103) months. Median overall (OS) and Disease-Free (DFS) Survival were 22 and 18.5 months, respectively. Radiotherapy related death was not observed. In Univariate analysis; AJCC 2002 stage I-II, RT dose, RT duration, for OS and RT dose, RT duration, neoadjuvant CHE ≤ 3 cycles, complete response, ≥ 4 cycles of CHE for DFS were significant (p <0.05). In multivariate analysis, RT duration > 49 days related with higher RT dose (≥ 60 Gy) were found a positive impact on OS (HR: 3.235, 95% CI: 1:25 to 8:32 p = 0.01).

Conclusion: In our study, elderly patients with NCSLC can be given ≥ 60 Gy without complications and was seen positively impact on survival.

Süreyya Sarıhan*1, Türkkan Evrensel2 and Deniz Sığırlı3


Article Image 1

Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Stereotactic Radiosurgery as Salvage Treatment for Recurrent Malignant High Grade Gliomas

High-Grade Gliomas (HGG) are the most common and aggressive primary brain malignancies in adults. Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (fSRT) and Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRS) have emerged as a novel technique to deliver high doses of RT in the recurrent setting with aim for durable local control and potential overall survival benefit. This study evaluated the patterns of recurrence, prognostic indicators as well as the efficacy of treatment in patients with recurrent HGG treated by fSRT or SRS. Favorable outcomes were observed in patients treated with fSRT and SRS as salvage therapy. The predominant mode of failure post salvage SRS and fSRT remains in-field. Prospective trials are required to better define patient selection, tumor recurrence size, and effective dose regimen.

Kevin King*, Philip Blumenfeld, Jacob Y Shin, George Tolekidis and Aidnag Diaz


Article Image 1

Examining the Survival benefit of Radiation Therapy on Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis and Identifying factors Associated with Survival Benefit of WBRT

Purpose: To report the survival benefit of Radiation Therapy (RT) in Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis (LMC) patients with different primary cancers and to identify the factors of LMC patients that had survival benefit from Whole Brain Radiation Therapy (WBRT).

Methods and Materials: Systematic literature review was performed. Search terms included ‘Leptomeningeal’, ‘prognostic factors’ and ‘lung’ or ‘breast’. Literatures were included if patient profile was reported. Specifically, age, median survival, diagnosis time line, type of cancer, received treatments, performance score, and systemic disease were sought after. Literatures were excluded if they were a) case reports, b) written in language other than English, or c) not including patient profile.

Results: RT treatment has survival benefit for LMC patients with CSF obstruction. For LMC patients with primary breast cancer, 7 studies were found since 1991 that met searching criteria. Factors which would allow breast cancer-caused LMC patients to benefit from WBRT with survival are identified with statistical significance. They include KPS>60, Intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy, systemic therapy, hormonal receptor status and severity of systemic disease. Patients who met aforementioned criteria and received WBRT had longer median survival (17 weeks vs. 11.9weeks, p=0.015). Similarly, 10 studies were found that met searching criteria for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) caused LMC. Beneficial factors for NSCLC-caused LMC are identified. They include IT chemotherapy, KPS > 60, and EGFR TKI treatment. Patient who met these criteria had longer median survival when received WBRT (17.6 weeks vs 12.2 weeks, p = 0.0412).

Conclusion: Profiles of LMC patients that can benefit with longer survival by receiving WBRT are identified for breast cancer and NSCLC. Algorithms in identifying such patients are provided.

Jae Kim*


Article Image 1

Anal Canal Squamous Cell Cancer; Pattern of Recurrence and Survival, 25 Years Experience

Background and objectives: Combined chemo radiation is the standard of care for treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Our objective was to analyze the treatment results of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal treated at our institution.

Methods: We identify patients with confirmed diagnoses of anal canal squamous cell carcinoma treated in our institution (KFSHRC), Riyadh between1994-2017. We retrospectively reviewed their pattern of recurrence and survival rate.

Results: 35 males (70%) and 15 females (30%) were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 58 years. 5(10%) patients underwent initial Abdomino Perineal Resection (APR) while 45 patients (90%) received definitive concurrent chemo radiation (30 using 2D/3DCRT and 15 patients using IMRT). All patients completed their planned treatment course except 4 patients (in 2D/3DCRT arm). IMRT resulted in significant decrease in all toxicity grades in comparison to 2D/3DCRT arm (p value 0.035). After median follow up of 13months, two out of the 5 patients (40%) who underwent initial APR had local recurrence; while after 18 months median follow up 8(19.6%) patients who underwent definitive chemo radiation had local recurrence. The 2 and 5 years Disease Free Survival (DFS) were 79.4% and 53% respectively in IMRT group vs 64% and 55% respectively in 2D/3DCRT group (p value 0.79). Regarding Overall survival (OS), the 2 and 5 years OS were 82% and 41% respectively in IMRT vs 66% and 44% respectively in the 2D/3DCRT group(p value 0.36). In Univariate analysis, only number of chemotherapy cycles was statistically correlated with DFS and OS with (p value of 0.02 and <0.0001) respectively.

Conclusion: Combined chemo radiation therapy for anal canal squamous cell carcinoma is effective treatment in term of local control and survival. The recurrence and survival pattern of our patients’ cohort compare favorably to the international results. Radiation therapy using IMRT resulted in significant decrease of all toxicity grades over 2D/3DCRT, with improvement of the 2 years DFS and OS in comparison to the 2D/3DCRT although it was not statistically significant. In Univariate analysis initial Hb level was not significantly correlated with DFS or OS at 5 years, only number of chemotherapy cycles was statistically correlated with survivals at 5 years

Ahmed Elashwah1,3*, Abdullah Alsuhaibani2, Alaa Abduljabbar, Samar Alhomoud4, Luai Ashari4, Shouki Bazarbashi5, Ali Aljubran5, Ahmed Alzahrani5 and Nasser AlSanea4


Article Image 1

Primary Diffuse Large B cell Lymphoma of the Uterus: A Case Report and Literature Review

A 64-year-old woman who was found to have an abdominal mass on ultrasound was misdiagnosed with a uterine fibroid/uterine sarcoma. Pelvic MRI showed multiple soft tissues mass shadows in the pelvic cavity, and the larger shadows were approximately 14.2 cm × 9.7 cm × 15.6 cm, with clear boundaries dominated by an iso long T1 and slightly longer T2, locally visible nodular long T2 and short T2 signal foci, and obvious high signals on DWI and decreased ADC signals. The enhancement of the densification was obviously non-uniform. The immunohistochemical results were positive for CD20, LCA, PAX-5+, CD43 +, c-myc, bcl2 and bcl6 and negative for SAM, Desmin, Myo D1, MPO, CD99, CD30, CD23, S-100, and CD10. The majority (90%) of tumor cells were positive for Ki-67. The diagnosis was a diffuse large b-cell lymphoma. Preoperative diagnosis of primary lymphoma of the uterus is difficult in clinical situations. Primary Female Genital System Lymphoma (PFGSL) is a rare disease that is mostly associated with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, usually Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). The majority of primary uterine DLBCL originates from endometrial stroma

Qianqian Wang1, Wenjuan Wang2, Wanfeng Fan1, Qian zhou1, Liguang Yang1 and Xinjiang Liu1*


Article Image 1

Adjuvant and Definitive Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer

The objective of this study is to evaluate early side effects, local control and early response rates of adjuvant or definitive radiotherapy and/or chemo radiotherapy in patients diagnosed with cervical cancer and treated in our clinic. Twenty-one patients who were admitted to our clinic with a diagnosis of stage IB-IVA cervical cancer between January 2017 and November 2018 were included in the study. Adjuvant radiotherapy was performed in 1 patient (5%), adjuvant chemo radiotherapy in 3 patients (14%) and definitive chemo radiotherapy in 17 patients (81%). All patients received intracavitary brachytherapy after radiotherapy. Median follow-up period is 13 months (range: 5-23 months). 12 patients (57%) had a complete response, in 7 patients (33%) had the partial response and in 2 patients (10%) had no response to treatment. 1 (5%) patients who did not respond to the treatment had died. One patient (5%) had lung metastasis, 1 (5%) patients had breast cancer as the second primary. Cystitis and diarrhea were the most common early side effects of radiotherapy. 8 patients (38%) had grade II diarrhea and cystitis and 2 patients (10%) had grade III diarrhea. Nine patients (43%) who received concurrent chemotherapy had grade II-III neutropenia as hematological toxicity. None of the cases had grade IV toxicity. In conclusion, concurrent radio chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone is the preferred treatment modalities in patients with adverse risk factors in stage ≥ IB cervical cancers because of high response rates and acceptable toxicity.

Elif Eda Tiken* and Gülşen Pınar Soydemir


Article Image 1

Clinical outcomes in Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinus Tumors: A Single Institution Experience from the Eastern Black Sea Region of Turkey

Nasal cavity and paranasal sinus tumors constitute 3-5% of the upper respiratory tract tumors, 0.2-0.8% of all tumors. Tumors are located approximately 40-50% in the nasal cavity, 30-40% in the maxillary sinus, 10% in the ethmoid and frontal sinuses and 5% in the sphenoid sinuses. Sixty Two patients who were admitted to our clinic with a diagnosis Nasal cavity and paranasal sinus tumors between January 1997 and December 2018 were included in the study. There were 28 (44%) females and 34 (55%) males, for a ratio of 1/1.2. Median age at presentation was 59.4 (range 32 to 87) years. The mean overall survival 59.7± 7 (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 41.3-79.6) months and the median overall survival 38 ± 7 (95% CI, 24.4-49.6) months. The -1, -3 and -5 year overall survival rates were 72.2 %, 51.4 % and 34.6% respectively. The mean disease-free survival 77.4± 8 (95% CI, 51.4-86.1) months and the median disease-free survival 36± 8 (95% CI, 7.65-78.5) months. The -1,-3 and-5 year DFS rates were 69.8%, 49.1% and 39.9% respectively. On Univariate analysis, the OS was significantly better with female sex (p<0.005), < 50 age (p<0.021), T stage (p<0.0001), the absence of lymph node involvement (p<0.0001). In conclusion, PNS/NC is a rare group of cancers. Surgical resection followed by PORT is an effective treatment. RT increases tumor control rate. Local recurrence was the main common cause of failure followed by distant metastasis and regional relapse of the lesions.

Gülşen Pınar Soydemir1 and Mustafa Kandaz2*


Article Image 1

Recurrent Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma. Report of a Case with Uncommon Clinical Presentation and Brief Review of the Literature

Though rare, angiosarcomas are one of the most common tumors to arise following radiation therapy for the treatment of malignancies, such as breast cancer and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Investigation of radiation-associated angiosarcomas has always proven difficult due to the extremely low incidence. This means that case studies are the predominant type of investigation found in the literature. Breast cancer treatment can lead to chronic lymphedema due to the dissection of axillary lymph nodes, as well as radiation treatment, often following conservative breast surgery. Due to these risk factors, breast cancer patients are at an increased risk of development of angiosarcoma. We present a case of breast angiosarcoma that developed after radiation therapy for breast ductal carcinoma. In this case, there were multiple metastases and recurrences in the involved breast, as well as development of angiosarcoma in the opposite breast. We also provide a brief review of the literature.

Samantha Webking1*, Mary Morse1, Nevill Duncan4, Daniel Hildebrandt1, Sherif Nasr3, Stephanie Bernik2, Mohamed Aziz3


Article Image 1

Low Frequency Magnetic Field in a CT Area

Introduction : Throughout history it has been proven that electromagnetic fields at uncontrolled levels can be harmful to health. The Computerized Axial Tomography (CT) is a high electromagnetic field generator. In TAC areas where workers are exposed to these radiations for extended periods of time, it is necessary to keep not only ionizing radiation under control, but also non-ionizing radiation.

Goals: Carry out magnetic field measurements in a CT area in a hospital in the city of Havana, compare them with international standards and check the state of the electromagnetic environment.

Methods: The magnetic field measurements were carried out using a gaussmeter located one meter above the floor level and punctually meter by meter. To verify the state of the environment, the recommendations of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) in 2010 were used as a point of comparison.

Results: The results showed values below those recommended by the ICNIRP, but very close to those provided by some authors as causing leukemia.

Conclusions: It was concluded that the non-ionizing radiation values obtained in µT do not exceed those recommended by this commission, with respect to occupational exposure, but strict surveillance must be maintained.

Yenisel Díaz Roller1, Janet Carvajal de la Osa1*, Ignat Pérez Almirall1, Alejandro Rivas Gamallo1, Miguel Castro Fernández1 and Iosvany Aguiar Ramos2